The medial-central septum based mammaplasty: A reliable technique to preserve nipple-areola complex sensitivity in post bariatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Massive weight loss is associated with the ptosis of the breast, loss of the upper pole fullness, medialization of the nipples and volume depletion. Post bariatric patients often need breast reshaping with mastopexy or breast reduction. We report the author's experience with the medial central septum based mammoplasty for breast reshaping after massive weight loss.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 85 women who underwent a medial-central septum based mammaplasty, analyzing patients (age, BMI, comorbidities) and operation specific characteristics' (surgical technique, complications) to identify the advantages and the drawbacks of the adopted technique. All the procedures were performed at a single institution by the senior author of this article.

RESULTS

85 patients were included in the review, in total 170 medial-central septum based mammaplasty were performed over a five years period. Early complications, as hematoma and seroma occurred in 2 patients. No total or partial nipple-areola losses were recorded and the viability of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) was excellent in all the treated patients. Sensation was retained in all breasts. Nine patients showed delayed wound healing at the joint of the T scar; in 5 patients we observed spreading scars.

CONCLUSION

The medial-central septum based mammaplasty seems to be an effective and safe choice for breast reshaping after massive weight loss, as none of our patients experienced nipple loss and all of them reported good nipple sensation. Moreover, the technique is versatile and can be applied to patients with hypertrophic breasts or gigantomastia.

Fibrin Sealant Artiss Compared to Progressive Tension Sutures With Stratafix in the Management of Wound Drainage Following Post-Bariatric Body-Contouring Surgery

Background

Post-bariatric body-contouring surgery is one of the most rapidly growing areas in plastic surgery. One of the most common complications following post-bariatric body-contouring surgery is seroma. There are a number of approaches to reducing wound drainage and seroma formation. A promising strategy to reduce these complications is to develop effective methods for reducing dead space between the tissue layers.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective trial assessing the use of human fibrin sealant Artiss in comparison to progressive tension sutures (PTS) with Stratafix, a bidirectional barbed suture device in patients undergoing post-bariatric body-contouring surgery. Thirty-six patients for abdominoplasty or lower-body-lift were evaluated. Treatment patients underwent procedure with fibrin sealant applied to adapt the tissue layers. Control patients underwent an identical procedure but with PTS. Primary outcome measures included total wound drainage and time to drain removal.

Results

The use of Artiss in abdominoplasty was associated with a mean drain volume that was significantly higher and more days that were needed to remove all drains compared to the PTS group. In body-lift, the mean drain volume and number of days needed to remove all drains tended to be higher when using Artiss compared to the PTS group.

Conclusion

The use of Artiss in post-bariatric body-contouring surgery did not decrease the rate of seromas and the length of time required for post-surgical drains when compared to PTS.

To Keep or Not to Keep? The Hamletic Umbilical Dilemma: Preservation versus Reconstruction of the Umbilicus in Vertical Abdominoplasty

(1) Background: The role of the umbilical scar and its repositioning remains one of the most important surgical steps in the execution of any type of abdominoplasty, including those involving "inverted-t" or "fleur de lys" incisions. A consequence of this is a surgeon's Hamletic dilemma: to keep or not to keep the original umbilical scar? (2) Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on all patients undergoing "T-inverted" abdominoplasty at the Department of Plastic Surgery of the Santa Maria alle Scotte University Hospital, Siena, between January 2018 and December 2020. Twelve months after the surgery we submitted to all patients the U-score questionnaire about their feelings about their umbilicus's appearance. Patients could assign a score from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied) to each of the five items of the score. (3) Results: The average of the scores attributed by the nine patients in whom the navel was preserved is 13 (Range 10-17), while in patients on whom a navel reconstruction was performed, the mean score is 16.8 (Range 12-20). The mean score of patients with a reconstructed umbilicus is, therefore, statistically higher than that of the other group of patients (t-value = 3.88, p = 0.000374) with an average increase of 3.8 points. (4) Conclusions: We can state that the reconstruction of a new navel is the right answer to the Hamletic dilemma in patients having undergone vertical or anchor abdominoplasty.

