Intracranial meningioma surveillance using volumetrics from T2-weighted MRI

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The gold standard for imaging of meningiomas is MRI with gadolinium-based contrast agent. Due to increased costs, time, and uncertain chronic effects of gadolinium exposure, use of noncontrast T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) in lieu of contrast-enhanced MRI has been an increasing focus of research across various diagnostic scenarios. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of T2WI in detecting changes in meningioma tumor volume.

METHODS

Imaging and clinical data were reviewed for 82 consecutive patients undergoing MR-surveillance of intracranial meningioma. Using volumetric-T2WI, two neuroradiologists independently calculated tumor volumes. Measurements were compared to a baseline study contrast-enhanced T1 tumor volume. Using contrast-enhanced sequences as the reference standard, statistical analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of T2WI in detecting changes of meningioma volume.

RESULTS

Using only T2WI, readers detected meningioma volume change ≥ 20% in 19/82 patients and volume change <20% in 63/82 patients. Reader accuracy for detecting change in tumor volume on T2WI ≥ 20% was 0.85, sensitivity 0.65, specificity 0.93, positive predictive value (PPV) 0.79, and negative predictive value (NPV) 0.87. For meningiomas >1 ml, reader accuracy for detecting change in tumor volume on T2WI ≥20% was 0.90, sensitivity 0.78, specificity 0.95, PPV 0.88, and NPV 0.91. Change in tumor volume on T2WI ≥20% was detected with 100% accuracy for posterior fossa meningiomas. Inter-reader agreement for all meningiomas was moderate (κ = 0.45) improving to substantial agreement (κ = 0.77) with tumor volumes >1 ml.

CONCLUSION

Volumetric-T2WI detects changes in meningioma volume with comparable accuracy to gold standard T1 postcontrast imaging, particularly with higher tumor volumes and posterior fossa locations.

Incidental Renal Lesions on Lumbar Spine MRI: Who Needs Follow-Up?

OBJECTIVE

Incidentally discovered renal lesions on lumbar spine MRI are a common occurrence. Many follow-up recommendations are generated by radiologists encountering renal lesions to help characterize the finding as a benign cyst or a more complex, potentially malignant lesion. We hypothesized that analysis of T2-weighted imaging features of incidentally discovered renal lesions could reliably distinguish complex renal lesions from simple cysts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two independent readers retrospectively evaluated 149 renal lesions identified on lumbar spine MRI examinations. Presence or absence of a complex renal lesion was determined using T2-weighted imaging only. Using dedicated renal cross-sectional imaging examinations as the reference standard, statistical analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of lumbar spine MRI in predicting a complex and potentially neoplastic renal lesion.

RESULTS

Of 149 renal lesions, 115 were simple cysts, and 34 were complex renal lesions (20 Bosniak II cysts, nine renal cell carcinomas, three Bosniak IIF cysts, and two angiomyolipomas). Lumbar spine MRI readers identified 72 lesions as simple cysts and 77 lesions as complex renal lesions. Reader sensitivity for detection of a complex renal lesion on lumbar spine MRI was 94% (95% CI, 80-99%); specificity, 63% (95% CI, 53-72%); positive predictive value, 43% (95% CI, 37-49%); and negative predictive value, 97% (95% CI, 90-99%). Readers correctly identified all neoplastic and potentially neoplastic lesions (≥ Bosniak IIF). Interreader agreement was excellent (κ = 0.84).

CONCLUSION

Follow-up imaging may not be required in all cases of incidentally discovered renal lesions on lumbar spine MRI. Analysis of T2-weighted imaging alone appears to reliably rule out neoplastic and potentially neoplastic complex renal lesions.