Clinical and prognostic implications of CD47 and PD-L1 expression in surgically resected small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological inhibition of the immune-checkpoint molecule CD47 has shown promising results in preclinical small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) models, whereas anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have been recently implemented in the standard of care of advanced-stage SCLC patients. Nevertheless, the expression pattern, clinical relevance and prognostic implication of both CD47 and PD-L1 are rather controversial in surgically treated SCLC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 104 Caucasian SCLC patients from two Central European thoracic centers were included in this study. CD47 and PD-L1 expression as well as the expression of the four major SCLC molecular subtype markers (ASCL1, NEUROD1, YAP1 and POU2F3) were measured by immunohistochemistry. Expression levels were independently evaluated and statistically correlated with clinicopathological data and survival.

RESULTS

Positive CD47 and PD-L1 expressions were seen in 84.6% and 9.6% of the samples, respectively. Meanwhile, the tumor-associated stroma was positive for PD-L1 in 59.6% of the cases. Stromal PD-L1 expression correlated with longer overall survival (OS) (versus PD-L1-negative stroma; median OS was 42 versus 14 months, respectively, P = 0.003) and was confirmed as an independent predictor of favorable outcome upon multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.530, 95% confidence interval 0.298-0.943, P = 0.031). Notably, neither CD47 nor PD-L1 presence was related to a distinct molecular SCLC subtype.

CONCLUSION

CD47 shows a remarkably high expression while tumoral PD-L1 expression is generally low in surgically treated SCLC. Importantly, stromal PD-L1 expression may indicate a favorable clinical outcome and serve as a novel prognostic factor in these patients. Additional studies are warranted to further investigate the clinical impact of CD47 and PD-L1 expression in SCLC.

miRNAs in the Regulation of Cancer Immune Response: Effect of miRNAs on Cancer Immunotherapy

In the last few decades, carcinogenesis has been extensively explored and substantial research has identified immunogenic involvement in various types of cancers. As a result, immune checkpoint blockers and other immune-based therapies were developed as novel immunotherapeutic strategies. However, despite being a promising therapeutic option, immunotherapy has significant constraints such as a high cost of treatment, unpredictable toxicity, and clinical outcomes. miRNAs are non-coding, small RNAs actively involved in modulating the immune system's multiple signalling pathways by binding to the 3'-UTR of target genes. miRNAs possess a unique advantage in modulating multiple targets of either the same or different signalling pathways. Therefore, miRNA follows a 'one drug multiple target' hypothesis. Attempts are made to explore the therapeutic promise of miRNAs in cancer so that it can be transported from bench to bedside for successful immunotherapeutic results. Therefore, in the current manuscript, we discussed, in detail, the mechanism and role of miRNAs in different types of cancers relating to the immune system, its diagnostic and therapeutic aspect, the effect on immune escape, immune-checkpoint molecules, and the tumour microenvironment. We have also discussed the existing limitations, clinical success and the prospective use of miRNAs in cancer.

Therapeutic Strategies for Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance Mediated by Immunosuppressive Factors of the Glioblastoma Microenvironment

Various mechanisms of treatment resistance have been reported for glioblastoma (GBM) and other tumors. Resistance to immunotherapy in GBM patients may be caused by acquisition of immunosuppressive ability by tumor cells and an altered tumor microenvironment. Although novel strategies using an immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), such as anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody, have been clinically proven to be effective in many types of malignant tumors, such strategies may be insufficient to prevent regrowth in recurrent GBM. The main cause of GBM recurrence may be the existence of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment involving immunosuppressive cytokines, extracellular vesicles, chemokines produced by glioma and glioma-initiating cells, immunosuppressive cells, etc. Among these, recent research has paid attention to various immunosuppressive cells—including M2-type macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells—that cause immunosuppression in GBM microenvironments. Here, we review the epidemiological features, tumor immune microenvironment, and associations between the expression of immune checkpoint molecules and the prognosis of GBM. We also reviewed various ongoing or future immunotherapies for GBM. Various strategies, such as a combination of ICI therapies, might overcome these immunosuppressive mechanisms in the GBM microenvironment.