Management of the sensitized pediatric renal transplant candidate

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with ESRD as it is associated with improved patient survival and better quality of life, especially in children. There are several barriers to a successful transplant including organ shortage, anatomic barriers, and immunologic barriers. One of the biggest immunologic barriers that precludes transplantation is sensitization, when patients have antibodies prior to transplantation, resulting in positive crossmatches with donor. 30%-40% of adult patients on the wait list are sensitized. There is a growing number of pediatric patients on the wait list who are sensitized. This poses a unique challenge to the pediatric transplant community. Therefore, attempts to perform desensitization to remove or suppress pathogenic HLA antibodies resulting in acceptable crossmatches, and ultimately a successful transplant, while reducing the risk of acute rejection, are much needed in these children. This review article aims to address the management of such patients both prior to transplantation, with strategies to overcome sensitization, and after transplantation with monitoring for allograft rejection and other complications.

Case report: Successful simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation across a positive complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch

Preformed donor-specific antibodies are associated with a higher risk of rejection and worse graft survival in organ transplantation. However, in heart transplantation, the risk and benefit balance between high mortality on the waiting list and graft survival may allow the acceptance of higher immunologic risk donors in broadly sensitized recipients. Transplanting donor-recipient pairs with a positive complement dependent cytotoxic (CDC) crossmatch carries the highest risk of hyperacute rejection and immediate graft loss and is usually avoided in kidney transplantation. Herein we report the first successful simultaneous heart-kidney transplant with a T- and B-cell CDC crossmatch positive donor using a combination of rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, bortezomib and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction followed by eculizumab therapy for two months post-transplant. In the year following transplantation, both allografts maintained stable graft function (all echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fractions ≥ 65%, eGFR>60) and showed no histologic evidence of antibody-mediated rejection. In addition, the patient has not developed any severe infections including cytomegalovirus or BK virus infection. In conclusion, a multitarget immunosuppressive regimen can allow for combined heart/kidney transplantation across positive CDC crossmatches without evidence of antibody-mediated rejection or significant infection. Longer follow-up will be needed to further support this conclusion.

A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Anti-T-Lymphocyte Igs to Basiliximab in Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Patients

Background

Two prospective studies that were performed before the era of highly sensitive solid-phase assays have shown a lower incidence of acute rejection in highly sensitized kidney-transplant patients given polyclonal antibodies compared with those given anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies.

Methods

This prospective pilot randomized French multicenter study aimed to compare anti–T-lymphocyte Ig (ATLG) (n = 32) and basiliximab (n = 27) in highly sensitized kidney-transplant patients without preformed donor-specific antibodies (pDSAs) as assessed by a Luminex Single-Antigen flow bead assay. Only patients with a calculated panel reactive antibody ≥50%, with at least 1 antibody with a mean fluorescence intensity ≥5000 and without a historical pDSA and without a pDSA on the day of transplantation were included.

Results

Treatment failure as defined by biopsy-proven acute rejection, patient lost to follow-up, graft loss, and death was observed in 18.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.9%–37.1%) and 18.8% (95% CI, 8.9%–37.1%) in patients who received ATLG and 14.8% (95% CI, 5.8%–34.8%) and 28.2% (95% CI, 14.2%–51.2%) of patients who received basiliximab, respectively at 6 (P = 0.66) and 12 (P = 0.62) months post-transplantation. One T cell–mediated rejection was observed in ATLG-treated patients (3.1%). One antibody-mediated rejection due to a de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA) occurred in basiliximab-treated patients (3.7%). Patient survival, graft survival, kidney parameters, and infection rate were similar in the 2 groups.

Conclusion

This pilot study indicates that in highly sensitized kidney-transplant patients without pDSAs, both ATLG and basiliximab can be used efficiently and safely. However, because of the lack of power, these results should be interpreted with caution.

Towards uniformity in the definition of acceptable mismatches for highly sensitized patients

The Eurotransplant (The Eurotransplant International Foundation) acceptable mismatch programme has been shown to be a successful tool to enhance transplantation of highly sensitized patients(HSPs). However, patients with rare HLA phenotypes in relation to the Eurotransplant donor population remain on the waiting list. EUROSTAM is an European Union funded project to explore the feasibility of a Europe‐wide acceptable mismatch programme enabling transplantation of HSPs with rare HLA phenotypes within their own organ exchange organization. The present study, which forms part of the EUROSTAM project, assesses the differences in the practices of the laboratories in different countries with respect to their HLA antibody profiling and risk adverseness. In the serum exchange exercises of 18 samples, a high level of variability has been shown in both assays and interpretation of results. In the data exchange exercise when all participants were given the same Luminex raw data for analysis, a high degree of consensus was reached where the median fluorescent intensity values of beads were <500 and >2000 for standard single antigen bead assays, or <500 and >5000 for assignment of acceptable mismatches. The risk adverseness analysis has showed distinct patterns of attitudes towards the perceived risks based on HLA antibody assay results, most probably influenced by the local protocols of the clinical transplant programme of each laboratory. In order to ensure fairness and maintain consistencies of organ exchange among partner transplant centres, a centralized facility will be instrumental for a uniform definition of acceptable mismatches.

