Outcomes of Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEP) Flap in Indian Population-A Prospective Single-Institute Study

Introduction  Breast reconstruction has become integral part of breast cancer treatment. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP)-based flap is considered the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. Aims and Objectives  The aim of this study was to evaluate the patient satisfaction and the incidence of complications in DIEP flaps in an Indian setup for breast reconstruction. Materials and Methods  This is a prospective, nonrandomized study at a single institute-Manipal Hospitals, Old Airport Road, Bangalore. Eligible patients were women aged between 28 and 60 years with primary breast cancer requiring mastectomy and radiotherapy, who consented for DIEP flap reconstruction. Results  The study includes subjects who had autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy with DIEP flap between January 2019 and August 2021 that included 31 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Four flaps were turbocharged and 17 flaps were superdrained primarily. The average operative time for the whole procedure by adopting a two-team approach is 353.8 ± 43.793 minutes. About 94.1% patients had excellent aesthetic score results. Six patients developed mastectomy flap necrosis, one had fat necrosis that was managed conservatively, whereas one patient had donor site re-exploration for hematoma. We had no DIEP flap necrosis, seroma, flap site hematoma, or flap failure. Physical well-being module of Breast-Q indicated an average of 83 points, psychosocial well-being module indicated 80 points, whereas sexual scores reverted an average of 77 points. Among satisfaction module, aesthetic outcomes for breast showed an average of 94 points, whereas the donor site had 96 points. Satisfaction with information, surgeon, medical staff each gained more than 87 points. Conclusion  Breast reconstruction with DIEP flap yields good aesthetic outcomes and quality of life in Indian population. The incidence of fat necrosis, flap and donor site complications is less over time and will enhance the patient satisfaction score further.

Surgical Considerations of One-Stage Reconstruction of Large Extremity Defects Using a Thin Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap

Background  One-stage reconstruction with "thin perforator flaps" has been attempted to salvage limbs and restore function. The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is a commonly utilized flap in breast reconstruction (BR). The purpose of this study is to present the versatility of DIEP flaps for the reconstruction of large defects of the extremities. Methods  Patients with large tissue defects on extremities who were treated with thin DIEP flaps from January 2016 to January 2018 were included. They were minimally followed up for 36 months. We analyzed the etiology and location of the soft tissue defect, flap design, anastomosis type, outcome, and complications. We also considered the technical differences in the DIEP flap between breast and extremity reconstruction. Results  Overall, six free DIEP flaps were included in the study. The flap size ranged from 15 × 12 to 30 × 16 cm 2 . All flaps were transversely designed similar to a traditional BR design. Three flaps were elevated with two perforators. Primary closure of the donor site was possible in all cases. Five flaps survived with no complications. However, partial necrosis occurred in one flap. Conclusion  A DIEP flap is not the first choice for soft tissue defects, but it should be considered for one-stage reconstruction of large defects when the circulation zone of the DIEP flap is considered. In addition, this flap has many advantages over other flaps such as provision of the largest skin paddle, low donor site morbidity with a concealed scar, versatile supercharging technique, and a long pedicle.

Building Complex Autologous Breast Reconstruction Program: A Preliminary Experience

Autologous breast reconstruction is an increasingly popular method of reconstruction for breast cancer survivors. While deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are the gold standard, not all patients are ideal candidates for DIEP flaps due to low BMI, body habitus, or previous abdominal surgery. In these patients, complex autologous breast reconstruction can be performed, but there is a limited number of programs around the world due to high technical demand. Given the increased demand and need for complex autologous flaps, it is critical to build programs to increase patient access and teach future microsurgeons. In this paper, we discuss the steps, pearls, and preliminary experience of building a complex autologous breast reconstruction program in a tertiary academic center. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent starting the year prior to the creation of our program. Since the start of our program, a total of 74 breast mounds have been reconstructed in 46 patients using 87 flaps. Over 23 months, there was a decrease in median surgical time for bilateral reconstruction by 124 min (p = 0.03), an increase in the number of co-surgeon cases by 66% (p < 0.01), and an increase in the number of complex autologous breast reconstruction by 42% (p < 0.01). Our study shows that a complex autologous breast reconstruction program can be successfully established using a multi-phase approach, including the development of a robust co-surgeon model. In addition, we found that a dedicated program leads to increased patient access, decreased operative time, and enhancement of trainee education.

