Chinese physician perception on the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia: online cross-section survey study

BACKGROUND

The management of chemotherapy induced anemia (CIA) remains challenging. The potential risk and benefits in providing patient-centered care need to be balanced; the disease is multifactorial; and the major treatments including red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and intravenous injection (i.v.)iron supplementation have a unique set of strengths and limitations. Also, most previous survey based on the patient data could not reveal the process of evaluation and decision-making for CIA treatment from a physician's perspective. As the comparison of China Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, the standard of CIA treatment in China will vary from United States and Europe, for example, the initial hemoglobin (Hb) for RBC transfusions. In order to understand the diagnosis, treatment, and unmet medical needs of CIA patients, the China Medical Education Association (CMEA), in conjunction with Cancer Hope Medium, initiated the first national survey of Chinese physicians regarding the diagnosis and treatment of CIA.

METHODS

The CMEA sent an online, 12-item questionnaire (via wjx.cn) to physicians across China from September 1, 2022 to October 22, 2022. Two hundred and sixty-five samples were calculated usingsurveyplanet.com. The questionnaire evaluated the impact of anemia on chemotherapy interruption, initial treatment, the target Hb level of CIA in, and the current status of ESAs prescription in clinical practice. Respondents were asked to score their reasons for not using ESAs (including safety issues, drug access in practice or adherence) and the risk options of the current treatment including ESAs, RBC transfusion, and i.v.iron.

RESULTS

A total of 331 questionnaires among 5,000 web visits were gathered, covering 247 hospitals in 29 provinces across China, of which 130 (53%) were tier IIIA hospitals, 50 (20%) were tier III B hospitals, 59 (24%) were tier IIA hospitals, and 8 (3%) were tier II B hospitals. The frequency of chemotherapy dose delay/reduction due to anemia was 24% [standard deviation (SD) 49%]. Most responding physicians rated an initial Hb level for ESAs treatment to be 80 g/L, with a favorable Hb level for chemotherapy being 100 g/L (60%), which would not limit treatment availability. The majority (67.6%, n=221) of physicians who responded indicated that they had used ESAs for anemia correction, while the others (32.4%, n=106) reported never using them.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study in conducting a large-scale survey on the diagnosis and treatment of CIA in China from a physicians' perspective. We found that in China, nearly one-quarter of patients undergoing chemotherapy with concurrent anemia may experience interruption of chemotherapy and that the initiation of anemia treatment is not adequately timed. In treating CIA, most physicians prioritize the completion of chemotherapy via Hb level over treating the symptoms of anemia.

Beneficial effect of roxadustat on early posttransplant anemia and iron utilization in kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective comparative cohort study

Background

Although posttransplant anemia (PTA) is a common complication after kidney transplant, it has not been thoroughly evaluated for appropriate treatment. Roxadustat can stimulate erythropoiesis by increasing erythropoietin (EPO) production and improving the utilization of iron. However, there are currently a few case reports describing its effect on PTA in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in KTRs with PTA.

Methods

In this retrospective study, KTRs with early PTA were divided into a roxadustat group, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) group, and untreated group (neither roxadustat nor ESA) according to the treatment prescribed by their physicians. We compared the levels of hemoglobin (Hb), creatinine, lipids, hepcidin, intact fibroblast growth factor 23 (iFGF23) and iron-related indices, at baseline and different time points posttransplant. Outcome was assessed at both month 3 and month 12 posttransplant. Adverse events during the treatment course were also recorded.

Results

A total of 57 KTRs were included (n=22 roxadustat group, n=13 ESA group, n=22 untreated group). There was no difference in age, sex, body mass index, dialysis method and duration, donor type among three groups at baseline. The mean Hb levels at month 3 posttransplant (128.00±19.62 vs. 118.59±11.60 g/L, P=0.048) and the average change in Hb levels from week 2 to month 3 (48.05±22.53 vs. 31.45±12.96 g/L, P=0.005) in the roxadustat group were significantly higher than those in the untreated group. However, there was no significant difference in the above indices between the roxadustat and ESA groups. At month 3, the total iron binding capacity (TIBC) and levels of transferrin were significantly higher while levels of ferritin, hepcidin and iFGF23 were significantly lower in the roxadustat group than in other groups (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels among the three groups at month 3. During the follow-up, no adverse events related to roxadustat were reported.

