Evolutions in fragment-based drug design: the deconstruction-reconstruction approach

Recent advances in the understanding of molecular recognition and protein-ligand interactions have facilitated rapid development of potent and selective ligands for therapeutically relevant targets. Over the past two decades, a variety of useful approaches and emerging techniques have been developed to promote the identification and optimization of leads that have high potential for generating new therapeutic agents. Intriguingly, the innovation of a fragment-based drug design (FBDD) approach has enabled rapid and efficient progress in drug discovery. In this critical review, we focus on the construction of fragment libraries and the advantages and disadvantages of various fragment-based screening (FBS) for constructing such libraries. We also highlight the deconstruction-reconstruction strategy by utilizing privileged fragments of reported ligands.

Ligand deconstruction: Why some fragment binding positions are conserved and others are not

Fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) relies on the premise that the fragment binding mode will be conserved on subsequent expansion to a larger ligand. However, no general condition has been established to explain when fragment binding modes will be conserved. We show that a remarkably simple condition can be developed in terms of how fragments coincide with binding energy hot spots--regions of the protein where interactions with a ligand contribute substantial binding free energy--the locations of which can easily be determined computationally. Because a substantial fraction of the free energy of ligand binding comes from interacting with the residues in the energetically most important hot spot, a ligand moiety that sufficiently overlaps with this region will retain its location even when other parts of the ligand are removed. This hypothesis is supported by eight case studies. The condition helps identify whether a protein is suitable for FBDD, predicts the size of fragments required for screening, and determines whether a fragment hit can be extended into a higher affinity ligand. Our results show that ligand binding sites can usefully be thought of in terms of an anchor site, which is the top-ranked hot spot and dominates the free energy of binding, surrounded by a number of weaker satellite sites that confer improved affinity and selectivity for a particular ligand and that it is the intrinsic binding potential of the protein surface that determines whether it can serve as a robust binding site for a suitably optimized ligand.

Fragment-based drug discovery-the importance of high-quality molecule libraries

Fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) is now established as a complementary approach to high-throughput screening (HTS). Contrary to HTS, where large libraries of drug-like molecules are screened, FBDD screens involve smaller and less complex molecules which, despite a low affinity to protein targets, display more 'atom-efficient' binding interactions than larger molecules. Fragment hits can, therefore, serve as a more efficient start point for subsequent optimisation, particularly for hard-to-drug targets. Since the number of possible molecules increases exponentially with molecular size, small fragment libraries allow for a proportionately greater coverage of their respective 'chemical space' compared with larger HTS libraries comprising larger molecules. However, good library design is essential to ensure optimal chemical and pharmacophore diversity, molecular complexity, and physicochemical characteristics. In this review, we describe our views on fragment library design, and on what constitutes a good fragment from a medicinal and computational chemistry perspective. We highlight emerging chemical and computational technologies in FBDD and discuss strategies for optimising fragment hits. The impact of novel FBDD approaches is already being felt, with the recent approval of the covalent KRASG12C inhibitor sotorasib highlighting the utility of FBDD against targets that were long considered undruggable.

Reactivity of Covalent Fragments and Their Role in Fragment Based Drug Discovery

Fragment based drug discovery has long been used for the identification of new ligands and interest in targeted covalent inhibitors has continued to grow in recent years, with high profile drugs such as osimertinib and sotorasib gaining FDA approval. It is therefore unsurprising that covalent fragment-based approaches have become popular and have recently led to the identification of novel targets and binding sites, as well as ligands for targets previously thought to be 'undruggable'. Understanding the properties of such covalent fragments is important, and characterizing and/or predicting reactivity can be highly useful. This review aims to discuss the requirements for an electrophilic fragment library and the importance of differing warhead reactivity. Successful case studies from the world of drug discovery are then be examined.

Pushing the Ligand Efficiency Metrics: Relative Group Contribution (RGC) Model as a Helpful Strategy to Promote a Fragment "Rescue" Effect

The ligand efficiency (LE) indexes have long been used as decision-making criteria in drug discovery and development. However, in the context of fragment-based drug design (FBDD), these metrics often exhibit a strong emphasis toward the selection of highly efficient “core” fragments for potential optimization, which are not usually considered as parts of a larger molecule with a size typical for a drug. In this study, we present a relative group contribution (RGC) model intended to predict the efficiency of a drug-sized compound in terms of its component fragments. This model could be useful not only in rapidly predicting all the possible combinations of promising fragments from an earlier hit discovery stage, but also in enabling a relatively low-LE fragment to become part of a drug-sized compound as long as it is “rescued” by other high-LE fragments.

Construct a variable-length fragment library for de novo protein structure prediction

Although remarkable achievements, such as AlphaFold2, have been made in end-to-end structure prediction, fragment libraries remain essential for de novo protein structure prediction, which can help explore and understand the protein-folding mechanism. In this work, we developed a variable-length fragment library (VFlib). In VFlib, a master structure database was first constructed from the Protein Data Bank through sequence clustering. The hidden Markov model (HMM) profile of each protein in the master structure database was generated by HHsuite, and the secondary structure of each protein was calculated by DSSP. For the query sequence, the HMM-profile was first constructed. Then, variable-length fragments were retrieved from the master structure database through dynamically variable-length profile-profile comparison. A complete method for chopping the query HMM-profile during this process was proposed to obtain fragments with increased diversity. Finally, secondary structure information was used to further screen the retrieved fragments to generate the final fragment library of specific query sequence. The experimental results obtained with a set of 120 nonredundant proteins show that the global precision and coverage of the fragment library generated by VFlib were 55.04% and 94.95% at the RMSD cutoff of 1.5 Å, respectively. Compared with the benchmark method of NNMake, the global precision of our fragment library had increased by 62.89% with equivalent coverage. Furthermore, the fragments generated by VFlib and NNMake were used to predict structure models through fragment assembly. Controlled experimental results demonstrate that the average TM-score of VFlib was 16.00% higher than that of NNMake.