Consecutive bilateral breast reconstruction using different autologous flaps: can symmetrical results still be achieved? A case report

We report a 60-year-old patient who underwent bilateral mastectomy at different times, followed by immediate autologous reconstruction with different flaps: deep-inferior epigastric-perforator flap on one breast, and fat-augmented latissimus dorsi on the contralateral side. At 20-month follow-up, good symmetry was recorded; patient-reported outcome measurements revealed high satisfaction scores.

A Case of Breast Cancer With Ulceration of a Reconstructed Nipple Due to Local Recurrence

Ulceration of a reconstructed nipple occurred in a woman in her 50s who had undergone mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap reconstruction for right breast cancer. The implanted cartilage was removed on suspicion of infection and the ulcer was biopsied. Local recurrence was identified on histopathological examination. Local recurrence near a reconstructed nipple can cause ulceration because of the fragility of the reconstructed nipple tissue. If erosion or ulceration develops in the reconstructed nipple relatively long after surgery, pathological examination is warranted.

Immediate Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstruction of a Giant Phyllodes Tumor

We present a case of a giant phyllodes tumor (PT) requiring simple mastectomy with en bloc pectoralis major resection and immediate deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction. This patient presented with a four-year history of an enlarging breast mass with ultrasound-guided biopsy results consistent with atypical fibroepithelial proliferation that was highly concerning for a borderline phyllodes tumor. In this large, rare breast tumor that required en bloc pectoralis major resection, we describe the novel use of an immediate single pedicled DIEP flap for the resulting chest wall defect. The patient's postoperative course was uncomplicated, and she reported satisfactory cosmetic and functional outcomes at her initial postoperative follow-up visits. Our findings support the use of simple mastectomy with en bloc resection and immediate single-pedicled DIEP flap for the definitive treatment of giant phyllodes tumors. Our experience shows this is a safe and effective technique for achieving adequate oncologic resection while maintaining postoperative function and cosmesis, which are essential for patient quality of life.

[Free superficial circumflex iliac artery flap combined with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for repair of large soft tissue defects of upper extremities]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of free superficial circumflex iliac artery flap (SCIP) combined with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) in repairing large soft tissue defects of upper extremities.

METHODS

Between February 2017 and January 2021, free SCIP combined with DIEP was used to repair 15 patients with large soft tissue defects of upper extremities. There were 12 males and 3 females, aged from 34 to 52 years, with a median age of 41 years. The causes of injury were mechanical injury in 11 cases and traffic accident injury in 4 cases. There were 9 cases of circular skin defect in the forearm and 6 cases of skin defect around the upper arm and elbow joint, with the defect in size of 15.5 cm×10.5 cm to 26.5 cm×15.5 cm, accompanied by exposure of deep tissues such as tendons and bones. There were 7 cases with open fractures and 8 cases with vascular and nerve injuries. The time from injury to operation ranged from 7 to 14 days, with an average of 7.5 days. The flaps in size of 16.0 cm×11.0 cm to 27.0 cm×16.0 cm were harvested; the thickness of the flaps was 0.8-1.3 cm, and the excess fat tissue was removed under the microscope after harvesting. The length of proximal vascular pedicle was 5.0-7.0 cm, and of distal vascular pedicle was 3.0-5.0 cm. The donor site was closed and sutured directly, and the navel was reconstructed.

