Fluocinolone acetonide implant (Iluvien®) for macular edema associated with retinitis pigmentosa: A case report

PURPOSE

Macular edema can be observed in 20% of patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and is often responsible of central vision impairment. Intraocular administration of corticosteroids (either triamcinolone or dexamethasone implant) has been found to be effective in that indication. We here describe the first report of a successful bilateral administration of fluocinolone acetonide implant in a patient with steroid-dependent macular edema associated to RP.

METHODS

Case report.

CASE REPORT

A 34-year female patient with RP was referred for a one-year bilateral persistent ME. She had been refractory either to topical or to general carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Bilateral off-label administration of 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®, Allergan, CA) was therefore decided. Efficacy and tolerance were very good in both eyes. Still, every four-month injections were required to maintain the macula dry. Off-label use of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant (Iluvien®, Alimera Sciences, GA) was then proposed and injected, first, in the right eye and, two-years after, in the left eye. No recurrences of the edema were observed from then on, i.e., for 3 years in the right eye and for 1 year in the left eye.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide could represent a promising means in the therapeutic management of persistent steroid-dependent ME related to RP.

Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant Removal From the Vitreous Cavity

Purpose: To describe a technique for fluocinolone acetonide implant removal from the vitreous cavity. Methods: A case report and review of surgical methods were performed. Results: The technique to remove a fluocinolone acetonide implant from the vitreous cavity was safe and effective. The vitreous cutter was used to align the implant coaxially with a 25-gauge cannula. The valve of the cannula was opened, creating pressure that drew the implant into the cannula. Conclusions: Fluocinolone acetonide implants can be efficiently removed from the vitreous cavity by creating a pressure differential using the valved cannula. Advantages of this technique include avoiding invasive maneuvers such as enlarging the sclerotomy or creating a corneal wound.

Long-Term Results of 0.19mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Insert for Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitis in Clinical Practice

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with non-infectious uveitis treated with 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide insert (FAi) for up to 36 months in clinical practice.

METHODS

A retrospective study conducted at a single uveitis center.

RESULTS

Fifty eyes of 39 patients were included. Mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) remained stable until month 36 after FAi implantation (61.04 vs. 70.25 letters and 370.8 vs. 332.5 µm, respectively). The recurrence rate was 34% (17 eyes) after 36 months, of which 82% (14 eyes) received high-dose corticosteroids before FAi. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) remained unchanged (13.38 vs. 15.74 mmHg), while most phakic eyes (13 of 14 eyes) required cataract surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that FAi effectively prevents recurrences of non-infectious uveitis for up to three years in clinical practice, comparable with randomized clinical trials. Patients who received high-dose corticosteroids before FAi have an increased risk for early recurrence and should be considered for scheduled re-treatment.

Management of Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Switched from Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant to Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant

To assess anatomical and functional outcomes after switching from dexamethasone implant (DEXi) to fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAci) in 113 diabetic macular edema eyes, a multicentric retrospective observational study was conducted. Seventy-five eyes (73.5%) were switched 1−8 weeks after their last DEXi. The mean best-corrected visual acuity improved to 59.8 letters at month 4 and remained stable during the follow-up. The mean central macular thickness (CMT) significantly decreased during the follow-up, with a minimum of 320.9 μm at month 3. The baseline CMT was higher in eyes that received the last DEXi >8 weeks versus <8 weeks before the first FAci (p < 0.021). After FAci injection, additional treatments were needed in 37 (32.7%) eyes. A longer diabetes duration (p = 0.009), a longer time between the last DEXi and the first FAci (p = 0.035), and a high baseline CMT (p = 0.003) were risk factors for additional treatments. The mean intraocular pressure was <19 mmHg at all timepoints, with no difference between eyes receiving the last DEXi ≤8 weeks or >8 weeks before the switch. Switching from DEXi to FAci in DME is effective and safe. A short time between the last DEXi and the first FAci reduced CMT fluctuations and the need for early additional treatments.

