One-year outcomes after prostate artery embolization versus laser enucleation: A network meta-analysis

Background

Although holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) is considered a size-independent procedure for treatment of an enlarged prostate, prostate artery embolization (PAE) is emerging as an alternative modality to treat moderate and large benign prostatic hyperplasia. This study aims to compare the early post-operative and short-term efficacy of PAE and HoLEP.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases were searched. Network meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA-N-guidelines. Post-operative parameters analysed include international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), post-void residual urine (PVR), maximal uroflow rate (Qmax) and serious adverse events (SAE). Random effects model calculated weighted mean differences (WMD). If 95%CI crossed the line of no effect (WMD = 0), evidence indicated no statistically significant difference between treatments compared.

Results

Qualitative and quantitative syntheses included 20 and 18 studies with 1991 and 1606 patients, respectively. At 3 months, there was no statistically significant difference between PAE and HoLEP in IPSS score improvement [WMD: -2.21: 95%CI: (-10.20, 5.78), favouring PAE], QoL score improvement [WMD: -0.22:95%CI: (-1.75, 1.32), favouring PAE] and PVR improvement [WMD: 26.97: 95%CI: (-59.53, 113.48), favouring HoLEP]. However, PAE was found inferior to HoLEP for Qmax improvement [WMD: 8.47, 95%CI: (2.89, 14.05), favouring HoLEP]. At 1-year follow-up, there was no statistically significant was found between PAE and HoLEP for IPSS score improvement [WMD:6.03, 95%CI: (-1.30, 13.35)], QoL score improvement [WMD: 0.03, 95%CI: (-1.19, 1.25)], PVR improvement [WMD:4.11, 95%CI: (-32.31, 40.53)] and Qmax improvement [WMD:2.60, 95%CI: (-2.20, 7.41)] with all differences favouring HoLEP. PAE was superior to HoLEP for SAE [PAE vs. HoLEP-OR: 0.68, 95%CI: (0.25, 1.37)].

Conclusion

HoLEP was superior to PAE at 3 months for Qmax improvement. There was no significant difference in IPSS, QoL, PVR and Qmax improvement at 1 year between PAE and HoLEP. PAE was also associated with lesser SAE compared to HoLEP. Studies on the long-term outcome of PAE are needed to establish the durability of early outcomes after PAE.

Efficacy and safety of the Rezum system for the treatment of catheter-dependent urinary retention: Three-year real-world outcomes in a multimorbid, multiethnic population

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term real-world efficacy and safety of Rezum for the treatment of catheter-dependent urinary retention in a multimorbid, multiethnic population.

METHODS

A single-office, retrospective study was conducted on patients treated with Rezum between 2017 and 2019. Patients were included if they had catheter-dependent urinary retention prior to treatment and at least one follow-up within 36 months postoperatively. Patient demographics, procedural characteristics, adverse events (AEs), and outcome measures, including benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) medication usage and postvoid residual (PVR), were collected at 3, 6, 12, and/or 36 months postoperatively. Regret was assessed at 36 months using the 5-item Decisional Regret Scale (DRS).

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients met the inclusion criteria, with the majority being Asian (29.6%), followed by non-Hispanic Black (26.0%) and Hispanic (22.2%). Most patients (77.8%) had at least one comorbidity. Trial of void (TOV) was attempted at a median of 8 days (7, 13). Fourteen patients (51.9%) failed their initial TOV. Median time until catheter independence was 13.5 days (8.5, 28.8). Common AEs included urinary retention (51.9%), urinary tract infections (UTIs) (25.9%), and dysuria (25.9%). All cases of UTIs (7/7) and most cases of dysuria (6/7) occurred in patients who failed their initial TOV. At 36 months, there was a significant median percentage change in PVR (-100.0% [-100.0, -36.7], p = .049), and 40.4% of patients discontinued their BPH medications (p = .001). Of the 11 patients who filled out the DRS, 10 (90.9%) agreed/strongly agreed that they made the right decision. By 36 months, 4 patients (14.8%) underwent reoperation and 24 (88.9%) remained catheter-independent.

