Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the novel hinotoriTM surgical robot system: initial experience and operation learning curve at a single institution

Background

The hinotoriTM surgical robot system (HSRS) is the first made-in-Japan robotic system used for radical prostatectomy. Here, we report initial results and describe our learning curve (skill development) implementing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using HSRS (h-RARP).

Methods

Between November 2021 and December 2022, 97 patients who underwent h-RARP at our institution were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical outcomes of the initial cases using h-RARP, comparing those of RARP using da Vinci surgical robot system (d-RARP) in our institution. Furthermore, the learning curves of two surgeons with the highest number of h-RARP were analyzed. Patients treated by each surgeon were categorized into two groups: 1-15 cases (earlier group) and >15 cases (later group). Preoperative patient characteristics, operation parameters, and complication rates were compared between the two groups.

Results

In terms of surgical outcome, h-RARP was comparable to d-RARP. The procedures performed by the HSRS were successfully completed in all cases. There was no complication of grade 3 or higher. Comparing the two surgeons, surgeon 1, who had performed 40 d-RARP procedures, had time using robot system of the later group that was significantly shorter than that of the earlier group. However, for surgeon 2 with more than 100 d-RARP procedures, there was no statistically significant difference in time using robot system between groups. Other parameters showed no difference between earlier and later groups for the two surgeons.

Conclusions

Our results show that surgical outcomes of h-RARP are comparable to those of d-RARP during the initial experience of clinical application. In addition, the surgeons' learning curves for the total RARP experience suggest that the experience of d-RARP can carry over to performance using the novel HSRS.

A transparent synthetic peptide hydrogel as a haemostatic agent in athermal nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an observational study

Background

PuraStat® is a new synthetic haemostatic agent constituting peptides that self-assemble into sheets when exposed to ionic charges. The objective of this submission is to assess the perioperative, functional and user-reported outcomes of PuraStat® as an athermal topical haemostatic agent for use on the neurovascular bundle (NVB) in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), and to inform further research into this developing field.

Methods

Demographic and disease data for 29 consecutive patients undergoing RARP were recorded. PuraStat® was used as the primary haemostatic agent to the NVB, without thermal or suture haemostasis, unless necessary. Preoperative, 1-h postoperative and 24-h postoperative haemoglobin (Hb) were measured. Operative data including postoperative complications up to 30 days were noted. Urinary function, continence and erectile function (EF) were measured pre- and postoperatively with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), patient reporting of pad usage, and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 respectively. A qualitative assessment of PuraStat® was made intraoperatively by the surgical assistant in the following categories: transparency, haemostatic efficacy, ready-to-use, handling, and overall satisfaction.

Results

Twenty-nine males aged between 49 and 75 years underwent a nerve-sparing RARP under a single surgeon for clinically significant prostate cancer with PuraStat® used as the primary haemostatic agent at the NVB. One patient required an additional haemostatic suture. The median prostate volume was 36 mL. Mean blood loss was 363 mL. The mean Hb at 1 and 24 h postoperative was 135.2 and 125.1 mg/dL. Median Hb change from 1-24 h postoperative was 11 mg/dL. No transfusions were required, and there were no postoperative complications. Urinary function and continence were preserved. EF in our series was lower than published data.

Conclusions

Our observational study suggests that PuraStat® is a safe haemostatic agent in RARP with similar perioperative bleeding outcomes, comparable long-term urinary outcomes and a high level of intraoperative user satisfaction. The effects on EF requires further investigation. PuraStat® appears to be a useful therapeutic tool for the urologist performing RARPs.

Surgical techniques to preserve continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Radical prostatectomy significantly impacts the inherent anatomy of the male pelvis and the functional mechanisms of urinary continence. Incontinence has a considerable negative influence on the quality of life of patients, as well as their social and psychological wellbeing. Numerous surgical techniques have been demonstrated to support the preservation of continence during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). In this in-depth analysis, we give a general summary of the surgical techniques used in RARP and their impact on incontinence rates.

