Assessment of the Occupational Radiation Dose from a Handheld Portable X-ray Unit During Full-mouth Intraoral Dental Radiographs in the Dog and the Cat - A Pilot Study

Occupational radiation protection is an important consideration in small animal clinics world-wide. With the increased use of portable handheld X-ray devices in veterinary dentistry, concerns related to occupational radiation protection are being raised. Annual occupational dose limits for dental workers are expressed as Total Dose Equivalent (TDE) or Effective Dose. The permitted TDE can vary depending on the anatomical region, ranging from 50 millisieverts (mSv) for the external whole body exposure dose to 500 mSv for external exposure of the skin or an extremity. Although several studies have been performed in human dentistry to establish the amount of backscatter radiation produced using portable handheld X-ray devices, no similar research has been conducted in veterinary dentistry. This study aimed to determine the TDE while acquiring a full mouth intraoral radiograph set in dogs and cats and to estimate the TDE for a handheld X-ray device's operator. For this, the backscatter radiation dose recorded by three sets of monitoring dosimeters located in strategic anatomical areas of the operator was assessed after taking one hundred intraoral radiographs in each group. The study concluded that the backscatter radiation levels were far below the permitted annual occupational doses in the three patient groups of this study. Even though the portable handheld X-ray unit was demonstrated to be a safe dental radiographic unit regarding backscattering radiation, the operator's eye, ovary, and breast regions were exposed to unnecessary radiation.

[Improved Protective Equipment for NICU Portable Radiography]

We have been developing protective equipment for portable radiography in neonatal intensive care units because the portable radiography's X-ray tube is in close proximity to the head of the nurse who is assisting the patient. Although our initial protective-equipment design was highly effective, there were some concerns that it obstructed the view of the patient and was difficult to handle. To overcome this problem, we have developed two new types of protective device: a narrow-type 0.13 mmPb device, 17 cm long and 45 cm wide (weight 200 g); and a wide type with a wider core material, 45 cm long and 25 cm wide (weight 300 g), both of which can be hung from the collimator cover of mobile X-ray equipment. The measured protective effectiveness was 80.6% at head height for the wide type and 76.8% for the narrow type. A survey of nurses regarding the new protective devices revealed no significant differences between the two types in terms of visibility and whether the devices would be an obstacle when assisting patients. The nurses preferred the wider type, which offered better protection. Radiological technologists also liked that both types were easy to handle because the irradiation field could be adjusted even after the device was fitted. Both types of the new protective device are thus expected to be useful in clinical practice in terms of their high protective effect and improved ease of handling.

Assessment of Scattered Dose to the Eye in Dentistry: A Systematic Review

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a tool for dental imaging of impactions, maxillofacial discrepancies, facial trauma, and tumors. In addition, It is used in treatment planning for dental implants, orthognathic surgery, and general maxillofacial surgery. There are no standardized methods for utilizing CBCT dosimetry, and there is no consensus among dental and medical physics health professionals regarding dental CBCT imaging procedures. The eyes and thyroid glands are radiosensitive organs that lie outside the primary beam but receive a significant amount of radiation due to scattered radiation. This study aimed to assess the dose to eye lens in patients imaged using CBCT. This review aims to evaluate the scattered doses to the eye from CBCT among adult patients seeking dental treatment. The search included published articles in the Web of Science, PubMed (MeSH and Web PubMed), Medline, and Google Scholar databases using the appropriate keywords from January 2010 to July 2022. The inclusion criteria were based on the method of dose measurement (phantom studies using Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD), language, and type of protocol used. A literature search was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist and flow chart. Out of 653 articles identified, 5 met the inclusion criteria. The results show that the scattered radiation dose ranged between 0.103 mSv and 8.3 mSv. This variation exists due to the difference in the field of vision (FOV), phantom exposure, dosimeters used, degree of rotation in the protocol, and finally, the scanner used. The scattered dose to the eye from CBCT is higher than the background radiation, with huge variability in the range of the dose measured. Clear guidelines for utilizing CBCT should be implemented, and dose reference levels should be established for benchmarking and optimization in practice.

A Cadaveric Simulation Study of Radiation Exposure to the Surgical Team during Fluoroscopic Spinal Surgery: How Much Are We Exposed?