CONCLUSIONS

At long-term follow-up, Rezum effectively treated catheter-dependent urinary retention with minimal decisional regret. In patients with urinary retention, urologists should consider delaying TOV until 2 weeks postoperatively to maximize the likelihood of a successful TOV and minimize the risk of AEs.

Rezum water vapor therapy for patients with mild, moderate, or severe lower urinary tract symptoms: A retrospective study in a multiethnic population

BACKGROUND

The Rezum System (Rezum) represents a novel, minimally invasive surgical therapy used to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of Rezum in patients with mild, moderate, or severe LUTS.

METHODS

A single office, retrospective study was conducted on patients from a multiethnic population treated with Rezum between 2017 and 2019. Patients were categorized into three cohorts based on baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) LUTS severity: mild LUTS (IPSS ≤ 7), moderate LUTS (IPSS 8-19), or severe LUTS (IPSS ≥ 20) cohorts. Outcome measures, including IPSS, quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR), BPH medication usage, and adverse events (AEs) were collected and analyzed at baseline, 1-, 3-, 6-, and/or 12-months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients were included: 33 with mild LUTS, 109 with moderate LUTS, and 96 with severe LUTS. At 1-month follow-up, the moderate and severe LUTS cohorts saw significant improvements in IPSS (moderate LUTS: -3.0 [-6.0, 1.5], p < 0.001; severe LUTS: -10.0 [-16.0, -5.0], p < 0.001) and QoL (moderate LUTS: -1.0 [-3.0, 0.0], p < 0.001; severe LUTS: -1.0 [-3.0, 0.0], p < 0.001) and improvements remained durable up to 12-months (p < 0.001). The mild LUTS cohort saw significant worsening in IPSS by 2.0 (0.0, 12.0) at 1-month (p = 0.002) but returned to baseline at 3-months (p = 0.114). However, the mild LUTS cohort experienced significant improvements in QoL by -0.5 (-3.0, 0.0) at 3-months (p = 0.035) and nocturia by 0.0 (-1.0, 0.0) at 6-months (p = 0.002), both of which remained durable to 12-months (p < 0.05). Most AEs were transient and nonserious, with gross hematuria (66.5%) being most common. There were no significant differences in QoL point reduction, Qmax improvement, PVR reduction, and AE occurrence between the cohorts at 12-months (p > 0.05). At 12-months, 80.0%, 87.5%, and 66.0% of the patients in the mild, moderate, and severe LUTS cohorts discontinued their BPH medications, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Rezum provides rapid and durable relief in LUTS in patients with moderate or severe LUTS and can be offered to patients with mild LUTS who have bothersome nocturia and wish to discontinue their BPH medications.

Transurethral Vapor Ablation in Patients with Intermediate-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer

Purpose: We report results of a prospective, multicenter single-arm study of transurethral vapor ablation (TUVA) of prostate tissue in patients with unilateral, intermediate-risk, localized prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods: Men ≥45 years of age with biopsy-confirmed unilateral Gleason grade group 2 (GGG2) adenocarcinoma of the prostate, prostate volume of 20-80 cc, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤15 ng/mL were enrolled. Cystoscopy and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance were used to deliver ∼103°C water vapor to prostate zones for unilateral hemigland ablation, including destruction of cancers detected by multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and confirmed by biopsy. The primary outcomes were device-related serious adverse events (SAEs). At 7 days and 6 months postprocedure, the ablation extent was assessed by mpMRI; MRI/TRUS fusion biopsies were completed at 6 months. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed with validated questionnaires. Results: All subjects underwent a single hemigland TUVA procedure. No SAEs occurred. Grade 2 procedure-related AEs included transient urinary retention (n = 4) and erectile (n = 1) or ejaculatory dysfunction (n = 1). At 7 days, mpMRI revealed complete ablation of 14/17 (82%) visible lesions. At 6 months, biopsies showed no Gleason pattern ≥4 or ≥GGG2 cancer on the treated side of prostates in 13/15 (87%) subjects. Ten of 15 (67%) subjects were biopsy negative. Of the 5 biopsy-negative subjects, 2 had one core each of 3 + 4 disease and 3 had one core each of 3 + 3 disease with ≤5% involvement. Median prostate volume was reduced by 40.7% and PSA by 58%. Extensive QOL assessments showed, on average, no appreciable negative effects of treatment. Conclusions: Initial evidence suggests that TUVA is safe in men with intermediate-risk PCa. Preliminary results demonstrate the absence of ≥GGG2 disease on the treated side in 87% of men and a favorable QOL profile.

