Massive and irreparable rotator cuff tear treatment by arthroscopic partial repair with long head of the biceps tendon augmentation provides better healing and functional results than partial repair only

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of 2 treatment methods for massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs): partial repair (PR) and PR with long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) augmentation. Biceps tendon augmentation is believed to promote better healing at the bone-tendon junction, leading to improved clinical and radiologic outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative study included patients with chronic, massive and irreparable RCTs involving both the supraspinatus (SSP) and infraspinatus muscles. Only patients with failure of nonoperative treatment and at least 1 year of follow-up between 2013 and 2018 were analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the chosen treatment method. Irreparability was defined intraoperatively as the inability to achieve sustainable repair of the SSP after complete release, typically corresponding to a Goutallier classification of stage ≥ 3 and Patte classification of stage 3. The clinical assessment protocol involved measurements of range of motion and shoulder strength, as well as the Constant-Murley score (CMS) and Simple Shoulder Test score. Radiologic assessment comprised measurements of the acromiohumeral distance, Hamada classification, Sugaya classification, and Goutallier classification of both the SSP and infraspinatus.

RESULTS

The study included data from 60 patients (30 in each group) with a mean age of 62.5 years and a mean follow-up period of 34.5 months. The retear rate was 43.3% for PR with LHBT augmentation and 73.3% for PR alone (P = .036). During the final examination, statistically significant differences in favor of PR with LHBT augmentation were observed for the CMS (76.2 ± 10.9 vs. 70.9 ± 11.5, P = .034), Sugaya classification (3.5 ± 1.1 vs. 4.1 ± 0.9, P = .035), and acromiohumeral distance (5.8 ± 2 mm vs. 4.7 ± 1.3 mm, P = .021). There were no significant differences between the groups in range of motion, shoulder strength, Hamada classification, Simple Shoulder Test score, and postoperative Goutallier stage.

CONCLUSION

PR with LHBT augmentation for patients with irreparable, massive RCTs provides a lower retear rate and better humeral head centralization, as well as improved results measured by the CMS, compared with PR alone.

Comparison of Outcomes After Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction Versus Arthroscopic Partial Repair or Arthroscopic Debridement for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Background

Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR), arthroscopic partial repair (PR), and arthroscopic debridement (DB) are valid treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff (RC) tears.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic SCR with arthroscopic PR and arthroscopic DB in patients with irreparable posterosuperior RC tears. It was hypothesized that SCR would lead to superior clinical and functional outcomes compared with PR or DB.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Clinical and functional outcomes of this single-center retrospective study included range of motion, strength, and the age- and sex-adjusted Constant-Murley score. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) involved the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, the Subjective Shoulder Value, and the visual analog scale for pain. Graft and repaired tendon integrity was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months of follow-up.

Results

In total, 57 patients treated with SCR (n = 20), PR (n = 17), and DB (n = 20) were included. The mean clinical follow-up was 33.8 ± 17.9 months. Preoperative clinical and functional characteristics were comparable among the 3 groups. The range of motion and clinical and functional scores of all 3 groups significantly improved from pre- to postoperatively. Postoperative PROMs showed no differences among all 3 study groups. SCR revealed significantly higher postoperative strength compared with PR (P = .001) and DB (P = .004). Postoperative MRI revealed a rerupture in 4 patients with SCR (20%). Postoperative MRI showed a rerupture in 9 patients with PR ( 53%). Fatty muscle infiltration of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus significantly progressed within all 3 study groups in postoperative MRI scans. No clinical and functional differences were observed between intact and reruptured PR.

Conclusion

Patients who underwent SCR had better postoperative strength recovery than patients who underwent PR or DB.

[Long-term effectiveness of arthroscopic partial repair for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears]

Objective

To explore the long-term effectiveness of arthroscopic partial repair in treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears from both the radiological and clinical perspectives.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 24 patients (25 sides) with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears who met the inclusion criteria between May 2006 and September 2014. Among them, there were 17 males (18 sides) and 7 females (7 sides) with an age range of 43-67 years (mean, 55.0 years). There were 23 cases of unilateral injury and 1 case of bilateral injuries. All patients were treated with the arthroscopic partial repair. The active range of motion of forward elevation and abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation, as well as the muscle strength for forward flexion and external rotation, were recorded before operation, at the first postoperative follow-up, and at last follow-up. The American Association of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scoring, and Constant score were used to evaluate shoulder joint function. And the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate shoulder joint pain. MRI examination was performed. The signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) was measured above the anchor point near the footprint area (m area) and above the glenoid (g area) in the oblique coronal T2 fat suppression sequence. The atrophy of the supraspinatus muscle was evaluated using the tangent sign. The global fatty degeneration index (GFDI) was measured to assess fat infiltration in the supraspinatus muscle, infraspinatus muscle, teres minor muscle, upper and lower parts of the subscapularis muscle. The mean GFDI (GFDI-5) of 5 muscles was calculated.