Clinical and histopathologic features of antibody-mediated rejection among pediatric renal transplant recipients with preformed vs de novo donor-specific antibodies

Preformed and de novo donor specific antibodies (pDSA and dnDSA) are risk factors for ABMR. This study compares the effects of pDSA vs dnDSA in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Sixteen pediatric patients with biopsy-proven ABMR were evaluated. Strong DSA (MFI >10 000) was recorded at transplant, rejection, and follow-up. DSAs with the highest MFI were termed iDSAs. Allograft biopsies were scored according to Banff 2013 criteria. Seven of 16 (44%) patients had pDSA at transplant; 9 (56%) developed dnDSA. Patients with pDSA developed ABMR earlier (median = 63 vs 1344 days, P = .017), while patients with dnDSA were more likely to have strong Class II iDSA (100% vs 28%, P = .009). Viral infection or non-adherence was more common in patients developing dnDSA (88.8% vs 28.6%, P < .01). Pathology in those with pDSAs demonstrated worse transplant glomerulitis (g score 1.57 ± 0.98 vs 0.56 ± 0.73, P = .031); however, those with dnDSAs exhibited higher C4d+ ABMR (P = .013). Patients developing dnDSAs showed ABMR later post-transplant with predominance of HLA-Class II iDSAs. Inadequate immunosuppression likely contributes to dnDSA formation. Patients with no DSA who have unprotocolized decreases in immunosuppression should be screened for dnDSA as it could lead to early intervention and potentially better outcomes.

Antibody desensitization therapy in highly sensitized lung transplant candidates

As HLAs antibody detection technology has evolved, there is now detailed HLA antibody information available on prospective transplant recipients. Determining single antigen antibody specificity allows for a calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) value, providing an estimate of the effective donor pool. For broadly sensitized lung transplant candidates (cPRA ≥ 80%), our center adopted a pretransplant multi-modal desensitization protocol in an effort to decrease the cPRA and expand the donor pool. This desensitization protocol included plasmapheresis, solumedrol, bortezomib and rituximab given in combination over 19 days followed by intravenous immunoglobulin. Eight of 18 candidates completed therapy with the primary reasons for early discontinuation being transplant (by avoiding unacceptable antigens) or thrombocytopenia. In a mixed-model analysis, there were no significant changes in PRA or cPRA changes over time with the protocol. A sub-analysis of the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) change indicated a small decline that was significant in antibodies with MFI 5000-10,000. Nine of 18 candidates subsequently had a transplant. Posttransplant survival in these nine recipients was comparable to other pretransplant-sensitized recipients who did not receive therapy. In summary, an aggressive multi-modal desensitization protocol does not significantly reduce pretransplant HLA antibodies in a broadly sensitized lung transplant candidate cohort.

Evaluating the Use of Bortezomib and Eculizumab in Desensitization of Transplant Patients

Objective: To systematically review the existing literature concerning the utilization of bortezomib and eculizumab to determine if there is enough evidence to warrant their routine use in desensitization protocols for high-risk transplant candidates. Data Sources: PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using the terms bortezomib, eculizumab, desensitization, transplant, highly-sensitized, pre-sensitized, and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The articles included were published between January 2009 and August 2012. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All English-language articles involving human subjects were assessed for inclusion. The search included articles evaluating the use of these agents in desensitization and the prevention of AMR, but excluded articles investigating these drugs in the treatment of established AMR. Data Synthesis: Highly sensitized transplant candidates are at an increased risk of developing AMR after transplant; desensitization potentially reduces this risk. The addition of bortezomib and eculizumab to current desensitization protocols may enhance outcomes. The bortezomib search produced 3 efficacy trials, 1 safety trial, 2 in-progress trials, 14 patient cases from 8 published case reports, and 3 efficacy study abstracts. Conclusions: Much of the available literature assessing the efficacy of bortezomib and eculizumab for use in desensitization exists as restricted clinical trials and incomplete case reports. Bortezomib and eculizumab appear to be potentially effective additions to current desensitization protocols. However, we are unable to determine at this time whether these agents improve the most clinically relevant outcome of successful transplantation. Further well-designed clinical trials are needed to determine their true clinical efficacy in highly sensitized transplant candidates.

Randomized controlled pilot study of B cell-targeted induction therapy in HLA sensitized kidney transplant recipients

Optimal induction regimens for patients at high risk for antibody and/or cell-mediated rejection have not been established. This pilot, prospective, randomized study evaluated addition of B cell/plasma cell-targeting agents to T cell-based induction with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) in high immunologic risk renal transplant recipients. Patients were randomized to induction with rATG, rATG + rituximab, rATG + bortezomib or rATG + rituximab + bortezomib. Inclusion criteria were: (1) current cytotoxic panel reactive antibody (PRA) ≥20% or peak cytotoxic PRA ≥50% or (2) T or B cell positive flow crossmatch with donor-specific antibody (DSA) or (3) historical positive serologic or cytotoxic crossmatch or DSA to donor or (4) prior allograft loss with more than one acute rejection. Median overall follow-up was 496 days: 1-year and overall acute rejection were 25% and 27.5%, and 25% of patients developed de novo DSA within 1 year. One-year and overall patient survival were 97.5% and 92.5%, and 1-year and overall death-censored allograft survival were 97.5% and 95%. Renal allograft function posttransplant was similar among all arms. Eight of nine cases of peripheral neuropathy were mild, whereas one case was moderate and required a narcotic prescription. In conclusion, addition of rituximab and/or bortezomib to rATG induction has an acceptable safety/toxicity profile in a high immunologic risk renal transplant population.