The views of African and Middle Eastern Gastroenterologists on the management of mild-to-moderate, non-erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD)

INTRODUCTION

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal disorder that occurs when backflow of the gastric contents into the esophagus results in troublesome symptoms. Though GERD has been extensively studied in Western populations, literature on the management of GERD in patients in Africa and Middle East (AME) is scarce.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide an overview of the management of mild-to-moderate GERD in AME. Here we focus on the efficacy and safety of currently available treatments for GERD to help physicians and community pharmacists appropriately manage patients with mild-to-moderate GERD in the primary healthcare setting, detailing specific situations and patient scenarios that are relevant to the region, including management of GERD during Ramadan and post-bariatric surgery.

EXPERT OPINION

Under-appreciation of the burden of GERD in the region has resulted in a lack of consensus on management. Barriers that currently prevent the adoption of treatment guidelines in the primary healthcare setting may include lack of availability of local guidelines and referral systems, a paucity of region-specific research, and dogmatic adherence to traditional practice. By increasing awareness, strengthening knowledge, and by more effective utilization of resources, physicians and pharmacists could optimize GERD management strategies to better support patients.

Gastrointestinal Permeability After Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review

Gastrointestinal permeability refers to the movement of substances across the gut wall. This is mediated by endotoxemia (bacterial products entering the systemic circulation), and is associated with metabolic disease. The effect of bariatric surgery on permeability remains uncertain; the associated dietary, metabolic and weight changes are suggested to influence, or trigger, altered permeability. The primary aim of this study is to synthesize evidence and analyze the effect of bariatric surgery on permeability. A systematic review was performed, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus until February 2023, using MESH terms "intestinal permeability", "bariatric", for studies reporting in vivo assessment of permeability. Three cohort studies and two case series were identified (n=96). Data was heterogeneous; methodology and controls preclude meta-analysis. Gastroduodenal permeability reduced post-sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Two studies showed an increase in small intestinal permeability after biliopancreatic diversion. Two studies revealed a decrease in post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. One study identified increased colonic permeability six months post-SG. Evidence regarding permeability change after bariatric surgery is conflicting, notably for the small intestine. Impaired colonic permeability post-SG raises concerns regarding colonic protein fermentation and harmful dietary sequelae. There are multiple interacting variables confounding gastrointestinal permeability change; procedure type, altered microbiota and metabolic response to surgery. Further understanding of this important aspect of obesity is required, both before and after bariatric surgery.

Understanding and Managing Metabolic Deficiencies Post Bariatric and Esophagectomy Surgeries: A Narrative Review of the Literature

Gastrectomy and esophagectomy are the most performed surgeries in the treatment of both esophageal and gastric cancers. The type of esophagectomy depends on the type of malignancy, site of the tumor, criteria of resection, and field of resection. The three standard approaches to esophagectomy are the transhiatal approach, the left thoracoabdominal approach, and a three-stage procedure. The transhiatal approach involves abdominal and cervical incisions, while the left thoracoabdominal approach is a one-stage procedure that utilizes a single incision exposing the dissection field. The Ivor Lewis and McKeown esophagectomies are two-stage and three-stage surgeries that include laparotomy with right thoracotomy. Malabsorption often emerges as a significant postoperative complication following esophagectomy and gastrectomy surgeries. Malnutrition linked with these cancers has detrimental effects, including heightened rates of postoperative complications, elevated infection risks, delayed wound healing, reduced tolerance to treatment, diminished quality of life, and heightened mortality rates. Our narrative review summarizes and sheds light on solutions to treat malabsorption disorders and malnutrition after gastric bypass surgery. These solutions include methods such as adjustments, supplements, and treatment. Although more research is needed to confirm their effectiveness, these methods indicate potential for lowering the impact on patients' diets. By considering the beneficial implications of these effects and considering solutions, we aim to improve the management of these adverse effects, ultimately improving the overall health and postoperative outcomes of patients.