Conclusions

Administration of roxadustat in KTRs with early PTA could elevate Hb levels effectively and safely by enhancing endogenous EPO production and improving iron utilization. Further randomized studies with larger sample size are necessary to verify our results.

Treatment of Renal Anemia in Patients With Hemodialysis Using Hypoxia-inducible Factor (HIF) Stabilizer, Roxadustat: A Short-term Clinical Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Renal anemia is a major complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hemodialysis, increasing morbidity and mortality. Roxadustat is a novel oral hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (PHI), which is administrated for renal anemia. Different from erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), Roxadustat could increase erythropoietin physiologically, improving the therapeutic effects. It has not been so long since Roxadustat was approved by the European Commission (EC). Thus, only a few studies have reported on the treatment of renal anemia using Roxadustat.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of Roxadustat in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Nine patients under HD (72±10 years old) were enrolled in this study. Patients received Roxadustat first time or changed from ESAs (5-10 mg, 3 times a week after HD). Observation period was 5.3±2.9 months.

RESULTS

Roxadustat treatment effectively increased and maintained hemoglobin levels. Levels of ferritin and C-reactive protein tended to decrease, but the difference was not statistically significant. No significant adverse effects were observed in all patients during the study.

CONCLUSION

Roxadustat is effective and relatively tolerant for treating renal anemia in patients subjected to hemodialysis.

Dynamics of Erythroferrone Response to Erythropoietin in Rats

Background: Erythroferrone (ERFE) is a hormone identified recently as a master regulator connecting iron homeostasis and erythropoiesis. Serum ERFE concentrations significantly increase in animals and humans with normal or impaired kidney function after receiving exogenous erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), which suggests it might be a predictive factor for erythropoiesis. To evaluate whether ERFE is an early, sensitive biomarker for long-term erythropoietic effects of ESAs, we investigated the relationship between ERFE dynamics and time courses of major erythropoietic responses to ESA treatment. Methods: Healthy rats received single dose and multiple doses (thrice a week for 2 weeks) of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) at three dose levels (100, 450, and 1350 IU/kg) intravenously. The rHuEPO and ERFE concentrations in plasma were determined at a series of time points after dosing. Erythropoietic effects including red blood cell count and hemoglobin concentrations were continuously monitored for 24 days (single dose) or 60 days (multiple doses). The expansion of erythroblasts in bone marrow was quantified by flow cytometry analysis. Results: ERFE significantly increased within a few hours and return to baseline at 24 h after rHuEPO treatment. The ERFE response was enhanced after repeated treatment, which was consistent with the observed expansion of erythroblasts in the bone marrow. In addition, the dynamics of ERFE showed double peaks at approximately 2 and 10 h after rHuEPO stimulation, and the ERFE baseline displayed a significant circadian rhythm. There was a strong positive correlation between peak values of short-term ERFE responses and the long-term hemoglobin responses. Conclusion: The stimulated release of ERFE is a rapid process within 24 h. The second peak in the ERFE response to rHuEPO suggests the presence of a feedback mechanism counterregulating the ESA stimulation. The early increase of ERFE at 2 h appears to be a predictor of the hemoglobin response at 14 days after single dose of rHuEPO. Under multiple-dose regimen, the enhanced ERFE responses still correlate with the peak hemoglobin responses. The ERFE baseline also exhibits a circadian rhythm.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the management of cancer patients with anemia: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are widely used in the management of anemia in cancer patients. Despite their apparent effectiveness, recent studies have suggested that ESAs could result in serious adverse events and even higher mortality. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the benefits and risks of ESAs in the management of cancer patients with anemia using a meta-analysis.

METHODS

The initial literature search covered Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials, and identified 1,569 articles. The final meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials (n=2,387) in cancer patients with <11 g/dL hemoglobin (Hb) at the baseline and target Hb (for stopping ESA treatment) at no more than 13 g/dL. The assessment measures included Hb response, blood transfusion rate and adverse events that included venous thromboemblism (VTE), hypertension, and on-study mortality. The results are expressed as pooled odds ratio (OR). Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot analysis.

RESULTS

ESAs significantly increased the Hb concentration [OR 7.85, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.85 to 10.53, P<0.001] and reduced the red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rate (OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.65, P<0.001). ESAs did not increase the accumulated adverse events (OR 0.95, P=0.82), or the on-study mortality (OR 1.09, P=0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

ESAs are not associated with increased frequency of severe adverse events in anemic cancer patients when the target Hb value is no more than 13 g/dL.