Effectiveness and tolerability of the fluocinolone acetonide implant in patients with diabetic macular edema in the UAE: 24 and 36-month outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness and safety of the fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant was evaluated at Month 24 and, in some sustained for up to 36 months, in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and a pseudophakic lens treated in the UAE following prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and dexamethasone (DEX) implant.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational audit study conducted between September 2017-September 2020 in which 22 patients were treated with the FAc implant and outcomes monitored for up to 36 months. Effectiveness outcomes were: best-corrected visual acuity (BVCA) and central macular thickness (CMT). Safety was assessed by monitoring intraocular pressure (IOP). All outcomes were measured at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in mean BCVA were observed versus baseline from Month 1, which were maintained up to Month 24 (P < 0.0001 versus baseline). In all five patients completing 36 months follow-up, the improvements in BVCA were maintained through to Month 36 P < 0.005 versus baseline. Similarly, mean CMT improved versus baseline at Month 1 through to Month 24 (P < 0.0001 versus baseline), with significant improvements also noted in the 5 patients completing 36 months follow-up (P < 0.005 versus baseline). An IOP rise to 32 mmHg was observed in one eye, but returned to normal values at next measure. Five eyes required IOP lowering drops and one required IOP-lowering surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

The FAc intravitreal implant is effective for 24 months, and sustained for 36 months, in a UAE population previously treated with a DEX implant, with tolerability profile in-line with previous reports.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema Previously Treated in Real-Life Practice: The REALFAc Study

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the main cause of visual impairment in diabetic patients and a chronic disease requiring long-term treatments. The fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant has recently been approved to treat DME in patients considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies. This study evaluates the functional and anatomical efficacy of the FAc implant in real-life practice. A total of 62 eyes with chronic DME were included and followed for a mean of 13.9 (+7.5) months. Previous treatment included at least anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in 83.9% of eyes, dexamethasone implant (DEX-I) in 100% of eyes, vitrectomy in 29.0% of eyes, and laser photocoagulation (either panretinal or focal photocoagulation) in 75.8% of eyes. The mean baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 64.0 (+/−17.2) letters (median: 67.5 letters) with a mean DME duration of 60.3 (+/−30.6) months. The maximum BCVA gain occurred at 21 months with a mean gain of 5.0 (+/−12.7) letters. A total of 50.0% of eyes gained ≥5 letters during follow-up. Patients with lower BCVA at baseline had the lowest final BCVA (p < 0.001) but the highest BCVA gain (p = 0.02). The best overall improvement in mean central macular thickness (CMT) occurred at 18 months (p < 0.0001). The improvement in BCVA was inversely associated with the decrease in CMT and showed a decrease when CMT increased (DME recurrence). According to the history of vitrectomy, we did not find any significant difference in mean final BCVA (p = 0.1) and mean BCVA gain (p = 0.2) between eyes previously vitrectomized or not. A total of 23 eyes (37.1%) required additional treatment for DME, and 17.7% required an IOP-lowering procedure during follow-up. In conclusion, this real-life observational study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the FAc implant in patients with chronic DME already treated with other available therapies.

Fluocinolone acetonide implant in diabetic macular edema: International experts' panel consensus guidelines and treatment algorithm

Center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of vision impairment in working-age adults. While its management is particularly challenging in a poorly compliant population, continuous innovation and the advent of new molecules have improved its outcome. The control of glycemia and of systemic aggravating factors remain essential to slow down progression of disease complications including DME. The indications for macular laser photocoagulation has progressively been phased out as a standard of care and replaced by local intraocular anti-VEGFs biologics and glucocorticoids (GCs). Intravitreal GCs in controlled-release drug delivery systems have allowed to reduce injection frequency and treatment burden. The non biodegradable Fluocinolone Acetonide (FAc) implant allows a long-lasting stabilization of both functional and anatomic improvements. However, adequate patient selection and monitoring through regular follow-up are essential for optimal results. Based on their experience and the latest literature, the aim of the present review is to provide international expert panel consensus on the place of the FAc implant in the treatment algorithm of DME, as well as its safety profile and how to manage it.

Intraocular Pressure Changes Are Predictive of Ocular Hypertension Onset After Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant: Significant Cutoffs and the Role of Previous DEX Implant

Background: Fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant represents a long-term strategy for the management of diabetic macular edema (DME). Because of the 3-year duration, the careful monitoring of the intraocular pressure (IOP) is necessary. The main aim of the study was to provide quantitative IOP cutoffs associated with the onset of IOP increases.

Methods: The study was retrospectively conducted with 2-year of follow-up. We separately considered eyes with good IOP control (Group 1), eyes requiring IOP-lowering medications (Group 2) and eyes undergoing IOP-lowering surgery (Group 3). The statistical analysis assessed Delta% IOP changes over the 2-year follow-up. ROC analysis was performed to detect significant cutoffs associated with Group 2 and Group 3. IOP changes occurring after a previously administered dexamethasone (DEX) implant were also evaluated.

