Evaluation of TUBB8 gene alterations in infertile women with oocyte maturation and cleavage arrest referred to Royan Institute

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are TUBB8 gene variations present in Iranian infertile women with oocyte maturation arrest or embryo cleavage arrest?

DESIGN

TUBB8 gene variations were investigated by polymerase chain reaction sequencing on blood samples from 16 women with oocyte maturation arrest and 12 women with cleavage arrest, collectively referred to as the experimental cohort, as well as 56 fertile women as the control group. The Exome Sequencing Project and dbSNP databases and the Genome Aggregation Database were used to search the frequency of corresponding variants. PolyPhen and SIFT were used to conduct in-silico analysis of gene variations and Align-GVGD was used to predict the effect of missense variants on proteins. The homology modelling and structure evaluation of variations was also checked.

RESULTS

Two likely pathogenic variants [c.713C>T (p.Thr238Met), c.1054G>T (p.Ala352Ser)] were identified in patients with oocyte maturation arrest and one likely pathogenic variant [c.G763A, (p.Val255Met)] was identified in a patient with cleavage arrest. These changes were absent in controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Three deleterious variants in TUBB8 related to oocyte maturation arrest or cleavage arrest and infertility were identified. TUBB8 variant screening for patients with oocyte maturation and cleavage arrest is recommended.

Molecular Clues to Understanding Causes of Human-Assisted Reproduction Treatment Failures and Possible Treatment Options

More than forty years after the first birth following in vitro fertilization (IVF), the success rates of IVF and of IVF-derived assisted reproduction techniques (ART) still remain relatively low. Interindividual differences between infertile couples and the nature of the problems underlying their infertility appear to be underestimated nowadays. Consequently, the molecular basis of each couple's reproductive function and of its disturbances is needed to offer an individualized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to each couple, instead of applying a standard or minimally adapted protocols to everybody. Interindividual differences include sperm and oocyte function and health status, early (preimplantation) embryonic development, the optimal window of uterine receptivity for the implanting embryo, the function of the corpus luteum as the main source of progesterone production during the first days of pregnancy, the timing of the subsequent luteoplacental shift in progesterone production, and aberrant reactions of the uterine immune cells to the implanting and recently implanted embryos. In this article, the molecular basis that underlies each of these abnormalities is reviewed and discussed, with the aim to design specific treatment options to be used for each of them.