Effect of Prefilled vs Vial-Drawn Syringes on Sustained Increases in Intraocular Pressure in Patients Treated With Aflibercept

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of syringe type on developing sustained intraocular pressure (IOP) increases. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients in a single academic center receiving antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections from 2012 to 2022 for various indications. Patients were grouped by anti-VEGF treatment of either vial-drawn or prefilled syringe delivery. Trends in IOP were recorded for 1 year after treatment began. Development of sustained IOP increase, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma was recorded. Sustained IOP increase was defined as ≥5 mm Hg above baseline for at least 4 weeks. Results: Of 257 total patients, 6 (2.3%) developed sustained IOP increases throughout the study's duration. No significant differences were noted with respect to prefilled versus vial-drawn syringe status on the development of sustained IOP increases or incident glaucoma (IOP: 1.8% vs 2.7%, respectively, P = .65; glaucoma: 0.0% vs 2.0%, respectively, P = .14). Patients treated with prefilled syringes were significantly less likely to develop ocular hypertension (2.8% vs 8.8%, P < .05). Conclusions: This study found that aflibercept intravitreal injection with prefilled syringes was not associated with a significant increase in IOP-related adverse effects when compared with those treated with vial-drawn syringes.

Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation

Purpose

To compare the risk of transient vision loss (TVL) probably attributable to a severe intraocular pressure spike after intravitreal aflibercept application using the novel prefilled syringe (PFS) vs. the established vial system (VS).

Methods

Datasets of the intravitreal injection service of the Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich and the Technical University Munich, Germany, were screened for documentation of TVL after intravitreal injection of aflibercept. The observation period included two full months prior to the introduction of the novel PFS and two months afterwards. TVL was defined as loss of perception of hand motion for a duration of >30 s.

Results

Over a period of four months, 1720 intravitreal injections of aflibercept were administered in 672 patients. There were 842 injections with the old VS, and 878 injections using the novel PFS. Using the VS, TVL was noted during two injections (0.24%) in two patients, as compared to 11 cases of TVL (1.25%) in 10 patients with the PFS (p = 0.015). Using the PFS, patients had a 5.3-fold risk of TVL as compared to the VS (OR: 5.33; 95% CI: 1.2-24.1; p = 0.0298).

Conclusion

There was a more than five-fold risk of TVL using the novel pre-filled aflibercept syringe as compared to the established vial system. During informed consent, this risk should be discussed.

Handling injectable medications in anaesthesia: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists

Peri-operative medication safety is complex. Avoidance of medication errors is both system- and practitioner-based, and many departments within the hospital contribute to safe and effective systems. For the individual anaesthetist, drawing up, labelling and then the correct administration of medications are key components in a patient's peri-operative journey. These guidelines aim to provide pragmatic safety steps for the practitioner and other individuals within the operative environment, as well as short- to long-term goals for development of a collaborative approach to reducing errors. The aim is that they will be used as a basis for instilling good practice.

Comprehensive Assessment of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Tolerability of Ligelizumab in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria to Optimize Its Subcutaneous Delivery System

Ligelizumab is a highly potent, humanized IgG1, anti-IgE monoclonal antibody. To explore its optimal subcutaneous delivery, the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and tolerability of ligelizumab from two Phase 1 studies in healthy volunteers (HVs) and four Phase 2 and 3 studies in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) were assessed. Using different injection volumes or durations of a liquid-in-vial (LIVI) formulation or different formulations (LIVI vs. prefilled syringe (PFS)), single-dose ligelizumab showed comparable PK exposure in HVs. Steady-state exposure of ligelizumab was also comparable between LIVI and PFS following multiple dosing in CSU patients. The total IgE level (a PD marker) and tolerability were similar between the two formulations in both HVs and patients. Furthermore, the PK, total IgE, and tolerability were comparable for PFS administered either by patients or healthcare providers (HCPs). Collective evidence demonstrated that the injection duration or volume, formulation, or administrator had no apparent impact on the PK, PD, and tolerability of ligelizumab, supporting no clinically relevant difference between LIVI and PFS, and that PFS can be administered by patients or HCPs. This report provides a comprehensive assessment based on data of multiple clinical endpoints from both HVs and patients to inform formulation development and commercial use of a monoclonal antibody.