RESULTS

The flaps survived successfully in 14 cases, and the arterial crisis occurred in 1 case at 10 hours after operation, and the flap survived after surgical exploration. All the wounds in the donor and recipient sites healed by first intention. All 15 patients were followed up 3-14 months, with an average of 10.5 months. The appearance, elasticity, and texture of flap were good without obvious bloat, contracture, or adhesion. The donor site healed well, no abdominal wall hernia was found, and the appearance of reconstructed navel was good, only linear scar left. At last follow-up, 12 cases were evaluated as excellent and 3 cases were good according to the evaluation criteria of flap function of the Chinese Medical Association Microsurgery Branch. The sensation recovered to S3+ in 7 cases and S3 in 8 cases.

CONCLUSION

Free SCIP combined with DIEP has a large excision area and excellent skin ductility. It is an effective clinical method for repairing large soft tissue defects of upper extremities.

The Anatomic Features and Role of Superficial Inferior Epigastric Vein in Abdominal Flap

In lower abdominal flap representing transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap or deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) exists as superficial and independent venous system from deep system. The superficial venous drainage is dominant despite a dominant deep arterial supply in anterior abdominal wall. As TRAM or DIEP flaps began to be widely used for breast reconstruction, venous congestion issue has been arisen. Many clinical series in regard to venous congestion despite patent microvascular anastomosis site were reported. Venous congestion could be divided in two conditions by the area of venous congestion and each condition is from different anatomical causes. First, if venous congestion was shown in whole flap, it is due to the connection between SIEV and vena comitantes of DIEP. Second, if venous congestion is limited in above midline (Hartrampf zone II), it is due to problem in venous midline crossover. In this article, the authors reviewed the role of SIEV in lower abdominal flap based on the various anatomic and clinical studies. The contents are mainly categorized into four main issues; basic anatomy of SIEV, the two cause of venous congestion, connection between SIEV and vena comitantes of DIEP, and midline crossover of SIEV.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap without skin paddle using delayed primary retention suture

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the outcomes of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap using delayed primary retention suture (DPRS) to achieve superior breast esthetics.

METHODS

Between December 2010 and March 2021, patients who underwent NSM with DIEP flap were inset with or without a skin paddle (using DPRS) as Group A or B, respectively. Demographics, operative findings, complications, BREAST-Q questionnaire, and Manchester scar scale were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Twelve patients underwent 12 unilateral reconstructions in Group A, while 12 patients underwent 13 DIEP flaps in Group B. There was no significant difference in demographics, ischemia time, flap-used weight and percentage, complications of hematoma, infection, re-exploration, partial flap loss, and total flap loss (All p > 0.05, respectively). At a mean 9 months of follow-up, the Breast-Q "Satisfaction with surgeon" domain was significant in Group B (p = 0.04). At a mean 12 months of follow-up, the overall Manchester scar scale of 10.3 in Group B was statistically superior to 12.6 in Group A (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The NSM with a DIEP flap using DPRS is a reliable and straightforward technique. It can provide greater cosmesis of the reconstructed breast mound in a single-stage procedure.

Strategies for selecting perforator vessels for transverse and oblique DIEP flap in male pediatric patients: Anatomical study and clinical applications

BACKGROUND

Transverse and oblique deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps are widely used in breast, lower extremity, urogenital, head and neck reconstruction. In this report, we present our experience with selecting perforator vessels for transverse and oblique DIEP flaps based on an anatomical study and clinical cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A detailed anatomical study of the DIEP flap was carried out using a standardized injection of lead oxide in 10 fresh cadavers. Additionally, 35 male pediatric patients (age 5-12 years) underwent lower extremity reconstruction with a DIEP flap. A transverse DIEP flap was used when the defect template did not exceed zone IV, while an oblique DIEP flap was used when the defect template exceeded zone IV.

RESULTS

Perforators located below the umbilicus in zones I and II were rich in transverse anastomoses across the midline of the abdominal wall, which is the basis for the transverse DIEP flap. Perforators lateral to the umbilicus in zone I had true anastomoses with the musculophrenic artery, the morphological basis for the oblique DIEP flap. The DIEP flap design was transverse in 20 patients and oblique in 15. Flap sizes ranged from 8 × 4.5 cm² to 24 × 9 cm². One oblique DIEP flap was necrosed totally, and it was repaired by a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap.