Rezum Outcomes in Relationship to Number of Injections: Is Less More?

Objectives: To assess efficacy and safety outcomes in relationship to the number of injections given during Rezum treatment. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) treated with Rezum. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on the number of injections received per lateral prostatic lobe: 1, 2, 3, or 4 injections. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-Erectile Function, IIEF-Orgasmic Function, and adverse events were collected at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and/or 12 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 179 patients were included: 58, 91, 22, and 8 patients in the 1, 2, 3, and 4 injections cohorts, respectively. Baseline demographics significantly different across cohorts were age, history of urinary retention, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, prostatic urethral length, and presence of median lobe. At 3 months, all cohorts reported significant improvements in IPSS and QoL, which remained durable to 12 months. There were no significant differences in changes in IPSS, QoL, PVR, and IIEF-Erectile and Orgasmic Function between the cohorts at any follow-up. Multiple linear regression showed that the number of injections did not predict changes in IPSS, QoL, PVR, and IIEF-Erectile and Orgasmic Function at any follow-up (p > 0.05) but predicted change in Qmax at 3 months (β = 5.7, p = 0.019). Multiple logistic regression showed that for each additional injection, the odds of gross hematuria, penile burning, penile pain, and dysuria increased by 3.8, 2.6, 2.2, and 3.0, respectively. Conclusions: Utilizing less injections represents a safe treatment strategy without compromising Rezum's efficacy in providing durable relief in LUTS.

Risk Factors and Real-World Short-Term Outcomes of a Failed Trial of Void After Rezum Therapy in a Multiethnic Population

Background: Postoperative urinary retention is a common complication following surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. We aimed to identify risk factors for a failed trial of void (TOV) following treatment with the Rezum system and assess the impact of a failed TOV on short-term outcomes. Methods: A single-office retrospective study was conducted on patients treated with Rezum therapy between 2017 and 2019. A urinary catheter was placed in all patients following Rezum therapy. Demographic data and outcome measures, including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR), and adverse events, were analyzed at baseline and 1, 3, and/or 6 months postoperatively. Risk factors were identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 289 patients were included. Thirty-five patients (12.1%) failed a TOV, while 254 (87.9%) had an effective TOV. All patients were given a TOV after a median of 5 days (4-5). Those who failed the TOV spent an additional mean of 13.7 ± 13.3 days with a catheter. Patients who failed the TOV were more likely to get a urinary tract infection compared with those who had an effective TOV (20.0% vs 4.7%, p < 0.001). All patients experienced significant improvements in IPSS, QoL, and Qmax at 1, 3, and/or 6 months. On multivariate analysis, a high baseline PVR was the only independent predictor of a failed TOV (odds ratio: 1.01, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.01). A greater proportion of patients with a baseline PVR >200 mL failed the TOV (40.0%) compared with patients with a baseline PVR <200 mL (10.9%, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Approximately one in eight patients failed the TOV following Rezum therapy. Baseline PVR was the only independent risk factor for a failed TOV. Nevertheless, all patients experienced significant relief of urinary symptoms. Patients with high baseline PVR, particularly >200 mL, may require a catheter for an extended duration.