Impact of Prefilled Syringes and Masking on Postintravitreal Injection Endophthalmitis

Purpose: To compare rates of endophthalmitis (1) following intravitreal injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor therapies with glass-vial preparation (GVP) vs prefilled syringes (PFS) and (2) before and after masking protocols were implemented. Methods: Medical records within a multicenter retina practice in Houston, Texas, from January 2015 to August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was rate of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection. Results: A total of 307 349 injections were performed during the study period and 101 cases of endophthalmitis were identified (0.033%). PFS use was associated with a decreased risk of endophthalmitis (relative risk [RR], 0.320; 95% CI, 0.198-0.518, P < .001); 54 cases of endophthalmitis occurred in the GVP group of aflibercept and ranibizumab (0.052%) compared with 24 in the PFS group (0.017%). There was no difference in the endophthalmitis rates with or without universal masking (RR, 0.953; 95% CI 0.616-1.473, P = .91). Discussion: PFS use was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of endophthalmitis while the use of surgical face masks did not appear to significantly impact the rate of endophthalmitis.

Characterizing Silicone Oil-Induced Protein Aggregation with Stimulated Raman Scattering Imaging

Particles in biopharmaceutical products present high risks due to their detrimental impacts on product quality and safety. Identification and quantification of particles in drug products are important to understand particle formation mechanisms, which can help develop control strategies for particle formation during the formulation development and manufacturing process. However, existing analytical techniques such as microflow imaging and light obscuration measurement lack the sensitivity and resolution to detect particles with sizes smaller than 2 μm. More importantly, these techniques are not able to provide chemical information to determine particle composition. In this work, we overcome these challenges by applying the stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy technique to monitor the C-H Raman stretching modes of the proteinaceous particles and silicone oil droplets formed in the prefilled syringe barrel. By comparing the relative signal intensity and spectral features of each component, most particles can be classified as protein-silicone oil aggregates. We further show that morphological features are poor indicators of particle composition. Our method has the capability to quantify aggregation in protein therapeutics with chemical and spatial information in a label-free manner, potentially allowing high throughput screening or investigation of aggregation mechanisms.

Assessment of real-life patient handling experience of AVT02 administered subcutaneously via autoinjector in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label, single-arm clinical trial, then an extension phase of AVT02 administered with a prefilled syringe

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the ability of patients, naïve to adalimumab treatment and self-injection with an autoinjector (AI), to successfully self-administer AVT02, an adalimumab biosimilar, using a custom, ergonomic AI (Alvotech hf., Reykjavik, Iceland).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a single-arm, open-label study, consisting of an 8-week active period and 48-week extension phase. Patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) self-administered 40 mg AVT02 subcutaneously via AI in the active period, followed by prefilled syringe in the extension phase. The primary endpoint was the percentage of successful self-injections up to Week 8. Usability and robustness of the AI were evaluated in the active period; safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity data were assessed throughout the study.

RESULTS

The AI success rate was 100%. No handling events were noted up to Week 8. Both Ctrough measurements and immunogenicity profile were in line with expectations from previous studies, with no unexpected safety signals.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that AVT02-AI can be successfully and reliably used for repeated self-injections of AVT02 by moderate to severe RA patients, despite no previous experience of adalimumab self-administration. The extension phase provides long-term efficacy and safety data for AVT02 in RA.

STUDY IDENTIFIER

NCT04224194.

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, 2-arm parallel study to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of AVT02 administered subcutaneously via prefilled syringe or autoinjector in healthy adults

BACKGROUND

AVT02 is an adalimumab biosimilar, with bioequivalence previously established along with clinical similarity. This study assessed the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity of a single dose of 100 mg/mL AVT02 administered via prefilled syringe (PFS) or autoinjector (AI).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this open-label, 2-arm, parallel-group study, healthy adults were randomized 1:1 to receive one 40 mg (100 mg/mL) dose of AVT02 subcutaneously via PFS (N = 102) or AI (N = 105). Primary PK parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-inf) were evaluated up to Day 64 of the study. Secondary PK parameters, safety, tolerability and immunogenicity were also assessed.

RESULTS

The 90% CIs for the ratio of geometric least squares means were contained within the pre-specified 80-125% equivalence margins for the primary PK parameters, demonstrating bioequivalence of AVT02 when administered by PFS or AI. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between the two groups, with a low frequency of injection site reactions observed. Immunogenicity profiles were also similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Bioequivalence was demonstrated for a single dose of AVT02 administered via PFS or AI. These results will help to increase availability of devices for patients, enabling treatment choice and flexibility.

