Predicting early recurrence after resection of initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases: the role of baseline and pre-surgery clinical, radiological and molecular factors in a real-life multicentre experience

BACKGROUND

Advances in surgical techniques and systemic treatments have increased the likelihood of achieving radical surgery and long-term survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Nonetheless, roughly half of the patients resected after an upfront systemic therapy experience disease relapse within 6 months from surgery, thus leading to the question whether surgery is actually beneficial for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A real-world dataset of mCRC patients with initially unresectable liver-limited disease treated with conversion chemotherapy followed by radical resection of CRLMs at three high-volume Italian institutions was retrospectively assessed with the aim of investigating the association of baseline and pre-surgical clinical, radiological and molecular factors with the risk of relapse within 6 or 12 months from surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 268 patients were included in the analysis and 207 (77%) experienced recurrence. Ninety-six (46%) of them had disease relapse within 6 months after CRLM resection and in spite of several variables associated with early recurrence at univariate analyses, only primary tumour resection at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.89, P = 0.02] remained significant in the multivariable model. Among patients with resected primary tumours, pN+ stage was associated with higher risk of disease relapse within 6 months (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.23-7.41, P = 0.02). One hundred and forty-nine patients (72%) had disease relapse within 12 months after CRLMs resection but none of the analysed variables was independently associated with outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical, radiological and molecular factors assessed before and after conversion chemotherapy do not reliably predict early recurrence after secondary resection of initially unresectable CRLMs. While novel markers are needed to optimize the cost/efficacy balance of surgical procedures, CRLM resection should be offered as soon as metastases become resectable during first-line chemotherapy to all patients eligible for surgery.

Impact of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy on functional outcomes in patients following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Introduction

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy (mpMRI PBx) leads to a higher rate of successful nerve-sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (ns-RALP) for prostate cancer (PCa). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of mpMRI PBx compared to standard ultrasound-guided PBx on functional outcomes focusing on erectile function in patients following ns-RALP.

Material and methods

All RALPs performed between 01/2016 and 06/2021 were retrospectively stratified according to (attempted) ns vs. non ns RALPs and were then categorized based on the PBx technique (mpMRI PBx vs. standard PBx). We compared RALP outcomes such as pathological tumor stage, rates of secondary nerve resection (SNR) and positive surgical margin status (PSM). Furthermore, we explored the association between PBx-technique and patient-reported outcomes assessed 12 months after RALP using the prospectively collected 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analysis were conducted.

Results

A total of 849 RALPs included 517 (61%) procedures with (attempted) ns. Among these, 37.5% were diagnosed via preoperative mpMRI PBx. Patients with a preoperative standard PBx had a 57% higher association of PSM (p = 0.030) compared to patients with mpMRI PBx and a 24% higher risk of erectile dysfunction (ED) 12 months post RALP (p = 0.025). When ns was attempted, we observed a significantly higher rate of SNR in patients who underwent a standard PBx compared to those who received a mpMRI PBx (50.8% vs. 26.7%, p < 0.001) prior RALP. In comparison, upgrading occurred more often in the standard PBx group (50% vs. 40% mpMRI PBx, p = 0.008).

Conclusion

The combination of mpMRI PBx for PCa diagnosis followed by ns-RALP resulted in significantly fewer cases of SNR, better oncological outcomes and reduced incidence of ED 1 year after surgery. This included fewer PSM and a lower rate of postoperative tumor upgrading.

Impact of mpMRI targeted biopsy on intraoperative nerve-sparing (NeuroSAFE) during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of prostate biopsy technique (transrectal ultrasound (US)-prostate biopsy (PBx) versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) targeted prostate biopsy (MRI-PBx) on intraoperative nerve-sparing and the rate of secondary neurovascular-bundle resection (SNR) in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). A real-time investigation with a frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) microscopically excluded or confirmed prostate cancer invasion of the nerve structures resulting in preservation of the neurovascular bundle or SNR. Additionally, we analyzed risk factors related to SNR, such as longer operation time and postoperative complications.

METHODS

The total study cohort was stratified according to non-nerve-sparing versus nerve-sparing RARP. Patients with nerve-sparing approach were then stratified according to biopsy technique (PBx vs. MRI-PBx). Further, we compared PBx versus MRI-PBx according to SNR rate.

RESULTS

We included a total of 470 consecutive patients, who underwent RARP for PCa at our institution between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients with a preoperative MRI-PBx had a 2.12-fold higher chance of successful nerve-sparing (without SNR) compared to patients with PBx (p < 0.01). Patients with preoperative MRI-PBx required 73% less intraoperative SNR compared to patients with PBx (p < 0.0001). Prior MRI-PBx is thus a predictor for successful nerve-sparing RARP approach.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative MRI-PBx led to better oncological outcomes and less SNR. Young patients with good erectile function could benefit from a preoperative MRI-PBx before nerve-sparing RARP.

