Deep brain stimulation - New programming algorithms and teleprogramming

INTRODUCTION

Thanks to a variety of factors, the field of neuromodulation has evolved significantly over the past decade. Developments include new indications and innovations of hardware, software, and stimulation techniques leading to an expansion in scope and role of these techniques as powerful therapies. They also imply the realization that practical application involves new nuances that make patient selection, surgical technique and the programming process even more complex, requiring continuous education and an organized structured approach.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors explore the developments in deep brain stimulation technology, including electrodes, implantable pulse generators, contact configurations (i.e, directional leads and independent current control), remote programming and sensing using local field potentials.

EXPERT OPINION

The innovations in the field of deep brain stimulation discussed in this review potentially provide increased effectiveness and flexibility not only to improve therapeutic response but also to address troubleshooting challenges seen in clinical practice. Directional leads and shorter pulse widths may broaden the therapeutic window of stimulation, avoiding current spread to structures that might trigger stimulation-related side effects. Similarly, independent control of current to individual contacts allows for the shaping of the electric field. Finally, sensing and remote programming represent important developments for more effective and individualized patient care.

Antiparkinsonian Drug Reduction After Directional Versus Omnidirectional Bilateral Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation

BACKGROUND

Several pilot trials and the Clinical Evaluation of the Infinity Deep Brain Stimulation System (PROGRESS) study have found that directional stimulation can provide a wider therapeutic window and lower therapeutic current strength than omnidirectional stimulation.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a single-center, open-label, registry-based, comparative trial to test the hypothesis that directional stimulation can be associated with a greater reduction in the total daily dose of antiparkinsonian medications (ApMeds) than omnidirectional stimulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 52 patients with directional and 57 subjects with omnidirectional bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) were enrolled. Preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, the dose of different ApMeds, the number of tablets used daily, the severity of motor and nonmotor symptoms using the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) were assessed.

RESULTS

According to the changes in the levodopa equivalent daily dose, directional STN-DBS led to a 13% greater reduction in the total daily dose of ApMed. The 10.3% greater reduction in the dose of levodopa was the main contributor to this difference. The number of different ApMed types also could be decreased in a greater manner with directional stimulation. The improvement in the severity of motor and nonmotor symptoms was comparable; however, we detected a 15.8% greater improvement in the global HRQoL among patients with directional stimulation according to the changes in the summary index of the PDQ-39. The total electrical energy delivered per second was comparable between the groups at 12-month postoperative visit, whereas the amplitude of stimulation was significantly lower and the impedance was significantly higher with directional leads.

CONCLUSIONS

Directional programming can further increase the reduction in the total daily dose of ApMed after STN-DBS. In addition, directional stimulation can have additional beneficial effects on the global HRQoL. The greater reduction of ApMed doses did not require more energy-consuming stimulation with directional stimulation.

Probabilistic Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation Sweet Spot Integration Into a Commercial Deep Brain Stimulation Programming Software Can Predict Effective Stimulation Parameters

OBJECTIVES

Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) may be challenging, especially when using segmented leads. In this study, we integrated a previously validated probabilistic STN sweet spot into a commercially available software to evaluate its predictive value for clinically effective DBS programming.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 14 patients with PD undergoing bilateral STN DBS with segmented leads were included. A nonlinear co-registration of a previously defined probabilistic sweet spot onto the manually segmented STN was performed together with lead reconstruction and tractography of the corticospinal tract (CST) in each patient. Contacts were ranked (level and direction), and corresponding effect and side-effect thresholds were predicted based on the overlap of the volume of activated tissue (VTA) with the sweet spot and CST. Image-based findings were correlated with postoperative clinical testing results during monopolar contact review and chronic stimulation parameter settings used after 12 months.

RESULTS

Image-based contact prediction showed high interrater reliability (Cohen kappa 0.851-0.91). Image-based and clinical ranking of the most efficient ring level and direction of stimulation were matched in 72% (95% CI 57.0-83.3) and 65% (95% CI 44.9-81.2), respectively, across the whole cohort. The mean difference between the predicted and clinically observed effect thresholds was 0.79 ± 0.69 mA (p = 0.72). The median difference between the predicted and clinically observed side-effect thresholds was -0.5 mA (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon paired signed rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of a probabilistic STN functional sweet spot into a surgical programming software shows a promising capability to predict the best level and directional contact(s) as well as stimulation settings in DBS for PD and could be used to optimize programming with segmented lead technology. This integrated image-based programming approach still needs to be evaluated on a bigger data set and in a future prospective multicenter cohort.

Developments in the mechanistic understanding and clinical application of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a life-changing treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and gives the unique opportunity to directly explore how basal ganglia work. Despite the rapid technological innovation of the last years, the untapped potential of DBS is still high.

AREAS COVERED. This review summarizes the developments in the mechanistic understanding of DBS and the potential clinical applications of cutting-edge technological advances. Rather than a univocal local mechanism, DBS exerts its therapeutic effects through several multimodal mechanisms and involving both local and network-wide structures, although crucial questions remain unexplained. Nonetheless, new insights in mechanistic understanding of DBS in PD have provided solid bases for advances in preoperative selection phase, prediction of motor and non-motor outcomes, leads placement and postoperative stimulation programming.

