Mismatched related donor allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation compared to other donor types for Ph+ chronic myeloid leukaemia: A retrospective analysis from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains an option for tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in first chronic phase (CP1) and high-risk patients with advanced disease phases. In this European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry-based study of 1686 CML patients undergoing first allo-HCT between 2012 and 2019, outcomes were evaluated according to donor type, particularly focusing on mismatched related donors (MMRDs). Median age at allo-HCT was 46 years (IQR 36-55). Disease status was CP1 in 43%, second CP (CP2) or later in 27%, accelerated phase in 12% and blast crisis in 18%. Donor type was matched related (MRD) in 39.2%, MMRD in 8.1%, matched unrelated (MUD) in 40.2%, and mismatched unrelated (MMUD) in 12.6%. In 4 years, overall survival (OS) for MRD, MMRD, MUD and MMUD was 61%, 56%, 63% and 59% (p = 0.21); relapse-free survival (RFS) was 48%, 42%, 52% and 46% (p = 0.03); cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 33%, 37%, 27% and 30% (p = 0.07); non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 19%, 21%, 21% and 24% (p = 0.21); and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 16%, 18%, 22% and 15% (p = 0.05) respectively. On multivariate analysis, MMRD use associated with longer engraftment times and higher risk of graft failure compared to MRD or MUD. There was no statistical evidence that MMRD use associated with different OS, RFS and incidence of GvHD compared to other donor types.

Outcomes with HLA-matched unrelated donor versus haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation

We investigated the outcomes after adult haploidentical (haplo) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in a single-center study (n = 452) including 276 MUD and 176 haplo transplants. Myeloablative (37%) and reduced-intensity conditioning (63%) were performed. Graft sources included peripheral blood (50%) and bone marrow (50%). GVHD prophylaxis included tacrolimus/methotrexate (53%) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based (47%). In MUD versus haplo HCT recipients, a similar incidence of neutrophil engraftment (18 vs 17 days, p = 0.895), grade II-IV acute GVHD (51% vs 50%, p = 0.773), relapse (26% vs 23%, p = 0.578), non-relapse mortality (22% vs 23%, p = 0.817), 1-year disease-free survival (62% vs 63%. p = 0.921), and 1-year overall survival (73% vs 74%, p = 0.744) were observed. Earlier platelet engraftment (22 vs 27 days, p < 0.001) and higher chronic GVHD (45% vs 35%, p = 0.040) were noted in MUD as compared to haplo HCT. Allogeneic transplantation should be done promptly whenever indicated, utilizing either matched unrelated or haploidentical donors.

Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia-Single-Centre Experience

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening type of aplastic anemia for which allogeneic stem cell transplantation or immunosuppressive therapy are the principal treatment modalities. Only about 25-30% of patients have a matched sibling donor, and finding an unrelated donor in ethnic minorities is a challenge. The use of related haploidentical donor transplants in severe aplastic anemia is uncommon. We would like to report our experience with the first four patients who underwent haploidentical transplants for severe aplastic anemia. This is a retrospective study. We collected data from our transplant database of all haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplants for SAA from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021. The transplant protocol used was the Hopkins' protocol. There were three patients who underwent haploidentical transplants as primary therapy for SAA. A fourth patient received a haploidentical transplant after immunosuppressive therapy failure. The median age of the patients at transplant was 24 y (range 20-29). All patients were engrafted. Neutrophil engraftment occurred at a median of 21 days (range 17-22). Any active infections resolved with the recovery of blood counts. The median hospitalization time was 27 days (range 22-41). Only one patient had grade 2 acute GVHD involving the skin. There was no chronic GVHD. All patients had complete lymphoid and myeloid donor chimerism on day 60. Based on our experience and the emerging literature, haplo-identical transplantation should be considered for select young patients with SAA who have low chances of responding to immunosuppressive therapy.