Results: We included 48 eyes (48 patients), stratified as follows: Group 1 (25/48; 52%), Group 2 (19/48; 40%) and Group 3 (4/48; 8%). ROC analysis performed on IOP values detected 2-months later DEX implant showed a mean Delta IOP increase>24% significantly associated with IOP-lowering medications after FAc implant, whereas a mean Delta IOP increase>35% was significantly associated with IOP-lowering surgery after FAc implant. With respect to IOP changes occurred after FAc implant, our ROC analysis showed a mean Delta IOP increase>8% significantly associated with IOP-lowering medications, whereas a mean Delta IOP increase>15% was significantly associated with IOP-lowering surgery. DEX-related IOP changes showed 52% sensitivity and 100% specificity of FAc-related IOP increases.

Conclusions: IOP changes provides clinically relevant cutoffs associated with the onset of FAc-related IOP increases.

Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy and Patient Acceptability of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide (0.2mcg/Day) Implant in the Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitis Affecting the Posterior Segment

Long-acting, slow-release injectable fluocinolone intravitreal implants have been approved for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment. We summarise the development of intravitreal fluocinolone implants and discuss the technology including pharmacokinetics. We conducted a systematic review of evidence for the efficacy, safety and patient acceptability of fluocinolone 0.18 mg and 0.19 mg injectable implants. We summarise evidence from the pivotal phase 3 studies that lead to the approval of these implants and evaluate real-world including disease-specific evidence. Safety including injection-related events and long-term adverse events is presented.

Challenging Clinical Cases - A Walk Through Supplemental Therapy with Intravitreal Ranibizumab Therapy Following Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with the 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant (ILUVIEN®)

Purpose

There are limited published data regarding the use of supplemental intravitreal therapies in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) following treatment with the 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc; ILUVIEN^®) intravitreal implant. The aim of this report was to analyze five challenging eyes that required supplemental therapies after treatment with the FAc implant.

Methods

This is a retrospective case series conducted at the Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto in Porto, Portugal, between 2015 and 2019. It aimed to assess the patient background, treatment history and patient outcomes in challenging clinical cases in which intravitreal injections (IVI) of ranibizumab had been given pro re nata following treatment with the FAc implant (with a minimum follow-up of 33 months). Parameters measured included best-corrected visual acuity in early treatment diabetic retinopathy scale, central macular thickness and intraocular pressure.

Patients

Five eyes (three patients) diagnosed with persistent or recurrent DME and suitable for treatment with the FAc implant according to its licensed indication in Europe.

Results

In the first 2 patients, one bilateral, DME was refractory to IVI of short-acting corticosteroids and anti-VEGF. Following FAc therapy, there was a favorable evolution and a clear regression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity. Supplemental treatments were adopted, but a reduced number of treatments were needed beyond three years in these cases. The third case had bilateral DME. One eye had been vitrectomized and FAc therapy led to resolution of DME within 6 months. In the contralateral eye, the control of DME was dependent on anti-VEGF supplemental treatments until a pars plana vitrectomy was performed.

Conclusion

The multifactorial nature of DME means there is a need for an individualized treatment approach to the management of DME. It also explains why some patients need a combined or a more aggressive approach to therapy in order to achieve successful outcomes for the patient.

Effectiveness of 190 µg Fluocinolone Acetonide and 700 µg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The CONSTANT Analysis

Purpose

Calculations of area-under-the-curve (AUC) provide the average letters gained across the entire treatment period, which may be a better estimate of long-term effectiveness than single time-point outcomes, particularly when it comes to sustained-release therapies.

Materials and Methods

The AUC method was used to compare the efficacy of the 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide (total dose of 0.19 mg; FAc) and dexamethasone (DEX) 700 µg implants based on published data from their respective Phase 3 FAME (Fluocinolone Acetonide for Macular Edema) and MEAD pivotal clinical trials in diabetic macular edema (DME). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter scores were collated from the FAME trial and compared with those reported in MEAD. The trapezoidal rule was then used to calculate AUC, based on BCVA letter score, from baseline to Month 36 (FAME)/Month 39 (MEAD) and presented as an overall mean visual acuity change per day.

Results

Treatment with either the FAc or DEX implant resulted in an improved BCVA over the treatment period compared with sham. This effect was statistically greater (p=0.029) for the FAc implant than the DEX implant (5.2 vs 3.5 letters/day, respectively) and even greater in the recurrent DME subgroup (p<0.001; 6.9 vs 3.5 letters/day, respectively).

Conclusion

Although direct comparisons between trial cohorts cannot be performed, this analysis indicated that, in their respective pivotal clinical trial cohorts, treatment with the FAc implant provides better long-term visual acuity outcomes and a lower treatment burden than achieved with the DEX implant.