Initial experience and short-term outcomes of single-port extraperitoneal transvesical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a two-center study

Background

This study presents the procedure of single-port extraperitoneal transvesical approach to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SETvRARP) on the da Vinci Xi platform coupling with a 4-channel single port and evaluated the short-term outcomes in the first 72 prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

Methods

Seventy-two patients with localized PCa were enrolled. Each operation was conducted by the same single robotic surgery group in two centers using the da Vinci Xi system.

Results

The median operation time was 150 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 50 mL. All operations were successfully carried out without open conversion or transfusion. No ≥ Grade II complications were noted. Urethral catheters were routinely removed on postoperative day 7. Sixty-eight (94.4%) patients recovered to immediate urinary continence after surgery, with 72 (100%) patients achieving full continence on postoperative day 14. A positive surgical margin was observed in 15 (20.8%) patients. Postoperative urodynamic studies regarding peak urinary flow, bladder capacity, and residual urine were not statically different from the preoperative results. No biochemical recurrence was noted in all patients within the follow-up period. Postoperative erectile function was not statistically different from the preoperative results (P=0.1697).

Conclusions

SETvRARP using the da Vinci Xi system coupling with a 4-channel single port is a valid radical prostatectomy technique in well-selected PCa patients, resulting in superior postoperative recovery of urinary continence. Meanwhile, the outcomes in functional protection and cancer control need to be further investigated with a long-term follow-up duration.

How May Longer Console Times Influence Outcomes after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP)?

Longer operating time in radical prostatectomy may increase the risk of perioperative complications. Various factors such as cancer extent, the procedure's level of difficulty, habitus and previous surgeries may lengthen robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and therefore compromise outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

this study investigates the influence of operating time on outcomes after RARP in real life settings in a monocentric single surgeon study.

METHODS

a total of 500 sequential patients who were operated on between April 2019 and August 2022 were involved. Men were allocated to three groups short (n = 157; 31.4%), under or equal to 120 min; average (n = 255; 51%), between 121 and 180 min; long (n = 88; 17.6%), above 180 min console time. Demographic, baseline and perioperative data were analyzed and compared between groups. Univariate logistic regression was completed to investigate the association between console time and outcomes and to predict factors which may prolong surgery.

RESULTS

hospital stay and catheter days were significantly longer in group 3 with medians of 6 and 7 days (p < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Those findings were confirmed in univariate analysis, with p = 0.012 for catheter days and p < 0.001 for hospital stay. Moreover, major complications were higher in patients with longer procedures, at p = 0.008. Prostate volume was the only predictor of a prolonged console time (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

RARP is a safe procedure and most patients will be discharged uneventfully. Yet, a longer console time is associated with a longer hospital stay, longer catheter days and major complications. Caution has to be taken in the large prostate to avoid longer procedures, which may prevent postoperative adverse events.

Surgical Tolerability and Frailty in Elderly Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Narrative Review

Simple Summary

Life expectancy in Western countries and East Asian countries has incremented over the past decades, resulting in a rapidly aging world, while in general, radical prostatectomy (RP) is not recommended in elderly men aged ≥75 years. Together with the evolving technique of robotic surgeries, surgical indications for RP should be reconsidered in ‘elderly’ and ‘frail’ men, since this procedure has now become one of the safest and most effective cancer treatments for prostate cancer. One important element to determine surgical indications is surgical tolerability. However, evidence is scarce regarding the surgical tolerability in elderly men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). In this review, we focused on the surgical tolerability in ‘elderly’ and/or ‘frail’ men undergoing RARP, with the intent to provide up-to-date information on this matter and to support the decision making of therapeutic options in this spectrum of patients.