Introduction

The harmful effects of long-term low-dose radiation have been well known. There are few comprehensive reports evaluating concrete real exposure doses for each part of a surgeon, assistant surgeon, scrub nurse, and anesthesiologist associated with fluoroscopic spinal procedures. This research aimed to quantify the radiation exposure dose to surgical team members during C-arm fluoroscopy-guided spinal surgery.

Methods

Seven fresh cadavers were irradiated for 1 and 3 min with C-arm fluoroscopy. The position of the X-ray source was under the table, over the table, and laterally. The radiation exposure doses were measured at the optic lens, thyroid gland, and hand in mannequins used to simulate surgical team members.

Results

A significant difference was observed in the radiation exposure dose according to the position of the X-ray source and the irradiated body area. The risk of scatter radiation exposure was the biggest for the lateral position (nearly 30-fold that for the position under the table). All radiation exposure doses were positively correlated with irradiation time.

Conclusions

The occupational radiation exposure dose to surgical team members during C-arm fluoroscopy-guided lumbar spinal procedures varies according to the X-ray source position. Our findings would help surgical team members to know the risk of radiation exposure during various fluoroscopic procedures. Surgeons in particular need to reduce their radiation exposure by using appropriate shielding and technique.

[Efficacy of L-shaped Shielding in Interventional Radiology by Transradial Approach and Consideration of Methods for Appropriate Use]

The present study investigated how effective an L-shaped shield was, depending on its position, in reducing a doctor's exposure to radiation during catheterization to access the transradial approach (TRA). The shield's effectiveness was evaluated by measuring the air kerma where the doctor stood under four conditions: with and without the shield, and with and without the shield in conjunction with conventional protection. To enable the shield to be positioned correctly in clinical practice, an illustrated instruction decal affixable to the shield's doctor-facing surface was produced, and the effectiveness of the decal was verified by means of a crossover test in which, as subjects of the study, different nurses set up the shield with and without the decal affixed to it. In the test, in which a human body phantom was used, the C-arm set at the PA angle, and the shield positioned 10 cm from the axilla of the phantom, the shield's effectiveness at 100 cm, 130 cm, and 160 cm above the floor where the doctor stood was 55%, 77%, and 47%, respectively. The effectiveness increased when the shield was positioned closer to the axilla. A significant difference in the positioning of the shield by the subjects was observed depending on whether or not the decal was affixed ( p<0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), indicating that the use of the decal improved the positioning. It was concluded that, positioned correctly, the shield could effectively reduce the doctor's exposure to radiation during TRA.

[Creation of Protective Equipment for Portable Radiography in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit]

Portable imaging in the NICU requires the assistance of a nurse, and the nurse is in close proximity to the X-ray tube, In all, 64 percent of our nurses thought that additional protective equipment was needed. Therefore, a radiation protection device was created and its usefulness was verified. A protective equipment of 0.13 mmPb with a width of 38 cm and a length of 70 cm was made and hung from the mono-tank X-ray unit of the mobile X-ray unit. The position of the nurse was set at 30 cm outward from the center of the irradiation field, and the protective effect was measured at three points: (a) the patient's height, (b) 30 cm above the patient, and (c) 60 cm above the patient. For the imaging conditions, a 2-liter plastic bottle filled with water was placed in the incubator, and measurements were taken with an SID of 100 cm, irradiated field of 20.3 cm×25.4 cm, tube voltage of 58 kV, and tube current-time product of 10 mAs, which was converted to the actual imaging condition of 1 mAs. Based on the results obtained, a questionnaire survey was conducted on nurses' thoughts for the protective equipment created for them. Only 3% reduction in height of (a) where no protective equipment is reached but (b) 50% and (c) 92%, respectively. In all, 82 percent of the nurses had a favorable impression of the new protective equipment. It is expected that the protective equipment designed to control lens dose and reduce anxiety of nurses will be useful.

