Symptom Agreement Between Patients and Their Peer Caregivers in Prison

Peer caregivers are incarcerated people who provide adjunct, nonclinical support to other incarcerated people. We described patient-caregiver symptom agreement in prison and correlates of symptom agreement to explore peer caregivers' ability to understand their patients' experience. We found dyads were aligned closely (N = 52; k = .86; αbinary = .86), though patients and peer caregivers often reported no symptoms during the assessment period. Peer caregivers were capable of matching their patients' self-reported symptoms beyond chance alone, though few correlates of patient-caregiver symptom agreement in prison emerged. The role of reverence and social homophily are discussed as potential drivers of symptom agreement. Future examination of caregiver burden or measures that account for both patient and caregiver characteristics are encouraged.

Characteristics of Hospice and Palliative Care Programs in US Prisons: An Update and 5-Year Reflection

Individuals with terminal illness are dying behind bars and many state prison administrators have incorporated on-site hospice and palliative care services. Little is known, however, about these programs since a 2010 study of prison hospice characteristics. We provide an updated description and reflection of current hospice and palliative care programs in state prisons serving incarcerated persons with terminal illness. A cross-sectional survey was sent to representatives of all known prisons offering hospice and palliative care programs and services (N = 113). Questions were drawn from an earlier iteration regarding interdisciplinary team (IDT) membership, training length and topics, peer caregivers, visitation policies, bereavement services, perceived stakeholder support, and pain management strategies. Additional questions were added such as estimated operational costs, peer caregiver input in patient care, and the strengths and weaknesses of such programs. Frequency distributions were calculated for all study variables. Responding representatives (n = 33) indicated IDTs remain integral to care, peer caregivers continue to support dying patients, and perceived public support for these programs remains low. Reduced enthusiasm for the programs may negatively influence administrative decision-making and program resources. Further, peer caregiver roles appear to be changing with caregivers charged with fewer of the identified tasks, compared with the 2010 study.