Difficult Airway Management in a Patient With Post-burn Contracture Neck

During reconstructive interventions in patients presenting with severe post-burn mento-sternal scar contracture, securing the airway forms a critical part of management. Extreme contracture is more likely to develop in patients who have had thoracic burns with ascending involvement of the neck and mandibular region. When cervical hyperextension and elevation of the mandible are impeded, post-burn contracture of the neck might render endotracheal intubation difficult. The development of rigid scar tissue that distorts the laryngeal and mandibular anatomy, or the development of microstomia following scar tissue retraction in facial burns, may make alternative approaches to direct laryngoscopy challenging. In patients with healed neck burns, intubation difficulties should be anticipated, and equipment for aiding intubation should be kept ready. Furthermore, a surgeon must be present throughout anesthesia induction in case an emergency neck release is required. Although the role of awake fiberoptic intubation has been well established in the general population, it is yet to be assessed in patients with burns. In this report, we present a case of successfully managed post-burn contracture that was planned for awake fiberoptic intubation.

Comparison of the Air-Q intubating laryngeal mask airway and the Ambu AuraGain laryngeal mask airway as a conduit for fibreoptic assisted endotracheal intubation for simulated cervical spine injury

INTRODUCTION

Airway management in patients with a cervical spine injury is a difficult and challenging task. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway and the Ambu AuraGain laryngeal mask airway as a conduit for fibreoptic (FO) assisted endotracheal intubation in adult patients with a simulated cervical spine injury.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 66 adult patients underwent elective surgery under general anaes-thesia, and they were randomized to two groups: the Air-Q (AQ) group (n = 33) and the Ambu AuraGain (AA) group (n = 33). A simulated cervical spine injury was created using a cervical collar, which was applied after the induction of general anaesthesia. Ease of insertion, time taken for successful insertion, time taken for successful FO guided endotracheal intubation, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), Brimacombe score for FO laryngeal view, post-intubation complications and haemodynamic changes were recorded for both groups.

RESULTS

The OLP was significantly higher in the AA group than in the AQ group (34.9 ± 6.4 vs. 28.6 ± 7.8 cm H 2 O; P = 0.001). Otherwise, there were no significant differences in the ease of insertion, time taken for successful insertion, time taken for successful FO guided endotracheal intubation, Brimacombe score for FO laryngeal view, haemodynamic parameters or complication rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Air-Q was comparably effective as Ambu AuraGain as a conduit for FO endotracheal intubation in patients with a simulated cervical spine injury; however, Ambu AuraGain has a better seal with significant OLP.

Comparison of the Parker flex tip and the unoflex reinforced endotracheal tube for orotracheal fibreoptic intubation in simulated difficult intubation patients

INTRODUCTION

The choice of endotracheal tube (ETT) is important for successful orotracheal fibreoptic intubation (OFI). The aim of this study was to compare the use of the Parker flex tip (PFT) with the unoflex reinforced (UFR) ETT during OFI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 58 patients who underwent elective surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised to two ETT groups, the PFT group (n = 29) and the UFR group (n = 29), for OFI in simulated difficult intubation patients using a rigid cervical collar. After successful standardised induction and relaxation, OFI and railroading of selected ETT were subsequently performed by a similarly experienced practitioner. Ease of insertion, degree of manipulation, time to successful intubation, post-intubation complications and haemodynamic changes were recorded for both groups.

RESULTS

he percentage of easy intubation was comparable between both groups with a slightly higher percentage in the UFR group than the PFT group (69.0% vs. 62.0%; P = 0.599). Degree of manipulation was also comparable between the two groups; the percentage of cases in which manipulation was not required was slightly higher in the UFR group than the PFT group (69.0% vs. 62.1%; P = 0.849). Time to successful intubation was also comparable between the groups, although the time was slightly shorter for the UFR group than the PFT group (56.9 s ± 39.7 s vs. 63.9 s ± 36.9 s; P = 0.488). There were also no significant differences in other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The Parker flex tip ETT was comparable to the unoflex reinforced ETT for OFI in simulated difficult airway patients.

A randomised trial comparing real-time double-lumen endobronchial tube placement with the Disposcope® with conventional blind placement

Double-lumen endobronchial tube placement is challenging. This study compared double-lumen tube placement with the Disposcope^® , a wireless videostylet allowing real-time visualisation, with conventional blind placement. Patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery with normal airways requiring one-lung ventilation were randomly allocated into two groups (27 patients in each group). The Disposcope was used to assist left-sided double-lumen tube placement in one group, and conventional blind placement was performed in the control group. Placement in both groups was checked with fibreoptic bronchoscopy. The Disposcope-assisted group had a shorter total mean (SD) placement time (18.6 (2.5) s vs. 21.4 (2.9) s, p < 0.001), laryngoscopy to end of auscultation time (83.4 (3.0) s vs. 93.9 (5.7) s, p < 0.001) and total operation time (130.7 (6.1) s vs. 154.5 (6.3) s, p < 0.001). In the Disposcope-assisted group, the double-lumen tube was inserted in the correct side in all patients (100.0%), whereas in the conventional group, the double-lumen tube was placed in the correct side in 25 (92.6%) patients and in the wrong side in 2 (7.4%) patients; the difference was not significant (p = 0.150). In the Disposcope-assisted group, the double-lumen tube was inserted to the optimal depth in 24 (88.9%) patients, whereas in the conventional group it was inserted to the optimal depth in one (4.0%) patient. The Disposcope increased the success rate of double-lumen tube placement, and shortened the total operation time when compared with standard placement with confirmation using fibreoptic bronchoscopy, and may replace the conventional method.