Abstract

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has now become the gold standard treatment for localized prostate cancer. There are multiple elements in decision making for the treatment of prostate cancer. One of the important elements is life expectancy, which the current guidelines recommend as an indicator for choosing treatment options. However, determination of life expectancy can be complicated and difficult in some cases. In addition, surgical tolerability is also an important issue. Since frailty may be a major concern, it may be logical to use geriatric assessment tools to discriminate ‘surgically fit’ patients from unfit patients. Landmark studies show two valid models such as the phenotype model and the cumulative deficit model that allow for the diagnosis of frailty. Many studies have also developed geriatric screening tools such as VES-13 and G8. These tools may have the potential to directly sort out unfit patients for surgery preoperatively.

Epidemiology and therapy of symptomatic lymphoceles after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)

Background

Lymphoceles are a common postoperative complication after radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Therapeutic options include cannulation and drainage (CD), drainage and instillation (DI), or laparoscopic fenestration (LF). The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of symptomatic lymphoceles (SLC) and evaluate the treatment options.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed all patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) at our clinic from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018. All documented lymphoceles of these patients were recorded and analysed with regard to symptoms, possible infection and the treatment option (or options) chosen.

Results

We were able to include all 1,029 patients who underwent RARP in the aforementioned period of time. Of these, 18.1% were diagnosed with a lymphocele either when discharged or when readmitted and 6.9% experienced an SLC requiring treatment. Thirteen-point-seven percent of patients readmitted with SLC showed an accompanying thrombosis. Due to recurring or bilateral SLCs receiving different treatment options for each side, there was a total of 115 SLCs treated. CD was carried out in 102 cases. Twenty-point-six percent of patients were sufficiently treated this way, the rest required further treatment or experienced recurrences not requiring further treatment. DI was carried out in 56 cases. Of those patients, 46.4% were sufficiently treated. LF was carried out in 54 cases (either after CD, or after DI, or primarily). Of those patients, 98.1% were treated sufficiently. LF had a statistically significant higher success rate compared to CD and DI (P<0.001 respectively).

Conclusions

The study confirmed the significance of SLC as a common complication after RARP. LF turned out to be the most effective treatment option for SLC, while CD as well as DI have not been proven effective.

Surgical techniques to improve continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Radical prostatectomy directly affects urinary continence dynamics with incontinence being a major factor in patients’ quality of life, social and psychological status. In order to help maintain continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), a number of surgical techniques have been described. In the present narrative review, we summarize the surgical techniques that have been applied during RARP and their effects on incontinence rates and time to continence recovery.

Surgical techniques to improve continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Radical prostatectomy directly affects urinary continence dynamics with incontinence being a major factor in patients' quality of life, social and psychological status. In order to help maintain continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), a number of surgical techniques have been described. In the present narrative review, we summarize the surgical techniques that have been applied during RARP and their effects on incontinence rates and time to continence recovery.

Longitudinal change of comprehensive lower urinary tract symptoms and various types of urinary incontinence during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

AIMS

To clarify longitudinal change of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and various types of urinary incontinence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using validated questionnaires.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The core lower urinary tract symptom score (CLSS) and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ)-Short Form (SF) questionnaires were administered to 607 consecutive, treatment-naïve men receiving RARP before and after surgery. The time course of comprehensive LUTS and various types of urinary incontinence, including stress-, urgency-, and urinary incontinence with no obvious reason, were evaluated. Continence recovery rates were compared for the different types of incontinence using Cox hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

After surgery, stress urinary incontinence (SUI) was reported most frequently (32% of cases) as the chief complaint with the most impact on daily life, as assessed by the CLSS questionnaire, followed by urgency urinary incontinence (UUI; 27% of cases). The rates of continence recovery differed among the different types of urinary incontinence, such as after urinating, when dressed, when asleep, when physically active or exercising, when coughing or sneezing, before reaching the toilet, and for no obvious reason. Incontinence for no obvious reason at 1 month after RARP was a strongest prognostic factor of delayed continence recovery (hazard ratio, 0.61; P < 0.0001), whereas patients reporting SUI and UUI gradually regained continence.

CONCLUSIONS

Further time course on continent recovery after RARP would be more precisely predictable based on the incontinence status at one month postoperatively. Especially, incontinence with no obvious reason would be a significant factor for delayed recovery.