Graft CD8 T-cell-based risk system predicts survival in antithymocyte globulin-based myeloablative haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Objective

This study investigated the cellular composition of peripheral blood grafts for anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-based myeloablative haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT).

Methods

Clinical characteristics were retrospectively evaluated in a training cohort with ATG-based myeloablative haplo-HSCT between January 2016 and February 2020 and confirmed in a validation cohort between March 2020 and June 2021.

Results

A higher dose of graft CD8+ T cells (≥ 0.85 × 108 kg-1) was significantly improved overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.750; P = 0.002) and disease-free survival (DFS; HR, 1.751; P < 0.001) in the training cohort, according to multivariate Cox regression analysis. Higher doses of mononuclear cells (MNCs) demonstrated better OS (HR, 1.517; P = 0.038) and DFS (HR, 1.532; P = 0.027). Older patient age (> 46 years), older donor age (≥ 50 years) and a higher refined disease risk index (rDRI) were also related to OS. A graft CD8+ T-cell risk system based on graft CD8+ T-cell dose, donor age and rDRI was constructed using a nomogram model after LASSO Cox regression analysis. It showed acceptable discrimination, with a C-index of 0.62 and 0.63, respectively. Graft CD8+ T-cell dose was negatively correlated with donor age (P < 0.001) and positively correlated with a higher lymphocyte percentage in the peripheral blood before mobilisation (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

A higher CD8+ T-cell dose in peripheral blood-derived grafts improves patients' survival with ATG-based myeloablative haplo-HSCT. Younger donors with higher lymphocyte percentages improved patients' survival with an intermediate rDRI risk.

Unrelated or haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in second complete remission for acute myeloid leukemia-Improved outcomes over time: A European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Acute Leukemia Working Party study

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only cure for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in second complete remission (CR2). Patients lacking a matched sibling donor (MSD) receive transplants from matched unrelated donors (MUDs), mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs), haploidentical (haplo) donors, or cord blood.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, registry-based European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation study that investigates changes in patient- and transplant-related characteristics and posttransplant outcomes over time.

RESULTS

We identified 3955 adult patients (46.7% female; median age, 52 years [range, 18-78 years]) with AML in CR2 first transplanted between 2005 and 2019 from a MUD 10/10 (61.4%), MMUD 9/10 (21.9%), or haplo donor (16.7%) and followed for 3.7 years. A total of 725 patients were transplanted between 2005 and 2009, 1600 between 2010 and 2014, and 1630 between 2015 and 2019. Over the three time periods, there was a significant increase in patient age (from 48.7 to 53.5 years; p < .001), use of a haplo donor (from 4.6% to 26.4%; p < .001), and use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (from 0.4% to 29%; p < .001). There was a significant decrease in total body irradiation and in vivo T-cell depletion. In multivariate analysis, transplants performed more recently had better outcomes. Leukemia-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; p = .002) and overall survival (HR, 0.73; p < .001) increased over time. Similarly, nonrelapse mortality (HR, 0.64; p < .001) decreased over time. We also observed better graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) rates (acute GVHD II-IV: HR, 0.78; p = .03; GVHD-free, relapse-free survival: HR, 0.69; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Even in the absence of an MSD, outcomes of allo-HCT in CR2 for AML have significantly improved over time, with most favorable outcomes achieved with a MUD.

Haploidentical Donor Blood or Marrow Transplantation for Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Overlap Neoplasms: Results from a North American Collaboration