Survival after secondary liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: Comparing data of three prospective randomized European trials (LICC, CELIM, FIRE-3)

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with liver-limited disease (LLD) have a chance of long-term survival and potential cure after hepatic metastasectomy. However, the appropriate postoperative treatment strategy is still controversial. The CELIM and FIRE-3 studies demonstrated that secondary hepatic resection significantly improved overall survival (OS). The objective of this analysis was to compare these favorable outcome data with recent results from the LICC trial investigating the antigen-specific cancer vaccine tecemotide (L-BLP25) as adjuvant therapy in mCRC patients with LLD after R0/R1 resection. Data from mCRC patients with LLD and secondary hepatic resection from each study were analyzed for efficacy outcomes based on patient characteristics, treatment and surveillance after surgery. In LICC, 40/121 (33%) patients, in CELIM 36/111 (32%) and in FIRE-3-LLD 29/133 (22%) patients were secondarily resected, respectively. Of those, 31 (77.5%) patients in LICC and all patients in CELIM were R0 resected. Median disease-free survival after resection was 8.9 months in LICC, 9.9 months in CELIM. Median OS in secondarily resected patients was 66.1 months in LICC, 53.9 months in CELIM and 56.2 months in FIRE-3-LLD. Median age was about 5 years less in LICC compared to CELIM and FIRE-3. Secondarily resected patients of LICC, CELIM and FIRE-3 showed an impressive median survival with a tendency for improved survival for patients in the LICC trial. A younger patient cohort but also more selective surgery, improved resection techniques, deep responses and a close surveillance program after surgery in the LICC trial may have had a positive impact on survival.

Induction Chemotherapy for Primarily Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma-Who Will Benefit from a Secondary Resection?

Background and Objectives: An increasing number of patients (pts) with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are treated with an intensive neoadjuvant therapy to obtain a secondary curative resection. Only a certain number of patients benefit from this intention. The aim of this investigation was to identify prognostic factors which may predict a benefit for secondary resection. Materials and Methods: Survival time and clinicopathological data of pts with pancreatic cancer were prospective and consecutively collected in our Comprehensive Cancer Center Database. For this investigation, we screened for pts with primarily unresectable pancreatic cancer who underwent a secondary resection after receiving induction therapy in the time between March 2017 and May 2019. Results: 40 pts had a sufficient database to carry out a reliable analysis. The carbohydrate-antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level of the pts treated with induction therapy decreased by 44.7% from 4358.3 U/mL to 138.5 U/mL (p = 0.001). The local cancer extension was significantly reduced (p < 0.001), and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was lowered (p = 0.03). The median overall survival (mOS) was 20 months (95% CI: 17.2–22.9). Pts who showed a normal CA 19-9 level (<37 U/mL) at diagnosis and after neoadjuvant therapy or had a Body Mass Index (BMI) below 25 kg/m² after chemotherapy had a significant prolonged overall survival (29 vs. 19 months, p = 0.02; 26 vs. 18 months, p = 0.04; 15 vs. 24 months, p = 0.01). Pts who still presented elevated CA 19-9 levels >400 U/mL after induction therapy did not profit from a secondary resection (24 vs. 7 months, p < 0.001). Nodal negativity as well as the performance of an adjuvant therapy lead to better mOS (25 vs. 15 months, p = 0.003; 10 vs. 25 months, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The pts in our investigation had different benefits from the multimodal treatment. We identified the CA 19-9 level at time of diagnosis and after neoadjuvant therapy as well as the preoperative BMI as predictive factors for overall survival. Furthermore, diagnostics of presurgical nodal status should gain more importance as nodal negativity is associated with better outcome.

Bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX-6 or FOLFOXIRI in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer: the OLIVIA multinational randomised phase II trial

BACKGROUND

For patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer, chemotherapy can downsize metastases and facilitate secondary resection. We assessed the efficacy of bevacizumab plus modified FOLFOX-6 (5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, oxaliplatin) or FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) in this setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

OLIVIA was a multinational open-label phase II study conducted at 16 centres in Austria, France, Spain, and the UK. Patients with unresectable liver metastases were randomised to bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) plus mFOLFOX-6 [oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), folinic acid 400 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) (bolus) then 2400 mg/m(2) (46-h infusion)] or FOLFOXIRI [oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), irinotecan 165 mg/m(2), folinic acid 200 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 3200 mg/m(2) (46-h infusion)] every 2 weeks. Unresectability was defined as ≥1 of the following criteria: no possibility of upfront R0/R1 resection of all lesions; <30% residual liver volume after resection; metastases in contact with major vessels of the remnant liver. Resectability was evaluated by multidisciplinary review. The primary end point was overall resection rate (R0/R1/R2). Efficacy end points were analysed by intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

In patients assigned to bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI (n = 41) or bevacizumab-mFOLFOX-6 (n = 39), the overall resection rate was 61% [95% confidence interval (CI) 45% to 76%] and 49% (95% CI 32% to 65%), respectively (difference 12%; 95% CI -11% to 36%). R0 resection rates were 49% and 23%, respectively. Overall tumour response rates were 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) with bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI and 62% (95% CI 45% to 77%) with bevacizumab-mFOLFOX-6. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18·6 (95% CI 12.9-22.3) months and 11·5 (95% CI 9.6-13.6) months, respectively. The most common grade 3-5 adverse events were neutropenia (bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI, 50%; bevacizumab-mFOLFOX-6, 35%) and diarrhoea (30% and 14%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI was associated with higher response and resection rates and prolonged PFS versus bevacizumab-mFOLFOX-6 in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Toxicity was increased but manageable with bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV

NCT00778102.