Effect of Various Silicone Oil and Tungsten Levels on the Stability of a Monoclonal Antibody in Nine Commercially Available Prefilled Syringes

Prefilled syringes are widely used as a primary container for therapeutic proteins because they are more convenient than glass vials. The stability of biologic molecules can be affected by different syringe materials and techniques, such as silicone oil levels and coating method, amount of tungsten remaining in the glass barrel after using a tungsten pin to create the needle hole, and end of the syringe, which can be Luer locked or pre-staked with a needle. We investigated the impact of these parameters by using a monoclonal antibody to collect the antibody's stability profile and the prefilled syringes' functionality data. Silicone oil levels had no impact on aggregation levels, and particle counts were lowest for silicone oil-free syringes. Functionality performance was similar and did not change throughout all stability time points for all syringe configurations. The break-loose force for Ompi syringes was initially lower and increased over time to align with those of the other configurations, all of which remained well below 25 N. Tungsten contaminants and agitation stress from shipping studies did not impact quality attributes. This work can help guide the development of similar products in prefilled syringes to ensure selection of the primary container that provides adequate stability for the protein, as well as maintain the desired functionality features over the shelf life of the drug product.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Study of the Prefilled Syringe and Lyophilized Formulation of a Recombinant Human Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Receptor II:lgG Fc Fusion Protein in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects

This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of the prefilled syringe (PFS) with lyophilized (LYO) recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-α receptor II:lgG Fc fusion protein (rhTNFR:Fc) in healthy Chinese male subjects. A single-center, randomized, open-label, 2-period, crossover study was performed in healthy Chinese male subjects. Subjects were randomly assigned into 2 sequences and received a subcutaneous injection of 25 mg rhTNFR:Fc PFS or rhTNFR:Fc LYO (Anbainuo), with a 35-day washout between the 2 periods. Blood samples were collected at specified time intervals, and then serum concentrations of rhTNFR:Fc were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The maximum serum concentration, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were all calculated and evaluated. Meanwhile, safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. A total of 82 subjects completed the study, and six subjects withdrew for various reasons. The 90%CIs for geometric mean ratios of maximum serum concentration, AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were all within the equivalence range of 80% to 125%. Safety was comparable between the 2 formulations with low immunogenicity. rhTNFR:Fc PFS exhibited similar pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of rhTNFR:Fc LYO (Anbainuo) in healthy Chinese male subjects.

Mepolizumab prefilled syringe for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma: focus on the pediatric population

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophil-targeted therapy with mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma has significantly improved asthma control and patient quality of life though administration in children had been restricted to health-care provider reconstitution of a lyophilized powder into a solution with in-clinic administration until recently. Here, we profile the newly FDA-approved use of mepolizumab as a prefilled syringe for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma in children aged 6-11 years old, allowing for home administration.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted on PubMed using keywords such as mepolizumab, severe asthma, eosinophils, IL-5, anti-IL-5, children, pediatric, prefilled syringe, and home administration in several combinations. Published literature through July 2022 including clinical trials and prescribing information for mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma, particularly for use in children and as administration as a prefilled syringe, is reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Asthma affects a significant number of children worldwide, and having efficacious, tolerable, targeted precision therapies for this population is crucial. Mepolizumab remains the only targeted anti-IL-5 therapy approved for pediatric asthma down to 6 years of age. The innovation of the prefilled syringe will enable home administration, which would decrease the burden of treatment, and could potentially increase adoption of therapy.

Evaluation of a novel prefilled syringe concept for ophthalmic applications: A formative human factors study

Intravitreal injection (IVI) is the most commonly performed intraocular procedure worldwide. Several manufacturers have developed glass prefilled syringe (PFS) devices to increase ease of performing IVIs and reduce complications associated with medication preparation. This formative human factors study assessed a novel, polymer PFS alternative to glass syringes to support development of a usable, silicone-free delivery platform for IVI. Thirteen retina specialists (RSs) with experience preparing a minimum of ≥10 IVIs per week completed the study. RSs were presented with the concept device and prototype instructions for use, and completed hands-on tasks to simulate IVI. They then evaluated the concept device for ease of use, comfort, safety, and overall preference versus the IVI devices they are accustomed to using. The primary objectives were to assess the ease of use and acceptability of the proposed syringe design, evaluate the corresponding IFU, and identify any potential usability issues. The secondary objectives were to evaluate a new tamper-evident cap design and compare several externally printed dose marking designs. There were 130 total opportunities for use errors that deviated from the IFU. Of these 130 steps, 110 were a Success, 17 were Incomplete or Incorrect, 2 were Resolved, and 1 was due to a Study Artifact. All 13 participants completed 3 Essential Tasks successfully and at least 10 participants completed each of the 4 Safety-Critical Tasks successfully. A total of 20 errors were made throughout the test simulation, most of which were rooted in unfamiliar use steps or transference behaviors. Overall, the concept device was found to be usable, acceptable, and safe for IVI by experienced RSs. RSs preferred the concept device to IVI products supplied in vials but there was no notable preference for the concept device design compared to current glass PFSs used for IVI. The unique features of the concept device, including absence of silicone oil and break-resistance, were mostly recognized by participants and may offer an improvement to currently available systems for IVI.