CONCLUSION

The transverse DIEP flap design based on the perforator located below the umbilicus in zone I is recommended for small skin and soft tissue defects. We recommend the use of the oblique DIEP flap design based on the perforator lateral to the umbilicus in zone I as an extended flap to reconstruct large tissue defects.

Teaching Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction-A Retrospective Cohort Study

Microsurgical breast reconstruction demands the highest level of expertise in both reconstructive and aesthetic plastic surgery. Implementation of such a complex surgical procedure is generally associated with a learning curve defined by higher complication rates at the beginning. The aim of this study was to present an approach for teaching deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flap breast reconstruction, which can diminish complications and provide satisfying outcomes from the beginning. DIEP and TUG flap procedures for breast reconstruction were either performed by a senior surgeon (>200 DIEP/TUG, "no-training&nbsp;group"), or taught to one of five trainees (>80 breast surgeries; >50 free flaps) in a step-wise approach. The latter were either performed by the senior surgeon, and a trainee was assisting the surgery ("passive training"); by the trainee, and a senior surgeon was supervising ("active training"); or by the trainee without a senior surgeon ("after training"). Surgeries of each group were analyzed regarding OR-time, complications, and refinement procedures. A total of 95 DIEP and 93 TUG flaps were included into this study. Before the first DIEP/TUG flap without supervision, each trainee underwent a mean of 6.8 DIEP and 7.3 TUG training surgeries (p > 0.05). Outcome measures did not reveal any statistically significant differences (passive training/active training/after training/no-training: OR-time (min): DIEP: 331/351/338/304 (p > 0.05); TUG: 229/214/239/217 (p > 0.05); complications (n): DIEP: 6/13/16/11 (p > 0.05); TUG: 6/19/23/11 (p > 0.05); refinement procedures (n): DIEP:71/63/49/44 (p > 0.05); TUG: 65/41/36/56 (p > 0.05)), indicating safe and secure implementation of this step-wise training approach for microsurgical breast reconstruction in both aesthetic and reconstructive measures. Of note, despite being a perforator flap, DIEP flap required no more training than TUG flap, highlighting the importance of flap inset at the recipient site.

Preoperative computed tomography assessment for a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap: a new easy technique from the Bologna experience

BACKGROUND

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction is the gold standard reconstructive technique for women undergoing breast cancer surgery. A preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA)-dedicated protocol and 3D reconstructions are mandatory for correct surgical planning.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new preoperative CTA protocol and a new reconstruction method in the assessment of DIEP technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 263 women (median age 49 years, age range 26-73 years) underwent preoperative CTA examination before DIEP flap breast reconstruction. A CTA-dedicated protocol followed by 3D-reconstructions were performed. Identification, branching pattern, and caliber at origin were assessed for each perforator. Intraoperative findings were the standard of reference. The sensitivity, positive predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the preoperative CTA protocol were calculated.

RESULTS

In 255/263 (97%) patients, the dominant perforators assessed by CTA resulted adequate for surgical reconstruction. In 260/263 (99%) cases, the imaging localization of the dominant perforators corresponded with those seen intraoperatively (mean errors ≤1 cm). The preoperative CTA imaging sensitivity, positive predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy in determining the localization of perforators were 99% (95% CI 98-100), 100% and 99% (95% CI 98-100), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the CTA findings and the surgical findings for the assessment of branching pattern and caliber of the dominant perforators (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The present protocol has demonstrated high accuracy in the CTA imaging assessment of the perforators before DIEP flap reconstruction with high reproducibility between CT and surgical findings.