Results

The incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up with the first follow-up time of 1.0-1.7 years (mean, 1.3 years) and the last follow-up time of 7-11 years (mean, 8.4 years). At last follow-up, the range of motion and muscle strength of forward elevation and abduction, ASES score, Constant score, UCLA score, and VAS score of the patients significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05). Compared with the first follow-up, except for a significant increase in ASES score ( P<0.05), there was no significant difference in the other indicators ( P>0.05). Compared with those before operation, the degree of supraspinatus muscle infiltration worsened at last follow-up ( P<0.05), GFDI-5 increased significantly ( P<0.05), and there was significant difference in the tangent sign ( P<0.05); while there was no significant difference in the infiltration degree of infraspinatus muscle, teres minor muscle, and subscapularis muscle, upper and lower parts of the subscapularis muscle ( P>0.05). Compared with the first follow-up, the SNQm and SNQg decreased significantly at last follow-up ( P<0.05). At the first and last follow-up, there was no correlation between the SNQm and SNQg and the ASES score, Constant score, UCLA score, and VAS score of the shoulder ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

Arthroscopic partial repair is effective in treating massive irreparable rotator cuff tear and significantly improves long-term shoulder joint function. For patients with severe preoperative fat infiltration involving a large number of tendons and poor quality of repairable tendons, it is suggested to consider other treatment methods.

Management of Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears-A Current Concepts Review and Proposed Treatment Algorithm by the AGA Shoulder Committee

Posterosuperior rotator cuff tears range among the most common causes of shoulder complaints. While non-operative treatment is typically reserved for the elderly patient with low functional demands, surgical treatment is considered the gold standard for active patients. More precisely, an anatomic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is considered the most desirable treatment option and should be generally attempted during surgery. If an anatomic RCR is impossible, the adequate choice of treatment for irreparable rotator cuff tears remains a matter of debate among shoulder surgeons. Following a critical review of the contemporary literature, the authors suggest the following evidence- and experience-based treatment recommendation. In the non-functional, osteoarthritic shoulder, treatment strategies in the management of irreparable posterosuperior RCT include debridement-based procedures and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as the treatment of choice. Joint-preserving procedures aimed at restoring glenohumeral biomechanics and function should be reserved for the non-osteoarthritic shoulder. Prior to these procedures, however, patients should be counseled about deteriorating results over time. Recent innovations such as the superior capsule reconstruction and the implantation of a subacromial spacer show promising short-term results, yet future studies with long-term follow-up are required to derive stronger recommendations.

Humeral head coverage in arthroscopic partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears improves functional outcomes: an analysis of influential factors

BACKGROUND

Although partial rotator cuff repair has shown good outcomes, differences in clinical outcomes remain concerns. This study was performed to determine whether patients with humeral head coverage would show better functional outcomes than patients without humeral head coverage and to identify the factors for humeral head coverage after arthroscopic partial repair of massive tears.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 63 patients with massive rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic partial repair between 2012 and 2018. Two to four margin convergences were first performed; then, the Mason-Allen technique was performed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with humeral head coverage (38 cases) and those without humeral head coverage (25 cases). The following factors were evaluated: age; sex; hypertension; diabetes; osteoporosis; preoperative and postoperative pseudoparalysis, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Constant score, acromiohumeral distance, and subacromial bony spur; and subscapularis tear and repair. Muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively, and the integrity of the repaired cuff was evaluated by ultrasonography at a minimum of 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Compared with preoperative values, significant improvements in VAS pain scores (from 6.27 to 2.32 in patients with humeral head coverage and from 7.00 to 2.81 in those without humeral head coverage) and Constant scores (from 51.35 to 75.95 and from 44.62 to 69.81, respectively) were observed in both groups (P < .001). Statistical analysis revealed that postoperative VAS pain scores (2.32 vs. 2.81) and Constant scores (75.95 vs. 69.81) in patients with humeral head coverage were superior to those in patients without humeral head coverage (P = .044 and P = .003, respectively). The integrity of the repaired cuff was evaluated by ultrasonography, and partial tears were found in 4 of 37 patients with humeral head coverage and 2 of 26 patients without humeral head coverage (P = .816). Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed that age (P < .001), comorbidity (P = .005), symptom duration (P = .023), preoperative shoulder mobility (P < .001), maintained acromiohumeral distance (P = .006), subscapularis tear (P = .026), and less preoperative supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle atrophy (P = .001 and P = .010, respectively) had significant correlations with humeral head coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall satisfactory results were achieved in most patients regardless of high retear rates, but patients with partial repair covering the humeral head were associated with better outcomes than patients without humeral head coverage. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that age (<70 years, P = .003), capability of shoulder mobility (P = .005), maintenance of the acromiohumeral space (>7 mm, P = .016), and less atrophy of the rotator cuff muscles (P = .021) were favorable factors to achieve humeral head coverage during surgical partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears.

