1
|
Grzybowski A, Schwartz SG, Matsuura K, Ong Tone S, Arshinoff S, Ng JQ, Meyer JJ, Liu W, Jacob S, Packer M, Lutfiamida R, Tahija S, Roux P, Malyugin B, Urrets-Zavalia JA, Crim N, Esposito E, Daponte P, Pellegrino F, Graue-Hernandez EO, Jimenez-Corona A, Valdez-Garcia JE, Hernandez-Camarena JC, Relhan N, Flynn HW, Ravindran RD, Behnding A. Endophthalmitis Prophylaxis in Cataract Surgery: Overview of Current Practice Patterns Around the World. Curr Pharm Des 2017; 23:565-573. [PMID: 27981903 DOI: 10.2174/1381612822666161216122230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2016] [Accepted: 12/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery remains a rare but important cause of visual loss. There is no global consensus regarding the optimal strategies for prophylaxis of endophthalmitis and practices vary substantially around the world, especially with respect to the use of intracameral antibiotics. The European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons in a randomized clinical trial (2007) reported an approximately 5-fold reduction in endophthalmitis rates associated with the use of intracameral cefuroxime. Despite this report, the use of intracameral antibiotics has not been universally adopted. METHODS Various endophthalmitis prophylaxis patterns around the world (including the United States, Canada, Australia/New Zealand, Japan, China, India, Indonesia, South Africa, Argentina, Russia, Sweden and Mexico) are compared. Each contributing author was asked to provide similar information, including endophthalmitis rates based on published studies, current practice patterns, and in some cases original survey data. Various methods were used to obtain this information, including literature reviews, expert commentary, and some new survey data not previously published. RESULTS Many different practice patterns were reported from around the world, specifically with respect to the use of intracameral antibiotics. CONCLUSION There is no worldwide consensus regarding endophthalmitis prophylaxis with cataract surgery.
Collapse
|
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't |
8 |
27 |
2
|
Galvis V, Tello A, Sánchez MA, Camacho PA. Cohort study of intracameral moxifloxacin in postoperative endophthalmitis prophylaxis. OPHTHALMOLOGY AND EYE DISEASES 2014; 6:1-4. [PMID: 24526838 PMCID: PMC3921022 DOI: 10.4137/oed.s13102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2013] [Revised: 11/21/2013] [Accepted: 12/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
We conducted a cohort study to evaluate post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis rates in relation to prophylactic intracameral moxifloxacin administration. A total of 2332 patients (2674 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification by a single surgeon from January 2007 through December 2012 were included in the study. A total of 1056 eyes did not receive intracameral prophylactic moxifloxacin and the antibiotic was injected in 1618 eyes. The incidence of presumed postoperative endophthalmitis in the 2 groups was calculated. The rate of presumed infectious endophthalmitis after cataract surgery between January 2007 and June 2009 (without intracameral moxifloxacin) was 0.094%. The rate in the second period, from July 2009 to December 2012 (with prophylactic intracameral moxifloxacin), was 0%. In our patients, a decline in the incidence of presumed infectious postoperative endophthalmitis appeared to be associated with the application of intracameral moxifloxacin.
Collapse
|
Journal Article |
11 |
25 |
3
|
Commonly used intracameral antibiotics for endophthalmitis prophylaxis: A literature review. Surv Ophthalmol 2020; 66:98-108. [PMID: 32343980 DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Revised: 04/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Endophthalmitis is a serious complication of cataract surgery that occurs in thousands of patients each year. To decrease the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis, many surgeons inject intracameral antibiotics (cefuroxime, moxifloxacin, and vancomycin) routinely at the end of surgery. A large number of recently published retrospective studies and large database analyses have reported decreased endophthalmitis rates with routine antibiotic use, and the only prospective, multicenter, randomized trial performed by the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery demonstrated that intracameral cefuroxime decreases the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis. Routine cefuroxime use has become common in many European countries, whereas moxifloxacin is the most commonly used drug in India, and vancomycin use predominates in Australia. The decision regarding whether or not to use intracameral prophylaxis and the drug that is selected varies considerably throughout the world because of antibiotic availability and cost, and the spectrum of causative organisms. Adverse events due to intracameral antibiotics are infrequent, but complications such as hemorrhagic occlusive retinal vasculitis have been reported. Because additional prospective, comparative trials have not been performed, a consensus regarding best practices to prevent postoperative endophthalmitis has not been reached. Additionally, many surgeons do not routinely use intracameral antibiotics because they believe them unnecessary with modern aseptic techniques, small incision surgery, and shorter operating times. We discuss the most commonly used intracameral antibiotics, present the risks and potential benefits of this approach, and highlight challenges with drug compounding and safety.
