Outcomes of Universal Newborn Screening Programs: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review examined the outcomes (age of identification and intervention, developmental outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and adverse effects on parents) of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) for children with permanent congenital hearing loss (PCHL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multiple electronic databases were interrogated in March and April 2020 with further reports identified from article citations and unpublished literature. UNHS reports in English with comparisons of outcomes of infants who were not screened, and infants identified through other hearing screening programs.

RESULTS

30 eligible reports from 14 populations with 7,325,138 infants screened through UNHS from 1616 non-duplicate references were included. UNHS results in a lower age of identification, amplification, and the initiation of early intervention services and better language/literacy development. Better speech perception/production were shown in younger, but not in older, children with early identification after UNHS. No significant findings were found for behavior problems and quality of life. UNHS was found to be cost-effective in terms of savings to society. In addition, no significant parental harm was noted as a result of UNHS.

CONCLUSIONS

In highly developed countries, significantly better outcomes were found for children identified early through UNHS programs. Early language development predicts later literacy and language development.

Bilateral Permanent Childhood Hearing Loss and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescence

Little is known about the impact of bilateral permanent childhood hearing loss (PCHL) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The objective of this study was to describe preference-based and non-preference based HRQoL outcomes in adolescence, from both self and proxy perspectives, amongst participants of the Hearing Outcomes Project. The Health Utilities Index Marks II (HUI2) and III (HUI3) and the PedsQLTM Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales were used to measure HRQoL based on self and parent proxy reports in 114 adolescents aged 13-19 years, 76 with bilateral PCHL and 38 with normal hearing, recruited from a population sample that was followed up from birth to adolescence. Descriptive statistics and multivariable analyses were used to estimate the relationship between severity of PCHL and HRQoL outcomes. PCHL was associated with decrements in mean multi-attribute utility score that varied between 0.078 and 0.148 for the HUI2 (p = 0.001) and between 0.205 and 0.315 for the HUI3 (p < 0.001), dependent upon the national tariff set applied and respondent group. Multivariable analyses revealed that, after controlling for clinical and sociodemographic covariates, mean HUI3 multi-attribute utility scores were significantly lower in adolescents with moderately severe, severe and profound hearing loss than in adolescents with normal hearing. Significant differences in physical functioning, social functioning, psychosocial functioning and total PedsQLTM scores were only observed when assessments by parents were relied upon, but these dissipated in the multivariable analyses. Bilateral PCHL is associated with poorer HRQoL outcomes in adolescence. Further studies conducted are needed to understand the trajectory and underpinning mechanisms of HRQoL outcomes following PCHL.

Parental experiences of the diagnosis of permanent childhood hearing loss: a phenomenological study

Objective: The objective of the study was to discover the nature of parental lived experiences of the diagnostic process of Permanent Childhood Hearing Loss (PCHL) and to construct an emotional life-world of parent experience around PCHL.Design: Through an Interpretive Phenomenological Analytical (IPA) framework and subsequent purposive sampling, parents were invited to semi-structured interviews.Sample: Ten parents of children who were identified with PCHL as one or the only permanent childhood disability diagnosed during early childhood were interviewed.Results: Five themes emerged; (a) a received disability, (b) casualties, (c) acceptance in real-time, (d) the unique signature of family life, and (e) audiologists are essential and appreciated guides. The emotional landscape chronicled two concurrent, non-linear affective groupings: the spiral of disorientation, and protective states of righting.Conclusion: Parents require a level of emotional support that exceeds frameworks of counselling. We propose the Dual Process Model as an intermediary model of emotional literacy to address both grieving and coping during the passage from diagnosis to early management. We believe it provides an effortless articulation with the principles of Family-Centred Care philosophies (top down) and behaviours (bottom up) by providing a taxonomy of grieving, coping and parents' movement between the two orientations.

Performance and characteristics of the Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in England: The first seven years

Objective: To assess the performance of the universal newborn hearing screen in England. Design: Retrospective analysis of population screening records. Study sample: A total of 4 645 823 children born 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2013. Results: 97.5% of the eligible population complete screening by 4/5 weeks of age and 98.9% complete screening by three months of age. The refer rate for the 12/13 birth cohort is 2.6%. The percentage of screen positive (i.e. referred) babies commencing follow up by four weeks of age and six months of age is 82.5% and 95.8% respectively. The yield of bilateral PCHL from the screen is around 1/1000. For bilateral PCHL in the 12/13 birth cohort the median age is nine days at screen completion, 30 days at entry into follow up, 49 days at confirmation, 50 days at referral to early intervention, and 82 days at hearing-aid fitting. Conclusion: The performance of the newborn hearing screening programme has improved continuously. The yield of bilateral PCHL from the screen is about 1/1000 as expected. The age of identification and management is well within the first six months of life, although there remains scope for further improvement with respect to timely entry into follow up.