Treatment of rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is ongoing controversy regarding optimal treatment for full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Given that the evidence surrounding the use of various treatment options has expanded, an overall assessment is required.

OBJECTIVES

The following were compared to determine which resulted in improved patient-reported function, pain, and reoperation rates for each: (1) double-row (DR) fixation and single-row (SR) fixation in arthroscopic cuff repair; (2) latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) with lower trapezius transfer (LTT), partial rotator cuff repair, and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR); and (3) early and late surgical intervention.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched through to April 20, 2021. Additional studies were identified from reviews. The following were included: (1) All English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients ≥18 years of age comparing SR and DR fixation, (2) observational studies comparing LDT with LTT, partial repair, and SCR, and (3) observational studies comparing early vs. late treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

RESULTS

A total of 15 RCTs (n = 1096 randomized patients) were included in the meta-analysis of SR vs. DR fixation. No significant standardized mean differences in function (0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.09, 0.24) or pain (-0.01, 95% CI -0.52, 0.49) were observed. There was a difference in retear rates in favor of DR compared with SR fixation (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06, 2.29). Four studies were included in the systematic review of LDT compared with a surgical control. LDT and partial repair did not reveal any differences in function (-1.12, 95% CI -4.02, 1.78) on comparison. A single study compared arthroscopically assisted LDT to LTT and observed a nonstatistical difference in the Constant score of 14.7 (95% CI -4.06, 33.46). A single RCT compared LDT with SCR and revealed a trend toward superiority for the Constant score with SCR with a mean difference of -9.6 (95% CI -19.82, 0.62). Comparison of early vs. late treatment revealed a paucity of comparative studies with varying definitions of "early" and "late" treatment, which made meaningful interpretation of the results difficult.

CONCLUSION

DR fixation leads to similar improvement in function and pain compared with SR fixation and results in a higher healing rate. LDT transfer yields results similar to those from partial repair, LTT, and SCR in functional outcomes. Further study is required to determine the optimal timing of treatment and to increase confidence in these findings. Future trials of high methodologic quality comparing LDT with LTT and SCR are required.

Irreparable Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears With Low-Grade Fatty Degeneration of the Infraspinatus Tendon: Minimum 7-Year Follow-up of Fascia Autograft Patch Procedure and Partial Repair

BACKGROUND

In shoulders with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) with high-grade fatty degeneration (Goutallier stage 3 or 4) of the supraspinatus tendon and low-grade fatty degeneration (Goutallier stage 1 or 2) of the infraspinatus tendon (ISP), arthroscopic patch grafting (PG) has been reported as superior to partial repair (PR) regarding the ISP retear rate at short-term to midterm follow-up. However, the longer term outcomes are unclear.

PURPOSE

To compare clinical and structural outcomes in the PG and PR groups at a minimum of 7 years postoperatively.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We evaluated 24 patients in the PG group and 24 patients in the PR group. We primarily used the Constant score for clinical outcomes and performed magnetic resonance imaging for structural outcomes in the PG and PR groups. The risk factors for a retear of the ISP were identified by univariate and multivariate (forward stepwise selection method) logistic regression analyses. We primarily compared values at midterm follow-up (<4 years) with values at the final follow-up (minimum 7 years) for each patient.

