Individual experiences following a 6-month exercise intervention: A qualitative study

Purpose

Dropout is a common problem in various exercise interventions. The individual's experience is believed to greatly impact dropout, yet little is known about the individual experiences of taking part in exercise interventions. The aim of this study was to examine individuals’ experiences following a self-determination theory–based exercise intervention in order to gain understanding of how standardized interventions can be adjusted to fit individuals’ specific needs, capacities, and circumstances.

Methods

A qualitative approach with semi-structured interviews was conducted with eight informants (three male and five female) aged between 26 and 47 years, whom all had participated in a 6-month exercise intervention with individual coaching based on self-determination theory and motivational interviewing. The interviews were analyzed thematically with an inductive approach.

Results

Aspects that influenced the informants’ motivation and participation in the exercise intervention were linked to three themes: the frames of the intervention, measurable changes, and the individual's context. The themes present information about the process and to what extent the informants felt that the intervention was adapted to fit their lives and needs.

Conclusions

This study emphasizes the importance of individualizing exercise interventions to support individuals’ diverse capacities and psychological needs.

A Systematic Framework for Analyzing Patient-Generated Narrative Data: Protocol for a Content Analysis

Background

Patient narrative data in online health care forums (communities) are receiving increasing attention from the scientific community for implementing patient-centered care. Natural language processing (NLP) methods are gaining more and more attention because of the enormous data volume. However, state-of-the-art NLP still cannot meet the need of high-resolution analysis of patients’ narratives. Manual qualitative analysis still plays a pivotal role in answering complicated research questions from analyzing patient narratives.

Objective

This study aimed to develop a systematic framework for qualitative analysis of patient-generated narratives in online health care forums.

Methods

Our systematic framework consists of 4 phases: (1) data collection, (2) data preparation, (3) content analysis, and (4) interpretation of the results. Data collection and data preparation phases are constructed based on text mining methods for identifying appropriate online health forums for data collection, differentiating posts of patients from other stakeholders, protecting patients’ privacy, sampling, and choosing the unit of analysis. Content analysis phase is built on the framework method, which facilitates and accelerates the identification of patterns and themes by an interdisciplinary research team. In the end, the focus of interpretation of the results phase is to measure the data quality and interpret the findings regarding the dimensions and aspects of patients’ experiences and concerns in their original contexts.

Results

We demonstrated the usability of the proposed systematic framework using 2 case studies: one on determining factors affecting patients’ attitudes toward antidepressants and another on identifying the disease management strategies in patient with diabetes facing financial difficulties. The framework provides a clear step-by-step process for systematic content analysis of patient narratives and produces high-quality structured results that can be used for describing patterns or regularities in patients’ experiences, generating and testing hypotheses, and identifying areas of improvement in the health care systems.

Conclusions

The systematic framework is a rigorous and standardized method for qualitative analysis of patient narratives. Findings obtained through such a process indicate authentic dimensions and aspects of patient experiences and shed light on patients’ concerns, needs, preferences, and values, which are the core of patient-centered care.

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

RR1-10.2196/13914

Development of a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Implement Asthma Management Guidelines in Pediatric Primary Care: Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

There is a longstanding gap between national asthma guidelines and their implementation in primary care. Primary care providers (PCPs) endorse numerous provider and practice or clinic-related barriers to providing guidelines-based asthma care. To reduce asthma morbidity in primary care, PCPs need access to tools that facilitate adherence to national guidelines, which can be delivered at the point of care, are minimally burdensome, and fit within the clinic workflow. Clinical decision support (CDS) tools are health IT systems that can be housed in the electronic health record (EHR) system.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to follow user-centered design principles and describe the formative qualitative work with target stakeholders (ie, PCPs and IT professionals) to inform our design of an EHR-embedded CDS tool that adheres to recent, significant changes in asthma management guidelines.

METHODS

Purposive sampling was used to recruit three separate subgroups of professionals (n=15) between (1) PCPs with previous experience using a paper-based CDS tool for asthma management, (2) PCPs without previous experience using CDS tools for asthma management, and (3) health care IT professionals. The PCP interview guide focused on their practice, familiarity with national asthma guidelines, and how a CDS tool embedded in the EHR might help them provide guideline-based care. The health care IT professional guide included questions on the design and implementation processes of CDS tools into the EHR. Qualitative data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and then analyzed using an inductive approach to develop themes.

RESULTS

Themes were organized into 2 domains, current practice and CDS tool development. The themes that emerged from PCPs included descriptions of assessments conducted to make an asthma diagnosis, previous attempts or opportunities to implement updated national asthma guidelines, and how a CDS tool could be implemented using the EHR and fit into the current asthma management workflow. The themes that emerged from health care IT professionals included processes used to design CDS tools and strategies to collect evidence that indicated a tool's value to a practice and the broader health system.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, user-centered design principles were used to guide a qualitative study on perceived barriers and facilitators to a primary care-based, EHR-integrated asthma CDS tool. PCPs expressed their interest in adopting an asthma CDS tool that was low burden and efficient but could help them adhere to national asthma guidelines and improve clinic workflow. Similarly, health care IT professionals perceived an asthma CDS tool to be useful, if it adhered to EHR design standards. Implementation of a CDS tool to improve adherence of PCPs to recently updated national asthma guidelines could be beneficial in reducing pediatric asthma morbidity.