Assessment of potential differences between pre-filled and manually prepared syringe use during vascular access device management in a pediatric intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Central line-associated bloodstream infection is one of the four primary health-care-associated infections applicable to pediatric intensive care units defined by The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to current guidelines, it is essential to flush vascular access devices before each infusion to assess catheter function and prevent catheter-related complications.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective trial aimed to assess the potential differences between pre-filled and manually prepared saline syringe use during vascular access device management in a pediatric intensive care unit.

METHODS

Volunteered registered pediatric intensive care unit nurses were asked to implement the flushing solution to an extension line of a central venous catheter in vitro. After the randomization process with opaque sealed envelopes, they have started either with manual preparation or used sterile pre-filled saline syringes. Sterile application steps forms were used for monitoring the manual preparation of saline syringes versus the pre-filled saline syringes phase. Each volunteer repeated the steps for 3, 5, and 10 mL syringe volumes with the manually prepared and pre-filled saline syringes. After completing the procedures, failed steps and durations were transferred into a database to be analyzed by a blinded investigator.

RESULTS

A total of 41 nurses volunteered and 123 forms for three attempts per one nurse were filled for each group. In the manual preparation group, the number of at least one failure in the necessary steps was 89 (72.3%) and the same number in the pre-filled syringe group was 6 (4.9%), and significantly lower in the pre-filled saline syringe group (p < 0.001). The overall time for preparing to flush was 86.0 ± 22.3 s (ranging from 46 to 173 s) for manual prepared syringes and 35.2 ± 9.4 s (ranging from 18 to 100 s) (p < 0.001) for pre-filled saline syringes.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that the risk for breaking the aseptic no-touch technic was higher in the manual preparation group. We have also demonstrated that the flushing time was shorter with pre-filled syringes compared to manually prepared ones, which may contribute to decreasing the workload of the nurses and may increase the quality of care in the intensive care units. The use of pre-filled saline syringes may decrease the central line-associated bloodstream infections incidence and may increase the quality of care by saving extra time in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Efficacy, safety, usability, and acceptability of risankizumab 150 mg formulation administered by prefilled syringe or by an autoinjector for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Risankizumab is approved for treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Availability of a patient-controlled single self-injection of risankizumab may improve adherence and long-term management of psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate efficacy, safety, and usability of a new risankizumab 150 mg/mL formulation administered as a single subcutaneous injection via prefilled syringe (PFS) or autoinjector (AI).

METHODS

Efficacy, safety, usability, and acceptability of risankizumab 150 mg/mL PFS or AI were investigated in adults with moderate to severe psoriasis in two phase 3 studies. Study 1 was a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that investigated 150 mg/mL risankizumab PFS; study 2 was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label study that investigated 150 mg/mL risankizumab AI.

RESULTS

At week 16, risankizumab 150 mg/mL demonstrated efficacy vs. placebo (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index ≥90% improvement (PASI 90), 62.9% vs. 3.8%; static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) 0/1, 78.1% vs. 9.6%; both p< .001) in study 1; in study 2, PASI 90 and sPGA 0/1 were 66.7%, and 81.5%, respectively. All patients successfully self-administered study treatments via PFS or AI. Acceptability of self-injection was high in both studies. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab 150 mg/mL were comparable with results from previous risankizumab phase 3 studies using the 90 mg/mL formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy, safety, and usability of 150 mg/mL risankizumab delivered as a single PFS or AI injection support use of this new formulation in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

CLINICAL TRIALS

NCT03875482 and NCT0387508.

PARTICULATE MATTER FROM SYRINGES USED FOR INTRAVITREAL INJECTIONS

BACKGROUND

Syringes containing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs to treat retinal diseases are prepared in different ways by various parties with syringe selection, preparation, and storage conditions affecting the risk of injecting particles into the vitreous. This study examines particle loads from various syringes over time.