A Rare Case of Pulmonary Restrictive Syndrome after Liquid Silicone Injection: The Role of the Plastic Surgeon

Despite being especially used in its solid form, silicone is still injected as a liquid filler for breast contouring in many countries. Here, we present a rare case of a woman with silicone pneumonitis and extended breast scarring after breast silicone injection. Because of evidence of a restrictive syndrome due to the thoracic extensive scarring tissue and the high demand of oxygen therapy, as jointly agreed with the pulmonologists, we decided to perform a surgical asportation of the scarring tissue and covering with microsurgical flap. We chose the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap mainly because of the large amount of skin that is possible to use, the good skin texture matching, and the possibility of double team working without changing patient’s position.

Deep Inferior Epigastric Flap Combined Bilateral-Anterolateral Thigh Flap for the Coverage of Both Lower Extremity Soft-Tissue Defect: A Case Report and a Literature Review

Background/Purpose

Anterolateral thigh perforator (ALTP) flap and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap have been advantageous over traditional myocutaneous flaps as they preserve the integrity of donor site muscles and minimize the damage and complication to donor site structures. Here, we reported the efficacy of free ALTP and DIEP in the repair of large skin area and soft tissue defects on both lower limbs after trauma.

Case Report

A 19-year-old female traffic accident victim presented with multiple open bilateral fractures to the lower extremities with joint dislocation, massive skin and soft tissue defects, and multiple soft tissue contusion. Wounds on both lower extremities were covered with VSD (Vacuum Sealing Drainage). The tibiofibular and ankle joints on both lower limbs were fixed using external fixators. DIEP and ALTP flap were performed at different times.

Results

After transfer, the vascular pedicle was anastomosed to the anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery, and the accompanying vein. After the operation, the donor site was directly closed and sutured. All flaps survived with a good appearance, leaving only a linear scar at the donor site.

Conclusion

This case shows that free ALTP and DIEP flaps are ideal for repairing large skin area and soft tissue defects in bilateral lower limbs after trauma.

The Value of Morphometric Measurements in Risk Assessment for Donor-Site Complications after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

Microsurgical abdominally-based reconstruction is considered the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. Despite refined surgical procedures, donor-site complications still occur, reducing patient satisfaction and quality of life. Recent work has outlined the potential of morphometric measurements in risk assessment for postoperative hernia development. With rising demand for personalised treatment, the goal of this study was to investigate their potential in risk assessment for any donor site complication. In this retrospective cohort study, 90 patients were included who each received microsurgical breast reconstruction at the hands of one surgeon between January 2015 and May 2017. Donor-site complications formed the primary outcome and were classified according to Clavien-Dindo. Morphometric measurements were taken on a routinely performed computed tomographic angiogram. Complications occurred in 13 of the 90 (14.4%) cases studied. All patients who developed any type of postoperative donor site complication had a history of abdominal surgery. The risk of postoperative complications increased by 3% with every square centimetre of omental fat tissue (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06, and p-value = 0.022). Morphometric measurements provide valuable information in risk assessment for donor-site complications in abdominally-based breast reconstruction. They may help identify personalised reconstructive options for maximal postoperative patient satisfaction and quality of life.

Geisinger MyCode® detects BRCA2 mutation prior to abdominal panniculectomy allowing for DIEP flap breast reconstruction

This case report presents a 38-year-old female who was scheduled for abdominal panniculectomy and tested positive for BRCA2 mutation through Geisinger MyCode^®. She canceled her panniculectomy and elected to proceed with bilateral mastectomies, utilizing her abdominal tissue for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction.

Lymphatic tract reconstruction using a pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap

We encountered a case in which we used a pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator(DIEP) flap to repair a lymphatic leak. This case shows that such repairs can lead to the reconstruction of the lymphatic tract and prevent lymphatic leak recurrences. The present report describes a 45-year-old woman with ovarian cancer who underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and omentectomy. She presented with a pelvic lymphocele with lower-extremity swelling. Lymphovenous anastomosis was performed and swelling of the lower extremity abated. However, because of the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis and the recurrence of swelling, we used a 6-cm-long and 14-cm-wideDIEP flap after lymphocele fenestration. The flap was de-epithelialized and fixed into the peritoneum, with the cutis side facing the leakage point. The postoperative course was uneventful, and no recurrence was observed. We obtained good results by providing abundant blood flow to abundant lymph tissue at the fenestration point. It is known that lymphatic vessels can spontaneously connect with each other. We hypothesize that the DIEP flap improved the edema in this case by regenerating the lymphatic network and improving flow into the bridging flap.

