Clinical observation on the treatment of displaced distal radial and ulnar fractures in children by closed manipulation combined with splinting

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of closed manipulation combined with splinting in the treatment of displaced distal radial and ulnar fractures in children.

Methods

A total of 82 children with displaced fractures of the distal radial and ulnar segment who met the inclusion criteria and were treated as outpatients or inpatients in the orthopedic department of Guangzhou Orthopedic Hospital, from January 2016 to June 2022 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group: 41 children in the observation group were treated with closed manipulation combined with splint fixation; 41 children in the control group were fixed with incisional repositioning elastic nails combined with internal plates. The Anderson efficacy grading, visual analog scale (VAS) score, fracture healing time, treatment cost, hospital days, and complications were observed and compared between the two groups.

Result

The efficacy was evaluated according to the Anderson forearm fracture efficacy evaluation criteria, and the results of statistical analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 3 and 7 weeks after treatment, the VAS scores of children in both groups decreased (P < 0.05), and the VAS scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05), indicating that the observation group had a significant advantage in the relief of pain after treatment. The fractures healed in both groups after treatment with the two different methods, and the difference in healing time between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The length of hospital stay, treatment cost, and complication ratio were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

In children with displaced fractures of the distal radial and ulnar segments, treatment by manual repositioning with external splinting can achieve satisfactory results with simple operation, low cost, short hospital stay, and few complications, which is especially suitable to be promoted in primary hospitals and has good social benefits.

An insight of how multiple skeletal maturity indices can be used for growth assessment: relationship between the simplified olecranon, simplified digital, and distal radius and ulna classifications

This cross-sectional study aims to investigate the relationship between the simplified olecranon, simplified digital, and distal radius and ulna (DRU) classifications, and whether they can aid in more comprehensive maturity assessment together. Left hand and wrist and lateral elbow radiographs from pediatric patients were assessed using the three skeletal maturity indices. The association between maturity indices was investigated using Goodman and Kruskal's gamma, and by mapping of individual grades based on chronological age. Specific maturity grades, at which peak height velocity (PHV) occurs as previously identified, were based upon to explore how the three systems interact. A total of 114 patients (63.2% girls) were studied. Correlations and associations between the three maturity parameters were significant (all at P < 0.001). Mapping revealed uneven spans and coverage of different periods by each index. Olecranon stage 1 coincided with R3 (for girls), R4 (for boys), U3, and SS1. Olecranon stage 5 occurred as early as R7, U6, and SS4. Upon elbow fusion, the simplified digital (SS5-SS8) and DRU (R8-R11 and U7-U9) classifications can be used for assessment until maturity. The inter-relationship of the simplified hand, wrist, and olecranon methods indicates their combined use. DRU grades can be used in growth periods which are less well covered. Prepubertal and growth acceleration phase of pubertal growth spurt can best be assessed by both the simplified olecranon (stages 1-3) and DRU classifications (R1-R5 and U1-U4). All three indices are required during PHV. For post-PHV, DRU (R8-R11 and U7-U9) and simplified digital method (SS5-SS8) complement each other for assessment until skeletal maturity.

Relationship between hand and wrist bone age assessment methods

Assessment of skeletal maturity is crucial for managing growth related problems. Tanner and Whitehouse (TW) hand and wrist bone age assessment is an accurate method; however, it is complex and labor-intensive. Several simplified methods derived from the TW method were proposed, and each had its own character. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between these methods for accurate usage.Between 2018 and 2019, a cross-sectional study was performed with consecutive left hand and wrist x-rays obtained from a pediatric orthopedic clinic. Bone age assessments included the distal radius and ulna (DRU) classification, Sanders staging (S), thumb ossification composite index (T), and TW method. Somers delta correlation was conducted to determine the interchangeability of these stages. The mean bone age and standard deviation (SD) of each subgrade were compared and analyzed.Totally 103 films (92 girls) were analyzed with mean age of 12.1 years (range: 8.0-17.9 years). The radius (R) stages had good correlation with S, T, and U stages with a very high Somers delta correlation (P < .05). R5 had relatively large SD (1.5) and referred to T2 and T3; R6 and R7 had the smallest SD (0.3) with reference to T4 or S2; R8 referred to T5 or S3, S4, S5; R9 referred to S6 and S7.The internal relationship between the DRU and digital stages system was well proven. We also provided a simple and accurate way to assess the bone age by combination of some subgrades with smaller SD: 10y-proximal thumb covered without sesamoid (T2); 10.5y-sesamoid just appearing (T3); 11y-distal radial physis just covered (medial double joint line, R6); 11.5y-medial capping of distal radial physis (R7); 12y-bilateral capping of distal radial physis (R8) / phalangeal capping without fusion (S3); 12.5y-distal phalangeal physes start to fuse (S4); 13y-distal phalangeal physes fused (S5); 13.5y-proximal phalangeal physes start to fuse (S6); 14.5y-proximal phalangeal physes fused (S7); 15y-distal radial physis almost fused (R10).Level of Evidence: Diagnostic study, level III.