Haploidentical donors offer a potentially readily available donor, especially for non-White patients, for blood or marrow transplantation (BMT). In this collaboration across North America, we retrospectively analyzed outcomes of first BMT using haploidentical donor and posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in MDS/MPN-overlap neoplasms (MDS/MPN), an otherwise incurable hematological neoplasm. We included 120 patients, 38% of non-White/Caucasian ethnicity, across 15 centers with median age at BMT 62.5 years. The median follow-up is 2.4 years. Graft failure was reported in 6% patients. At 3-years, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 25%, relapse 27%, grade 3-4 acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) 12%, chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppression 14%, progression-free survival (PFS) 48% and overall survival (OS) 56%. On multivariable analysis, statistically significant associations included older age at BMT (per decade increment) with NRM (sdHR 3.28, 95%CI 1.30-8.25), PFS (HR 1.98, 95% 1.13-3.45) and OS (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.11-3.63), presence of mutation in EZH2/RUNX1/SETBP1 with relapse (sdHR 2.61, 95%CI 1.06-6.44), and splenomegaly at BMT/prior splenectomy with OS (HR 2.20, 95%CI 1.04-4.65). Haploidentical donors are a viable option for BMT in MDS/MPN, especially for those disproportionately represented in the unrelated donor registry. Disease-related factors including splenomegaly and high-risk mutations dominate outcomes following BMT.

Haploidentical versus Double-Cord Blood Stem Cells as a Second Transplantation for Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

There are limited data on second stem cell transplantation (SCT2) outcomes with alternative donors for relapsed AML after the first stem cell transplantation (SCT1). We analyzed the outcomes of 52 adult AML patients who received SCT2 from haploidentical donors (HIT, N = 32) and double-cord blood (dCBT, N = 20) between 2008 and 2021. The HIT group received T-cell-replete peripheral blood stem cells after reduced-toxicity conditioning with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), while the dCBT group received myeloablative conditioning. For a median follow-up of 64.9 months, the HIT group, compared to the dCBT group, had earlier engraftment, superior 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) with similar relapse. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that HIT was significantly associated with better OS, DFS, and lower NRM than dCBT. Both longer remission duration after SCT1 and complete remission at SCT2 were significantly associated with a lower relapse rate. In addition, bone marrow WT1 measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity was significantly associated with inferior OS and higher relapse. This study suggests that T-cell-replete HIT with ATG-based GVHD prophylaxis may be preferred over dCBT as SCT2 for relapsed AML and that WT1-MRD negativity may be warranted for better SCT2 outcomes.

Comparison of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Outcomes Using Matched Sibling Donors, Haploidentical Donors, and Immunosuppressive Therapy for Patients With Acquired Aplastic Anemia

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of 387 consecutive patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with a fludarabine-based conditioning regimen from matched sibling donors (MSD) (n = 108) or haploidentical donors (HID) (n = 91) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) (n = 188) from 2014 to 2020 at our hospital. Compared with HID-HSCT, MSD-HSCT had a lower incidence of graft failure (1% vs. 7%, p = 0.062), grade II–IV acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) (16% vs. 35%, p = 0.001), and mild to severe chronic GvHD (cGvHD) (8% vs. 23%, p = 0.007), but an equivalent incidence of grade III–IV aGvHD (8% vs. 12%, p = 0.237) and moderate to severe cGvHD (3% vs. 9%, p = 0.076). HSCT had superior blood count recovery at 3, 6, and 12 months compared with IST (p < 0.001). The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) of the MSD, HID, and IST groups were 86%, 72%, and 79% (p = 0.02), respectively; accordingly, the failure-free survival (FFS) rates were 85%, 68%, and 56%, respectively (p < 0.001). For patients aged ≤40 years, the OS rate was still significantly superior for MSD-HSCT receipients compared to HID-HSCT receipients (89% vs. 76%, p = 0.024) while the HID-HSCT recipients showed similar OS (76% vs. 78%, p = 0.166) but superior FFS (p = 0.047) when follow-up was longer than 14.5 months in contrast to IST. In a multivariate analysis, HID-HSCT and a conditioning regimen that included busulfan were adversely related to OS among patients who received allografts. In conclusion, MSD-HSCT was the frontline choice for patients with severe AA aged ≤40 years, while HID-HSCT was as effective as IST for patients without an MSD.