Early adoption of the fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant in patients with persistent or recurrent diabetic macular edema (DME)

Objective: To assess long-term outcomes for effectiveness, safety, and treatment burden after injection of 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide [FAc] intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN^®) in patients with persistent or recurrent diabetic macular edema (DME) and 6–18 months of follow-up.

Methods: Retrospective case series in 18 eyes (13 patients) treated with the FAc implant. Prior to the implant, eyes were treated with an anti-VEGF therapy, dexamethasone implant, or focal or panretinal photocoagulation. Effectiveness outcomes included changes in visual acuity and macular edema. Safety outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP) changes, IOP drugs, and IOP-related surgeries/interventions. Treatment burden was assessed by comparing the number of DME treatments before and after FAc implantation.

Results: The FAc implant reduced macular volume in 16/18 (89%) eyes, with a statistically significant mean change of –1.33 mm³ (p=0.001). The average central retinal thickness reduction for all 18 eyes was statistically significant, decreasing from 444 µm at baseline to 359 µm after the FAc implant (p<0.001). In 90% of eyes, visual acuity was stable throughout the follow-up period, with increases or no worsening in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score. Although mean IOP was statistically higher after treatment, it was within the normal range at all timepoints, and most (83.3%) eyes remained in the IOP category 0–22 mmHg, and the number of IOP treatments required did not increase and no patients required IOP-lowering surgery. Treatment burden for DME was reduced after the implant was administered, with 56% of eyes not requiring any additional treatment. The average number of treatments was 1.3 in the 6 months after the FAc implant versus 4.6 in the 12 months preceding the implant.

Conclusion: The FAc implant is an appropriate option to incorporate earlier in the DME treatment process, leading to positive long-term outcomes with an acceptable safety profile, and a reduced treatment burden for patients, and reduced clinical staff time.

Fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (Retisert® ) in the treatment of sight threatening macular oedema of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-related uveitis

PURPOSE

We describe eight patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis-related chronic uveitis, who received a fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAI, Retisert®, Bausch&Lomb) in one eye. All patients had poor visual acuity (VA) due to persistent macular oedema in one or both eyes despite treatment with antirheumatic medication.

METHODS

Median age of the patients was 22.9 years (range, 14.1-39.7) and duration of uveitis 13.0 years (range, 6.8-28.4) at FAI implantation. Median preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.1 (range, 0.05-0.4) and Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature, SUN-grade was SUN 2+ (range, 0.5-4.0). All patients had been treated extensively with systemic corticosteroids and antirheumatic drugs by the time of FAI implantation. The median follow-up time was 5.3 years (range, 4.4-6.3).

RESULTS

Macular edema resolved in a median time of 0.2 years (range, 0.04-0.39) after the FAI implantation. The median BCVA was 0.5-0.63 (range, 0.1-1.0) from 1 to 5 years of follow-up. Macular edema did not recur in 5 eyes after the implantation. In three eyes, the macular oedema relapsed at 2.7, 2.9 and 5.5 years of follow-up. All our patients needed antirheumatic drugs in addition to the FAI to treat their macular edema. During the follow-up, 7 eyes required further intraocular operations: 4 cataract operations, 4 intraocular pressure -lowering operations and 1 retinal detachment surgery were performed.

CONCLUSION

Fluocinolone acetonide implant is a valuable option in the treatment of persistent macular edema associated with JIA-related uveitis refractory to systemic treatments.

Outcome of Multiple Implants and Dissociation of Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant (Retisert) in a Series of 187 Consecutive Implants

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of long-term follow-up of Retisert multiple implantation and dissociation in eyes with chronic noninfectious uveitis.

METHODS

Review of 187 consecutive Retisert implants. Outcomes of multiple implantation and spontaneous medication pellet-strut dissociation were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 187 consecutive Retisert implants were reviewed. Eight implants were removed. The prevalence of spontaneous dissociation was 2.6% (5/187). The rate of dissociation increased to 11.11% (2/18) in cases of multiple implants. The mean period between Retisert implantation and spontaneous dissociation was 65.05 months. The mean period between implants in the same eye was 55.25 months. In cases of multiple implantations the old implant was not removed and 17.64% (3/17) of eyes required glaucoma filtering surgery.

CONCLUSION

The rate of spontaneous dissociation of Retisert medication pellet-strut in eyes with single implant for noninfectious uveitis is low, which tends to increase in eyes with multiple implants.