PNI as a Potential Add-On Biomarker to Improve the IMDC Intermediate Prognostic Score

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to assess the role of the adjusted PNI-IMDC risk scoring system in stratifying the intermediate group of metastatic RCC patients who received TKIS in the first-line setting.

METHODS

A total of 185 patients were included. The adjusted PNI and IMDC model was used to divide the intermediate group into two groups: intermediate PNI-high and intermediate PNI-low groups. The statistical data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The results showed that the adjusted PNI-IMDC risk score, classic IMDC, and PNI had similar prognostic values. Adjusted PNI-IMDC risk score might be used for a more homogeneous differentiation of the classic intermediate group. On the other hand, multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of nephrectomy, adjusted favorable/intermediate (PNI-high) group, ECOG performance score, and presence of bone metastasis were independent predictors of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-treatment PNI, as a valuable and potential add-on biomarker to the adjusted PNI-IMDC classification model, can be helpful for establishing an improved prognostic model for intermediate group mRCC patients treated with first-line TKISs. Further validation studies are needed to clarify these findings.

Antibody-Based Therapeutics for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Challenges and Opportunities

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is among the top 10 most common cancers in both men and women with an estimated 75 000 cases each year in the US. Over the last decade, the therapeutic landscape for patients with metastatic RCC has significantly evolved, with immunotherapy emerging as the new front-line therapy. Despite significant improvement in toxicity profile and survival outcomes, key concerns such as patient selection, treatment sequencing, and intrinsic and acquired resistance remain unresolved. Emerging options such as antibody-based therapeutics (eg, anti-CD70, anti-CA9, and anti-ENPP3) are being explored in clinical trials for patients with cancer resistant or refractory to current immunotherapies. Despite positive results for hematological cancers, breast cancer, and more recently bladder cancer, most antibody-based therapies failed to improve the outcomes in patients with advanced RCC. This underscores the need to understand the underlying causes of failed responses to this treatment class, which will ultimately support the rational design of more effective and tolerable treatments. In this review, we summarize the evolving landscape of RCC therapeutics and describe recent clinical trials with emerging antibody-based therapeutics. We also describe the challenges that need to be overcome for the successful creation of therapeutic antibodies for treating RCC.

Hypertransaminasemia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving immune-based combinations: a meta-analysis

Aims: We performed a meta-analysis to assess the relative risk (RR) of all-grade and grade 3-4 hypertransaminasemia in studies comparing immune-based combinations with sunitinib in treatment-naive patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Materials & methods: Outcomes of interest included all-grade and grade 3-4 hypertransaminasemia measured as RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: RRs for all-grade hypertransaminasemia were 1.73 (95% CI: 1.25-2.4) and 1.63 (95% CI: 1.25-2.12) in patients receiving immunocombinations and sunitinib, respectively. The pooled RRs for grade 3-4 hypertransaminasemia were 3.24 and 3.04 in patients treated with immunocombinations or sunitinib. Conclusion: Immune-based combinations were associated with higher hypertransaminasemia risk. Physicians should pay attention to these common but overlooked events. Careful monitoring of tolerability remains a crucial need.

Outcomes of systemic targeted therapy in recurrent renal cell carcinoma treated with adjuvant sunitinib

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of rechallenge with sunitinib and other targeted therapies (TTs) in patitents with relapsed recurrent renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the advanced setting.

METHODS

In this multi-institutional retrospective study, patients with relapsed RCC were rechallenged with sunitinib or other systemic TTs as a first-line therapeutic approach after failed adjuvant sunitinib treatment. Patient characteristics, treatments and clinical outcomes were recorded. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients with relapses were recorded, and 25 of these (73.5%) were men. Twenty-five patients were treated with systemic TT: 65% of patients received TT against the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway (including sunitinib), 21.7% received mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and 13% received immunotherapy. The median (interquartile range) time to relapse was 20.3 (5.2-20.4) months from diagnosis, and 7.5 months (1.0-8.5) from the end of adjuvant suntinib treatment. At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, 24 of the 25 patients had progressed on first-line systemic therapy. The median PFS was 12.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.78-18.2). There were no statistical differences in PFS between different treatments or sunitinib rechallenge. PFS was not statistically different in patients relapsing on or after adjuvant suntinib treatment (≤ 6 or >6 months after adjuvant suntinib ending). The ORR was 20.5%. The median OS was 29.1 months (95% CI 16.4-41.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Rechallenge with sunitinib or other systemic therapies is still a feasible therapeutic option that provides patients with advanced or metastastic RCC with additional clinical benefits with regard to PFS and OS after failed response to adjuvant sunitinib.

Downregulated METTL14 accumulates BPTF that reinforces super-enhancers and distal lung metastasis via glycolytic reprogramming in renal cell carcinoma

