Highly Sensitive 3-Tesla Real Inversion Recovery MRI Detects Leptomeningeal Contrast Enhancement in Chronic Active Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal contrast enhancement (LME) on T2-weighted Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (T2-FLAIR) MRI is a reported marker of leptomeningeal inflammation, which is known to be associated with progression of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, this MRI approach, as typically implemented on clinical 3-tesla (T) systems, detects only a few enhancing foci in ~25% of patients and has thus been criticized as poorly sensitive.

PURPOSE

To compare an optimized 3D real-reconstruction inversion recovery (Real-IR) MRI sequence on a clinical 3 T scanner to T2-FLAIR for prevalence, characteristics, and clinical/radiological correlations of LME.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We obtained 3D T2-FLAIR and Real-IR scans before and after administration of standard-dose gadobutrol in 177 scans of 154 participants (98 women, 64%; mean ± SD age: 49 ± 12 years), including 124 with an MS-spectrum diagnosis, 21 with other neurological and/or inflammatory disorders, and 9 without neurological history. We calculated contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) in 20 representative LME foci and determined association of LME with cortical lesions identified at 7 T (n = 19), paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL) at 3 T (n = 105), and clinical/demographic data.

RESULTS

We observed focal LME in 73% of participants on Real-IR (70% in established MS, 33% in healthy volunteers, P < 0.0001), compared to 33% on T2-FLAIR (34% vs. 11%, P = 0.0002). Real-IR showed 3.7-fold more LME foci than T2-FLAIR ( P = 0.001), including all T2-FLAIR foci. LME CNR was 2.5-fold higher by Real-IR ( P < 0.0001). The major determinant of LME status was age. Although LME was not associated with cortical lesions, the number of PRL was associated with the number of LME foci on both T2-FLAIR ( P = 0.003) and Real-IR ( P = 0.0003) after adjusting for age, sex, and white matter lesion volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-IR a promising tool to detect, characterize, and understand the significance of LME in MS. The association between PRL and LME highlights a possible role of the leptomeninges in sustaining chronic inflammation.

Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein levels correlate with paramagnetic rim lesions in people with radiologically isolated syndrome

BACKGROUND

There are no specific, evidence-based recommendations for the management of individuals with radiologically isolated syndrome. Imaging and blood biomarkers may have prognostic utility.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether plasma neurofilament light protein (NfL) or glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels in people with radiologically isolated syndrome correlate with imaging measures that have been shown to be associated with negative clinical outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of people with radiologically isolated syndrome. Participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and cervical spinal cord, and plasma was collected. Plasma NfL and GFAP levels were measured with a single-molecule array, and correlations with MRI measures were assessed, including the number of: T1-black holes, white-matter lesions demonstrating the central vein sign, paramagnetic rim lesions, cervical spinal cord lesions and infratentorial lesions.

RESULTS

Plasma GFAP levels, but not NfL levels, showed correlations with the number of T1-black holes, white matter lesions demonstrating the central vein sign and paramagnetic rim lesions (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We found correlations between plasma GFAP levels and imaging measures associated with poor clinical outcomes and chronic inflammation in individuals with radiologically isolated syndrome. Plasma GFAP may have prognostic utility in clinical trials and clinical practice.

Imaging chronic active lesions in multiple sclerosis: a consensus statement

Chronic active lesions (CAL) are an important manifestation of chronic inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) and have implications for non-relapsing biological progression. In recent years, the discovery of innovative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and PET derived biomarkers has made it possible to detect CAL, and to some extent quantify them, in the brain of persons with MS, in vivo. Paramagnetic rim lesions on susceptibility-sensitive MRI sequences, MRI-defined slowly expanding lesions on T1-weighted (T1-w) and T2-w scans, and 18-kDa translocator protein-positive lesions on PET are promising candidate biomarkers of CAL. While partially overlapping, these biomarkers do not have equivalent sensitivity and specificity to histopathological CAL. Standardization in the use of available imaging measures for CAL identification, quantification, and monitoring is lacking. To fast-forward clinical translation of CAL, the North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative developed a Consensus Statement, which provides guidance for the radiological definition and measurement of CAL. The proposed manuscript presents this Consensus Statement, summarizes the multistep process leading to it, and identifies the remaining major gaps in knowledge.

Structural disconnectivity from paramagnetic rim lesions is related to disability in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

In people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), lesions with a hyperintense rim (rim+) on Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) have been shown to have greater myelin damage compared to rim- lesions, but their association with disability has not yet been investigated. Furthermore, how QSM rim+ and rim- lesions differentially impact disability through their disruptions to structural connectivity has not been explored. We test the hypothesis that structural disconnectivity due to rim+ lesions is more predictive of disability compared to structural disconnectivity due to rim- lesions.

METHODS

Ninety-six pwMS were included in our study. Individuals with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) <2 were considered to have lower disability (n = 59). For each gray matter region, a Change in Connectivity (ChaCo) score, that is, the percent of connecting streamlines also passing through a rim- or rim+ lesion, was computed. Adaptive Boosting was used to classify the pwMS into lower versus greater disability groups based on ChaCo scores from rim+ and rim- lesions. Classification performance was assessed using the area under ROC curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The model based on ChaCo from rim+ lesions outperformed the model based on ChaCo from rim- lesions (AUC = 0.67 vs 0.63, p-value < .05). The left thalamus and left cerebellum were the most important regions in classifying pwMS into disability categories.

CONCLUSION

rim+ lesions may be more influential on disability through their disruptions to the structural connectome than rim- lesions. This study provides a deeper understanding of how rim+ lesion location/size and resulting disruption to the structural connectome can contribute to MS-related disability.

Cognitive impairment, the central vein sign, and paramagnetic rim lesions in RIS

Objective:

The central vein sign (CVS) and “paramagnetic rim lesions” (PRL) are emerging imaging biomarkers in multiple sclerosis (MS) reflecting perivenular demyelination and chronic, smoldering inflammation. The objective of this study was to assess relationships between cognitive impairment (CI) and the CVS and PRL in radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS).

Methods:

Twenty-seven adults with RIS underwent 3.0 T MRI of the brain and cervical spinal cord (SC) and cognitive assessment using the minimal assessment of cognitive function in MS battery. The CVS and PRL were assessed in white-matter lesions (WMLs) on T2*-weighted segmented echo-planar magnitude and phase images. Multivariable linear regression evaluated relationships between CI and MRI measures.

Results:

Global CI was present in 9 (33%) participants with processing speed and visual memory most frequently affected. Most participants (93%) had ⩾ 40% CVS + WML (a threshold distinguishing MS from other WM disorders); 63% demonstrated PRL. Linear regression revealed that CVS + WML predicted performance on verbal memory(β =-0.024, p = 0.03) while PRL predicted performance on verbal memory (β = -0.040, p = 0.04) and processing speed (β = -0.039, p = 0.03).

Conclusions:

CI is common in RIS and is associated with markers of perivenular demyelination and chronic inflammation in WML, such as CVS + WML and PRL. A prospective follow-up of this cohort will ascertain the importance of CI, CVS, and PRL as risk factors for conversion from RIS to MS.