Spatial Scattering Radiation to the Radiological Technologist during Medical Mobile Radiography

Mobile radiography allows for the diagnostic imaging of patients who cannot move to the X-ray examination room. Therefore, mobile X-ray equipment is useful for patients who have difficulty with movement. However, staff are exposed to scattered radiation from the patient, and they can receive potentially harmful radiation doses during radiography. We estimated occupational exposure during mobile radiography using phantom measurements. Scattered radiation distribution during mobile radiography was investigated using a radiation survey meter. The efficacy of radiation-reducing methods for mobile radiography was also evaluated. The dose decreased as the distance from the X-ray center increased. When the distance was more than 150 cm, the dose decreased to less than 1 μSv. It is extremely important for radiological technologists (RTs) to maintain a sufficient distance from the patient to reduce radiation exposure. The spatial dose at eye-lens height increases when the bed height is high, and when the RT is short in stature and abdominal imaging is performed. Maintaining sufficient distance from the patient is also particularly effective in limiting radiation exposure of the eye lens. Our results suggest that the doses of radiation received by staff during mobile radiography are not significant when appropriate radiation protection is used. To reduce exposure, it is important to maintain a sufficient distance from the patient. Therefore, RTs should bear this is mind during mobile radiography.

Technical note: Characteristics of the energy spread kernels of scattered radiation in an x-ray room

PURPOSE

To describe the scattered radiation spectra inside an x-ray room for different scattering conditions.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulations of an x-ray room using phantoms of different size, varying field sizes, and a range of mono-energetic beams were carried out. For each energy, the particle fluence spectrum of scattered photons was collected at different spherical zones to describe the radiation reaching the different boundaries of the x-ray room. The effect on the scattered spectrum of the room floor was also considered.

RESULTS

The scattered spectra for mono-energetic primary beams at a given spherical zone give rise to oriented energy spread kernels (OESKs) that can be used to calculate the scattered spectrum for any poly-energetic beam at that zone. Despite the large differences, which can be seen in the OESKs when the scattering conditions vary, an important invariance is also observed: the position of the broad scatter peak for a given primary energy and zone.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of breaking down the calculation of the scattered radiation spectrum into the different factors that influence it allows estimating the spectrum in a wide range of situations. The invariant position of the broad scatter peak can be used to estimate the highest energy of the scattered photons for a given primary energy and zone, which may determine radiation shielding needs.

[Usefulness of Radiation Protection Cloths in Fluoroscopy with Clean Areas]

Lowering the dose limit for the lens of the eye incorporated into the Regulation on Prevention of Ionizing Radiation Hazards, effective on April 2021, and dose reduction will become more and more important in the field of radiation. Radiation protective cloth is used as a protective equipment in fluoroscopy rooms. Although it is usually used to protect staff from radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, we investigated whether there is a way to use it for procedures in clean areas. Assuming ureterostomy fistula replacement in urology, the protective cloth was suspended on the side of the patient's head and posterior aspect of the tube, and the distance between the anterior aspect of the X-ray tube and the patient's foot was 55 cm. As a result of measuring the dose rate, a 10% dose reduction was obtained for the lens of the eye of the surgeon, and the distribution of air dose rate in the examination room was significantly reduced. Although scattered radiation from the radiation protection cloth appeared in some areas, the radiation dose to the patient was reduced throughout the body, and a high degree of radiation protection was obtained, especially for the lens of the eye. It is expected that the radiation protection cloths may be useful even when the length of the cloths is limited due to the cleanliness of the area.

Initial investigations of scatter cross-talk in simultaneous biplane high-speed 1000 frames per second neuro-angiography using Monte Carlo simulations

The Aries photon counting detector (PCD) by Direct Conversion Inc. can image up to 1000 frames per second and is used to track contrast bolus in neuro-vasculature for hemodynamic calculations. For 3D tracking, synchronized biplane imaging with 1 ms acquisition times is used such that both imaging planes are exposed simultaneously. This leads to cross-scattered radiation being detected and a degradation of image quality compared to single-plane imaging. In this study, we utilize Monte Carlo (MC) methods to quantify the increase in scatter due to cross-talk without the use of a radiographic grid. EGSnrc biplane simulations were performed with the Zubal anthropomorphic head phantom. The total scatter plus primary and cross-scatter was calculated in the imaging planes for two orthogonal AP and lateral beams with a field size consistent with the 7.5×5 cm Aries detector, while the primary was determined with a 1×1 mm beam. The forward scatter was then determined from the difference between total and primary. The scatter is seen to increase by 4%-56% for AP projections and 48%-71% for lateral projections depending on detector orientation during simultaneous exposure. Scatter degradation from cross-talk can be reduced using an anti-scatter grid as well as the energy thresholding capabilities of the Aries PCD.