Versatility of Free Cutaneous Flaps for Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Reconstruction

The goals of upper extremity soft tissue reconstruction should go well beyond providing coverage and restoring function. As the field of reconstructive microsurgery has evolved, free cutaneous flaps (FCFs) are gaining wider application. The advantages of FCF include minimizing donor-site morbidity by preserving the muscle and fascia, improving versatility of flap design, and superior aesthetic results. This review highlights the application of anterolateral thigh, superficial circumflex iliac artery, deep inferior epigastric perforator, superficial inferior epigastric artery, and flow-through flaps for reconstruction of upper extremity defects. These flaps share several qualities in common: well-concealed donor sites, preservation of major arteries responsible of providing inflow to distal extremity, and potential for a two-team approach (donor and recipient sites). While the choice of flaps should be decided based on individual patient and defect characteristics, FCF should be considered as excellent options to achieve the goals of upper extremity reconstruction.

Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal-based perforator free flaps

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Two staged tissue expander-implant with acellular dermal matrix (TE/I + ADM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap are the most common implant and autologous methods of reconstruction in the U.S. Implant-based techniques are disproportionally more popular, partially due to its presumed cost effectiveness. We performed a comprehensive cost analysis to compare TE/I + ADM and DIEP flap.

METHODS

A comparative cost analysis of TE/I + ADM and DIEP flap was performed. Medicare reimbursement costs for each procedure and their associated complications were calculated. Pooled probabilities of complications including cellulitis, seroma, skin necrosis, implant removal, flap loss, partial flap loss, and fat necrosis, were calculated using published studies from 2010 to 2016.

RESULTS

Average actual cost for successful TE/I + ADM and DIEP flap were $13 304.55 and $10 237.13, respectively. Incorporating pooled complication data from published literature resulted in an increase in cost to $13 963.46 for TE/I + ADM and $12 624.29 for DIEP flap. The expected costs for successful TE/I + ADM and DIEP flap were $9700.35 and $8644.23, which are lower than the actual costs.

CONCLUSIONS

DIEP flap breast reconstruction incurs lower costs compared to TE/I + ADM. These costs are lower at baseline and when additional costs from pooled complications are incorporated.

Aesthetical outcome after breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: Personal techniques

BACKGROUND

Now-a-days, deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is widespread throughout the world. The aesthetical result is very important in breast reconstruction and its improvement is mandatory for plastic surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The most frequent problems, we have observed in breast reconstruction with DIEP flap are breast asymmetry in terms of volume and shape, the bulkiness of the inferior lateral quadrant of the new breast, the loss of volume of the upper pole and the lack of projection of the inferior pole. We proposed our personal techniques to improve the aesthetical result in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Our experience consists of more than 220 DIEP flap breast reconstructions.

RESULTS

The methods mentioned for improving the aesthetics of the reconstructed breast reported good results in all cases.

CONCLUSION

The aim of our work is to describe our personal techniques in order to correct the mentioned problems and improve the final aesthetical outcome in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Risk reducing mastectomy, breast reconstruction and patient satisfaction in Norwegian BRCA1/2 mutation carriers

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of risk-reducing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with and without breast cancer. Uptake, methods of operation and reconstruction, complications, patient satisfaction and histopathological findings were registered at all five departments of genetics in Norway. Data from 267 affected and unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were analyzed, including a study-specific questionnaire returned by 178 mutation carriers. There was a steady increase in the uptake of risk-reducing mastectomies during the study period. Complications were observed in 106/266 (39.7%) women. Patient satisfaction was high. The majority of women expressed great relief after risk-reducing mastectomy and would have chosen the same option again.