Multigene testing panels reveal pathogenic variants in sporadic breast cancer patients in northern China

Background: Breast cancer, the most prevalent malignancy in women worldwide, presents diverse onset patterns and genetic backgrounds. This study aims to examine the genetic landscape and clinical implications of rare mutations in Chinese breast cancer patients. Methods: Clinical data from 253 patients, including sporadic and familial cases, were analyzed. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed, categorizing identified rare variants according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines. In silico protein modeling was used to analyze potentially pathogenic variants' impact on protein structure and function. Results: We detected 421 rare variants across patients. The most frequently mutated genes were ALK (22.2%), BARD1 (15.6%), and BRCA2 (15.0%). ACMG classification identified 7% of patients harboring Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic (P/LP) variants, with one case displaying a pathogenic BRCA1 mutation linked to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Also identified were two pathogenic MUTYH variants, previously associated with colon cancer but increasingly implicated in breast cancer. Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were identified in 112 patients, with PTEN c.C804A showing the highest frequency. The role of these variants in sporadic breast cancer oncogenesis was suggested. In-depth exploration of previously unreported variants led to the identification of three potential pathogenic variants: ATM c.C8573T, MSH3 c.A2723T, and CDKN1C c.C221T. Their predicted impact on protein structure and stability suggests a functional role in cancer development. Conclusion: This study reveals a comprehensive overview of the genetic variants landscape in Chinese breast cancer patients, highlighting the prevalence and potential implications of rare variants. We emphasize the value of comprehensive genomic profiling in breast cancer management and the necessity of continuous research into understanding the functional impacts of these variants.

Psychological impact of multigene cancer panel testing in patients with a clinical suspicion of hereditary cancer across Spain

OBJECTIVE

Patients' psychological reactions to multigene cancer panel testing might differ compared with the single-gene testing reactions because of the complexity and uncertainty associated with the different possible results. Understanding patients' preferences and psychological impact of multigene panel testing is important to adapt the genetic counselling model.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-seven unrelated patients with clinical suspicion of hereditary cancer undergoing a 25-gene panel test completed questionnaires after pretest genetic counselling and at 1 week, 3 months, and 12 months after results to elicit their preferences regarding results disclosure and to measure their cancer worry and testing-specific distress and uncertainty.

RESULTS

A pathogenic variant was identified in 38 patients (34 high penetrance and 4 moderate penetrance variants), and 54 patients had at least one variant of uncertain significance. Overall, cancer panel testing was not associated with an increase in cancer worry after results disclosure (P value = .87). Twelve months after results, carriers of a moderate penetrance variant had higher distress and uncertainty scores compared with carriers of high penetrance variants. Cancer worry prior to genetic testing predicted genetic testing specific distress after results, especially at long term (P value <.001). Most of the patients reported the wish to know all genetic results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that patients can psychologically cope with cancer panel testing, but distress and uncertainty observed in carriers of moderate penetrance cancer variants in this cohort warrant further research.

Next Generation Sequencing and Multi-Gene Panel Testing: Implications for the Oncology Nurse

OBJECTIVES

To review past, current, and future events in genetics and discuss how genetic testing information personalizes cancer screening, detection, and treatment. A case study is presented to illustrate key points.

DATA SOURCES

National guidelines, evidence-based summaries, peer-reviewed studies, editorials, and web sites.

CONCLUSION

Multi-gene testing using next-generation sequencing has changed the landscape for hereditary cancer syndromes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses have key roles in personalizing health care including recognizing the complexities of genetic testing, assessing family history, understanding gene/environment factors, referring for genetics consultations, and promoting registry studies. In order to be effective, nurses must stay current with the rapidly-changing technology and guidelines for genetic evaluations and testing.

Increased yield of actionable mutations using multi-gene panels to assess hereditary cancer susceptibility in an ethnically diverse clinical cohort

This study aims to assess multi-gene panel testing in an ethnically diverse clinical cancer genetics practice. We conducted a retrospective study of individuals with a personal or family history of cancer undergoing clinically indicated multi-gene panel tests of 6-110 genes, from six commercial laboratories. The 475 patients in the study included 228 Hispanics (47.6%), 166 non-Hispanic Whites (35.4%), 55 Asians (11.6%), 19 Blacks (4.0%), and seven others (1.5%). Panel testing found that 15.6% (74/475) of patients carried deleterious mutations for a total of 79 mutations identified. This included 7.4% (35/475) of patients who had a mutation identified that would not have been tested with a gene-by-gene approach. The identification of a panel-added mutation impacted clinical management for most of cases (69%, 24/35), and genetic testing was recommended for the first degree relatives of nearly all of them (91%, 32/35). Variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) were identified in a higher proportion of tests performed in ethnic minorities. Multi-gene panel testing increases the yield of mutations detected and adds to the capability of providing individualized cancer risk assessment. VUSs represent an interpretive challenge due to less data available outside of White, non-Hispanic populations. Further studies are necessary to expand understanding of the implementation and utilization of panels across broad clinical settings and patient populations.