EXPERT OPINION. DBS has not only strong evidence of clinical effectiveness in PD treatment, but technological advancements are revamping its role of neuromodulation of brain circuits and key to better understanding PD pathophysiology. In the next few years, the worldwide use of new technologies in clinical practice will provide large data to elucidate their role and to expand their applications for PD patients, providing useful insights to personalize DBS treatment and follow-up.

Blood glucose modulation and safety of efferent vagus nerve stimulation in a type 2 diabetic rat model

Vagus nerve stimulation is emerging as a promising treatment for type 2 diabetes. Here, we evaluated the ability of stimulation of the vagus nerve to reduce glycemia in awake, freely moving metabolically compromised rats. A model of type 2 diabetes (n = 10) was induced using a high‐fat diet and low doses of streptozotocin. Stimulation of the abdominal vagus nerve was achieved by pairing 15 Hz pulses on a distal pair of electrodes with high‐frequency blocking stimulation (26 kHz, 4 mA) on a proximal pair of electrodes to preferentially produce efferent conducting activity (eVNS). Stimulation was well tolerated in awake, freely moving rats. During 1 h of eVNS, glycemia decreased in 90% of subjects (−1.25 ± 1.25 mM h, p = 0.017), and 2 dB above neural threshold was established as the most effective “dose” of eVNS (p = 0.009). Following 5 weeks of implantation, eVNS was still effective, resulting in significantly decreased glycemia (−1.7 ± 0.6 mM h, p = 0.003) during 1 h of eVNS. There were no overt changes in fascicle area or signs of histopathological damage observed in implanted vagal nerve tissue following chronic implantation and stimulation. Demonstration of the biocompatibility and safety of eVNS in awake, metabolically compromised animals is a critical first step to establishing this therapy for clinical use. With further development, eVNS could be a promising novel therapy for treating type 2 diabetes.

DiODe v2: Unambiguous and Fully-Automated Detection of Directional DBS Lead Orientation

Directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads are now widely used, but the orientation of directional leads needs to be taken into account when relating DBS to neuroanatomy. Methods that can reliably and unambiguously determine the orientation of directional DBS leads are needed. In this study, we provide an enhanced algorithm that determines the orientation of directional DBS leads from postoperative CT scans. To resolve the ambiguity of symmetric CT artifacts, which in the past, limited the orientation detection to two possible solutions, we retrospectively evaluated four different methods in 150 Cartesia™ directional leads, for which the true solution was known from additional X-ray images. The method based on shifts of the center of mass (COM) of the directional marker compared to its expected geometric center correctly resolved the ambiguity in 100% of cases. In conclusion, the DiODe v2 algorithm provides an open-source, fully automated solution for determining the orientation of directional DBS leads.

Directional Deep Brain Stimulation of the Thalamic Ventral Intermediate Area for Essential Tremor Increases Therapeutic Window

OBJECTIVES

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) and the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (VIM) is a well-established therapy for essential tremor (ET), but it is frequently associated with side effects like dysarthria or gait ataxia. Directional DBS (dDBS) may be a way to activate fiber tracts more selectively. Is dDBS for ET superior to omnidirectional DBS (oDBS) regarding therapeutic window and clinically as effective as oDBS?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients with ET treated with PSA/VIM-DBS were recruited. Therapeutic window served as primary outcome parameter; clinical efficacy, volume of neuronal activation, and total electrical energy delivered (TEED) served as secondary outcome parameters. Therapeutic window was calculated for all three dDBS directions and for oDBS by determining therapeutic thresholds and side effect thresholds. Clinical efficacy was assessed by comparing the effect of best dDBS and oDBS on tremor and ataxia rating scales, and accelerometry. Volume of neural activation and TEED were also calculated for both paradigms.

RESULTS

For best dDBS, therapeutic window was wider and therapeutic threshold was lower compared to oDBS. While side effect threshold did not differ, volume of neural activation was larger for dDBS. In terms of clinical efficacy, dDBS was as effective as oDBS.

CONCLUSIONS

dDBS for ET widens therapeutic window due to reduction of therapeutic threshold. Larger volume of neural activation for dDBS at side effect threshold supports the notion of persistent directionality even at higher intensities. dDBS may compensate for slightly misplaced leads and should be considered first line for PSA/VIM-DBS.

Directional DBS increases side-effect thresholds-A prospective, double-blind trial

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate whether directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease (PD) offers increased therapeutic windows, side-effect thresholds, and clinical benefit.

METHODS

In 10 patients, 20 monopolar reviews were conducted in a prospective, randomized, double-blind design to identify the best stimulation directions and compare them to conventional circular DBS regarding side-effect thresholds, motor improvement, and therapeutic window. In addition, circular and best-directional DBS were directly compared in a short-term crossover. Motor outcome was also assessed after an open-label follow-up of 3 to 6 months.

RESULTS

Stimulation in the individual best direction resulted in significantly larger therapeutic windows, higher side-effect thresholds, and more improvement in hand rotation than circular DBS. Rigidity and finger tapping did not respond differentially to the stimulation conditions. There was no difference in motor efficacy or stimulation amplitudes between directional and circular DBS in the short-term crossover. Follow-up evaluations 3 to 6 months after implantation revealed improvements in motor outcome and medication reduction comparable to other DBS studies with a majority of patients remaining with a directional setting.

CONCLUSION

Directional DBS can increase side-effect thresholds while achieving clinical benefit comparable to conventional DBS. Whether directional DBS improves long-term clinical outcome needs to be investigated in the future. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.