Trends in opioid initiation among people who use opioids in three US cities

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

The increased availability of prescription opioids (PO) and non-medical prescription opioids (NMPO) has fundamentally altered drug markets and typical trajectories from initiation to high-risk use among people who use opioids (PWUO). This multi-site study explores trends in opioid initiation in three US cities and associations with sociodemographic factors, current drug use and overdose risk.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We analysed survey data from a cross-sectional study of PWUO in Baltimore, Maryland (n = 173), Boston, Massachusetts (n = 80) and Providence, Rhode Island (n = 75). Age of first exposure to PO, NMPO and heroin was used to calculate opioid of initiation, and multinomial regression was employed to explore correlates of initiating with each.

RESULTS

Thirty-three percent of PWUO initiated with heroin, 24% with PO, 18% with NMPO and 24% with multiple opioids in their first year of use. We observed a reduction in heroin initiation and gradual replacement with PO/NMPO over time. Women were more likely to initiate with NMPO [relative risk ratio (RRR) 2.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1, 5.0], PO (RRR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1, 4.4) or multiple opioids (RRR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1, 4.2), than heroin. PWUO initiating with NMPO had significantly higher current benzodiazepine use, relative to those initiating with heroin (RRR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4, 7.4), and a high prevalence of current fentanyl use (30%).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights women and PWUO initiating with NMPO as key risk groups amid the changing landscape of opioid use and overdose, and discusses implications for targeted prevention and treatment.

Association Between Initial Opioid Prescribing Patterns and Subsequent Long-Term Use Among Opioid-Naïve Patients: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Long-term efficacy of opioids for non-cancer pain is unproven, but risks argue for cautious prescribing. Few data suggest how long or how much opioid can be prescribed for opioid-naïve patients without inadvertently promoting long-term use.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between initial opioid prescribing patterns and likelihood of long-term use among opioid-naïve patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study; data from Oregon resident prescriptions linked to death certificates and hospital discharges.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients filling opioid prescriptions between October 1, 2012, and September 30, 2013, with no opioid fills for the previous 365 days. Subgroup analyses examined patients under age 45 who did not die in the follow-up year, excluding most cancer or palliative care patients.

MAIN MEASURES

Exposure: Numbers of prescription fills and cumulative morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) dispensed during 30 days following opioid initiation ("initiation month").

OUTCOME

Proportion of patients with six or more opioid fills during the subsequent year ("long-term users").

KEY RESULTS

There were 536,767 opioid-naïve patients who filled an opioid prescription. Of these, 26,785 (5.0 %) became long-term users. Numbers of fills and cumulative MMEs during the initiation month were associated with long-term use. Among patients under age 45 using short-acting opioids who did not die in the follow-up year, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for long-term use among those receiving two fills versus one was 2.25 (95 % CI: 2.17, 2.33). Compared to those who received < 120 total MMEs, those who received between 400 and 799 had an OR of 2.96 (95 % CI: 2.81, 3.11). Patients initiating with long-acting opioids had a higher risk of long-term use than those initiating with short-acting drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Early opioid prescribing patterns are associated with long-term use. While patient characteristics are important, clinicians have greater control over initial prescribing. Our findings may help minimize the risk of inadvertently initiating long-term opioid use.