The Role of Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Different Stages of Melanoma

Melanoma is a skin cancer arising from melanocytes, the cells responsible for synthesizing melanin pigment, which gives the skin its color. Early diagnosis and treatment of melanoma increase survival rates. Clinical examination and biopsy are the primary tools used to diagnose melanoma. However, distinguishing between pre-malignant melanocytic lesions and early invasive melanoma histopathologically remains challenging. Therefore, additional modalities such as a detailed clinical history, imaging, genetic testing, and biomarkers have been applied to diagnose melanoma. This review discusses the current trends in biomarker advancements over the last 10 years to assist in the early detection and diagnosis of melanoma. Biomarkers such as melanoma-associated antigens (MAAs), S100B, microRNAs (miRNAs), and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have the potential to aid in the detection, diagnosis, and prognosis of melanoma. However, the application of biomarkers in the diagnosis of melanoma is still evolving.

Immunogenicity of SEREX-identified antigens and disease outcome in pancreatic cancer

Despite spontaneous or vaccination-induced immune responses, pancreatic cancer remains one of the most deadly immunotherapy-resistant malignancies. We sought to comprehend the spectrum of pancreatic tumor-associated antigens (pTAAs) and to assess the clinical relevance of their immunogenicity. An autologous SEREX-based screening of a cDNA library constructed from a pancreatic T3N0M0/GIII specimen belonging to a long-term survivor (36 months) revealed 18 immunogenic pTAA. RT-PCR analysis displayed broad distribution of the identified antigens among normal human tissues. PNLIPRP2 and MIA demonstrated the most distinct pancreatic cancer-specific patterns. ELISA-based screening of sera for corresponding autoantibodies revealed that although significantly increased, the immunogenicity of these molecules was not a common feature in pancreatic cancer. QRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry characterized PNLIPRP2 as a robust acinar cell-specific marker whose decreased expression mirrored the disappearance of parenchyma in the diseased organ, but was not related to the presence of PNLIPRP2 autoantibodies. Analyses of MIA-known to be preferentially expressed in malignant cells-surprisingly revealed an inverse correlation between intratumoral gene expression and the emergence of autoantibodies. MIA(high) patients were autoantibody-negative and had shorter median survival when compared with autoantibody-positive MIA(low) patients (12 vs. 34 months). The observed pTAA spectrum comprised molecules associated with acinar, stromal and malignant structures, thus presenting novel targets for tumor cell-specific therapies as well as for approaches based on the bystander effects. Applying the concept of cancer immunoediting to interpret relationships between gene expression, antitumor immune responses, and clinical outcome might better discriminate between past and ongoing immune responses, consequently enabling prognostic stratification of patients and individual adjustment of immunotherapy.

Serum markers to detect metastatic uveal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Osteopontin (OPN) is overexpressed in metastatic uveal melanoma (UM). S-100beta and melanoma-inhibitory activity (MIA) serum levels are elevated in metastatic cutaneous melanoma. The ability of OPN, S-100beta and MIA serum levels to be used as non-invasive markers for detecting metastatic UM was tested.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

OPN, S-100beta and MIA levels were measured by ELISA assays in 18 patients with metastatic UM and in 38 patients who were disease-free (DF) for at least 10 years after treatment of the primary tumor. Paired serum samples from 8 patients before and after development of metastasis were analyzed. Forty-four healthy controls (C) were compared to the other two groups.

RESULTS

Serum OPN, MIA, and S-100beta levels were significantly higher in patients with metastatic UM as compared to patients who were DF for at least 10 years after treatment (p = 0.0001) or with age-matched controls. Serum OPN, MIA and S-100beta levels were significantly higher (p < 0.005) after metastasis formation than before the clinical detection of metastasis in the 8 patients. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was performed for metastatic patients vs. DF and vs. C, and the area under the curve was calculated for each marker and for the combination of the 3 markers, which was 91%.

CONCLUSION

Elevated serum OPN, MIA and S-100beta levels correlate with metastatic UM to the liver. When used in combination, these markers provide a highly sensitive and specific method to detect hepatic metastases and therefore provide for earlier therapeutic intervention that can prolong survival.

Overexpression of melanoma inhibitory activity (MIA) enhances extravasation and metastasis of A-mel 3 melanoma cells in vivo

The secreted MIA protein is strongly expressed by advanced primary and metastatic melanomas but not in normal melanocytes. Previous studies have shown that MIA serum levels correlate with clinical tumour progression in melanoma patients. To provide direct evidence that MIA plays a role in metastasis of malignant melanomas, A-mel 3 hamster melanoma cells were transfected with sense- and antisense rhMIA cDNA and analysed subsequently for changes in their tumorigenic and metastatic potential. Enforced expression of MIA in A-mel 3 cells significantly increased their metastatic potential without affecting primary tumour growth, cell proliferation or apoptosis rate in hamsters, compared with control or antisense transfected cells. Additionally, MIA overexpressing transfectants showed a higher rate of both tumour cell invasion and extravasation. Cells transfected with MIA antisense generally exerted an opposite response. The above changes in function attributed to the expression of MIA may underlie the contribution of MIA to the malignant phenotype.

Melanoma-inhibiting activity (MIA) mRNA is not exclusively transcribed in melanoma cells: low levels of MIA mRNA are present in various cell types and in peripheral blood

The detection of minimal amounts of melanoma cells by tyrosinase reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is seriously hampered by false negative reports in blood of melanoma patients with disseminated melanoma. Therefore, additional assays which make use of multiple melanoma markers are needed. It has been shown that introduction of multiple markers increases the sensitivity of detection. Melanoma inhibitory activity (MIA) is one such melanoma-specific candidate gene. To test the specificity of MIA PCR, we performed 30 and 60 cycles of PCR with two different sets of MIA specific primers on 19 melanoma and 16 non-melanoma cell lines. MIA mRNA was detected in 16 out of 19 melanoma cell lines and in seven out of 16 non-melanoma cell lines after 30 cycles of PCR. However, MIA mRNA could be detected in all cell lines after 60 cycles of PCR. Also, in 14 out of 14 blood samples of melanoma patients, five out of six blood samples of non-melanoma patients and in seven out of seven blood samples of healthy volunteers, MIA mRNA was detected after 60 cycles of PCR, whereas no MIA PCR product could be detected in any of the blood samples after 30 cycles of PCR. We conclude that low levels of MIA transcripts are present in various normal and neoplastic cell types. Therefore, MIA is not a suitable marker gene to facilitate the detection of minimal amounts of melanoma cells in blood or in target organs of the metastatic process.