What Do They Do? Construction of a Team Leader Intervention Model

This research report aimed to present a team leader intervention model regarding when unexpected events arise in meetings. Onward, the model will form a starting point for the creation and validation of a team leader interventions inventory. Sixteen managers provided the empirical material for the construction of the model. The subjects proposed as many interventions as possible based on 10 different group meeting scenarios. In total, 327 interventions were proposed, which constituted the basis for a conceptual framework comprising six categories—Control, Inform, Initiate, Investigate, Support, and Avoid. Three of the categories correspond to classical leadership behaviours: the Control category to Authoritative Leadership and Task Behaviour and structure; the Support category to Democratic Leadership and Relationship Behaviour and consideration; and the Avoid category to Laissez-Faire Leadership, letting events pass without taking leadership. In addition, the conceptual framework includes three new categories in addition to the classical leadership theory. The Inform category is related to the controlling function. When the leader clarifies goals and how to achieve the goals, it is indirectly a controlling function. The Initiate category is related to launching procedural or distracting activities. Finally, the Investigate category is an almost necessary step ahead of the other categories. Before controlling, informing, initiating, supporting, or avoiding, the leader ought to investigate the causes of the disorder and then decide which intervention is most appropriate.

Self-control in old age: A grounded theory study

Background

Self-control is associated with multiple positive outcomes. There are several studies on self-control, yet no literature describing the mechanism of self-control in old age.

Objective

This study aims to develop a substantive theory on the exercise of self-control in old age.

Methods

Grounded Theory methodology developed by Glaser & Strauss was utilized in the conduct of this study with ten (10) older adults as participants following the set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Individual in-depth interviews of 30-45 minutes were observed to gather the needed verbatim narrative responses from each participant after careful consideration of the ethical procedures approved by the University research ethics board. Major themes with their respective sub-themes were generated after rigorous analysis of the participants' responses following the steps provided by Glasser & Strauss in conducting grounded theory studies.

Results

This study resulted in the formulation of three propositions such as: (1) Older adults exercise self-control differently, (2) several personal motivations are involved in the exercise of self-control, and (3) the exercise of self-control leads to life satisfaction. From the propositions emerged the Theory of Self-control in Old age, which states that the process of self-control encompasses the human capability of exercising self-restraint to overrun different types of desires, passions, and temptations. The theory posits that older adults vary in their exercise of self-control depending upon their personal motivations. The theory also assumes that the exercise of self-control results in life satisfaction as displaying self-control is attributed to a host of positive life outcomes.

Conclusion

The present study has important implications in the field of gerontology and health care services since the older population is growing, and so does the demand for health care services. The need to understand the choices and decisions of older adult clients is fundamental in individualizing the health care services that may be designed and provided for them.

Definitions and Measurements for Atypical Presentations at Risk for Diagnostic Errors in Internal Medicine: Protocol for a Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Atypical presentations have been increasingly recognized as a significant contributing factor to diagnostic errors in internal medicine. However, research to address associations between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors has not been evaluated due to the lack of widely applicable definitions and criteria for what is considered an atypical presentation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to describe how atypical presentations are defined and measured in studies of diagnostic errors in internal medicine and use this new information to develop new criteria to identify atypical presentations at high risk for diagnostic errors.

METHODS

This study will follow an established framework for conducting scoping reviews. Inclusion criteria are developed according to the participants, concept, and context framework. This review will consider studies that fulfill all of the following criteria: include adult patients (participants); explore the association between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors using any definition, criteria, or measurement to identify atypical presentations and diagnostic errors (concept); and focus on internal medicine (context). Regarding the type of sources, this scoping review will consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods study designs; systematic reviews; and opinion papers for inclusion. Case reports, case series, and conference abstracts will be excluded. The data will be extracted through MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar searches. No limits will be applied to language, and papers indexed from database inception to December 31, 2023, will be included. Two independent reviewers (YH and RK) will conduct study selection and data extraction. The data extracted will include specific details about the patient characteristics (eg, age, sex, and disease), the definitions and measuring methods for atypical presentations and diagnostic errors, clinical settings (eg, department and outpatient or inpatient), type of evidence source, and the association between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors relevant to the review question. The extracted data will be presented in tabular format with descriptive statistics, allowing us to identify the key components or types of atypical presentations and develop new criteria to identify atypical presentations for future studies of diagnostic errors. Developing the new criteria will follow guidance for a basic qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach.

RESULTS

As of January 2024, a literature search through multiple databases is ongoing. We will complete this study by December 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review aims to provide rigorous evidence to develop new criteria to identify atypical presentations at high risk for diagnostic errors in internal medicine. Such criteria could facilitate the development of a comprehensive conceptual model to understand the associations between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors in internal medicine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework; www.osf.io/27d5m.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/56933.