Trans-anal Minimally Invasive Surgery Combined With a Robotic Anterior Approach for Sleeve Resection of a Huge Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Due to anatomical complexity, large rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in the pelvis at the anterior aspect often require extended abdominal surgery to obtain clear surgical margins. Here, we show our trans-anal minimally invasive surgery combined with a robotic anterior approach for a huge low rectal GIST that was widely in contact with the prostate and urethra. By performing lateral dissection first, we can identify the orientation of critical organs such as the prostate, urethra, and neurovascular bundles, facilitating anterior anorectal dissection without urethral injury. Although the combination with a transabdominal robotic approach was required because of firm inflammatory adhesion between the tumor and prostate, the preceding trans-anal dissection plane facilitated the robotic anterior dissection and contributed to achieving complete dissection with negative resection margins.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery with a fluorescent near-infrared ray ureteral catheter for a rectal cancer patient with pelvic kidney: A case report

An 85-year-old woman presented with a stomachache after a meal and was admitted to the previous clinic. Multi-detector computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen showed wall thickening in the rectum and right ectopic pelvic kidney. Colonoscopy revealed a mass at the rectum, and a biopsy showed adenocarcinoma. CT showed no lymphadenopathy or distant metastasis. Hartmann's procedure with fluorescent near-infrared ray ureteral catheters was used to avoid causing urinary injury. Robotic surgery was performed while checking the route of the ureter in near-infrared mode. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 14 without specific complications. This case appears to be the first of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for a rectal cancer patient with pelvic kidney.

Robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer results of a non-randomized study

INTRODUCTION

The Czech Republic belongs to countries in which colorectal cancer significantly contributes to the overall oncological burden. Radical removal of tumor-affected tissues plays a key role in the multimodal therapy of rectal cancer. In the first decade of the third millennium the mini-invasive approach in rectal cancer surgery gradually expanded to include robotic-assisted surgeries. The aim of this paper is to present the results of a non-randomized study with prospectively collected data from robotically assisted rectal cancer surgeries.

METHODS

204 patients with rectal cancer (.

Average treatment effect of robotic versus laparoscopic rectal surgery for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to estimate what would have happened if all patients treated with laparoscopy for rectal cancer had instead been treated with the robotic technique.

METHODS

To estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) of the robotic technique over the laparoscopic approach, data from patients treated at two centres between 2007 and 2018 were used to obtain counterfactual outcomes using an inverse probability weighting (IPW) adjustment.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 261 patients, of which 177 and 84 patients had undergone robotic surgery and standard laparoscopy, respectively. After IPW adjustment, the difference between the groups was similar in the pseudo-population. The average conversion rate would fall by an estimated 6.1% if all procedures had been robotic (p = 0.045). All other post-operative variables showed no differences regardless of the approach.

CONCLUSION

ATE estimation suggests that robotic rectal cancer surgery could be associated with a lower conversion rate. The approach did not affect the post-operative morbidity rates or the operative time.

Robotic colorectal surgery: more than a fantastic toy?

There has been a rapid rise in the number of robotic colorectal procedures worldwide since the da Vinci Surgical System robotic technology was approved for surgical procedures in the year 2000. Several recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews have shown a significant difference in outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, these results from pooled data have not been supported by the initial results reported from the Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic assisted resection for rectal cancer trial. In this article, we examine the current evidence for robotic colorectal surgery, assess its features and functionality, evaluate its learning curve and provide our perspective on its future.