Fibreoptic gastro-intestinal endoscopy at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana: a historical perspective

Fibreoptic (or Flexible) endoscopy has revolutionized and completely transformed practice of gastroenterology, and many other medical specialties, over the past half century or so. At the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra the development of this facility has evolved gradually, especially involving specialists from the Departments of Medicine and Surgery since the 1970s. This article is an attempt to trace and record this journey and to highlight some of the problems and challenges yet to be overcome. It is an anecdotal account based on the authors' recollection with attempts at verification of important dates.

ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Placement: A Comparison of Blind versus Direct Laryngoscopic Insertion Techniques

Background and Objectives:

The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) ProSeal is most commonly used supraglottic airway device; it is routinely inserted by blind technique. Although blind insertion technique is most widely used, there are many techniques which are available such as priming the drain tube with a guiding instrument such as a suction catheter, a gum elastic bougie, a Flexi-Slip Stylet, direct laryngoscopy, and even a fiber-optic bronchoscope (FOB). The present study was undertaken to compare and assess the placement of LMA ProSeal using blind versus direct laryngoscopy techniques using FOB.

Materials and Methods:

A prospective randomized comparative study of 110 patients divided into two groups of 55 each as Group I (blind insertion) and Group II (direct laryngoscopic insertion) after satisfying the inclusion criteria. The anatomical position was assessed by flexible FOB and evaluated based on fiber-optic scoring system.

Results:

In the present study, demographic characteristics, vital parameters, Mallampati score, and Wilson's score were comparable in both the groups (P > 0.05). The fiber-optic score (FOS) 1 in Group II was 78.18% compared to 60% in Group I, but the difference was statistically not significant (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the mean FOS in Group II was slightly high (3.84 ± 0.87) compared to Group II (1.62 ± 0.87), but the difference was statistically not significant (P > 0.05). Further hemodynamic parameters (P > 0.05) and complications (P > 0.05) were comparable in both the groups.

Conclusion:

The LMA placement scoring was similar in both blind and direct laryngoscopic techniques. Blind insertion technique is a simpler, easier, and has stood the test of time.

The efficacy of combined regional nerve blocks in awake orotracheal fiberoptic intubation

AIMS OF STUDY

To evaluate the efficacy, hemodynamic changes, and patient comfort during awake fiberoptic intubation done under combined regional blocks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present observational study, 50 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists ( ASA) Grade I-II, Mallampati Grade I-IV were given nerve blocks - bilateral glossopharyngeal nerve block, bilateral superior laryngeal nerve block, and recurrent laryngeal nerve block before awake fiberoptic intubation using 2% lidocaine.

RESULTS

Procedure was associated with minimal increases in hemodynamic parameters during the procedure and until 3 min after it. Most of the intubations were being carried out within 3 min. Patient comfort was satisfactory with 90% of patients having favorable grades.

DISCUSSION

The most common cause of mortality and serious morbidity due to anesthesia is from airway problems. One-third of all anesthetic deaths are due to failure to intubate and ventilate. Awake flexible fiberoptic intubation under local anesthesia is now an accepted technique for managing such situations. In awake patient's anatomy, muscle tone, airway protection, and ventilation are preserved, but it is essential to sufficiently anesthetize the upper airway before the performance of awake fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided intubation to ensure patient comfort and cooperation for which in our study we used the nerve block technique.

CONCLUSION

A properly performed technique of awake fiberoptic intubation done under combined regional nerve blocks provides good intubating conditions, patient comfort and safety and results in minimal hemodynamic changes.

A technique of placing cuffed endotracheal tubes through in situ paediatric laryngeal mask airways

If tracheal intubation is not possible using direct laryngoscopy, one option is to use a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) through which an endotracheal tube (ETT) can be passed. In children, however, the size of an uncuffed ETT that can pass through the lumen of an LMA is sometimes too small for the trachea, resulting in gas leakage around the ETT. Using a cuffed ETT may reduce the gas leak but withdrawal of the LMA is then prevented by the pilot balloon. In this study, the largest sizes of cuffed and uncuffed Mallinckrodt™ ETTs that could pass with ease through various sizes of paediatric Classic™ and ProSeal™ LMAs were documented. For cuffed ETTs, withdrawal of the LMA was made possible by simply cutting off the pilot balloon. The ETT cuff-inflating mechanism was then repaired by passing a 20 or 22 gauge cannula into the cut end of the inflating tubing. The proximal end of the cannula was then connected to a one-way valve or a three-way stopcock. This technique of cutting off the pilot balloon of the cuffed ETT made it possible to use paediatric cuffed ETTs in exchange for the LMAs tested. The task was easy to perform. Subsequent repair of the cuff-inflation tubing was effective and could withstand high pressures. These findings indicate that it is possible to pass cuffed ETTs through paediatric LMA lumens, which can provide ventilation without gas leaks, unlike uncuffed ETTs.

In which clinical scenario would awake fibreoptic nasal intubation be employed?

KEY CLINICAL MESSAGE

The routine way to access the uncomplicated airway is via direct laryngoscopy. When this is not possible, there are a number of other techniques to help visualization such as the video laryngoscopy. These require a degree of mouth opening. With almost complete trismus, the clinician should resort to awake fibreoptic nasal intubation to secure the airway.