METHODS

Four syringes were studied: two plastic transfer syringes lubricated with silicone oil or oleamide, a glass syringe with baked-on silicone, and a lubricant-free polymer syringe. Syringes were rinsed with water or filled with buffer and analyzed over time; particles were quantified by flow imaging. Particle formation in a bevacizumab formulation was also characterized.

RESULTS

Insulin syringes consistently showed very high particle counts. Oleamide-lubricated syringes had substantially fewer particles, but showed appreciable increases over time (leading to visible particles). Baked-on silicone glass syringes and lubricant-free polymer syringes both showed low particle levels ≥10 μm. Lubricant-free syringes showed the lowest particle levels ≥1 μm and the lowest particle levels with bevacizumab agitation.

CONCLUSION

Syringes have different intrinsic particle loads which can contribute to particle loads in the delivered drug. Oleamide-lubricated transfer syringes, commonly used for bevacizumab repackaging, have time-dependent particle loads and are associated with the formation of visible particles beyond 30 days of storage.

Vaccine-Related Errors in Reconstitution in South Korea: A National Physicians' and Nurses' Survey

Vaccine-related errors (VREs) result from mistakes in vaccine preparation, handling, storage, or administration. We aimed to assess physicians' and nurses' experiences of VREs in South Korea, focusing on reconstitution issues, and to understand the barriers to and facilitators of preventing them. This was a cross-sectional study using an internet-based survey to examine experiences of reconstitution-related errors, and experience or preference with regard to ready-to-use vaccines (RTU) by physicians and nurses. A total of 700 participants, including 250 physicians and 450 nurses, responded to the questionnaire. In total, 76.4% and 41.5% of the physicians and nurses, respectively, reported an error related to reconstituted vaccines. All errors had been reported as experienced by between 4.9% and 52.0% of physicians or nurses. The errors were reported to occur in more than one in 100 vaccinations for inadequate shaking of vaccines by 28.0% of physicians and 6.9% of nurses, incomplete aspiration of reconstitution vials by 28.0% of physicians and 6.4% of nurses, and spillage or leakage during reconstitution by 20.8% of physicians and 6.9% of nurses. A total of 94.8% of physicians had experience with RTU vaccines, and all preferred RTU formulations. In conclusion, this study highlights the high frequency and types of reconstitution-related errors in South Korea. RTU vaccines could help reduce the time needed for preparation and reduce the risk of errors in South Korea.

A Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence Study of Fremanezumab Administered Subcutaneously Using an Autoinjector and a Prefilled Syringe

Fremanezumab (AJOVY; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Netanya, Israel), approved for the preventive treatment of migraine, is available as a subcutaneous injection either once a month or once every 3 months using an autoinjector or a prefilled syringe. The present study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence of a single subcutaneous injection of fremanezumab 225 mg administered using an autoinjector compared to a prefilled syringe in healthy volunteers. Blood samples for PK and antidrug antibodies were collected before and after dosing. Safety and tolerability assessments included physical examinations, adverse event reporting, laboratory evaluations, and immunogenicity. Following single-dose administration, the mean concentration-time profiles for the 2 treatment groups (autoinjector, n = 106; and prefilled syringe, n = 110) were similar. The point estimates for the back-transformed ratio (autoinjector/prefilled syringe) of geometric least squares means of maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of the last measurable drug concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were 1.03, 1.04, and 1.05, respectively, with the 90% confidence intervals entirely contained within bioequivalence margins of 0.8 to 1.25. For both groups, median time to maximum observed concentration was 5 days and mean terminal elimination half-life was approximately 29 days. Treatment-related adverse events were reported by 39 (36%) subjects in the autoinjector group and 26 (24%) in the prefilled syringe group, and the majority were nonserious injection site reactions. The incidence of treatment-emergent antidrug antibody response was low and evenly distributed between the autoinjector (n = 3; 3%) and prefilled syringe (n = 4; 4%) groups. These results indicate that the fremanezumab autoinjector presentation provides an easy-to-use bioequivalent PK profile with a similar safety and tolerability profile to that of the prefilled syringe.

Tissue Resistance during Large-Volume Injections in Subcutaneous Tissue of Minipigs

PURPOSE

Injection devices for administration of biopharmaceuticals enable subcutaneous self-administration by patients. To meet patient specific capabilities, injection forces need to be characterized. We address the open question of whether tissue resistance significantly contributes to overall injection forces, especially for large injection volumes.