Impact of bowtie filter and detector collimation on multislice CT scatter profiles: A simulation study

PURPOSE

To investigate via Monte Carlo simulations, the impact of scan subject size, antiscatter grid (ASG), collimator size, and bowtie filter on the distribution of scatter radiation in a typical realistically modeled third generation 16 slice diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scanner.

METHODS

Full radiation transport was simulated with Geant4 in a realistic CT scanner geometric model, including the imaging phantom, bowtie filter (BTF), collimators and detector assembly, except for the ASGs. An analytical method was employed to quantify the probable transmission through the ASG of each photon intersecting the detector array. Normalized scatter profiles (NSP) and scatter-to-primary-ratio (SPR) profiles were simulated for 90 and 140 kVp beams for different size phantoms and slice thicknesses. The impact of CT scatter on the reconstructed attenuation coefficient factor was also studied as were the modulating effects of phantom- and patient-tissue heterogeneities on scatter profiles. A method to characterize the relative spatial frequency content of sinogram signals was developed to assess the latter.

RESULTS

For the 21.4-cm diameter phantom, NSP and SPR increase linearly with collimator opening for both tube potentials, with the 90 kVp scan exhibiting slightly larger NSP and SPR. The BTF modestly modulates scatter under the phantom center, reducing the prominent off-axis lobes by factors of 1.1-1.3. The ASG reduces scatter on the central axis NSP threefold, and reduces scatter at the detectors outside the phantom shadow by factors of 25 to 500. For the phantoms with diameters of 27 and 32 cm, the scatter increases roughly three- and fourfold, respectively, demonstrating that scatter monotonically increases with phantom size, despite deployment of the ASG and BTF. In the absence of a scan subject, the ASG reduces the signal profile arising photons scattered by the BTF. Without ASG, the in-air scatter profile is relatively flat compared to the scatter profile when the ASG is present. For both 90 and 140 kVp photon spectra, the calculated attenuation coefficient decreases linearly with increasing collimation size. For both homogeneous and heterogeneous objects, NSPs are dominated by low spatial frequency content compared to the primary signal. However, the SPR, which quantifies the local magnitude of nonlinear detector response and is dominated by the high frequency content of the primary profile, can contribute strongly to high-spatial frequency streaking artifacts near high-density structures in reconstructed image artifacts.

CONCLUSION

Public-domain Monte Carlo codes, Geant-4 in particular, is a feasible method for characterizing CT detector response to scattered- and off-focal radiation. Our study demonstrates that the ASG substantially reduces the scatter radiation and reshapes scatter-radiation profiles and affects the accuracy with which the detector array can measure narrow-beam attenuation due its inability to distinguish between true uncollided primary and narrow-angle coherently scattered photons. Hence, incorporating the impact of detector array collimation into the forward-projection signal formation models used by iterative reconstruction algorithms is necessary to use CT for accurately characterizing material properties. While tissue heterogeneities exercise a modest influence on local NPS shape and magnitude, they do not add significant high spatial frequency content.

Efficacy of breast shielding during head computed tomography examination

BACKGROUND

Female breasts are exposed to scattered radiation regardless of not being included in the primary field during head CT. This study aimed to investigate whether the use of lead shielding is beneficial in dose reduction to the breasts during head CT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was performed in two different hospitals on two different CT units and included 120 patients. Half of the measurements (n = 60) was conducted without the use of lead shielding and the other half (n = 60) with the use of lead shielding of 0.5 mm equivalent thickness.

RESULTS

Significant skin dose reduction to the breasts during head CT in both hospitals with the use of lead shielding was discovered; 81% (338.2 ± 43.7 μGy to 64.3 ± 18.8 μGy) in Hospital A and 74% (from 253.1 ± 35.1 μGy to 65.3 ± 16.9 μGy) in Hospital B.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the assumed carcinogenic effect of low doses of radiation, high frequency of the head CT scans and the significant reduction of radiation doses to the highly radiosensitive breasts, the use of lead shielding is highly recommendable.

