1
|
Bergholt MD, Falstie-Jensen AM, Brink Valentin J, Hibbert P, Braithwaite J, Johnsen SP, Von Plessen C. Patients experience more support, information and involvement after first-time hospital accreditation: a before and after study in the Faroe Islands. Int J Qual Health Care 2021; 33:6410636. [PMID: 34698825 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of hospital accreditation on the experiences of patients remains a weak point in quality improvement research. This is surprising given the time and cost of accreditation and the fact that patient experiences influence outcomes. We investigated the impact of first-time hospital accreditation on patients' experience of support from health-care professionals, information and involvement in decisions. OBJECTIVE We aimed to examine the association between first-time hospital accreditation and patient experiences. METHODS We conducted a longitudinal study in the three Faroese hospitals that, unlike hospitals on the Danish mainland and elsewhere internationally, had no prior exposure to systematic quality improvement. The hospitals were accredited in 2017 according to a modified second version of the Danish Healthcare Quality program. Study participants were 18 years or older and hospitalized for at least 24 h in 2016 before or 2018 after accreditation. We administered the National Danish Survey of Patient Experiences for acute and scheduled hospitalization. Patients rated their experiences of support, information and involvement in decision-making on a 5-point Likert scale. We calculated individual and grouped mean item scores, the percentages of scores ≥4, the mean score difference, the relative risk (RR) for high/very high scores (≥4) using Poisson regression and the risk difference. Patient experience ratings were compared using mixed effects linear regression. RESULTS In total, 400 patients before and 400 after accreditation completed the survey. After accreditation patients reported increased support from health professionals; adjusted mean score difference (adj. mean diff.) = 1.99 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.89, 2.10), feeling better informed before and during the hospitalization; adj. mean diff. = 1.14 (95% CI: 1.07; 1.20) and more involved in decision-making; adj. mean diff. = 1.79 (95% CI: 1.76; 1.82). Additionally, the RR for a high/very high score (≥4) was significantly greater on 15 of the 16 questionnaire items. The greatest RR for a high/very high score (≥4) after accreditation, was found for the item 'Have you had a dialogue with the staff about the advantages and disadvantages of the examination/treatment options available?'; RR= 5.73 (95% CI: 4.51, 7.27). CONCLUSION Hospitalized patients experienced significantly more support from health professionals, information and involvement in decision-making after accreditation. Future research on accreditation should include the patients' perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Daniella Bergholt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Oluf Palmes Allé 43-45, Aarhus N DK-8200, Denmark.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, Hellerup DK-2900, Denmark
| | | | - Jan Brink Valentin
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Aalborg University and Aalborg University Hospital, Frederik Bajers vej 5, Aalborg DK-9220, Denmark
| | - Peter Hibbert
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.,Australian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute (UniSA CRI), School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Søren Paaske Johnsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Aalborg University and Aalborg University Hospital, Frederik Bajers vej 5, Aalborg DK-9220, Denmark
| | - Christian Von Plessen
- Policlinique Médicale, Unisanté, Rue du Bugnon 44, Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,Institute for Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, Syddanmark DK-5230, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giessler K, Seefeld A, Montagu D, Phillips B, Mwangi J, Munson M, Green C, Opot J, Golub G. Perspectives on implementing a quality improvement collaborative to improve person-centered care for maternal and reproductive health in Kenya. Int J Qual Health Care 2020; 32:671-676. [PMID: 33057658 PMCID: PMC7737155 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand perspectives and experiences related to participation in a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) to improve person-centered care (PCC) for maternal health and family planning (FP) in Kenya. DESIGN AND SETTING Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with members of the QIC in four public health facilities in Kenya. PARTICIPANTS Clinical and nonclinical public health facility staff who had participated in the QIC were purposively sampled to participate in the semi-structured interviews. INTERVENTION A QIC was implemented across four public health facilities in Nairobi and Kiambu Counties in Kenya to improve PCC experiences for women seeking maternity or FP services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Semi-structured interviews with participants of the QIC to understand perspectives and experiences associated with sensitization to and implementation of PCC behaviors in maternity and FP services. RESULTS Respondents reported that sensitization to PCC principles resulted in multiple perceived benefits for staff and patients alike, including improved interactions with patients and clients, deeper awareness of patient and client preferences, and improved interpersonal skills and greater job satisfaction. Respondents also highlighted system-level challenges that impeded their ability to consistently provide high-quality PCC to women, namely staff shortages and frequent turnover, high patient volumes and lack of space in their respective health facilities. CONCLUSION Respondents were easily able to articulate perceived benefits derived from participation in this QIC, although they were equally able to identify challenges that hindered their ability to consistently provide high-quality PCC to women seeking maternity or FP services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Giessler
