Negative pressure wound therapy aids recovery following surgical debridement due to severe bacterial cellulitis with abdominal abscess post-cesarean: A case report (CARE-Compliant)

INTRODUCTION

Bacterial cellulitis post-Cesarean section is rare. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is widely used in various medical specialities; its effectiveness in obstetrics however remains the topic of debate-used predominantly as an adjunct to secondary intention specific to high-risk patient groups. Its application in the treatment of actively infected wounds post-Cesarean is not well documented. Here, we document NPWT in the treatment of an unusually severe case of bacterial cellulitis with abdominal abscess postpartum. We provide a unique photographic timeline of wound progression following major surgical debridement, documenting the effectiveness of 2 different NPWT systems (RENASYS GO and PICO, Smith & Nephew). We report problems encountered using these NPWT systems and "ad-hoc" solutions to improve efficacy and patient experience.A 34-year-old primiparous Caucasian female with no prior history or risk factors for infection and a normal body mass index (BMI) presented with severe abdominal pain, swelling, and extensive abdominal redness 7 days postemergency Cesarean section. Examination revealed extensive cellulitis with associated abdominal abscess. Staphylococcus aureus was identified in wound exudates and extensive surgical debridement undertaken day 11 postnatally due to continued febrile episodes and clinical deterioration, despite aggressive intravenous antibiotic therapy. Occlusive NPWT dressings were applied for a period of 3 weeks before discharge, as well as a further 5 weeks postdischarge into the community.NPWT was well tolerated and efficacious in infection clearance and wound healing during bacterial cellulitis. Wound healing averaged 1 cm per week before NPWT withdrawal; cessation of NPWT before full wound closure resulted in significantly reduced healing rate, increased purulent discharges, and skin irritation, highlighting the efficacy of NPWT. Five-month follow-up in the clinic found the wound to be fully healed with no additional scarring beyond the boundaries of the original Cesarean incision. The patient was pleased with treatment outcomes, reporting no lasting pain or discomfort from the scar.

CONCLUSIONS

This report represents the first documented use of NPWT to aid healing of an actively infected, open wound following extensive surgical debridement 10 days post-Cesarean section, confirming both the efficacy and tolerability of NPWT for the treatment of severe bacterial cellulitis in obstetric debridement.

Negative-pressure wound therapy - does it lower the risk of complications with closed wounds following breast surgery?

Introduction: Breast surgery complications are important not only due to their morbidity and psychological impact, but also the delays that can occur for adjuvant treatment or the loss of implants in severe cases. There is growing evidence that negative pressure dressing on closed wounds can reduce the complications following surgery. Methods: This study aimed to assess whether negative-pressure dressings reduced complications in patients undergoing bilateral reduction mammoplasty with randomization of a side to negative pressure and standard care, fixation strips, on the contralateral side. This allowed patients to act as their own controls. Results: This study found a significant reduction in the rate of wound complications but used a wide definition for what constituted a wound complication. Discussion: This finding is mirrored in existing work with studies showing that negative-pressure therapy is a cost-effective intervention. Further work is required to validate this finding and targeting those at highest risk may be preferential.

PICO™ (Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy) Dressing Use as Postoperative Prophylaxis for Preventing Surgical Site Infections in Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study

Introduction Surgical site infections (SSIs) are one of the dreaded complications of spinal surgery. These typically develop within the first 30 days following surgery. The overall pooled incidence of SSIs is reported at 3.1%. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been employed for the management of open wounds and soft tissue injury. There has been a recent trend towards the use of closed incision NPWT (ciNPT), such as PICO. There are only a few studies evaluating the prophylactic use of ciNPT in spinal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prophylactic use of PICO dressings can reduce SSI incidence and complications in spinal surgery. Methods Data were collected retrospectively for patients undergoing spinal surgery, with a PICO dressing used for closed surgical incisions, from February 2021 to October 2022. Each patient was followed up for 30 days. The results were compared with local hospital infection control statistics for previous years. Results A total of 50 patients underwent spinal surgery and had PICO dressings post-operatively. None of the patients developed a seroma. Two out of 50 (4.0%) patients developed wound dehiscence and then subsequent SSI (1 superficial, 1 deep). These were managed conservatively with the use of antibiotics and prolonged ciNPT. None of these patients returned to the theatre. The average SSI incidence from previous years was 9.27 ± 4.14 per annum (1.15%), but with an average of 77.3% of these requiring a return to theatres. Conclusion Our study reflects that there is no difference in the incidence rates for SSIs for patients who have PICO dressings versus those having standard occlusive dressings as post-operative closed surgical incision site wound closure following spinal surgery. For those who do develop SSIs, there was no difference in the rates of return to theatres among the two patient populations.

Study design: think 'scientific value' not 'p-values'

Statistically based experimental designs have been available for over a century. However, many preclinical researchers are completely unaware of these methods, and the success of experiments is usually equated only with 'p < 0.05'. By contrast, a well-thought-out experimental design strategy provides data with evidentiary and scientific value. A value-based strategy requires implementation of statistical design principles coupled with basic project management techniques. This article outlines the three phases of a value-based design strategy: proper framing of the research question, statistically based operationalisation through careful selection and structuring of appropriate inputs, and incorporation of methods that minimise bias and process variation. Appropriate study design increases study validity and the evidentiary strength of the results, reduces animal numbers, and reduces waste from noninformative experiments. Statistically based experimental design is thus a key component of the 'Reduction' pillar of the 3R (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) principles for ethical animal research.

Evaluating the characteristics of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted during COVID-19 peaks: A single-center study

Background

Nowadays, the world is facing a coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, elicited by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). At the time of studying, five COVID-19 waves occurred in Iran. We aimed to evaluate the characteristics of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to Vasei Hospital of Sabzevar, Iran during COVID-19 peaks.

Methods

Clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, radiological findings, and underlying diseases of patients with COVID-19 were obtained from electronic medical records. Then, this information was compared in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection to the peaks of COVID-19.

Results

The highest and lowest respiratory involvements were observed in the third (74.6%) and fourth (38.8%) peaks, respectively. The most common radiological finding in all peaks was ground-glass opacity (28.98%), followed by consolidation, which was the highest (14.6%) in peak three. The lymphocyte count decreased in all peaks. Its highest reduction (16.12) occurred in the third peak. The SpO2 was lower than normal range in all peaks, except for the second (90.77%) and fifth (91.06%) peaks. Dyspnea (52.36%) was the most and dizziness (1.26%) and sore throat (0.6%) were the least frequent symptoms. The mortality rates were 14. 4%, 18.2%, 23%, 9.02%, and 9.4% in the first to fifth peaks, respectively.

Conclusion

As different variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus were predominant in each wave, COVID-19 patients had different features in various peaks. The fifth wave of COVID-19 had the highest number of hospitalized patients, while the first peak had the lowest number. Perhaps, the significant increase in testing capacity in the fifth wave and its long time period are the reasons for this growth. Most of the clinical symptoms were similar in all peaks, but the incidence was different. As patients hospitalized in the third peak had the highest rate of underlying disease, it can be a reason for the increase in the death rate of patients. We did not observe any significant differences in laboratory tests among the patients during different peaks. Thus, we should be vigilant in continuously studying the characteristics of the disease, and be able to modify treatments rapidly if necessary.