[Scatter Radiation Intensities during Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using a Mobile C-arm System]

The purpose of this study was to measure the scatter radiation intensity during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a mobile C-arm system (Arcadis Orbic 3D; Siemens) and minimize radiation exposure. Dosimetry was performed with anterior-posterior and lateral continuous fluoroscopy, and cone beam computed tomography (CT). A scaffold tower (L: 300 cm×W: 200 cm×H: 150 cm) was built with radiation-resistant paper cylinders at intervals of 50 cm and plastic joints over the bed, and 100 optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (nanoDot; Nagase Landauer) were placed on each joint. A human torso phantom from head to pelvis (Kyoto Kagaku) was positioned on the bed in a prone position. The scatter radiation dose in a lateral view was highest on the X-ray tube side at the height of 100 cm (170.5 μGy/min). The scatter radiation dose increased significantly on the X-ray tube side during lateral continuous fluoroscopy. Continuous change of surgeons' standing positions is important to minimize radiation exposure received by a specific surgeon.

Assessment of scatter radiation dose and absorbed doses in eye lens and thyroid gland during digital breast tomosynthesis

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is an alternative tool for breast cancer screening; however, the magnitude of peripheral organs dose is not well known. This study aimed to measure scattered dose and estimate organ dose during mammography under conventional (CM) and Tomo (TM) modes in a specific DBT system. Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs), whose responses were corrected using a parallel-plate ionization chamber, were pasted on the surface of custom-made polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and RANDO phantoms to measure entrance surface air kerma (ESAK). ESAK measurements were also acquired with a 4.5-cm thick breast phantom for a standard mammogram. Organ dose conversion factors (CFD ) were determined as ratio of air kerma at a specific depth to that at the surface for the PMMA phantom and multiplied by the ratio of mass energy absorption coefficients of tissue to air. Normalized eye lens and thyroid gland doses were calculated using the RANDO phantom by multiplying CFD and ESAK values. Maximum variability in OSLD response to scatter radiation from the DBT system was 33% in the W/Rh spectrum and variations in scattered dose distribution were observed between CM and TM. The CFD values for eye lens and thyroid gland ranged between 0.58 to 0.66 and 0.29 to 0.33, respectively. Mean organ doses for two-view unilateral imaging were 0.24 (CM) and 0.18 (TM) μGy/mAs for the eye lens and 0.24 (CM) and 0.25 (TM) μGy/mAs for the thyroid gland. Higher organ doses were observed during TM compared to CM as the automatic exposure control (AEC) system resulted in greater total mAs values in TM.

Inverted C-arm Orientation During Simulated Hip Arthroscopic Surgery

Background

Fluoroscopic guidance is routinely utilized during hip arthroscopic surgery. Previous studies have shown that the C-arm orientation can significantly affect radiation exposure for both the surgeon and the patient during orthopaedic procedures. However, this has not been previously assessed for hip arthroscopic surgery.

Hypothesis

Using an inverted C-arm during hip arthroscopic surgery will reduce radiation exposure to the patient and surgeon.

Study Design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

A simulation study measured scatter radiation during hip arthroscopic surgery performed in the supine position under fluoroscopic guidance with an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom on a radiolucent operating table. Radiation exposure tested 2 different C-arm orientations: standard and inverted. Testing was performed at 6 locations corresponding to the patient, surgeon's neck, surgeon's waist, surgical technician, anesthesiologist, and radiology technician. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate analyses assessing radiation exposure between the C-arm orientations. A risk calculation for carcinogenesis was performed based on reported radiation dosages.

Results

Radiation exposure (in mGy/min) was more than 100-fold higher for the patient compared with the surgeon in both C-arm orientations. The inverted C-arm orientation resulted in a 2.48-fold decrease in patient radiation exposure when compared with the standard orientation (10.8 mGy/min vs 26.8 mGy/min, respectively). There was a small but significant increase in surgeon radiation exposure in the inverted orientation compared with the standard orientation (0.072 vs 0.067 mGy/min, respectively). The patient's carcinogenesis risk was decreased 2.64-fold with the inverted orientation compared with the standard orientation (1.4 × 10^-5 vs 3.7 × 10^-5, respectively).