RESULTS

The mean midterm and final follow-up times for the PG group were 41.0 and 95.1 months, respectively, compared with 35.7 and 99.3 months, respectively, for the PR group. We found significant differences for the midterm and final follow-up Constant total scores in the PG and PR groups (midterm follow-up: 79.1 vs 69.9, respectively [P = .001]; final follow-up: 76.0 vs 65.3, respectively [P = .006]) and in the Constant strength scores (midterm follow-up: 14.6 vs 8.5, respectively [P < .001]; final follow-up: 13.1 vs 8.3, respectively [P = .001]). Treatment group (PR) was a significant predictor of an ISP retear in the logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 3.545; P = .043).

CONCLUSION

Patients with low-grade massive RCTs treated with PG or PR improved significantly in terms of clinical outcomes at the midterm and final follow-up time points. However, Constant scores were significantly better in the PG group at the final follow-up.

Midterm Functional and Structural Outcomes of Large/Massive Cuff Tears Treated by Arthroscopic Partial Repair

Background:

Previous studies have shown good clinical outcomes in patients with irreparable large or massive rotator cuff tears treated using arthroscopic partial repair (APR); however, few studies have evaluated both functional and structural outcomes in these patients.

Purpose:

To evaluate both functional and structural outcomes in patients with large or massive rotator cuff tears treated using APR.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Between March 2009 and November 2016, a total of 30 patients underwent APR because of the irreparability of their large or massive rotator cuff tears during surgery. Of these patients, 24 completed the minimum 24-month follow-up (mean, 61.8 ± 27.1 months; range, 24-112 months) and were included in this study. Functional outcome measures included the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scores and the visual analog scale for pain. Structural outcome measures comprised preoperative fatty degeneration, mediolateral tear size, residual tendon attachment area, and glenohumeral (GH) arthritic changes evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging scans or plain radiographs before and after surgery. Functional and structural outcomes were evaluated preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively, and at the final follow-up.

Results:

The JOA scores for all patients significantly improved from 67.9 ± 11.3 preoperatively to 85.4 ± 15.6 postoperatively (P < .0001). Similarly, the UCLA scores significantly improved from 15.8 ± 4.20 preoperatively to 29 ± 6.69 at final follow-up postoperatively (P < .0001). The mediolateral tear size were significantly decreased at 3 months postoperatively (P < .001) and at the final follow-up (P < .001). Compared with preoperative scores, the novel score evaluating the residual tendon attachment area improved from 3.08 ± 0.46 to 3.54 ± 0.41 (P < .001) after surgery overall, although it significantly deteriorated from 3 months postoperatively to the final follow-up. GH osteoarthritis progressed in 6 patients (25%). Patients who developed osteoarthritis had lower JOA and UCLA scores than did those who did not (JOA, P = .010; UCLA, P = .037).

Conclusion:

In irreparable large or massive rotator cuff tears treated using APR, functional outcome improved after surgery. Although the residual tendon attachment area improved, functional outcome after APR corresponded to the GH alterations at the midterm follow-up. Longer-term follow-up is needed to further elucidate the effect of APR on clinical outcomes in these patients.

A Novel Reparability Assessment Scoring System for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

Background:

It is difficult to predict the arthroscopic reparability of rotator cuff tears preoperatively when the repair is challenging. This can result in unsatisfactory outcomes and a high retear rate.

Purpose:

To develop an assessment score reflecting factors in rotator cuff tears that can predict reparability before surgery.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

We retrospectively enrolled 170 patients with rotator cuff tears larger than 2 cm who underwent arthroscopic repair. Patients were categorized into “complete repair” and “partial repair” groups based on the area of the exposed footprint after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. In each group, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging factors (tear size, fatty infiltration, remnant tendon length, atrophy), clinical factors (range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score), and patient demographics were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to choose the optimal cutoff value. A reparability assessment score was formulated through stepwise selection using variables that showed significant between-group differences on univariate analysis. We selected 4 variables and assigned a relative score for each variable based on estimated coefficient values. The sum of the scores for each factor ranged from 0 to 5.

Results:

The average rotator cuff tear size was 28 × 26 mm. The torn rotator cuff was repaired completely in 74 patients (43.5%) and partially in 96 patients (56.5%). The following factors were chosen for the reparability assessment score: positive tangent sign (odds ratio [OR], 5.969; P = .001), fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus of grade ≤2 (OR, 3.537; P = .001), coronal tear size ≥26 mm (OR, 3.315; P = .002), and remnant tendon length <15 mm (OR, 2.584; P = .017). Complete repair was possible if the sum of the scores was <3 (area under curve, 0.803; 95% CI, 0.739-0.867; sensitivity, 51.0%; specificity, 95.9%).