Collapse
|
Review |
5 |
25 |
4
|
Gautam M, Gupta R, Singh P, Verma V, Verma S, Mittal P, Karkhur S, Sampath A, Mohan RR, Sharma B. Intracameral Drug Delivery: A Review of Agents, Indications, and Outcomes. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2023; 39:102-116. [PMID: 36757304 DOI: 10.1089/jop.2022.0144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
An intracameral (IC) injection directly delivers the drug into the anterior chamber of the eye. This targeted drug delivery technique overcomes the ocular barriers and offers a high therapeutic concentration of medication at the desired site and consequently better clinical outcomes. IC drug delivery is a safe and effective modality with many advantages over topical delivery. These include excellent bioavailability, reduced systemic risk, and minimal ocular toxicity. Agents delivered via IC injection have shown promising results against infection, inflammation, ocular hypertension, and neovascularization. Current literature shows that IC antibiotics, including cefuroxime, vancomycin, and moxifloxacin, are routinely used for prophylaxis of endophthalmitis. Other drugs available for IC use are steroids, anesthetics, mydriatics, miotics, antivascular endothelial growth factor, antiglaucoma, and alkylating agents. Introduction of sustained-release devices containing dexamethasone or Bimatoprost in anterior chamber via IC route has the potential in treating ocular inflammation and raised intraocular pressure. The complications such as hemorrhagic occlusive retinal vasculitis and toxic anterior segment syndrome have been documented with IC prophylaxis but are rare. In this review, we provide an overview of available IC drugs, their pharmacokinetics, the spectrum of activity, dosage and preparation, prophylactic and therapeutic usage, clinical efficacy, and safety profiles.
Collapse
|
Review |
2 |
10 |
5
|
Dave VP, Singh VM, Reddy JC, Sharma S, Joseph J, Das T. Clinical features and microbiology of post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis with and without intracameral moxifloxacin prophylaxis: Endophthalmitis prophylaxis study report 3. Indian J Ophthalmol 2021; 70:158-163. [PMID: 34937229 PMCID: PMC8917526 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_1405_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the clinical presentations, microbiology, and management outcomes of post–cataract surgery endophthalmitis, with and without intracameral moxifloxacin prophylaxis. Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective, consecutive, comparative case series. Records of consecutive cataract surgery from January 1, 2015, till June 30, 2020, were analyzed. The cases that developed endophthalmitis were analyzed. The endophthalmitis cases were divided by their prophylaxis treatment into two groups: with intracameral moxifloxacin (ICM) and without (N-ICM). Inclusion criteria were (1) age ≥ 18 years, (2) cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation, (3) endophthalmitis within 6 weeks of cataract surgery, and (4) cataract surgery in the institute by any of the three methods—phacoemulsification, manual small incision cataract surgery, and extracapsular cataract extraction. Results: In the study period, 66,967 cataract surgeries were performed; 48.7% (n = 32,649) did not receive ICM. There was no difference between the N-ICM and ICM groups in the incidence of clinical (n = 21, 0.064% and n = 15, 0.043%; P = 0.23) and culture proven (n = 19, 0.033% and n = 11, 0.023%; P = 0.99) endophthalmitis, respectively. Greater number of patients in the N-ICM group had lid edema (76.2% vs. 40%; P = 0.03), corneal edema (71.4% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.03) and lower presenting vision with available correction (logMAR [logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution] 1.26 ± 1.2 vs. logMAR 0.54 ± 0.85; P = 0.02). The final best-corrected visual acuity following treatment was worse in the N-ICM group (logMAR 1.26 ± 1.2 vs. 0.54 ± 0.85; P = 0.02). Conclusion: Endophthalmitis after intracameral moxifloxacin may have relatively milder signs and symptoms and may respond better to treatment.