Background: Methyltransferase-like 14 (METTL14) participates in tumorigenesis in several malignancies, but how METTL14 mediates the metastasis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has never been reported. Methods: Western blotting, quantitative real-time PCR, and immunohistochemistry were used to determine the mRNA and protein levels of relevant genes. Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing and RNA sequencing were utilized to screen potential targets of METTL14. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing were performed to investigate epigenetic alterations. The biological roles and mechanisms of METTL14/BPTF in promoting lung metastasis were confirmed in vitro and in vivo using cell lines, patient samples, xenograft models, and organoids. Results: Utilizing the TCGA-KIRC and Ruijin-RCC datasets, we found low expression of METTL14 in mRCC samples, which predicted poor prognosis. METTL14 deficiency promoted RCC metastasis in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, METTL14-mediated m⁶A modification negatively regulated the mRNA stability of bromodomain PHD finger transcription factor (BPTF) and depended on BPTF to drive lung metastasis. Accumulated BPTF in METTL14-deficient cells remodeled the enhancer landscape to reinforce several oncogenic crosstalk. Particularly, BPTF constituted super-enhancers that activate downstream targets like enolase 2 and SRC proto-oncogene nonreceptor tyrosine kinase, leading to glycolytic reprogramming of METTL14^-/- cells. Finally, we determined the efficacy of the BPTF inhibitor AU1 in suppressing mRCC of patient-derived cells, mRCC-derived organoids (MDOs), and orthotopic xenograft models. Conclusions: Our study is the first to investigate the essential role of m⁶A modification and the METTL14/BPTF axis in the epigenetic and metabolic remodeling of mRCC, highlighting AU1 as a vital therapeutic candidate.

The implementation of lenvatinib/everolimus or lenvatinib/pembrolizumab combinations in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Introduction: There are 400,000 new cases of Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) and 175,000 deaths worldwide every year. Currently available frontline therapies to treat RCC have less toxicity than previously employed therapeutic agents, but drug resistance is still a clinically significant problem. Drug resistance occurs through angiogenic escape by the activation of pathways that are independent of the VEGF targets of most first-line therapies. The lenvatinib/everolimus and lenvatinib/pembrolizumab are part of a new generation of combinations that can combat this method of resistance to extend both progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic RCC.Areas covered: This article discusses the evolution of current data on the efficacy and safety of these two combinations and future directions for their implementation in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.Expert opinion: Future research will focus on these combinations in contrast with other currently approved regimens. Once specific biomarkers that predict response to treatment are identified, the future of treatment of mRCC will involve specifically tailored therapies for a patient's genotype. Therapies unique only to the patient undergoing treatment will increase both efficacy and safety of new treatments, and that is the truly exciting future that awaits this field.

So slow, so fast, a case of nivolumab-induced hypothyroidism with subsequent rhabdomyolysis

Background: Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of cancer, but this has not come without a cost. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors are less toxic than conventional chemotherapy, they are associated with more frequent autoimmune side effects. Case presentation: We report a case of a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who was treated with nivolumab and subsequently developed treatment related hypothyroidism with consequent rhabdomyolysis. Treatment with thyroxine resulted in resolution of the symptoms. Because of normal thyroid function tests before initiating nivolumab therapy and the absence of any other causes of hypothyroidism, it was safe to extrapolate a causal relationship between nivolumab and hypothyroidism. To date, this is the first reported case of a programmed cell death-1 inhibitor causing hypothyroidism, severe enough to induce rhabdomyolysis. Conclusion: Patients on nivolumab and other PD-1 inhibitors should be monitored and screened regularly for immune-related adverse events.

Prognostic impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Estimate prognosis and clinical outcome of patients with localized or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an important issue which drive our medical decisions.

METHODS

We carried out a meta-analysis of available clinical studies exploring neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in RCC in order to evaluate if this ratio could be correlated to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with localized/metastatic RCC.

RESULTS

In overall population higher NLR resulted in worst OS and PFS (OS pooled hazard ratio of 1.80; 95% CI: 1.61-2.00; I² 45%; PFS pooled hazard ratio of 1.69; 95% CI: 1.42-2.01; I² 81%), this negative correlation was also confirmed in both metastatic and nonmetastatic patients.

CONCLUSION

The NLR ratio is a variable correlated to prognosis in RCC patients.

Patterns of practice and pharmacoeconomic analysis of the management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in Greece--the CRISIS study. A retrospective analysis by the Hellenic Genitourinary Cancer Group (HGUCG)

Background:Metastatic RCC (mRCC) treatment has been revolutionized with 11 approved targeted agents. We report patterns of practice, outcomes and pharmacoeconomic analyses after the introduction of targeted therapy. Patients and methods: CRISIS was a retrospective multicenter study of mRCCpatients who received targeted therapy . Results were related to the start of 1st-line therapy, with a cut off at 1 January 2011 in order to depict the impact of increased availability of effective options. Results: 164 patients, were included. 70.1% and 44.5% received 2nd and 3rd-line therapy, respectively. More patients were treated in 2nd-line after 1 January 2011. After a median follow-up of 55.1 months, median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.7 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 8.3-13.7), 7.3 (95% CI: 5.1-8.6), 5.8 (95% CI: 3.8-7.8) and 34 (95% CI: 28.5-39.8), 22.4 (95% CI: 16-32.1), 18.3 (95% CI: 12.4-26.4) months for first, second and third line, respectively. Efficacy of sunitinib and pazopanib in 1st-line were similar. The mean total cost/patient was 35,012.2 Euros (standard deviation [SD]: 28,971.5). Conclusions: Our study confirms previous real-world data suggesting that continuing advances in the treatment of mRCC produce favorable outcomes in everyday practice. Pharmacoeconomic analyses are important for cost-effective utilization of emerging novel therapies.

Critical appraisal of axitinib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma

A growing understanding of the biology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has led to the development and US Food and Drug Administration approval of seven new molecular targeted agents over the past 7 years. Axitinib is a potent, selective, second-generation inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and the latest to join the armamentarium of drugs available for the treatment of metastatic RCC. Despite recent advances in the development of molecular targeted agents for metastatic RCC, the ideal sequencing of these agents remains unclear.