A Prospective Trial Comparing Haploidentical Donor Transplantation With Cord Blood Versus HLA-Matched Sibling Donor Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancy Patients

Although haploidentical donor (HID) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has achieved similar survival to HLA-identical sibling donor (ISD) transplantation, the delayed hematopoietic engraftment as well as higher incidence of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), results in prolonged hospitalization, higher costs, and increased morbidity. In this study, a prospective, non-randomized clinical study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent HID HSCT supported by cord blood or ISD HSCT. Between May 2017 and November 2020, 113 patients were enrolled to undergo HID HSCT supported by cord blood (n=88) or ISD HSCT (n=25). The cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet engraftment at 30days was comparable in these two groups. Importantly, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD at 100days (20.5% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.2%–28.8%] versus 12.0% [95% CI: 0.2%–23.8%], P = 0.32) and cGVHD at 1 year (19.5% [95% CI: 11.2%–27.8%] versus 16.6% [[95% CI: 1.3%–31.9%] P = 0.70) between the two groups. Among the HID and ISD groups, the 2-year disease free survival was 76.8 and 80.0% (P = 0.83), the 2-year overall survival was 82.4 and 88.0% (P = 0.66), the 2-year GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was 68.9 and 75.3% (P = 0.62), respectively. Our results indicate that HID transplantation supported by cord blood may offer a good alternative to ISD HSCT for patients with hematopoietic malignancies.

Myeloablative Haploidentical Transplant as an Alternative to Matched Sibling Transplant for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas

The number of HLA-haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT) is increasing. Comparative studies about Haplo-HSCT versus allo-HSCT with HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD-HSCT) have been tried in leukemias and B-cell lymphomas. Few studies were reported in Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs). We performed a multicenter retrospective study about 52 patients with PTCLs undergoing Haplo-HSCT (n = 20) or MSD-HSCT (n = 32). All Haplo-HSCT recipients received antithymocyte globulin (ATG) based graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The median follow-up for all survivors was 38 months. The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD was similar (19% in the MSD-HSCT group versus 28% in the Haplo-HSCT group, P = 0.52). The 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (limited and extensive) after Haplo-HSCT (30%) was also similar with that in the MSD-HSCT group (50%, P = 0.15). The 3-year relapse rates (33% vs 27%, P = 0.84) and non-relapse mortality (21% vs 22%, P = 0.78) did not differ between these two groups. There were also no differences in 3-year overall survival (OS) (48% vs 50%, P = 0.78) and progression-free survival (47% vs 51%, P = 0.95) between these two groups. On multivariate analysis, prognostic index for T-cell lymphoma (PIT) score (higher than 1: hazard ratio [HR], 4.0; P = 0.003) and disease status (stable or progression disease before HSCT: HR, 2.8; P = 0.03) were independent variables associated with worse OS. We concluded that ATG-based haplo-HSCT platform could work as an alternative to MSD-HSCT for patients with PTCLs.

G-CSF-Primed Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Haploidentical Transplantation Could Achieve Satisfactory Clinical Outcomes for Acute Leukemia Patients in the First Complete Remission: A Registered Study