Impact of Medial Thighplasty on Self-Perception and Body Image After Post-Bariatric Massive Weight Loss

BACKGROUND

The demand for body sculpting procedures after massive weight loss (MWL) has grown, with medial thighplasty (MT) emerging as an effective option. This study examines the impact of MT on quality of life (QoL), particularly focusing on body image and self-perception in individuals who have undergone MWL.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study included 21 patients who had post-bariatric MWL and subsequently underwent MT. QoL, with a focus on body image and self-perception, and was assessed through a custom-designed questionnaire administered before and after surgery. Inclusion criteria were a BMI < 35 and a history of bariatric surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (20 female, 1 male) were included, with an average age of 50.3 years. The median weight loss was 58.4 kg. Post-operatively, the Physical Component Score (PCS-12) showed significant improvement, while the Mental Component Score (MCS-12) did not show a notable change. However, self-acceptance, body contact, sexuality, and self-esteem all significantly improved post-surgery, whereas vitality did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with previous studies, MT yields positive outcomes regarding physical well-being. This study further highlights the procedure's benefits for self-acceptance, body contact, sexuality, and self-esteem. Patients with expectations of improvements in vitality, or mental health concerns like depression or anxiety, should be carefully selected and may benefit from multidisciplinary care, including psychiatry or psychological support, to avoid dissatisfaction with post-surgical outcomes.

Differences in the Impact of Obesity and Bariatric Surgery on Patients Hospitalized for Atrial Flutter and Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Analysis, 2016-2020

BACKGROUND

The "obesity paradox" claims that although obesity is a risk factor for atrial fibrillation, obese patients have lower inpatient mortality when admitted due to atrial fibrillation. This study aims to analyze if the obesity paradox still holds true after weight loss from bariatric surgery.  Methods: This study analyzed discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample, 2016-2020. Patients admitted due to atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, with or without obesity, and with or without a past medical history of bariatric surgery were identified using ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS codes. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, resource utilization, necessity for endotracheal intubation, and necessity for cardioversion. STATA v.13 was used for univariate and multivariate analysis (StataCorp LLC, Texas, USA).

RESULTS

Among 2,292,194 patients who had a primary diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, 494,830 were obese and 25,940 had bariatric surgery. Mortality was not significantly different in post-bariatric surgery patients when compared to the general population (OR 0.76; 95% [CI 0.482-1.2; p=0.24]). Mortality was significantly lower in obese patients when compared to the general population (OR 0.646; 95% [CI 0.583-0.717; p<0.001]). Therefore, post-bariatric surgery patients had a higher mortality than obese patients when compared to the general population. Obese patients spent more days in the hospital (regression 0.219; 95% [CI 0.19-0.248, p<0.001]), had higher resource utilization (regression 3491.995; 95% [CI 2870.085-4113.905, p<0.001]), more cardioversions (OR 1.434; 95% [CI 1.404-1.465; p<0.001]), and no difference in endotracheal intubation rate (OR 1.02; 95% [CI 0.92-1.127; p=0.724]) when compared to the general population. Post-bariatric patients had no difference in length of stay (regression -0.053; 95% [CI -0.137-0.031; p=0.218]) and resource utilization (regression 577.297; 95% [CI -1069.801-2224.396; p=0.492]), fewer endotracheal intubations (OR 0.583; 95% [CI 0.343-0.99; p=0.046]), and more cardioversions (OR 1.223; 95% [CI 1.134-1.32; p<0.001]) when compared to the general population.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the general population, post-bariatric patients had higher inpatient mortality than obese patients when admitted due to atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. This research reinforces the presence of the obesity paradox following bariatric surgery with respect to mortality.