Technical challenges during emergent endovascular aneurysm repair with the ALTO system

INTRODUCTION

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) pose an immediate threat for patient's life and endovascular repair (EVAR) is currently the preferred treatment modality in the presence of suitable anatomy. This is determined based on the requirements of each endograft as described in the instructions for use (IFU). The new ALTO system (Endologix, Irvin, CA, U.S.A.), can accommodate a great range of anatomies such as short necks and/or narrow access, but its unique design requires specific technical modifications during treatment of ruptured AAAs.

AREAS COVERED

The standard double balloon technique has long been described and it is used to provide circulatory support during EVAR for ruptured AAA. While this technique is straightforward with the use of endografts with a traditional design, this would not be the case if one uses the ALTO system. In that case specific maneuvers would be required to treat AAA patients in an acute setting.

EXPERT OPINION

The ALTO system although being able to treat AAAs with adverse anatomy, it may not be appropriate during treatment of ruptured AAA patients with profound hemodynamic instability. A careful evaluation of the individual's patient anatomy and hemodynamic condition is mandatory in order to decide the best endograft for each case.

Fulminant Myocarditis With ST Elevation and Cardiogenic Shock in a SARS-CoV-2 Patient

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first described in patients in Wuhan, China, who presented with flu-like symptoms. Since then, it has spread all over the world and in March 2020 it was labeled as a pandemic by the World Health Organization. Most common presentations include respiratory symptoms that vary from mild cough and shortness of breath to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Gastrointestinal symptoms like nausea, vomiting and diarrhea are also common. However, cardiovascular complications have not been reported widely. Patients can present with cardiac complications that include chest pain, heart failure and fulminant myocarditis, which is one of the most serious cardiac manifestations. Primary means of diagnosis are echocardiogram and cardiac magnetic imaging. Treatment is mostly supportive in case of cardiogenic shock and includes ionotropic support with or without mechanical circulatory support and mechanical ventilation. A strong suspicion is required for early diagnosis and aggressive treatment in order to reduce mortality and morbidity.

Mode of Death after Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Introduction: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) might be a lifesaving therapy for patients with cardiac arrest and no return of spontaneous circulation during advanced life support. However, even with ECPR, mortality of these severely sick patients is high. Little is known on the exact mode of death in these patients. Methods: Retrospective registry analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing ECPR between May 2011 and May 2020 at a single center. Mode of death was judged by two researchers. Results: A total of 274 ECPR cases were included (age 60.0 years, 47.1% shockable initial rhythm, median time-to-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) 53.8min, hospital survival 25.9%). The 71 survivors had shorter time-to-ECMO durations (46.0 ± 27.9 vs. 56.6 ± 28.8min, p < 0.01), lower initial lactate levels (7.9 ± 4.5 vs. 11.6 ± 8.4 mg/dL, p < 0.01), higher PREDICT-6h (41.7 ± 17.0% vs. 25.3 ± 19.0%, p < 0.01), and SAVE (0.4 ± 4.8 vs. −0.8 ± 4.4, p < 0.01) scores. Most common mode of death in 203 deceased patients was therapy resistant shock in 105/203 (51.7%) and anoxic brain injury in 69/203 (34.0%). Comparing patients deceased with shock to those with cerebral damage, patients with shock were significantly older (63.2 ± 11.5 vs. 54.3 ± 16.5 years, p < 0.01), more frequently resuscitated in-hospital (64.4% vs. 29.9%, p < 0.01) and had shorter time-to-ECMO durations (52.3 ± 26.8 vs. 69.3 ± 29.1min p < 0.01). Conclusions: Most patients after ECPR decease due to refractory shock. Older patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest might be prone to development of refractory shock. Only a minority die from cerebral damage. Research should focus on preventing post-CPR shock and treating the shock in these patients.

Uterine rupture in patients with a history of laparoscopy or hysteroscopy procedures: Three case reports

RATIONALE

Uterine rupture is a rare incidence but can lead to catastrophic maternal and fetal consequences. We still need to place a high premium on these cases.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The patients all showed hemodynamic shock with complaints of serious pain in the abdomen. They all had a history of laparoscopy or hysteroscopy procedures.

DIAGNOSES

Case 1 and 2 were diagnosed during surgery. Case 3 was diagnosed by an urgent abdominal ultrasonogram before surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

We performed emergency surgeries for the 3 cases.

OUTCOMES

Three patients all recovered well. But only the child in case 2 survived.

LESSONS

It must be emphasized that pregnant women with a history of such surgeries should be aware of uterine rupture during pregnancy.

The Diagnosis and Hemodynamic Monitoring of Circulatory Shock: Current and Future Trends

Circulatory shock is a complex clinical syndrome encompassing a group of conditions that can arise from different etiologies and presented by several different hemodynamic patterns. If not corrected, cell dysfunction, irreversible multiple organ insufficiency, and death may occur. The four basic types of shock, hypovolemic, cardiogenic, obstructive and distributive, have features similar to that of hemodynamic shock. It is therefore essential, when monitoring hemodynamic shock, to making accurate clinical assessments which will guide and dictate appropriate management therapy. The European Society of Intensive Care has recently made recommendations for monitoring hemodynamic shock. The present paper discusses the issues raised in the new statements, including individualization of blood pressure targets, prediction of fluid responsiveness, and the use of echocardiography as the first means during the initial evaluation of circulatory shock. Also, the place of more invasive hemodynamic monitoring techniques and future trends in hemodynamic and metabolic monitoring in circulatory shock, will be debated.