METHODS

Subcutaneous tissue resistance was systematically quantified for injection volumes up to 11 mL depending on viscosity (1-20 mPa·s) and injection rates (0.025-0.2 mL/s) using Göttingen Minipigs as the animal model. The contribution of an artificially applied external force at the injection site simulating autoinjector needle cover depression was tested between 2.5-7.5 N.

RESULTS

Tissue resistance reached average values of ~120 mbar for injection volumes up to 11 mL independent of viscosity and injection rate, and maximum values of 300 mbar were determined. Artificially applied external forces led to higher values, independent of the absolute applied force - maximum values of 1 bar were obtained when injecting 4.5 mL of the 20 mPa·s solution at an injection rate of 0.1 mL/s with the application of an artificial 5 N force, corresponding to ~450 mbar. All conditions yield defined injection sites suggesting tissue resistance is defined by mechanical properties of the subcutaneous tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

We set our results in relation to overall injection forces, concluding that maximum values in tissue resistance may cause challenges during subcutaneous injection when using injection devices. Graphical abstract.

Human factors studies of a prefilled syringe with stable liquid glucagon in a simulated severe hypoglycemia rescue situation

Background: Two human factors studies evaluated whether a stable liquid formulation of glucagon in a prefilled syringe (G-PFS) could be safely and effectively administered and evaluated the effectiveness of the product label guide and instructions-for-use (IFU). Research design and methods: In a formative study, 11 participants received orientation with the G-PFS instructional materials and performed a single unaided rescue attempt. In the validation study, 75 adult and adolescent participants received training or familiarized themselves with the G-PFS IFU, Label Guide, and device. All participants returned 1 week later to perform a single unaided rescue attempt of a simulated person with diabetes suffering from an emergency severe hypoglycemic event. Results: The formative study resulted in a 100% success rate across all rescue dose attempts. The validation study resulted in 74/75 (99%) of participants successfully using the G-PFS to administer the full glucagon rescue dose, and validated that intended users could learn from, comprehend, and recall the G-PFS instructions to successfully use the product. Conclusion: The G-PFS provides a familiar, easy-to-use alternative to currently marketed lyophilized glucagon kits for treating severe hypoglycemia. The G-PFS IFU and Label Guide enable even untrained users to successfully administer a full rescue dose of stable liquid glucagon.

Comparison of pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of secukinumab administered subcutaneously using different delivery systems in healthy volunteers and in psoriasis patients

AIMS

The aim of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of secukinumab with different devices for subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of 2 mL.

METHODS

A phase 1 study in healthy subjects with 6 devices to administer 2 mL injection volumes was conducted to evaluate the serum PK, safety and tolerability of secukinumab following single s.c. injection of 300 mg in the abdomen (either side) or in the thigh (either leg). Primary PK endpoints were maximum observed serum concentration and area under the serum concentration-time curve. The impact of device, site and side of injection on serum exposure was evaluated. In a phase 3 study in psoriasis patients, PK of secukinumab was evaluated following multiple s.c. injections of 300 mg by either 2 × 1-mL prefilled syringe or 1 × 2-mL prefilled syringe.

RESULTS

Mean serum concentration-time profiles for administration as 2 × 1 mL injections or as 1 × 2 mL injections were similar. With an injection volume of 2 mL, perceived injection pain was not different from 2 × 1 mL injections. A nonclinically significant difference in PK endpoints was observed between thigh and abdomen. Results with a 2 mL prefilled syringe in a 1-year phase 3 study in patients confirmed PK results observed in the phase 1 study.

CONCLUSION

Collective evidence from both studies demonstrated that 2-mL injections of secukinumab into the abdomen or thigh using different devices resulted in comparable PK characteristics and were all well tolerated without noticeable local reactions.

Single-Use Autoinjector Functionality And Reliability For At-Home Administration Of Benralizumab For Patients With Severe Asthma: GRECO Trial Results

Purpose

Accessorized prefilled syringes (APFS) have demonstrated functionality and reliability for subcutaneous (SC) delivery, including self-administration, of benralizumab 30 mg in the clinic or at home. The multicenter, open-label GRECO study (NCT02918071) assessed functionality and reliability of a single-use autoinjector (AI) for at-home benralizumab administration by patients or their caregivers.

Patients and methods

Adults with severe asthma received benralizumab SC injections at the study site at Weeks 0, 4, and 8. The first dose was administered by health care providers. Patients/caregivers had the option of administering the second dose and were required to administer the third dose under supervision. At Weeks 12 and 16, patients/caregivers administered benralizumab via AI at home. After each administration, patients/caregivers completed questionnaires concerning administration and device functioning. All AI devices used were returned for evaluation.

