Developing a model of neonatal nurse-controlled analgesia: A Delphi study

AIM

To develop a nurse-led model of analgesia to manage post-operative pain in the surgical neonate.

DESIGN

A four-round e-Delphi study was conducted from March to December 2022.

METHODS

An e-Delphi method was used seeking a consensus of 70% or greater. Fifty-one experts were invited to join the panel. Members consisted of multi-disciplinary healthcare professionals who work in areas associated with neonatal care. In round 1, 49 statements relative to neonatal pain assessment and management were distributed to the panel. Panel members were asked to rate their level of agreeance on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Ratings equal to or greater than 4 represented agreement, 3 indicated uncertainty and 2 or less disagreement with the proposed statement. An opportunity for free-text responses after each statement was provided. This iterative process continued for three rounds. In the fourth and final round, the completed model of neonatal nurse-controlled analgesia was presented along with a further opportunity to provide feedback on the final version.

RESULTS

Four rounds of statements and voting were required to reach consensus on a model of neonatal nurse-controlled analgesia. The model consists of criteria for use, over-arching guidelines and three separate pathways based on an individual baby's pain assessment scores, need for pain relieving interventions and time-lapsed post-surgical procedure.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive model of neonatal nurse-controlled analgesia, applicable to the Australasian context, was developed in collaboration with a group of neonatal experts.

IMPACT

This study provides a multi-modal family-integrated model to manage neonatal post-operative pain. By providing nurses with increased autonomy to assess and manage acute pain, this model has the potential to not only provide a more responsive and individualized approach to alleviate discomfort, but highlights the integral role of parent partnerships in the neonatal intensive care.

REPORTING METHOD

This study was reported in line with the Conducting and REporting of DElphi studies (CREDE) guidance on Delphi studies.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution was utilized for this study.

A rare case of neurological dysfunction due to severe hyponatremia after carotid artery endarterectomy: A review of the clinical approach to hyponatremia

Development of severe hyponatremia after carotid endarterectomy procedure is rare. Several pathophysiological mechanisms related to the carotid endarterectomy procedure may infer an increased risk of developing this complication in specific populations.

Development and internal validation of a predictive model of cognitive decline 36 months following elective surgery

INTRODUCTION

Our goal was to determine if features of surgical patients, easily obtained from the medical chart or brief interview, could be used to predict those likely to experience more rapid cognitive decline following surgery.

METHODS

We analyzed data from an observational study of 560 older adults (≥70 years) without dementia undergoing major elective non-cardiac surgery. Cognitive decline was measured using change in a global composite over 2 to 36 months following surgery. Predictive features were identified as variables readily obtained from chart review or a brief patient assessment. We developed predictive models for cognitive decline (slope) and predicting dichotomized cognitive decline at a clinically determined cut.

RESULTS

In a hold-out testing set, the regularized regression predictive model achieved a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.146 and a model r-square (R2 ) of .31. Prediction of "rapid" decliners as a group achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of .75.

CONCLUSION

Some of our models could predict persons with increased risk for accelerated cognitive decline with greater accuracy than relying upon chance, and this result might be useful for stratification of surgical patients for inclusion in future clinical trials.

Survey of endoscopic skull base surgery practice patterns among otolaryngologists

Background

Endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) is a rapidly expanding field. Despite divergent reported preferences for reconstructive techniques and perioperative management, limited data exist regarding contemporary practice patterns among otolaryngologists performing ESBS. This study aims to elucidate current practice patterns, primarily the volumes of cases performed and secondarily a variety of other perioperative preferences.

Methods

An anonymous 32‐item electronic survey examining perioperative ESBS preferences was distributed to the American Rhinologic Society membership. Statistical significance between variables was determined utilizing Student t, chi‐square, and Fisher exact tests.

Results

Seventy otolaryngologists completed the survey. The effective response rate was approximately 22.5%. Sixty percent of respondents were in full‐time academic practice and 70% had completed rhinology/skull base fellowships. Annually, 43.3 mean ESBS cases were performed (29.1 private practice vs. 52.9 academic practice, P = .009). Academic practice averaged 24.1 expanded cases versus only 11 in private practice (P = .01). Of respondents, 55.7% stood on the same side as the neurosurgeon and 72.9% remained present for the entire case. Current procedural terminology coding and antibiotic regimens were widely divergent; 31.4% never placed lumbar drains preoperatively, while 41.4% did so for anticipated high‐flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks. While considerable variation in reconstructive techniques were noted, intradural defect repairs utilized vascularized flaps 86.3% of the time versus only 51.3% for extradural repairs (P < 0.001). Major complications were rare. Postoperative restrictions varied considerably, with most activity limitations between 2–8 weeks and positive airway pressure use for 2–6 weeks. Most respondents started saline irrigations 0–2 weeks postoperatively.

Conclusions

Based on responses from fellowship‐ and non‐fellowship‐trained otolaryngologists in various practice settings, there remains considerable variation in the perioperative management of patients undergoing ESBS.

Level of Evidence

5

Efficacy and safety of low-dose celecoxib in reducing post-operative paralytic ileus after major abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

A number of interventions have been used to decrease the incidence of post-operative paralytic ileus. A secondary outcome of a randomized controlled study showed that COX-2 inhibitors decreased the incidence of paralytic ileus. We sought to study a large cohort of patients undergoing major abdominal operations who were treated with a COX-2 inhibitor.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. All eligible patients were given a COX-2 inhibitor--celecoxib 100 mg--twice daily starting on the day of surgery until the seventh day post-operatively or discharge, whichever was earlier. The rate of paralytic ileus was calculated and compared with historical data. Secondary outcome measures were the effect of using COX-2 inhibitors on renal function, electrolytes and haemoglobin, morbidity and leak rates.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-two patients were treated with celecoxib; the control arm consisted of 67 historical patients. Of the 252 patients, we had complete data for 235 patients and ileus in 17 patients (7.23%) compared with 13.4% in the control group (P = 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed ileus in 5.45% of colectomy patients and 6.36% of patients who have had a colectomy and high anterior resection. There was no detriment of measured blood tests. There were leaks in two treated patients, both of whom did not require a laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of low-dose COX-2 inhibitor over a short period of time decreases the paralytic ileus rates and does not cause any significant morbidity.