Conclusion:

In patients with a score of <3 on the novel reparability assessment score, complete repair was obtainable, whereas in patients with a score of ≥3, complete repair was difficult and other methods such as biologic grafts or arthroplasty had to be considered for a favorable prognosis.

Comparing Clinical Outcomes After Subacromial Spacer Insertion Versus Other Reconstruction Methods in the Treatment of Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Background:

Previous studies on subacromial spacer (SAS) insertion have been limited to case series that did not compare the effectiveness of this technique with other techniques.

Hypothesis:

Outcomes after SAS insertion for the treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (IMRCTs) will be similar to those of other techniques.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

This retrospective study was based on data collected from patients who underwent correction of IMRCTs between January 2010 and October 2017. Group 1 patients (n = 17) received SAS insertion with or without partial repair; group 2 patients (n = 36) were treated with other techniques (isolated partial repairs or bridging grafts). Preoperative tear size and global fatty degeneration index values were evaluated. Range of motion, visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and acromiohumeral distance (AHD) were assessed preoperatively and at final follow-up at least 2 years after the surgery (range, 24-60 months). In both groups, ultrasonographic examination was performed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at 1 year.

Results:

Tear size and preoperative global fatty degeneration index were not significantly different between the groups (all P > .05). There were no differences in functional scores between the groups at final follow-up (all P > .05). AHD was maintained at final follow-up in group 1 (mean ± SD: 6.2 ± 2.1 mm [postoperatively] vs 6.7 ± 2.3 mm [final follow-up]; P = .678), and there was no difference compared with group 2 (7.2 ± 3.2 mm; P = .244). Patients with retears in group 2 (23 of 36, 63.9%) had lower ASES (P = .041) and SST (P = .027) scores at final follow-up when compared with patients in group 1. Six patients (35.3%) in group 1 had partial repairs; these patients had better external rotation at 90° (P = .047), better SST scores (P = .036), and higher AHDs at final follow-up (P = .046) than those in group 1 who had no repair. Three patients (50%) showed retears of partially repaired tendons on MRI. Of 13 patients (76.5%) in group 1 with postoperative MRI, 12 (92.3%) showed fibrotic tissue in the subacromial space not seen preoperatively.

Conclusion:

There was no difference in outcomes between SAS and the other reconstruction methods for treating IMRCTs. However, given the high retear rate associated with other techniques and poor functional outcomes after retear, SAS insertion could be a viable option for treating IMRCTs.

Irreparable rotator cuff tears: challenges and solutions

Irreparable rotator cuff tears are common conditions seen by shoulder surgeons, characterized by a torn and retracted tendon associated with muscle atrophy and impaired mobility. Direct fixation of the torn tendon is not possible due to the retracted tendon and lack of healing potential which result in poor outcome. Several treatment options are viable but correct indication is mandatory for a good result, pain improvement, and restoration of shoulder function. Patient can be treated either with a conservative program or surgically when necessary, by different available modalities like arthroscopic debridement, partial reconstruction, subacromial spacer, tendon transfer, and shoulder replacement with reverse prosthesis. The aim of this study was to review literature to give an overview of the available possible solutions, with indications and expected outcomes.

Is augmentation with the long head of the biceps tendon helpful in arthroscopic treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears?

BACKGROUND

Although various surgical techniques have been used to treat irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs), debate remains regarding which treatment is most effective. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes of partial rotator cuff repair versus repair with augmentation of the tenotomized long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT).

METHODS

This study included 76 patients with large to massive RCTs. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with LHBT augmentation was performed in 39 patients (group I), while partial repair was performed in 37 patients (group II). Clinical and functional outcomes were compared with a visual analog scale for pain and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, and Korean Shoulder Score. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 29.6 ± 7.8 months (range, 24-51 months). Significant improvements in pain and clinical scores were observed in both groups at the last follow-up. However, there were no significant differences in pain, clinical scores, or range of motion between the 2 groups at any time point. Retears were observed in 16 patients in group I (41.0%) and 14 in group II (37.8%, P = .78). Augmented LHBT pathology was observed in 10 patients (25.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Both partial repair and repair with LHBT augmentation were effective in improving clinical and radiologic outcomes. No significant differences in clinical outcomes or repaired cuff integrity were observed between the groups. The investment of operation time and effort in augmenting the LHBT in the treatment of irreparable RCTs is not recommended.