Results

A total of 595 AIs were used for 121 patients (mean age 48.5 years; 64% female) in the clinic and at home. Of 116 participants, 113 (97.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.63–99.46) and 112 (96.6%; 95% CI: 91.41–99.05) successfully administered benralizumab at home at Weeks 12 and 16, respectively; 108 (93.1%; 95% CI: 86.86–96.98) were successful on both occasions. Throughout the study, 10 (1.7%) AI administrations were unsuccessful: 8 (1.3%) because of user error, 1 (0.2%) with undetermined cause, and 1 (0.2%) because of a manufacturing defect. Benralizumab efficacy (assessed by Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 score) and pharmacokinetics for patients using the AI were comparable to published results for patients receiving benralizumab via syringe in a clinical setting. No new or unexpected safety findings were observed.

Conclusion

AIs were functional, reliable, and performed well in the clinic and at home. Nearly all patients and caregivers successfully administered SC benralizumab via AI. Benralizumab availability in AI and APFS could provide patients with choices for self-administration.

Evidence of bioequivalence and positive patient user handling of a tocilizumab autoinjector

BACKGROUND

The anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab is approved for subcutaneous injection using a prefilled syringe (PFS). We report results from a bioequivalence study in healthy subjects and a user-handling study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using an autoinjector (AI) for tocilizumab.

METHODS

A randomized crossover study in healthy subjects (N = 161) examined the bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of tocilizumab after a single subcutaneous injection by AI versus PFS. A nonrandomized observational, real-life human factors study in RA patients (N = 54) assessed user (RA patients, caregivers, health care providers) ability to administer tocilizumab effectively by AI.

RESULTS

Bioequivalence criteria for tocilizumab AI versus PFS were met for key pharmacokinetic parameters. Safety was comparable between devices and consistent with the established tocilizumab profile. In the real-life human factors study, the proportion of users who successfully performed all essential tasks required to operate the AI to deliver the full dose was 92.3% at first assessment and 98.1% at second assessment, with no safety concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Tocilizumab administration by AI was bioequivalent to administration by PFS. Intended users were successful in performing the tasks required to administer tocilizumab by AI. No new safety signals were observed in either study.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02678988, NCT02682823.

Prefilled syringes for intravitreal drug delivery

Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medications play an increasingly critical role in numerous retinal vascular diseases. Initially, anti-VEGF medications came in vials that had to be drawn up by the physician into a syringe for administration. In 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) approved the ranibizumab 0.3 mg prefilled syringe (PFS), and in October 2016, the US FDA approved the ranibizumab 0.5 mg PFS. This article discusses the advantages of the PFS, including reduced injection time, possible reduced risk of endophthalmitis, reduction in intraocular air bubbles and silicone oil droplets, and improved precision in the volume and dose of intravitreal ranibizumab administered, along with possible disadvantages. Implications of the innovation of the PFS on intravitreal injection technique and clinical practice pattern are discussed and reviewed.

Effects of syringe material and silicone oil lubrication on the stability of pharmaceutical proteins

Currently, polymer-based prefillable syringes are being promoted to the pharmaceutical market because they provide an increased break resistance relative to traditionally used glass syringes. Despite this significant advantage, the possibility that barrel material can affect the oligomeric state of the protein drug exists. The present study was designed to compare the effect of different syringe materials and silicone oil lubrication on the protein aggregation. The stability of a recombinant fusion protein, abatacept (Orencia), and a fully human recombinant immunoglobulin G1, adalimumab (Humira), was assessed in silicone oil-free (SOF) and silicone oil-lubricated 1-mL glass syringes and polymer-based syringes in accelerated stress study. Samples were subjected to agitation stress, and soluble aggregate levels were evaluated by size-exclusion chromatography and verified with analytical ultracentrifugation. In accordance with current regulatory expectations, the amounts of subvisible particles resulting from agitation stress were estimated using resonant mass measurement and dynamic flow-imaging analyses. The amount of aggregated protein and particle counts were similar between unlubricated polymer-based and glass syringes. The most significant protein loss was observed for lubricated glass syringes. These results suggest that newly developed SOF polymer-based syringes are capable of providing biopharmaceuticals with enhanced physical stability upon shipping and handling. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 104:527–535, 2015

Functional evaluation and characterization of a newly developed silicone oil-free prefillable syringe system

