Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma and foscarnet use in a multitarget treatment documented by 18F-FDG PET/CT: A case report

RATIONALE

The case reported the rapid remission of disease recurrence achieved adding foscarnet, a DNA polymerase inhibitor that interacts with fibroblast growth factor 2, to low molecular weight heparin and sunitinib for the first time in a patient with an anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC).

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 65-year-old woman with a multinodular goiter referred for a rapid enlargement of a nodule. Histological examination revealed an ATC with a little area of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). The patient was resistant to selective single-target treatment.

DIAGNOSES

Immunophenotyping and gene analyses found a significant increase in FGF2 and FGFR1 expression in the primary ATC area (FGF2 = 38.2 ± 6.2% in ATC vs 34.6 ± 6.0% in the differentiated area of PTC, P < 0.05; FGFR1: 41.7 ± 6.0% in ATC vs 34.4 ± 4.2% in PTC, P < 0.001) and in metastatic neck lymph nodes (P < 0.001 vs normal control tissues). Unlike conventional imaging, F-FDG PET/CT with PERCIST 1.0 criteria promptly and quantitatively detected disease recurrence and remission before and after multitarget therapy, combining anatomic, metabolic, and functional data.

INTERVENTIONS

Foscarnet was administered given the positivity for FGF2, FGFR1 and FGFR4 in ATC. Low molecular wight heparin and Sunitinib were coadministere to limiti metastatic progression and on neck tumor masse, respectively.

OUTCOMES

The rationale for the clinical response to this innovative multitarget association with foscarnet is based on the histological and genetic finding that fibroblast growth factors and their receptor super-family are up-regulated in the primary anaplastic thyroid tumor and in the metastatic lymph node of our patient.

LESSONS

We propose that fibroblast growth factors and their receptor super-family play a key role as potential therapeutic targets in anaplastic thyroid cancer and the positive relevance of this suggestion for patient care, especially for an individualized management.

A pilot study on EORTC or PERCIST for the prediction of progression-free survival with nivolumab therapy in advanced or metastatic gastric cancers: A STROBE-compliant article

Recent breakthrough results from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have paved the way to a new era of cancer immunotherapy, and have thus led to a paradigm shift of cancer treatment. In particular, inhibition of the antiprogrammed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis with ICI, including nivolumab and pembrolizumab, has been emerging as a novel treatment strategy for advanced gastric cancers. An accurate noninvasive assessment of the response to ICI is important for the management of patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.To examine whether the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) are valuable for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancers treated with nivolumab.Six patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancers who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) scans before, and from 2 to 6 months after initiation of nivolumab therapy between September 2017 and August 2019, were evaluated retrospectively. The correlation between tumor progression and EORTC or PERCIST was assessed with the Fisher's exact test. The PFS was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method.Two patients were alive without progression, and the remaining 4 patients exhibited tumor progression. Two patients without progression were classified as partial metabolic response (PMR) patients based on EORTC or PERCIST, while the other 4 patients with progression were classified as progressive metabolic disease (PMD) patients based on EORTC (P = .067), or stable metabolic disease (SMD) patients, or PMD patients based on PERCIST (P = .067).The mean and median PFS of all patients was 12.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9-20.4 months) and 5 months (95%CI, 4.0-11.0 months). Two EORTC or PERCIST PMR patients showed significantly longer median PFS compared with 4 non-PMR patients (not reached vs 4.0 months, P = .044). Three PERCIST PMR or SMD patients also showed significantly longer median PFS compared with 3 PMD patients (not reached vs 4.0 months, P = .022). These results suggest that EORTC or PERCIST has the potential to predict PFS of patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancers treated by nivolumab and further studies are needed to determine its value in larger study populations.

Results of an Integrated Phase I/II Prospective Clinical Trial (NEXIS) for Neoadjuvant Anti-PD-L1 (Durvalumab) and Anti-CTLA-4 (Tremelimumab) With Radiation for High-Risk Soft-Tissue Sarcoma of the Trunk and Extremities

Background The current management of large, high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the trunk and extremities includes radiation and surgical resection. The initial use of chemotherapy and targeted therapy are controversial and although most patients present with localized disease, many eventually develop incurable metastases. The results and analysis of the safety and antitumor activity of combined checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy with neoadjuvant radiation for high-risk primary STS are presented here. Methods This was an integrated phase I/II prospective single-arm trial (Nutrition and Exercise in Critical Illness Trial (NEXIS) trial). Eligible patients were age ≥18 years with histologically confirmed intermediate or high-grade STS of the trunk or extremity ≥5 cm diameter and were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. The treatment algorithm included neoadjuvant anti-PD-L1 (Durvalumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (Tremelimumab) for three cycles of four weeks/cycle along with external beam radiation for five weeks, followed by wide surgical resection, and adjuvant Durvalumab monotherapy for four cycles. High-grade toxicity was continually assessed for the first 12 patients in phase I and the primary endpoint for phase II was an excellent histological response (grade 0 or 1 score on a semi-quantitative assessment for tumor regression). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03116529. Findings Between October 2017 and November 2021, 23 patients were enrolled. Five patients had progression of distant disease during neoadjuvant treatment and withdrew from the study before surgery. A total of 18 patients who completed at least the neoadjuvant immunotherapy, radiation and surgery were included for analysis. The most common tumor was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n=9, 50%). The occurrence of any adverse event (AE) was recorded in 16 (88.9%) patients, and 3 (16.7%) patients had a serious AE. Eight out of 18 patients (44.4%) had disease-free survival at a median of 39.7 months. Four out of 18 patients (22.2%) were alive-with-disease at a median of 37.1 months from diagnosis of distant metastasis, and six out of 18 (33.3%) died of disease at a median of 20.8 months from diagnosis of distant metastasis. Local recurrence occurred in two patients (11.1%) and was concomitant with distant disease in each case. Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1, a partial response was noted in five (27.8%) cases, stable disease in 10 (55.6%) cases, and progressive disease in three (16.7%) cases. Histological semiquantitative analysis revealed a "good" response in eight (44.4%) patients, a "moderate" response in four (22.2%) patients, and a "poor" response in six (33.3%) patients. The mean patient-reported outcome measures regarding fatigue, physical function, or physical interference demonstrated no significant differences between various timepoints before, during, or after treatment. Conclusion Neoadjuvant combined immunotherapy and radiation for high-risk STS was relatively well-tolerated. The histological, radiologic, and clinical outcome data in this novel trial were relatively similar to historical literature for non-immunotherapy treatment regimens.