Prostatic Urethral Lift for Obstructive Median Lobes: Consistent Results Across Controlled Trial and Real-World Settings

Introduction: The evidence for prostatic urethral lift (PUL), in treating lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men with obstructive median lobes (OMLs), has grown. In this study, we present the first detailed comparison of outcomes between OML patients treated with PUL in controlled and real-world settings to relevant comparators (subjects treated with transurethral resection of the prostate [TURP] and sham in randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) to demonstrate similar symptom, safety, and patient experience outcomes. Materials and Methods: Symptom and safety outcomes and patient satisfaction were compared through 12 months among controlled PUL studies: BPH6 RCT (35 men randomized to TURP); L.I.F.T. pivotal RCT in subjects with lateral lobe obstruction (66 subjects randomized to sham) and MedLift, an U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) extension of the L.I.F.T. trial (45 men with OML). Symptom improvement, catheterization, and adverse event rates were compared between MedLift subjects and OML patients (n = 187) from the large real-world retrospective (RWR) study of PUL filtered on baseline characteristics to approximate the MedLift population. Results: Posttreatment, International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) improvement for MedLift subjects was 170% greater compared with sham at 3 months with significantly better quality of life (QoL), Qmax, and benign prostatic hyperplasia impact index (BPHII). Compared with TURP, MedLift IPSS and QoL improved significantly better at 1 and 3 months and with superior ejaculatory function scores at all time points after PUL. IPSS, QoL, postvoid residual (PVR), and Qmax outcomes were equivalent between MedLift and RWR OML groups at 3, 6, and 12 months. RWR OML patients did not experience higher rates of overall adverse events compared with MedLift. Conclusion: Controlled and real-world outcomes confirm PUL is a safe and effective treatment for BPH patients with and without OML.

Trends in minimally invasive surgical therapies for overactive bladder management in Australia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the national trends in minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for overactive bladder (OAB) in Australia over the past decade.

METHODS

Annual MIST data were extracted using the Australian Medicare Benefit Schedule (MBS) on intravesical botulinum toxin (BTX), sacral nerve modulators (SNM) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulators (PTNS) performed between 2010 and 2021. Population-adjusted rates of these procedures were compared in relation to individual states and against the introduction of various OAB drugs during the intervening years.

RESULTS

The overall national utilization of MIST for OAB has increased over the last decade. The data reflect a rapid uptake in PTNS over the last 2 years following its introduction compared to the relatively steady increase in BTX and SNM over the past decade. There was minimal difference in SNM lead and generator placement, suggesting perhaps the conversion of trial SNM to permanent SNM has been relatively stable across the years. In contrast, there was an increase in PTNS maintenance in the following years following the initial rise in the PTNS treatment initiation. The introduction of various OAB drugs in the market did not seem to significantly affect the pattern of MIST uptake.

CONCLUSION

Despite the introduction of various OAB drugs, the overall MIST has increased steadily over the last decade, especially with PTNS. Further exploration into the motivators for specific MIST and cost-benefit analysis of these MIST for OAB is warranted.

Recent advances in UroLift: A comprehensive overview

OBJECTIVE

Recent years have seen a steep rise in minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Prostatic urethral lift (UroLift) is a mechanical intervention aimed at reducing lower urinary tract symptoms, which affect patients with BPH.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A narrative synthesis of all studies regarding UroLift is performed over the last decade, evaluating its impact on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), Qmax, Benign Prostate Hypertrophy Impact Index, and sexual health metrics.

RESULTS

The studies included have demonstrated significant improvements in the objective parameters measured. UroLift has a low side-effect profile and is comparable to transurethral resection of the prostate in QoL changes and is superior with respect to recovery time and ejaculatory function.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that UroLift may be an appropriate treatment for individuals undergoing treatment for BPH who are concerned with sexual and ejaculatory functions. More studies are needed to determine who is eligible for UroLift, as well as the long-term impact of UroLift on individuals with BPH.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia: an overview

Despite the deceptively simple description of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the actual relationship between BPH, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), benign prostatic enlargement, and bladder outlet obstruction is complex and requires a solid understanding of the definitional issues involved. The etiology of BPH and LUTS is still poorly understood, but the hormonal hypothesis has many arguments in its favor. There are many medical and minimally invasive treatment options available for affected patients. In the intermediate and long term, minimally invasive treatment options are superior to medical therapy in terms of symptom and flow rate improvement; tissue ablative surgical treatment options are superior to both minimally invasive and medical therapy.