A systematic review of Clostridium difficile infection following reversal of ileostomy

AIM

The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been reported to be as high as 4% following ileostomy reversal. CDI can be associated with significant morbidity. A systematic review on this subject has not been previously reported; our aim was to review the literature to establish incidence and to evaluate the factors that may contribute to an increased risk of CDI following ileostomy reversal.

METHOD

A systematic review of Ovid, Embase and Medline was undertaken. Search terms included C. difficile, reversal of ileostomy and ileostomy closure. Articles were included where at least one case of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea following reversal of defunctioning ileostomy was reported. Data extraction for articles was performed by two authors, using predefined data fields. The primary outcome measure was incidence of CDI amongst patients undergoing ileostomy reversal. Secondary outcomes were defunctioning time, antibiotic regime, acid suppression, time to onset of symptoms and study conclusions including colectomy and mortality rate.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were included (five case reports and six cohort studies). The overall incidence of CDI was 1.8% (242/13 728). The mean defunctioning time was 8.7 months (range 6-12). A variety of antibiotic regimes were described. Mean time to onset of symptoms was 6 days (range 3-14). Use of acid suppression, colectomy or mortality rate were frequently not reported.

CONCLUSION

CDI should be recognized as a potentially life-threatening complication of ileostomy closure. Careful consideration should be given to peri-operative antibiotic regime, acid suppression, timing of reversal and appropriate preoperative counselling of patients.

Day-case closure of ileostomy: feasible, safe and efficient

AIM

Over 5000 loop ileostomy closures were performed in the UK in 2013 with a median inpatient stay of 5 days. Previously we have successfully implemented a 23-h protocol for loop ileostomy closure which was modified for same-day discharge. We present our early experience of day-case loop ileostomy closure.

METHOD

A specific patient pathway for day-case discharge following loop ileostomy closure was implemented with inclusion criteria to conform with British Association of Day Surgery guidelines. Exclusion criteria included postoperative chemoradiotherapy, multiple comorbidities and social care needs. Follow-up consisted of telephone contact (24 and 72 h after discharge) and a routine outpatient appointment. Patients were provided with a 24-h contact point in case of emergency.

RESULTS

Fifteen (12 male) patients were enrolled of median age 67 (39-80) years. The median operating time was 41 (23-80) min. The indication for ileostomy formation was to cover a low anterior resection for adenocarcinoma (13), reversal of Hartmann's procedure (1) and functional bowel disorder (1). The median interval from the primary procedure to day-case loop ileostomy closure was 8 (3-14) months. Every patient was discharged on the day of surgery. There were no complications related to the surgery and there was one readmission due to a urinary tract infection. The median length of follow-up was 4 (2-16) months.

CONCLUSION

Our early experience shows that day-case loop ileostomy closure is feasible, safe and efficient. This protocol will become standard within our institution for suitable patients, saving on average five inpatient bed days per patient.