G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood (G-PB) harvest is the predominant graft for identical sibling donor and unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients, but it was controversial in haploidentical related donor (HID) HSCT. In this registry study, we aimed to identify the efficacy of HID G-PB HSCT (HID-PBSCT) for acute leukemia (AL) patients in first complete remission (CR1). Also, we reported the outcomes for the use of G-PB grafts in comparison with the combination of G-BM and G-PB grafts in HID HSCT recipients. Sixty-seven AL patients in CR1 who received HID-PBSCT were recruited at Institute of Hematology, Peking University. Patients who received haploidentical HSCT using the combination of G-BM and G-PB harvests in the same period were enrolled as controls (n=392). The median time from HSCT to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days (range, 9-19 days) and 12 days (range, 8-171 days), respectively. The 28-day cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet engraftment after HSCT was 98.5% and 95.5%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 29.9% (95%CI 18.8-40.9%) and 7.5% (95%CI 1.1-13.8%), respectively. The cumulative incidences of total and moderate-severe chronic GVHD were 54.9% (95%CI 40.9-68.8%) and 17.4% (95%CI 6.7-28.0%), respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality were 13.9% (95%CI 5.4-22.5%) and 3.4% (95%CI 0-8.1%), respectively. The probabilities of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 84.7% (95%CI 74.7-94.7%) and 82.7% (95%CI 73.3-92.1%) respectively. Compared with the HID HSCT recipients using the combination of G-BM and G-PB grafts, the engraftments of neutrophil and platelet were both significantly faster for the G-PB group, and the other clinical outcomes were all comparable between the groups. In multivariate analysis, graft types did not influence the clinical outcomes. Overall, for the patients with AL CR1, G-PB graft could be considered an acceptable graft for HID HSCT recipients. This study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03756675.

Haploidentical Donor Transplantation Using a Novel Clofarabine-containing Conditioning Regimen for Very High-risk Hematologic Malignant Neoplasms

Recurrent/refractory hematologic malignancies have a poor prognosis, and there is a need for novel treatment regimens that can be tolerated by this heavily pretreated patient group. Clofarabine has antileukemic activity with an acceptable toxicity profile. In a phase I clinical trial (NCT00824135), we substituted clofarabine for fludarabine in a well-established reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for a T cell-depleted, mismatched-related (haploidentical) donor transplant backbone and explored the maximum tolerated dose of clofarabine in this combination in 15 patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation for recurrent/refractory or secondary leukemia. Clofarabine was well tolerated at a dose of 50 mg/m/d for 5 days in this regimen, with minimal treatment-related mortality in a heavily pretreated group of high-risk patients. All patients exhibited quick hematopoietic recovery, with median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment being 11 and 16 days, respectively. Transient elevation of transaminases was the most common toxicity-observed in 13 patients (86.7%), with 6 (40%) grade III or above. Three patients (20%) developed hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Eleven patients (73.3%) died, with the most common cause of death being disease relapse (in 9 patients [60%]), followed by treatment-related mortality (in 2 patients [13.3%]). Four (26.6%) of the patients are long-term survivors.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without in vivo T-cell depletion for pediatric aplastic anemia: A single-center experience

For young patients, HLA-MRD HSCT is the first-line treatment of SAA. However, due to China's birth control policy, few patients could find suitable sibling donors and HLA-MUD. More and more transplantation centers have used Haplo-D as the donor source for young adult and pediatric patients. However, studies with larger amount of pediatric patients are rare. We retrospectively analyzed the data of children with AA who were treated with allogeneic HSCT and compared the therapeutic efficacy of Haplo-HSCT and MRD/MUD group. A total of 62 patients were enrolled. Implantation was successfully performed in 58 patients. There was no significant difference in the time for reconstruction of hematopoietic function between patients in the two groups. Thirty-two had grade I-IV aGVHD with incidence of 51.61%. The incidence of aGVHD was 79.41% for patients in the Haplo-HSCT, significantly higher than that of 17.86% for patients in the MRD/MUD group (P < .01). However, the incidence of cGVHD was not significantly different between patients in the two groups (26.47% vs 10.71%, P = .09), the incidence of CMV infection was 28.57% and 52.94% for patients in the MRD/MUD and Haplo group, respectively, showing no significant difference (P = .053). The incidence of EBV infection was 47.06% for patients in the Haplo group and 28.57% for patients in the MRD/MUD group, showing no significant difference (P = .11). However, the 3- and 5-year cumulative OS and FFS rates showed statistically significant difference in the two groups, P = .012 and .045, respectively. Compared to Haplo-HSCT, MRD/MUD is more economic. In this study, we achieved good Haplo transplantation results. The incidences of cGVHD and CMV/EBV were not significantly different between Haplo group and MRD/MUD group. Although OS and FFS of the Haplo group were not as good as those of the MRD/MUD group, it is still acceptable as an alternative treatment under emergency.

