Susceptibility to kindling and neuronal connections of the anterior claustrum

The claustrum has been implicated in the kindling of generalized seizures from limbic sites. We examined the susceptibility of the anterior claustrum itself to kindling and correlated this with an anatomical investigation of its afferent and efferent connections. Electrical stimulation of the anterior claustrum resulted in a pattern of rapid kindling with two distinct phases. Early kindling involved extremely rapid progression to bilaterally generalized seizures of short duration. With repeated daily kindling stimulations, early-phase generalized seizures abruptly became more elaborate and prolonged, resembling limbic-type seizures as triggered from the amygdala. We suggest that the rapid rate of kindling from the anterior claustrum is an indication that the claustrum is functionally close to the mechanisms of seizure generalization. In support of our hypothesis, we found significant afferent, efferent, and often reciprocal connections between the anterior claustrum and areas that have been implicated in the generation of generalized seizures, including frontal and motor cortex, limbic cortex, amygdala, and endopiriform nucleus. Additional connections were found with various other structures, including olfactory areas, nucleus accumbens, midline thalamus, and brainstem nuclei including the substantia nigra and the dorsal raphe nucleus. The anatomical connections of the anterior claustrum are consistent with its very high susceptibility to kindling and support the view that the claustrum is part of a forebrain network of structures participating in the generalization of seizures.

Connections between anterior inferotemporal cortex and superior temporal sulcus regions in the macaque monkey

We examined the connections between the anterior inferotemporal cortex and the superior temporal sulcus (STS) in the macaque monkey by injecting Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) or wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) into the dorsoanterior and ventroanterior subdivisions of TE (TEad and TEav, respectively) and observing the labeled terminals and cell bodies in STS. We found a clear dichotomy in the connections of the rostral part of STS: the injections into TEad resulted in a dense distribution of labeled terminals and cell bodies in the upper bank of rostral STS, whereas labeling was confined to the lower bank and fundus of rostral STS after injections into TEav. The distribution of labeling in the rostral STS was discontinuous from the distribution of labeling surrounding the injection sites: the lower bank of the rostral STS was spared from labeling in the TEad injection cases, and TEad had only sparse distribution in the TEav injection cases. These results revise the classical view that the lower bank of rostral STS is connected with TE, whereas the upper bank of rostral STS is connected with the parietal, prefrontal, and superior temporal regions (Seltzer and Pandya, 1978, 1991, 1994). The upper bank of the rostral STS is called the superior temporal polysensory area (STP), because it was previously found that neurons there respond to auditory, somatosensory, and visual stimuli. The present results thus suggest that the polymodal representation in STP interacts more with information processing in TEad than TEav. It is also suggested that the information processing in the ventral bank of the rostral STS is distinct from that in TEad, and the former more directly interacts with TEav than TEad.

Effect of sensory disuse on geniculate afferents to cat visual cortex

In the kitten, as little as a week of monocular lid suture during early life causes a remarkable remodeling of the geniculocortical projections serving the deprived eye (Antonini & Stryker, 1993a, 1996). While the physiological effects of monocular deprivation have been shown to be due to competitive interactions between the projections serving the two eyes, it is not known whether these morphological changes are due to competitive interactions or to sensory disuse. We addressed this question by analyzing the morphology of geniculocortical arbors in kittens deprived of patterned vision by binocular lid suture for 1 week or 2 weeks ending at 6 weeks of age. Such deprivation would be expected to affect the afferents serving the two eyes equally, giving neither eye a competitive advantage. The arbors were anterogradely filled with Phaseolus lectin iontophoretically injected into lamina A of the lateral geniculate nucleus. The lectin was visualized immunohistochemically, and single geniculocortical arbors were serially reconstructed in three dimensions. Arbors reconstructed in binocularly deprived animals were compared with arbors serving the deprived and nondeprived eye in animals monocularly deprived by lid suture of one eye for a week and with arbors obtained in age-matched normal controls. Geniculocortical arbors in binocularly deprived animals did not suffer the drastic remodeling of the deprived arbors in monocularly deprived animals. Indeed, arbors in binocularly deprived animals were indistinguishable from arbors in normal kittens or nondeprived arbors in short-term monocularly deprived animals. These results support the notion that competitive mechanisms rather than sensory disuse are responsible for gross morphological remodeling of geniculocortical arbors.

Organization of corticostriatal and corticoamygdalar projections arising from the anterior inferotemporal area TE of the macaque monkey: a Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin study

Corticostriatal and corticoamygdalar projections arising from area TE of the macaque monkey were studied by focal injections of the anterograde tracer Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin into the dorsolateral and ventromedial subdivisions of the anterior TE (TEad and TEav, respectively). This approach yielded several new results. First, the global distributions of labeled terminals revealed that both TEad and TEav projected to the ventrocaudal striatum, including the tail of the caudate nucleus and the adjacent ventral putamen, and the dorsolateral aspect of the deep amygdaloid nuclei. TEav also projected to the medial basal nucleus of the amygdala and the ventral striatum. Second, the reconstructed single axons (n = 18) demonstrated that some axons originating from TEav or TEad projected simultaneously to the ventrocaudal striatum and the dorsolateral aspect of the deep amygdaloid nuclei by giving off collaterals. TEav axons projected to the medial basal nucleus of the amygdala also had collaterals projecting to the perirhinal cortex or area TG. And third, it was revealed that the axons originating from a focal TEav or TEad projected to a restricted territory (3.4-3.6 mm rostrocaudally) in the ventrocaudal striatum with four to six dispersed, rostrocaudally elongated, rod-like modules. Individual axons with multiple arbors innervated many of these modules. These findings add the evidence that the anterior part of TE is anatomically heterogeneous and suggest that the deep amygdaloid nuclei may be functionally dissociated, with the dorsolateral aspect more closely related to the ventrocaudal striatum and the medial basal nucleus more closely related to the perirhinal cortex.

Divergent projections from the anterior inferotemporal area TE to the perirhinal and entorhinal cortices in the macaque monkey

Area TE is located at the latter part of the ventral visual cortical pathway, which is essential for visual recognition of objects. TE projects heavily to the perirhinal region, which is important for visual recognition memory of objects. To study the organization of projections from TE to the perirhinal (areas 35 and 36) and entorhinal (area 28) cortices, we made focal injections of Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) and large injections of biocytin or wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) into anterior levels of TE in macaque monkeys. Injections of PHA-L into the ventral part of anterior TE (TEav) resulted in labeling of terminals distributed widely in area 36 (approximately one-half of its total extent), although the injection sites were limited to 0.7 mm in width. The labeled terminals tended to be denser in the medial part of area 36. There was less dense but definite labeling in area 35 and the lateral part of area 28. After a single injection of PHA-L or WGA-HRP into the dorsal part of anterior TE (TEad), labeled terminals were confined to a small region at the lateral part of area 36 (less than one-tenth of its total extent). The projections to areas 35 and 28 from TEad were much sparser than those from TEav. The different patterns of projections to the perirhinal and entorhinal cortices, together with previously reported differences in their afferent and other efferent connections, suggest the functional differentiation between TEav and TEad. The divergent projection from TEav to the perirhinal cortex may facilitate the association of different visual features in the perirhinal cortex.