Discharge Disposition Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Predicting the Need for Rehabilitation and Association with Survival

Many hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients require rehabilitation due to deconditioning following intensive conditioning regimens and immune reconstitution. HCT recipients are preferentially discharged to home to avoid the risk of exposure to healthcare-associated infection in a rehabilitation facility (RF), with a caregiver who has been provided specific education about the complexity of post-HCT care. This study was conducted to determine the incidence of discharge to an RF following HCT, identify pre-HCT and peri-HCT risk factors for discharge to an RF, and estimate the effect of discharge disposition on overall survival (OS). This retrospective, matched 1:4 case-control study included 56 cases over a 10-year period from a single institution. Controls were matched by transplantation type (autologous versus allogeneic) and date of transplantation. The incidence of discharge to an RF was 2.2%. Controlling for disease, increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.15; P < .001), female sex (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.32 to 7.32; P = .01), high-risk HCT Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) score (≥3) (OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.39 to 8.52; P = .008), decreasing pre-HCT serum albumin (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.07 to 6.38; P = .037), and development of acute kidney injury during HCT (OR, 4.10; 95% CI, 1.36 to 12.40; P = .012) were associated with discharge to an RF. Discharge to an RF was associated with worse OS and higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) compared with discharge to home (1-year OS, 70.5% [95% CI, 55.8% to 81.1%] versus 88.8% [95% CI, 83.6% to 92.4%], P < .001; 100-day NRM: 9.5% [95% CI, 3.5% to 19.2%] versus 1.8% [95% CI, 0.6% to 4.3%]; P = .03). Discharge to an RF following HCT is a rare event but associated with poor OS. Modifiable risk factors for discharge to an RF, including serum albumin as a measure of nutrition and reversible HCT-CI components, should be prospectively studied to determine the effect of mitigation on discharge disposition and survival.

COVID-19 Outbreak at a Geriatric Rehabilitation Facility: The Silent Threat of Asymptomatic Patients with High Viral Loads

Data about outbreaks of nosocomial COVID-19 disease within geriatric rehabilitation facilities are scarce. In this retrospective case series analysis, we describe such an outbreak, determine the proportion of a-/presymptomatic patients, the median time before symptom onset among presymptomatic patients and investigate whether the viral load differs between patients with and without symptoms. Typical and atypical symptoms were retrieved from the electronic medical records of patients who tested positive for COVID-19 disease during their stay at a 95-bed geriatric rehabilitation facility. The viral load at the time of diagnosis was estimated on cycle threshold values of the rRT-PCR test. Overall, 34 patients (median age, 87 years; range, 66-98; 67% female) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. During the same period, 19 health care workers were also diagnosed with COVID-19. Among the 27 patients who provided consent, 20 (74%) were symptomatic at the time of testing. Among the remaining seven patients, six developed symptoms after a median of 2 days. A viral load > 10⁶ copies/mL was observed in 20 out of the 27 patients, including five out of the seven initially asymptomatic patients. The rapid transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and the prevalence of initially asymptomatic patients with high viral loads support an extended screening strategy at such facilities.

Antibiotic consumption surveillance in rehabilitation facilities - a new task according to § 23 of the German Infection Protection Act. Data from rehabilitation facilities in the Rhine-Main area, 2016-2018

Background: Multidrug-resistant pathogens are a major health problem in many countries. In Germany, in accordance with the German Antibiotic Resistance Strategy (DART), the surveillance of antibiotic consumption in acute care hospitals and rehabilitation facilities was made mandatory by the Infection Protection Act in 2011 and 2017. Whereas comparable reference data for acute care hospitals are available, such data is lacking for rehabilitation facilities. Therefore, the Rhine-Main network on MDRO (Multi Drug Resistant Organisms) has offered to evaluate the antibiotic consumption of the network's rehabilitation facilities. Antimicrobial consumption (if possible already given as daily defined doses, DDD) and patient days from 2016-2018 were requested. Materials and methods: By October 31, 2019, nine clinics, including a facility for early neurological rehabilitation, reported their consumption of antibiotics (mostly already as DDD) and patient days from 2016-2018. The information from the clinics was entered in an Excel table and the DDD calculated if necessary. In order to compare the facilities, the DDD/100 patient days (pd) were calculated for the individual active substances. Results: Antibiotic consumption in general rehabilitation facilities decreased slightly from 4.8 DDD/100 pd to 4.4 DDD/100 pd from 2016 to 2018. In early neurological rehabilitation, antibiotic consumption increased from 10.2 DDD/100 pd to 13.1 DDD/100 pd in the same period. Among the most commonly used antibiotics, cefuroxime came first, followed by ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin in third place. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first antimicrobial consumption data from rehabilitation facilities in Germany. Antibiotic consumption in general rehabilitation facilities is less than 10% of the consumption in normal/regular wards of acute care clinics, and the consumption in neurological early rehabilitation was approximately 10% of the consumption in intensive care wards within acute care clinics. Reserve or broad-spectrum antibiotics were rarely or not used at all in the rehabilitation facilities. Despite this overall positive situation, antibiotic stewardship should also be introduced in rehabilitation facilities, possibly with the support of the regional MDRO networks.

Discharge Destination of Patients in Fast-Track Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Results From a Prospective Danish Cohort

BACKGROUND

Following the implementation of the fast-track protocol in total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), the median length of stay (LOS) has been significantly reduced without an increase in readmissions. However, it is unclear if the reduction in LOS is at the expense of an increase in nonhome discharge. The aim of this study was to investigate the discharge destination among THA, TKA, and UKA patients.

METHODS

The prospective multicenter study included 6,856 patients undergoing primary THA, TKA, and UKA in a fast-track setting with an overall median LOS of one day. Outcomes were discharge destination, median LOS in each discharge destination category, and cause of rehabilitation center discharge. Data were gathered using preoperative questionnaires and a review of medical records. Discharge destination and LOS were registered at discharge.

RESULTS

We found that 99% of patients had been discharged to their own homes, of which 21% had been discharged to their own homes with home care. There were 1% who were discharged to a rehabilitation facility and 0.1% who were discharged to a nursing home. The THA (1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7 to 1) and TKA (1%, 95% CI 0.9 to 2) had a significantly higher rate of discharge to a rehabilitation facility compared to UKA (0.1%, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a short LOS, 99% of patients were discharged to their own homes. Rehabilitation facility discharge was only 1% and was mostly caused by inadequate postoperative mobilization.