Haploidentical transplantation compared with matched sibling and unrelated donor transplantation for adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission

We retrospectively investigated outcomes of haploidentical donor (HID) transplant for adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1) compared with human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD) and HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants. A total of 348 adult patients were enrolled, including 127 HID, 144 MSD and 77 MUD recipients. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was 39·5%, 24·0% and 40·3% for HID, MSD and MUD, respectively (P = 0·020). However, there was no difference in grade III-IV aGVHD (11·4%, 7·7%, 13·5%, respectively, P = 0·468). The 5-year cumulative transplant-related mortality was 16·4%, 11·6% and 19·6% (P = 0·162), the 5-year relapse rate post-transplantation was 14·8%, 21·1% and 16·7% (P = 0·231), the 5-year overall survival was 70·1%, 73·7% and 69·8% (P = 0·525), and the 5-year disease-free survival was 68·7%, 67·3% and 63·7%, respectively (P = 0·606). Furthermore, the 3-year GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was not different (50·8%, 54·9% and 52·2%, respectively, P = 0·847). Our results indicate that the outcomes of HID transplants are equivalent to those of MSD and MUD, and that HID transplantation is a valid alternative for standard-risk adults with ALL in CR1 who lack matched donors.

Unmanipulated haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for children with severe aplastic anaemia

Haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) used to be a third-line treatment option for childhood severe aplastic anaemia (SAA). We conducted this retrospective study of 36 children (38 transplants) who received haplo-HSCT from human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched related donors between July 2002 and November 2013 at five HSCT centres in China, including 17 cases that were 5/6 HLA matched (Group 1) and 21 that were 4/6 or 3/6 HLA matched (Group 2). Although patients in Group 2 had a higher incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (57·9% vs. 5·9%, P = 0·001), they had similar rates of graft failure (5·3% vs. 5·9%, P = 0·742) and overall survival (80·8% vs. 93·8%, P = 0·234) as Group 1. Unmanipulated haplo-HSCT is an effective treatment for SAA children with satisfactory outcome of this cohort, especially in the 5/6 HLA-matched group. For patients in critical situations, such as unresponsive to immunosuppressive therapy, refractory infection and failing first HSCT, to bring forward the timing of haplo-HSCT is a feasible salvage strategy with better and faster donor accessibility.

Unrelated cord blood compared with haploidentical grafts in patients with hematological malignancies

BACKGROUND

Alternative donors, such as unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) and related haploidentical (haplo) donors, are more and more frequently searched for and used for patients who are candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation but are without a suitable related or unrelated donor. The aim of the current retrospective study was to compare the outcome of patients after haplo and UCB grafts prepared using a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen.

METHODS

A total of 150 adult patients with high-risk hematologic diseases who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from alternative donors at 2 centers (Paoli-Calmettes Institute [Marseille, France] and Humanitas Cancer Center [Milan, Italy]) were analyzed. Sixty-nine patients had haplo donors and 81 patients had UCB donors.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of nonrecurrence mortality at 1 year was 23% in the UCB group versus 17% in the haplo group (P = .39). The incidence of grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease and extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease in the UCB group versus the haplo group was 52% versus 29% (P = .05) and 12% versus 6% (P<.0001), respectively. The overall survival rate at 2 years was 45% in the UCB group (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 34%-56%) versus 69% in the haplo group (95% CI, 58%-80%) (P = .10). The progression-free survival rate at 2 years was 36% in the UCB group (95% CI, 25%-47%) versus 65% in the haplo group (95% CI, 53%-77%) (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study suggest that for patients with high-risk hematological diseases without a related or unrelated donor, haploidentical transplants are a promising alternative option that deserves further investigation.