Current concepts in the primary management of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears without arthritis

Various procedures exist for patients with irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (IRCT). At present, no single surgical option has demonstrated clinical superiority.There is no panacea for treatment and patients must be aware, in cases of palliative or non-prosthetic options, of an alarming rate of structural failure (around 50%) in the short term.The current review does not support the initial use of complex and expensive techniques in the management of posterosuperior IRCT.Further prospective and comparative studies with large cohort populations and long-term follow-up are necessary to establish effectiveness of expensive or complicated procedures such as superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), subacromial spacers or biological augmentation as reliable and useful alternative treatments for IRCT. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180002.

Outcome of partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without human tissue allograft bridging repair

BACKGROUND

The surgical management of massive rotator cuff tears remains a challenge. It is suggested that, even in a massive tear that appears irreparable, attempting to repair it as much as possible can be helpful in improving functional outcomes. However the results can be short term and variable. The purpose of our study was to determine if human tissue allograft bridged repair of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears to achieve a complete repair produces similar outcomes compared to partial repair alone.

METHODS

We prospectively reviewed outcome scores in 13 patients who underwent partial repair alone for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and compared them to 13 patients who had partial repairs bridged with allograft. Oxford and Constant scores were compared pre-operatively and at a minimum follow-up of 2 years (range 2 years to 5 years).

RESULTS

The mean improvement in the Constant score at final follow-up compared to pre-operative scores was 27.7 points in the partial repair group and 42.8 points in the allograft group (p < 0.01). The Oxford Shoulder Score improved mean of 19.3 points in the partial repair group and 29 points in the allograft group (p < 0.02) at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Human tissue matrix allograft provides a better outcome for open bridging of irreparable rotator cuff tears than partial repair alone.

Arthroscopic Partial Repair of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Preoperative Factors Associated With Outcome Deterioration Over 2 Years

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic partial repair is a treatment option in irreparable large-to-massive rotator cuff tears without arthritic changes. However, there are indications that arthroscopic partial repair does not yield satisfactory outcomes.

PURPOSE

To report the clinical and radiographic results of arthroscopic partial repairs in patients with irreparable large-to-massive cuff tears. In addition, an analysis was performed regarding preoperative factors that may influence patient outcomes and patient-rated satisfaction over time.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2011, a total of 31 patients who underwent arthroscopic partial repair for irreparable large-to-massive cuff tears were retrospectively evaluated. Partial repair was defined as posterior cuff tissue repair with or without subscapularis tendon repair to restore the transverse force couple of the cuff. Pain visual analog scale (PVAS), questionnaire results (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] and Simple Shoulder Test [SST]), and radiographic changes (acromiohumeral distance and degenerative change) were assessed preoperatively, at first follow-up (roughly 1 year postoperatively), and at final follow-up (>2 years postoperatively). Patients rated their satisfaction level at each postoperative follow-up as well. Preoperative factors that might influence outcomes, such as patient demographics, tear size, and fatty infiltration, were investigated.

RESULTS

The preoperative, first follow-up, and final follow-up results for mean PVAS (5.13, 2.13, and 3.16, respectively) and questionnaires (ASES: 41.97, 76.37, and 73.78; SST: 3.61, 6.33, and 6.07, respectively) improved significantly (all P < .05). Radiographic evaluation showed no difference compared with preoperative status. Nevertheless, patient-rated satisfaction at final evaluation was inferior: 16 good responses ("very satisfied" and "satisfied") and 15 poor responses ("rather the same" and "dissatisfied"). Despite initial improvements in both groups (P < .05), patients with poor satisfaction demonstrated statistically significant deterioration in mean PVAS (from 2.07 to 4.67), questionnaire scores (ASES: from 74.56 to 59.80; SST: from 5.11 to 3.81), and acromiohumeral distance (from 7.19 to 5.06 mm) between the first and final follow-up (all P < .05). Patients with good satisfaction showed no significant difference or they improved (P > .05) from the first to the final follow-up. Among preoperative factors, fatty infiltration of the teres minor was identified as the only statistically significant factor affecting patient-rated satisfaction (P = .007).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that arthroscopic partial repair may produce initial improvement in selected outcomes at 2-year follow-up. However, about half of the patients in the study were not satisfied with their outcomes, which had deteriorated over time. Preoperative fatty infiltration of the teres minor was the only factor that correlated with worse final outcomes and poor satisfaction after arthroscopic partial repair.