Recent advances regarding endoscopic biliary drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Biliary drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) is still associated with a number of controversies to be resolved. The superiority of bilateral drainage in comparison to unilateral drainage has not been proven obviously yet. However, bilateral drainage is necessary to treat obstructive jaundice in some UMHBO patients, and this may be connected with preservation of the functional liver volume. The partial stent-in-stent (SIS) method and side-by-side (SBS) method developed as bilateral drainage methods. There is no significant difference in the technical or clinical success rates of the SIS and SBS methods. In addition, these methods are comparable in terms of adverse events, patency period, and survival period. On the other hand, reintervention for recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after the SBS method seems to be easier in comparison to cases with RBO after the SIS method; however, there is no remarkable difference in the clinical results of these procedures. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage also has become an option for patients with UMHBO. Left hepatic drainage using EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has become common; however, few studies have reported the results of bridging drainage for the right lobe using the EUS-HGS route or EUS-guided hepaticojejunostomy. A few studies addressed the results of newly designed stents, such as the 6-mm braided metal stent and inside stent. The development of various drainage methods and new devices is necessary for the further advancement of endoscopic biliary drainage for patients with UMHBO, further studies to evaluate those methods and devices are warranted.

Side-by-side versus stent-in-stent technique for stent deployment during systemic chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Objectives

With the improved prognosis of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) owing to advances in chemotherapy, long-term stent patency has become an important goal in patients undergoing biliary stent placement. We compared the duration of stent patency between unresectable BTC patients undergoing multi-stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction by the side-by-side (SBS) and stent-in-stent (SIS) techniques during systemic chemotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the data of 62 unresectable BTC patients who underwent multi-stenting before the first or second cycle of first-line chemotherapy. Stent deployment was performed by the SBS technique in 40 patients (SBS group) and by the SIS technique in 22 patients (SIS group).

Results

The median time-to-recurrent biliary obstruction was 147 days in the SBS group and 252 days in the SIS (p = 0.029), being longer in the SIS group. The rates of development of early adverse events were 28% and 9% (p = 0.09) and the rates of development of late adverse events were 26% and 14% in the SBS and SIS groups (p = 0.27). The median overall survival was 480 days in the SBS group and 563 days in the SIS group (p = 0.92).

Conclusion

The duration of stent patency was shorter in the SBS group than in the SIS group; thus, the SIS technique is preferable to the SBS technique for biliary stent deployment in unresectable BTC patients during systemic chemotherapy.