Prognostication and Goals of Care Decisions in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Survey of The Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference Working Group

Abstract Best practice guidelines have advanced severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) care; however, there is little that currently informs goals of care decisions and processes despite their importance and frequency. Panelists from the Seattle International severe traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC) participated in a survey consisting of 24 questions. Questions queried use of prognostic calculators, variability in and responsibility for goals of care decisions, and acceptability of neurological outcomes, as well as putative means of improving decisions that might limit care. A total of 97.6% of the 42 SIBICC panelists completed the survey. Responses to most questions were highly variable. Overall, panelists reported infrequent use of prognostic calculators, and observed variability in patient prognostication and goals of care decisions. They felt that it would be beneficial for physicians to improve consensus on what constitutes an acceptable neurological outcome as well as what chance of achieving that outcome is acceptable. Panelists felt that the public should help to define what constitutes a good outcome and expressed some support for a "nihilism guard." More than 50% of panelists felt that if it was certain to be permanent, a vegetative state or lower severe disability would justify a withdrawal of care decision, whereas 15% felt that upper severe disability justified such a decision. Whether conceptualizing an ideal or existing prognostic calculator to predict death or an unacceptable outcome, on average a 64-69% chance of a poor outcome was felt to justify treatment withdrawal. These results demonstrate important variability in goals of care decision making and a desire to reduce this variability. Our panel of recognized TBI experts opined on the neurological outcomes and chances of those outcomes that might prompt consideration of care withdrawal; however, imprecision of prognostication and existing prognostication tools is a significant impediment to standardizing the approach to care-limiting decisions.

Cotard's Delusion and Its Relation With Different Psychiatric Diagnoses in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Background Cotard's delusion/Cotard's syndrome is a series of delusions ranging from a false, fixed, unshakeable belief that one has lost their soul, blood, organs, and body parts to the belief that one is dead. The syndrome was initially thought to be associated with only mood disorders but later was found in other psychiatric illnesses as well. Aim The study aimed to find an association between Cotard's delusion and the psychopathology of different psychiatric diagnoses. Method The clinical study comprised seven patients presenting with symptoms of Cotard syndrome with different presentations, diagnoses, and onset and meeting inclusion criteria. The study was carried out in the Department of Psychiatry, Assam Medical College and Hospital. The patients were hospitalized and, after a detailed history, mental status examination, and laboratory investigations, were treated with pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods. A descriptive statistical analysis was done. Results Denial of the existence of body organs was the most similar complaint encountered in the cases. The duration of illness onset ranged from weeks to months. The symptoms were found to be present in different psychiatric illnesses like schizophrenia, delusional disorder, depression, and intellectual disability. The patient had responded well to pharmacological agents with the exception of three patients who were treated with electroconvulsive therapy. Conclusion The study highlights the different subtypes of Cotard's syndrome and its associated symptoms, which provides a better understanding of the condition. The case series presents a finding of a higher proportion of male patients and adolescent cases than in previous reports. The study also provides valuable insights into its heterogeneity in the diagnosis and treatment of Cotard's syndrome, which may help in the early recognition and management of this rare condition.

Pediatric Acute Kidney Injury-The Time for Nihilism Is Over

Nihilism has been pervasive in the acute kidney injury field for decades, given that no studies, had been able to reduce AKI rates in hospitalized patients. Furthermore, children with AKI comprise an orphan population, where there is little incentive to develop diagnostics, therapeutics or devices specifically for them. The 3rd International Symposium on Acute Kidney Injury in Children, held in Cincinnati in October 2018, provided a platform to demonstrate the advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of children with, or at-risk for AKI, and also highlighted barriers to advancing care for this population. The progress made in the pediatric AKI since the 2nd International Symposium in 2016, highlighted the positive outcomes emanating from federal agency, private foundation and corporate sponsor investment in pediatric AKI. As a result, the time should be over for nihilism in the pediatric field.