Conclusion

The inverted C-arm orientation resulted in a 2.48-fold decrease in patient radiation exposure with a 2.64-fold decrease in the carcinogenesis risk compared with the standard orientation. Inadvertently, the inverted orientation provided a 9-cm increase in the surgeon's working area. Our data supported the clinical utilization of the inverted C-arm orientation during hip arthroscopic surgery to minimize patient radiation exposure. Although there was a minimal but significant increase in surgeon radiation exposure with the inverted orientation, we believe that this is negligible when incorporated with standard leaded protective equipment as contrasted with the significant dose reduction for the patient as well as the decreased risk of carcinogenesis and hereditary disorders.

Clinical Relevance

Patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery routinely acquire radiation exposure during the use of the C-arm. Measures to minimize radiation via the inverted C-arm orientation will decrease the unnecessary risk to the patient while continuing to allow for optimal treatment.

Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation

Relative dose measurements with small ionization chambers in combination with an electrometer placed in the treatment room ("internal electrometer") show a large dependence on the polarity used. While this was observed previously for percent depth dose curves (PDDs), the effect has not been understood or preventable. To investigate the polarity dependence of internal electrometers used in conjunction with a small-volume ionization chamber, we placed an internal electrometer at a distance of 1 m from the isocenter and exposed it to different amounts of scattered radiation by varying the field size. We identified irradiation of the electrometer to cause a current of approximately -1 pA, regardless of the sign of the biasing voltage. For low-sensitivity detectors, such a current noticeably distorts relative dose measurements. To demonstrate how the current systematically changes PDDs, we collected measurements with nine ionization chambers of different volumes. As the chamber volume decreased, signal ratios at 20 and 10 cm depth (M20/M10) became smaller for positive bias voltage and larger for negative bias voltage. At the size of the iba CC04 (40 mm³) the difference of M20/M10 was around 1% and for the smallest studied chamber, the iba CC003 chamber (3 mm³), around 7% for a 10 × 10 cm² field. When the electrometer was moved further from the source or shielded, the additional current decreased. Consequently, PDDs at both polarities were brought into alignment at depth even for the 3 mm³ ionization chamber. The apparent polarity effect on PDDs and lateral beam profiles was reduced considerably by shielding the electrometer. Due to normalization the effect on output values was low. When measurements with a low-sensitivity probe are carried out in conjunction with an internal electrometer, we recommend careful monitoring of the particular setup by testing both polarities, and if deemed necessary, we suggest shielding the electrometer.

Real-time, ray casting-based scatter dose estimation for c-arm x-ray system

Objectives

Dosimetric control of staff exposure during interventional procedures under fluoroscopy is of high relevance. In this paper, a novel ray casting approximation of radiation transport is presented and the potential and limitation vs. a full Monte Carlo transport and dose measurements are discussed.

Method

The x‐ray source of a Siemens Axiom Artix C‐arm is modeled by a virtual source model using single Gaussian‐shaped source. A Geant4‐based Monte Carlo simulation determines the radiation transport from the source to compute scatter from the patient, the table, the ceiling and the floor. A phase space around these scatterers stores all photon information. Only those photons are traced that hit a surface of phantom that represents medical staff in the treatment room, no indirect scattering is considered; and a complete dose deposition on the surface is calculated. To evaluate the accuracy of the approximation, both experimental measurements using Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and a Geant4‐based Monte Carlo simulation of dose depositing for different tube angulations of the C‐arm from cranial‐caudal angle 0° and from LAO (Left Anterior Oblique) 0°–90° are realized. Since the measurements were performed on both sides of the table, using the symmetry of the setup, RAO (Right Anterior Oblique) measurements were not necessary.

