Managing Postoperative Nausea With an Application of Ice Pack to the Posterior Upper Neck

PURPOSE

Measure effectiveness of a non-pharmacological approach to manage postoperative nausea (PON) by applying an ice pack to the posterior upper neck.

DESIGN

This was an observational quality improvement project. The sample included adults 18 years old and older who received general anesthesia (inhalation and/or intravenous), recovering in Phase I or Phase II postoperative care unit (PACU) experiencing very mild to moderate nausea. Exclusion criteria were patients who experienced severe nausea or were actively vomiting; were admitted for head or neck plastic surgery; were hypothermic (< 36.0°C); patients who refused the ice pack, or the provider stated that placing an ice pack to the patient's posterior upper neck was contraindicated.

METHODS

Patients who experienced mild to moderate PON had an ice pack applied to the posterior upper neck as first line management. If the patient's nausea continued to progress or did not improve within five minutes of ice pack application the patient was offered a different non-pharmacological approach or pharmacological approach to prevent vomiting as per standards of care. Demographics were collected and patient's level of nausea was documented at the time of ice pack application and after five minutes.

FINDINGS

Of the 70 patients included in this study, 61% reported ice pack application as effective in mitigating their nausea, 14% were unsure, and 24% reported not effective. There was a significant decrease in nausea between baseline (2.3 ± 0.6; range 1-3) and five minutes post application (1.5 ± 1.1; range 0-4). The within subject baseline-post change (↓0.9 ± 1.1; P < .001) reflected a decrease in nausea.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of an ice pack to the posterior upper neck, may effectively decrease very mild to moderate PON.

Assessment of the Dynamics of Temperature Changes in the Knee Joint Area in Response to Selected Cooling Agents in Thermographic Tests

Although local cryotherapy (LC) is performed with various cooling agents (C_Ag) such as ice, water, and gasses, in clinical practice, it is mostly performed with cooling gasses. Presently, LC with cooling gasses is very popular but the inference about the thermal (stimulus) effect on the tissues is mainly based on research carried out using ice packs. The proposed objective of the study was to evaluate the dynamics of temperature changes in the knee joint area in response to a 3-min exposure to liquid nitrogen vapors (LNVs), cold air (CA) and ice bag (IB). The study group included 23 healthy volunteers with an average age of 26.67 ± 4.56. The exposed (ROI_E) and contralateral (ROI_NE) areas of the knee joint after exposure to C_Ag were observed. Immediately after 3 min of LC, the ROI_E temperature dropped by 10.11 ± 0.91 °C after LNV, 7.59 ± 0.14 °C after IB and 6.76 ± 1.3 °C after CA. Significant tissue cooling was maintained up to 15 min after LNV (p < 0.01), 10 min after IB (p < 0.05) and 5 min after CA (p < 0.05). LC causes significant temperature changes both in ROI_E and ROI_NE. The greatest cooling potential was demonstrated for LNV and the lowest for CA.

Cooling of Lower Extremity Muscles According to Subcutaneous Tissue Thickness

CONTEXT

When using an ice bag, previous researchers recommended cooling times based on the amount of subcutaneous tissue. Unfortunately, many clinicians are unaware of these recommendations or whether they can be applied to other muscles.

OBJECTIVE

To examine if muscles of the lower extremity cool similarly based on recommended cooling times.

DESIGN

Crossover study.

SETTING

Athletic training laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Fourteen healthy participants volunteered (8 men, 6 women; age = 21.1 ± 2.2 years, height = 174.2 ± 4.5 cm, weight = 74.0 ± 7.5 kg).

INTERVENTION(S)

Subcutaneous tissue thickness was measured at the largest girth of the thigh, medial gastrocnemius, and medial hamstring. Participants were randomized to have either the rectus femoris or medial gastrocnemius and medial hamstring tested first. Using sterile techniques, the examiner inserted a thermocouple 1 cm into the muscle after accounting for subcutaneous tissue thickness. After the temperature stabilized, a 750-g ice bag was applied for 10 to 60 minutes to the area(s) for the recommended length of time based on subcutaneous adipose thickness (0 to 5 mm [10 minutes]; 5.5 to 10 mm (25 minutes]; 10.5 to 15 mm [40 minutes]; 15.5 to 20 mm [60 minutes)]. After the ice bag was removed, temperature was monitored for 30 minutes. At least 1 week later, each participant returned to complete testing of the other muscle(s).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Intramuscular temperature (°C) at baseline, end of treatment time (0 minutes), and posttreatment recovery (10, 20, and 30 minutes postintervention).

RESULTS

At the end of treatment, temperature did not differ by subcutaneous tissue thickness (10 minutes = 29.0°C ± 3.8°C, 25 minutes = 28.7°C ± 3.2°C, 40 minutes = 28.7°C ± 6.0°C, 60 minutes = 30.0°C ± 2.9°C) or muscle (rectus femoris = 30.1°C ± 3.8°C, gastrocnemius = 28.6°C ± 5.4°C, hamstrings = 28.1°C ± 2.5°C). No significant interaction was present for subcutaneous tissue thickness or muscle (P ≥ .126).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower extremity muscles seemed to cool similarly based on the recommended cooling times for subcutaneous tissue thickness. Clinicians should move away from standardized treatment times and adjust the amount of cooling time by ice-bag application based on subcutaneous tissue thickness.

The effect of varying degrees of compression from elastic vs plastic wrap on quadriceps intramuscular temperature during wetted ice application

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of wetted ice bag, applied with high compression elastic wrap or held in place with low compression plastic wrap, on reducing vastus lateralis intramuscular temperature and skin surface temperature. Ten healthy male participants had wetted ice packs applied to a standardized area on the anterior aspect of the quadriceps simultaneously to both legs for 30 minutes. The ice pack was secured with high compression (elastic wrap) to the left anterior thigh (60.6 ± 8.1 mm Hg) and low compression (plastic wrap) to the right anterior thigh (15.5 ± 4.0 mm Hg). Intramuscular temperature (1 and 3 cm) and skin temperature of the vastus lateralis were measured continuously during a 10-minute baseline period, 30-minute treatment period, and a 60-minute recovery period. No difference was observed between treatments in terms of the magnitude of reduction in intramuscular temperature at both 1 and 3 cm and skin temperature regardless of compression pressure (P > 0.05). Temperature upon conclusion of elastic wrap treatment was as follows: 17.8 ± 5.2°C at 1 cm and 23.1 ± 4.9°C at 3 cm; plastic wrap treatment: 17.9 ± 4.4°C at 1 cm and 24.5 ± 6.7°C at 3 cm. Plastic wraps may offer a practical alternative to elastic wraps for clinicians as they may be disposed of by the patient or athlete without having to stay at the treatment facility.