Nitrogen-Dioxide Remains a Valid Air Quality Indicator

In epidemiological studies, both spatial and temporal variations in nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) are a robust predictor of health risks. Compared to particulate matter, the experimental evidence for harmful effects at typical ambient concentrations is less extensive and not as clear for NO₂. In the wake of the “Diesel emission scandal—Dieselgate”, the scientific basis of current limit values for ambient NO₂ concentrations was attacked by industry lobbyists. It was argued that associations between NO₂ levels and medical endpoints were not causal, as NO₂ in older studies served as a proxy for aggressive particulate matter from incineration processes. With the introduction of particle filters in diesel cars, NO₂ would have lost its meaning as a health indicator. Austria has a high percentage of diesel-powered cars (56%). If, indeed, associations between NO₂ concentrations and health risks in previous studies were only due to older engines without a particle filter, we should expect a reduction in effect estimates over time as an increasing number of diesel cars on the roads were outfitted with particle filters. In previous time series studies from Vienna over shorter time intervals, we have demonstrated distributed lag effects over days up to two weeks and previous day effects of NO₂ on total mortality. In a simplified model, we now assess the effect estimates for moving 5-year periods from the beginning of NO₂ monitoring in Vienna (1987) until the year 2018 of same and previous day NO₂ on total daily mortality. Contrary to industry claims of a spurious, no longer valid indicator function of NO₂, effect estimates remained fairly stable, indicating an increase in total mortality of previous day NO₂ by 0.52% (95% CI: 0.35–0.7%) per 10 µg/m³ change in NO₂ concentration.