[Efficacy and safety of Sorafenib as monotherapy to FLT3-ITD positive acute myeloid leukemia]

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of Sorafenib as monotherapy to FLT3 positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods: From April 2014 to December 2015, fourteen AML patients with FLT3 positive, 7 males and 7 females with a median age of 42 (range: 14-81) years old, were enrolled in this study. Of the 14 cases, 4 were de novo cases, 9 refractory cases and 1 relapsed case, including 78.6% patients with severe complications and 57.1% patients with KPS score less than 60 [the median KPS score was 45 (20-70) ]. The administration of Sorafenib was 400 mg twice daily and Sorafenib was continued if tolerated. The treatment response was evaluated by MICM and the data were analyzed by paired samples t test before and after Sorafenib treatment. Results: The peripheral blood WBC count [4.2 (0.9-11.8) ×109/L vs 39.6 (2.3-209.5) ×109/L, P<0.001 ], the percentage of peripheral blast cell [0.07 (0-0.54) vs 0.53 (0-0.94), P<0.001] and the percentage of bone marrow blast cell [0.266 (0.020-0.880) vs 0.604 (0.180-0.900), P=0.003] were significantly decreased after Sorafenib monotherapy compared with before. The overall response rate was 57.1% (8/14), including 5 cases (35.7%) with complete remission (CR). Of 4 de novo cases, 2 achieved CR, 1 with PR, 1 with NR; 3 of 10 refractory and relapsed patients achieved CR and 2 cases achieved PR, 5 cases NR. The median duration of achieving molecular remission (FLT3-ITD negative) after Sorafenib was 46(33-72) days, and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 53 (28-175) days. Conclusion: Sorafenib shows activity in FLT3-ITD mutation positive AML patients. Sorafenib monotherapy could be used as a treatment option for elderly patients or patients with severe complications, and refractory and relapsed patients with not suitable for intensive chemotherapy.

[The clinical features of patients with lymphoplasmacytic diseases harboring MyD88 L265P mutation]

Objective: To explore the clinical features of lymphoplasmacytic diseases with MyD88 L265P mutation. Methods: To analyze the distribution of MYD88 L265P mutation in patients with lymphoplasmacytic diseases by using of ARMS PCR-CE. Results: There were 25(30.9%) MyD88 L265P mutated patients in 81 patients. The mutation was frequently observed in 14 patients with WM (77.8%, 14/18), 2 patients with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (66.7%, 2/3), 1 acute lymphocytic leukemia patient (50.0%, 1/2), 3 multiple myeloma patients (30.0%, 3/10), 1 patient with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (25%, 1/4), 3 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (13.0%, 3/23) and 1 lymphoma patient (4.8%, 1/21). 20 (80%, 20/25) patients were identified with IgM subtype. Compared with wild-type group of 56 cases, mutated patients were older (median age: 67 years vs 55 years, P< 0.001), with lower WBC count (median count: 5.23 × 109/L vs 10.80 × 109/L, P=0.001), lower HGB level (median count: 85 g/L vs 119 g/L, P<0.001). Conclusion: MyD88 L265P mutation was mainly observed in patients with IgM subtype lymphoplasmacytic diseases, and Waldenstrom' s macroglobulinemia was the most common disease. Compared with the wild-type group, patients with MyD88 L265P mutation were older and had lower WBC count, lower level of HGB. However, further studies were needed to test the prognostic value of MyD88 L265P mutation.