An update on the cutaneous manifestations of coeliac disease and non-coeliac gluten sensitivity

INTRODUCTION

Coeliac disease is a gluten-induced immune-mediated enteropathy, characterised by the expression of specific genotypes and the production of autoantibodies. The inflammatory process specifically targets the intestinal mucosa, but gastrointestinal and extraintestinal signs and symptoms can also be present. Non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) can be diagnosed in individuals who have intestinal and/or extraintestinal symptoms related to the ingestion of gluten, but do not have autoantibodies and do not suffer from lesions in the duodenal mucosa. Among the extraintestinal manifestations, cutaneous manifestations are the most common for both diseases.

PURPOSE

We conducted this review to illustrate the common and uncommon features underlying the association of coeliac disease and NCGS with cutaneous manifestations related to gluten ingestion. Areas covered: The roles of innate and adaptive immunity in the cutaneous appearance of gluten sensitivity will be discussed.

Differences in the detection of circulating Hsp90 alpha between patients with atopic dermatitis and dermatitis herpetiformis

Heat shock protein 90 alpha (Hsp90α) is one of the key intra- and extracellular chaperones responsible for the biological activity of various signaling molecules that are involved in (auto)immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Recent epidemiologic data suggest that patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are at risk for several autoimmune diseases, including dermatitis herpetiformis (DH), an extraintestinal manifestation of celiac disease (CD). In addition, pruritic diseases such as AD may be confused clinically with DH. In this study, we aimed to determine the role of circulating Hsp90α in patients with AD in relation to patients with DH, CD, and healthy controls. Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, levels of circulating Hsp90α were determined in serum samples derived from patients with AD (n = 31), DH (n = 26), CD (n = 15), and healthy controls (n = 55). Although serum concentrations of Hsp90α were similar between patients with DH, CD, and healthy controls, we found that serum levels of Hsp90α were significantly higher (mean value of 5.08-fold; p < 0.0001) in patients with AD when compared to patients with DH. A cutoff value calculated as 2 × standard deviation above the mean concentration of Hsp90α in DH patients revealed that 83.9% (26/31) of AD patients were Hsp90α positive, whereas none of the DH patients (0/26) displayed such a positivity. This preliminary study suggests a distinct role for extracellular Hsp90α in the pathogenesis of AD compared to DH and its potential use in distinguishing AD from DH. Nevertheless, the potential role of the evaluation of extracellular Hsp90α for distinguishing between AD and DH is at present speculative and requires further and careful observations.