Predicting the Development of Renal Replacement Therapy Indications by Combining the Furosemide Stress Test and Chemokine (C-C Motif) Ligand 14 in a Cohort of Postsurgical Patients

OBJECTIVES

Optimal timing of renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation in severe acute kidney injury (AKI) remains controversial. Initiation of treatment early in the course of AKI may lead to some patients undergoing unnecessary RRT, whereas delayed treatment is associated with increased mortality. This study aims to investigate whether the combination of the furosemide stress test (FST) and AKI-associated biomarkers can predict the development of indications for RRT.

DESIGN

Single-center, prospective, observational study.

SETTING

University Hospital of Muenster, Germany.

PATIENTS

Critically ill, postoperative patients with moderate AKI (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage 2) and risk factors for further progression (vasopressors and/or mechanical ventilation) receiving an FST.

INTERVENTIONS

Sample collection and measurement of different biomarkers (chemokine [C-C motif] ligand 14 [CCL14], neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, dipeptidyl peptidase 3).

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary endpoint was the development of greater than or equal to one predefined RRT indications (hyperkalemia [≥ 6 mmol/L], diuretic-resistant hypervolemia, high urea serum levels [≥ 150 mg/dL], severe metabolic acidosis [pH ≤ 7.15], oliguria [urinary output < 200 mL/12 hr], or anuria). Two hundred eight patients were available for the primary analysis with 108 having a negative FST (urine output < 200 mL in 2 hr following FST). Ninety-eight patients (47%) met the primary endpoint, 82% in the FST negative cohort. At the time of inclusion, the combination of a negative FST test and high urinary CCL14 levels had a significantly higher predictive value for the primary endpoint with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.92) compared with FST or CCL14 alone (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.85 and AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.89; p < 0.001, respectively). Other biomarkers showed lower AUCs.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of the FST with the renal biomarker CCL14 predicts the development of indications for RRT.

Furosemide Stress Test and Renal Resistive Index for Prediction of Severity of Acute Kidney Injury in Sepsis

Introduction The furosemide stress test (FST) predicts the severity and the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (S-AKI). The renal resistive index (RRI) indicates renal vascular resistance. Objectives The primary objective was to find the correlation between FST and RRI in S-AKI. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the role of FST and RRI on the progression of S-AKI. Methods A total of 154 consenting adult patients with S-AKI were administered FST. Renal echography was performed within the first 12 hours of admission, and RRI was calculated. The patients were grouped either into progressors or non-progressors to AKI-KDIGO stage 3. Results Of the patients who had RRI at Day 1 less than 0.73, 60% recovered, 34.3% needed RRT, and 35.5% died, whereas in those who had RRI at Day 1 greater than 0.73, only 22% recovered, 46.6% required RRT, and 51.6% died. RRI value of 0.73 predicted the need for RRT with a sensitivity of 35.1%, specificity of 80.4% and accuracy of 69.1%. The highest number of patients of KDIGO stage 3 (50%), followed by stage 2 (28.1%) and stage 1 (21.9%), presented technical difficulties in measuring the RRI. Conclusion FST is an economical and easily administered test to assess renal tubular function and can predict the occurrence and progression of S-AKI. RRI is a modest marker for predicting the need for RRT or persistent AKI.

Current Concepts of Pediatric Acute Kidney Injury-Are We Ready to Translate Them into Everyday Practice?

Pediatric acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children undergoing interventional procedures. The review summarizes current classifications of AKI and acute kidney disease (AKD), as well as systematizes the knowledge on pathophysiology of kidney injury, with a special focus on renal functional reserve and tubuloglomerular feedback. The aim of this review is also to show the state-of-the-art in methods assessing risk and prognosis by discussing the potential role of risk stratification strategies, taking into account both glomerular function and clinical settings conditioned by fluid overload, urine output, or drug nephrotoxicity. The last task is to suggest careful assessment of eGFR as a surrogate marker of renal functional reserve and implementation of point-of-care testing, available in the case of biomarkers like NGAL and [IGFBP-7] × [TIMP-2] product, into everyday practice in patients at risk of AKI due to planned invasive procedures or treatment.

Role of the Furosemide Stress Test in Renal Injury Prognosis

Risk stratification and accurate patient prognosis are pending issues in the management of patients with kidney disease. The furosemide stress test (FST) has been proposed as a low-cost, fast, safe, and easy-to-perform test to assess tubular integrity, especially when compared to novel plasma and urinary biomarkers. However, the findings regarding its clinical use published so far provide insufficient evidence to recommend the generalized application of the test in daily clinical routine. Dosage, timing, and clinical outcomes of the FST proposed thus far have been significantly different, which further accentuates the need for standardization in the application of the test in order to facilitate the comparison of results between series. This review will summarize published research regarding the usefulness of the FST in different settings, providing the reader some insights about the possible implications of FST in clinical decision-making in patients with kidney disease and the challenges that research will have to address in the near future before widely applying the FST.

Timing of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: Shedding New Light on an Old Controversy

Critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI-D) require renal replacement therapy (RRT) increasingly. However, the optimal timing of initiation of RRT for non-life-threatening indications of AKI remains unknown. There is a debate as to whether different philosophies of RRT initiation (early vs. delayed) confer a survival benefit. Lowering the threshold for RRT initiation, however, inevitably leads to more critically ill patients receiving unnecessary RRT. The relevant proportion of nonprogressing early stage AKI patients with spontaneous kidney recovery is a matter of severe concern because RRT has potentially lethal complications and is expensive. Moreover, these patients should be excluded from randomized trials. The furosemide stress test in critically ill patients with early stages of AKI serves as a novel tubular function test to identify those patients with severe and progressive AKI-D. Future trials to validate findings of a promising pilot study are warranted.

Renal Stress Testing in the Assessment of Kidney Disease

As part of human evolutionary development, many human organ systems have innate mechanisms to adapt to increased "work demand" or stress. This reserve capacity can be informative and is used commonly in cardiology to assess cardiac function (e.g., treadmill test). Similarly, the kidney possesses reserve capacity, which can be demonstrated in at least 2 of the following renal domains: glomerular and tubular. When appropriate stimulants are used, healthy patients with intact kidneys can significantly increase their glomerular filtration rate and their tubular secretion. This approach has been used to develop diagnostics for the assessment of renal function. This article reviews both glomerular and tubular kidney stress tests and their respective diagnostic utility.