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Mission Hall, Box 1224, 550 16th Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Avery Seefeld
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Mission Hall, Box 1224, 550 16th Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Dominic Montagu
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Mission Hall, Box 1224, 550 16th Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Beth Phillips
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Mission Hall, Box 1224, 550 16th Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - James Mwangi
- Jacaranda Health, Nairobi, Kenya, Diani Close, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Meghan Munson
- Jacaranda Health, Nairobi, Kenya, Diani Close, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Cathy Green
- Jacaranda Health, Nairobi, Kenya, Diani Close, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - James Opot
- Innovations for Poverty Action, Sandalwood Lane, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Ginger Golub
- Innovations for Poverty Action, Sandalwood Lane, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wachira J, Middlestadt S, Reece M, Peng CYJ, Braitstein P. Physician communication behaviors from the perspective of adult HIV patients in Kenya. Int J Qual Health Care 2014; 26:190-7. [PMID: 24519123 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We describe perceived physician communication behaviors and its association with adherence to care, among HIV patients in Kenya. DESIGN This cross-sectional study was conducted between July and August 2011. SETTING The study was conducted in three adult HIV clinics within the Academic Model Providing Healthcare program in western Kenya. PARTICIPANTS HIV adult patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patient's predisposition to attend clinic, missed appointment and missed combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) medication. RESULTS A total of 400 patients were enrolled and participated in the study; the median age was 38 years (IQR = 33-44) and 56.5% were female. Patients perceived physicians engaged in a high number of communication behaviors (mean = 3.80, range 1-5). A higher perceived general health status (P = 0.01), shorter distance to the health facility (P = 0.03) and lesser time spent at the health facility (P = 0.02) were associated with a higher number of perceived physician communication behaviors. Physician-patient relationship factors were not associated with physician communication behaviors. In addition, a higher number of perceived physician communication behaviors was associated with a very high likelihood of patients' attending the next HIV clinic [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49-2.40], a lower likelihood of patients' missing an appointment (AOR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61-0.92) and missing cART medication (AOR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.52-0.87). CONCLUSION Patients' perception of physician communication behaviors was found to be associated with their adherence to HIV care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juddy Wachira
- AMPATH, Nandi Road, P.O. Box 4606, Eldoret-30100, Kenya.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen J, Vargas-Bustamante A. Treatment compliance under physician-industry relationship: a framework of health-care coordination in the USA. Int J Qual Health Care 2013; 25:340-7. [PMID: 23407823 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Factors associated with treatment compliance have been well studied. However, no study has examined treatment compliance under the context of physician-industry relationship. This study developed a conceptual framework of physician-industry relationship and treatment compliance, and empirically tested patients' treatment compliance and affordability under the physician-industry relationship in the USA. DESIGN We first proposed a conceptual framework to analyze different scenarios, where the physician-industry relationship could impact patients' treatment compliance and affordability, taking into consideration the role of health insurers. We then employed a nationally representative data set to investigate these relationships. Multivariable logistic regressions were employed to examine the physician-industry relationship and the physicians' perception of patients' treatment compliance. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS 2008 Health Tracking Physician Survey. RESULTS Our results showed that physicians with closer industry relationships were more likely to report rejection of care by insurers [odds ratios (ORs): 1.24-1.85, P < 0.001], patients' non-compliance with treatment (OR: 1.34, P < 0.01) and patients' inability to pay (OR: 1.42, P < 0.01) as the major problems affecting their ability to provide high quality care, when compared with physicians without industry relationships. CONCLUSIONS Our results shed light on the lack of articulation among industry, physicians and health insurers in the USA. It is important to make sure that different agents in the health-care marketplace, such as physicians, industry, and health insurers, coordinate more efficiently to provide quality and consistent care to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Chen
- Department of Health Services Administration, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, 3310A SPH Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|