Results

The Geant4‐Monte Carlo simulation agreed within 3% with the measured data, which is within the accuracy of measurement and simulation. The ray casting approximation has been compared to TLD measurements and the achieved percentage difference was −7% for data from tube angulations 45°–90° and −29% from tube angulations 0°–45° on the side of the x‐ray source, whereas on the opposite side of the x‐ray source, the difference was −83.8% and −75%, respectively. Ray casting approximation for only LAO 90° was compared to a Monte Carlo simulation, where the percentage differences were between 0.5–3% on the side of the x‐ray source where the highest dose usually detected was mainly from primary scattering (photons), whereas percentage differences between 2.8–20% are found on the side opposite to the x‐ray source, where the lowest doses were detected. Dose calculation time of our approach was 0.85 seconds.

Conclusion

The proposed approach yields a fast scatter dose estimation where we could run the Monte Carlo simulation only once for each x‐ray tube angulation to get the Phase Space Files (PSF) for being used later by our ray casting approach to calculate the dose from only photons which will hit an movable elliptical cylinder shaped phantom and getting an output file for the positions of those hits to be used for visualizing the scatter dose propagation on the phantom surface. With dose calculation times of less than one second, we are saving much time compared to using a Monte Carlo simulation instead. With our approach, larger deviations occur only in regions with very low doses, whereas it provides a high precision in high‐dose regions.

JOURNAL CLUB: Scatter Radiation Dose From Digital Screening Mammography Measured in a Representative Patient Population

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to quantify the amount of scatter radiation received at the skin surface overlying the thyroid gland, salivary gland, lens of the eye, sternum, and uterus during a routine screening digital mammographic examination measured in a representative patient population.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The subjects were 207 women without symptoms with varied body mass indexes who underwent annual screening mammography while wearing six optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters placed at the bridge of the nose, right submandibular gland, right and left thyroid lobes, mid sternum, and 2 cm caudal to the umbilicus to assess scatter radiation dose to the skin.

RESULTS

The average scatter radiation doses at the skin surface during digital screening mammography in the representative population of women were as follows: overlying the right lobe of the thyroid, 0.24 mGy; left lobe of the thyroid, 0.25 mGy; salivary gland, 0.2 mGy; bridge of the nose, 0.025 mGy; sternum, 0.87 mGy; and umbilicus, 0.011 mGy. The scatter radiation doses at the umbilicus and the bridge of the nose were too low to measure with statistical confidence. Scatter radiation dose increased with increasing body mass index and increasing breast compression thickness.

CONCLUSION

Scatter radiation dose at the skin overlying organs of interest is a small fraction of the entrance skin dose to the breast. The low levels of scatter radiation measured do not support delaying clinically indicated mammography during early pregnancy.

How Effective Are Radiation Reducing Gloves in C-arm Fluoroscopy-guided Pain Interventions?

Background

The physician's hands are close to the X-ray field in C-arm fluoroscopy-guided pain interventions. We prospectively investigated the radiation attenuation of Proguard RR-2 gloves.

Methods

In 100 cases, the effective doses (EDs) of two dosimeters without a radiation-reducing glove were collected. EDs from the two dosimeters-one dosimeter wrapped with a glove and the other dosimeter without a glove- were also measured at the side of the table (Group 1, 140 cases) and at a location 20 cm away from the side of the table (Group 2, 120 cases). Mean differences such as age, height, weight, radiation absorbed dose (RAD), exposure time, ED, and ratio of EDs were analyzed.

Results

In the EDs of two dosimeters without gloves, there were no significant differences (39.0 ± 36.3 µSv vs. 38.8 ± 36.4 µSv) (P = 0.578). The RAD (192.0 ± 182.0 radcm²) in Group 2 was higher than that (132.3 ± 103.5 radcm²) in Group 1 (P = 0.002). The ED (33.3 ± 30.9 µSv) of the dosimeter without a glove in Group 1 was higher than that (12.3 ± 8.8 µSv) in Group 2 (P < 0.001). The ED (24.4 ± 22.4 µSv) of the dosimeter wrapped with a glove in Group 1 was higher than that (9.2 ± 6.8 µSv) in Group 2 (P < 0.001). No significant differences were noted in the ratio of EDs (73.5 ± 6.7% vs. 74.2 ± 9.3%, P = 0.469) between Group 1 and Group 2.

Conclusions

Proguard RR-2 gloves have a radiation attenuation effect of 25.8-26.5%. The radiation attenuation is not significantly different by intensity of scatter radiation or the different RADs of C-arm fluoroscopy.