Collapse
|
|
4 |
7 |
6
|
Galor A, Goldhardt R, Wellik SR, Gregori NZ, Flynn HW. Management strategies to reduce risk of postoperative infections. CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY REPORTS 2013; 1. [PMID: 24319649 DOI: 10.1007/s40135-013-0021-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative infections, although rare, are still of great concern to the ophthalmologist. The incidence of post-cataract endophthalmitis is low, with a range of .28 per 1,000 to 2.99 per 1000. In addition to intraoperative considerations such as poor wound construction, vitreous loss, topical anesthesia, and prolonged surgical time, other risk factors include preoperative factors such as a diseased ocular surface and systemic immunosuppression. Potential methods of reducing risk of endophthalmitis after anterior segment surgery are discussed and available literature is summarized.
Collapse
|
Journal Article |
12 |
6 |
7
|
Kelkar AS, Sharma N, Verma L, Chandorkar SA, Saxena R, Mishra D, Kelkar JA, Sengupta S. Antibiotic prophylaxis for cataract surgery - Practice patterns amongst Indian Ophthalmologists. Indian J Ophthalmol 2023; 71:3235-3241. [PMID: 37602614 PMCID: PMC10565941 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_702_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the current trends in use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, especially intracameral antibiotics (ICAB), for cataract surgery in India. Methods This was an E-survey using a previously validated questionnaire carried out by the All India Ophthalmological Society (AIOS) in August 2022. An E-mail invitation to complete an online 40-point survey was sent to all members of the AIOS using a digital E-mail service (Survey Monkey) and social media platforms. Results Out of 1804 total respondents, 58% (n = 1022) reported using routine ICAB prophylaxis. Of those using ICAB, 89% (n = 909) reported using it for all cases, whereas the rest used it for specific indications such as post-PC rent (n = 43), one eyed patient (n = 19), and high-risk cases (n = 50). Commercially available moxifloxacin was by far the commonest agent used for ICAB (n = 686, 67%). Eighty respondents (8%) reported noticing occasional toxic reactions and nontoxic corneal edema (n = 64, 6%) with ICAB. Surgeons with >10 years' experience especially practicing in medical colleges used fewer ICAB (OR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.38 - 0.72, P < 0,001) compared to younger surgeons (<5-year experience) in solo clinics. The commonest reason for nonadoption of IC antibiotics was "unconvinced of the need to use it in my setting" (n = 296, 52% of those who answered this question). Conclusion IC antibiotic prophylaxis for cataract surgery has significantly increased in India from 40% in 2017 to 58% in 2022. Commercially available moxifloxacin was preferred by the majority users. Intraocular inflammation may occur occasionally and needs safer formulations to avoid this.
Collapse
|
research-article |
2 |
3 |
8
|
Shi SL, Yu XN, Cui YL, Zheng SF, Shentu XC. Incidence of endophthalmitis after phacoemulsification cataract surgery: a Meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol 2022; 15:327-335. [PMID: 35186695 PMCID: PMC8818473 DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2022.02.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the overall endophthalmitis incidence and the effectiveness of potential prophylaxis measures following phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS). METHODS The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to April 30th, 2021. We included studies that reported on the incidence of endophthalmitis following PCS. The quality of the included studies was critically evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. The random effect or the fixed-effects model was used to evaluated the pooled incidence based on the heterogeneity. The publication bias was assessed by Egger's linear regression and Begg's rank correlation tests. RESULTS A total of 39 studies containing 5 878 114 eyes were included and critically appraised in the Meta-analysis. For overall incidence of endophthalmitis after PCS, the Meta-analysis yielded a pooled estimate of 0.092% (95%CI: 0.083%-0.101%). The incidence appeared to decrease with time (before 2000: 0.097%, 95%CI: 0.060%-0.135%; 2000 to 2010: 0.089%, 95%CI: 0.076%-0.101%; after 2010: 0.063%, 95%CI: 0.050%-0.077%). Compared with typical povidone-iodine solution (0.178%, 95%CI: 0.071%-0.285%) and antibiotics subconjunctival injections (0.047%, 95%CI: 0.001%-0.095%), the use of intracameral antibiotics significantly reduced the incidence of endophthalmitis after PCS (0.045%, 95%CI: 0.034%-0.055%, RR: 7.942, 95%CI: 4.510-13.985). CONCLUSION Due to the advancement of phacoemulsification technology and the widespread use of intracameral antibiotics, the incidence of endophthalmitis following PCS shows a decreasing trend over time. The use of intracameral antibiotics administration will significantly reduce the risk of endophthalmitis.