The functionality of a newly developed silicone oil-free (SOF) syringe system, of which the plunger stopper is coated by a novel coating technology (i-coating™), was assessed. By scanning electron microscopy observations and other analysis, it was confirmed that the plunger stopper surface was uniformly covered with the designed chemical composition. A microflow imaging analysis showed that the SOF system drastically reduced both silicone oil (SO) doplets and oil-induced aggregations in a model protein formulation, whereas a large number of subvisible particles and protein aggregations were formed when a SO system was used. Satisfactory container closure integrity (CCI) was confirmed by means of dye and microorganism penetration studies. Furthermore, no significant difference between the break loose and gliding forces was observed in the former, and stability studies revealed that the SOF system could perfectly show the aging independence in break loose force observed in the SO system. The results suggest that the introduced novel SOF system has a great potential and represents an alternative that can achieve very low subvisible particles, secure CCI, and the absence of a break loose force. In particular, no risk of SO-induced aggregation can bring additional value in the highly sensitive biotech drug market. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 103:1520–1528, 2014

Preference, satisfaction and usability of subcutaneously administered methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis: results of a postmarketing surveillance study with a high-concentration formulation

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This postmarketing surveillance study assessed the preference, satisfaction, usability, and tolerability of subcutaneous self-administration of a high-concentration (50 mg/ml) ready-to-use formulation of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis.

METHODS

The study enrolled 403 patients with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis. The first injection was administered by the attending physician or nurse, followed by five self-administered injections at weekly intervals. The high-concentration formulation consisted of a prefilled syringe with MTX 50 mg/ml solution and a pre-attached needle. Questionnaires were used to document outcomes.

RESULTS

The overall assessment was 'very good' and 'good' in 87.6% of the patients and in 92.8% of the physicians/study nurses. Availability and use of a pre-attached needle was considered as very advantageous and advantageous by 91.8% of the patients and 88.8% of the physicians/study nurses. A total of 96% of the patients described the feeling of the injection as comfortable or tolerable. Patients reported that self-administration led to a feeling of more independence (89.1%) and an improved quality of life (83.6%). A total of 109 patients reported previous self-administration of low-concentration MTX formulations; 94.5% of them stated that they would prefer the high-concentration MTX formulation in the future. The formulation was generally well tolerated. Physicians' expectations concerning the benefit of switching to MTX self-administration was met in 92.8% of the patients. A total of 96.3% of the patients were considered suitable for subcutaneous self-administration of the MTX formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The 50 mg/ml prefilled syringe appears to be a valuable treatment option for patients with rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis in need of MTX. This is supported by the strong appreciation of the patients as well as their attending healthcare professionals for its convenience and tolerability. The results confirm the findings and experience from a clinical study performed in Germany in 2009, which showed that 93% of the patients prefer the 50 mg/ml prefilled syringe with a pre-attached needle.

Tolerability and patient/physician satisfaction with subcutaneously administered methotrexate provided in two formulations of different drug concentrations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives:

To determine preference, satisfaction, usability and local tolerability by patients, physicians and study nurses of two subcutaneously administered methotrexate (MTX) formulations of different concentrations.

Methods:

This was an open-label, comparative, within-patient controlled, multicentre study of 132 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MTX treatment consisted of 20 mg/week administered as a medium-concentration formulation (MC) (2.0 ml of 10 mg/ml solution in prefilled syringe; separate needle) compared to a novel high-concentration formulation (HC) (0.4 ml of 50 mg/ml in prefilled syringe; pre-attached needle). Each treatment was given for three weeks. Questionnaires and visual analogue scales were used to measure outcomes.

Results:

At the end of the study, 93% of the patients preferred HC over MC as further treatment. Overall assessment of HC was “good” or “very good” in 90.6% vs 34.4% in MC-treated patients. Physician’s and patients global assessment of syringe usability showed highly statistically significant differences (P < 0.0001) in favour of HC. Overall assessment by study nurses’ and investigators’ was “good” (18.8%) or “very good” (81.2%) for HC and “good” in 31.3% or “very good” in 12.5% for MC, and no preference in 50%. Local tolerability improved slightly also with HC.

Conclusions:

The total smaller volume of administered drug and the improved usability of a pre-attached needle in combination with a smaller prefilled syringe resulted in preference of the patients of HC over MC. The slightly improved local tolerability may also have added to this preference. This assessment was confirmed by similar assessments made by healthcare professionals.

Eudra-CT number: 2007-003591-19.