Collapse
|
research-article |
3 |
2 |
9
|
Garcia O’Farrill N, Abi Karam M, Villegas VM, Flynn HW, Grzybowski A, Schwartz SG. New Approaches to Overcoming Antimicrobial Resistance in Endophthalmitis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:321. [PMID: 38543107 PMCID: PMC10974156 DOI: 10.3390/ph17030321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Endophthalmitis is a rare but vision-threatening infection characterized by marked inflammation of intraocular fluids and tissues, uncommonly seen following surgery and intravitreal injection. Antimicrobials are used worldwide in the prophylaxis and treatment of bacterial and fungal infections of the eye and are standard treatment in the preoperative and postoperative care of surgical patients. However, antimicrobials are reported to be overprescribed in many parts of the world, which contributes to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). AMR complicates the prophylaxis and treatment of endophthalmitis. This article examines the prevalence and mechanisms of AMR in ocular microorganisms, emphasizing the importance of understanding AMR patterns for tailored treatments. It also explores prophylaxis and management strategies for endophthalmitis, with a discussion on the use of intracameral antibiotic administration. The use of prophylactic intracameral antibiotics during cataract surgery is common in many parts of the world but is still controversial in some locations, especially in the US. Finally, it highlights the role of stewardship in ophthalmology and its benefits in the treatment of endophthalmitis.
Collapse
|
Review |
1 |
|
10
|
Passaro ML, Posarelli M, Avolio FC, Ferrara M, Costagliola C, Semeraro F, Virgili G, Dickman MM, Romano V. Evaluating the efficacy of postoperative topical antibiotics in cataract surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol 2025. [PMID: 40018950 DOI: 10.1111/aos.17469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2025] [Indexed: 03/01/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cataract surgery is the most frequently performed surgical procedure worldwide, but postoperative endophthalmitis remains a serious complication that can lead to vision loss. While intracameral (IC) antibiotics are well established in significantly reducing the risk of postoperative infections, there is no consensus on the use of postoperative topical antibiotics. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of topical antibiotics in preventing endophthalmitis in patients already receiving IC antibiotics. METHODS A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases yielded 31 studies that met the inclusion criteria, involving patients who underwent cataract surgery via phacoemulsification. The patients were divided into two groups: those receiving IC antibiotics alone and those receiving additional postoperative topical antibiotics. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis. RESULTS A total of 1 235 051 eyes were included in the meta-analysis, with 608 302 in the IC + T group, which received intraoperative intracameral antibiotics combined with postoperative topical antibiotics, and 626 749 in the IC group, which received intracameral antibiotics alone. The pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the incidence of endophthalmitis between the two groups (p = 0.97), with an incidence of 0.0004 (95% CI: 0.0003-0.0005) in both groups. These results suggest that the addition of topical antibiotics does not provide further benefit in preventing infections beyond IC antibiotics alone. CONCLUSIONS IC antibiotics as a sole prophylactic measure may be sufficient, and the routine use of postoperative topical antibiotics could be unnecessary. Reducing the use of topical antibiotics may also help mitigate the risk of antimicrobial resistance.
Collapse
|
Review |
1 |
|