Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors and the Cardiovascular System: Current Knowledge and Future Expectations

Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a well-recognized clinical entity and reflects a complex relationship between metabolic substrates and myocardial function. Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are antidiabetic agents that are found to exert multiple cardioprotective effects. Large clinical trials showed their beneficial effects on patients with heart failure, reducing the rates of rehospitalizations and improving kidney function. The aim of this review is to summarize the latest evidence in the literature regarding the multiple effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on patients across the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases.

Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A system review and network meta-analysis

Cardiovascular and renal impairment are the most common complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). As an emerging class of glucose-lowing agents sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2), possesses beneficial effects on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with T2DM. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of different SGLT2 inhibitors for cardiovascular and renal outcomes for patients with T2DM when compared with placebo. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library from inception through November 2021. Randomized clinical trials enrolling participants with T2DM were included, in which SGLT2 inhibitors were compared with each other or placebo. The primary outcomes including all-caused mortality, Cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization for heart failure), and the renal composite outcomes (worsening persistent microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria, new or worsening chronic kidney disease, doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, renal transplant, or renal death). The data for the outcomes were pooled and recorded as Hazard rations (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CLs). Two researcher independently screened the trials and drawn the data. Ten trials enrolling 68,723 patients were included. Compared with placebo groups, Canagliflozin [HR, 0.85 (95%CI, 0.75-0.98)], ertugliflozin [HR, 0.93 (95%CI, 0.78-1.11)], and sotagliflozin [HR, 0.94 (95%CI, 0.79-1.12)] were associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. Canagliflozin [HR, 0.84 (95%CI, 0.72-0.97)], dapagliflozin [HR, 0.88 (95%CI, 0.79-0.99)], empagliflozin [HR, 0.62 (95%CI, 0.49-0.78)], ertugliflozin [HR, 0.92 (95%CI, 0.77-1.10)], and sotagliflozin [HR, 0.88 (95%CI, 0.73-1.06)] were associated with a reduction in cardiovascular mortality; Canagliflozin [HR, 0.64 (95%CI, 0.53-0.77)], dapagliflozin [HR, 0.71 (95%CI, 0.63-0.81)], empagliflozin [HR, 0.65 (95%CI, 0.50-0.85)], ertugliflozin [HR, 0.70 (95%CI, 0.54-0.90)], and sotagliflozin [HR, 0.66 (95%CI, 0.56-0.77)] were associated with a reduction in hospitalization for heart failure. Dapagliflozin [HR, 0.55 (95%CI, 0.47-0.63)], Empagliflozin [HR, 0.54 (95%CI, 0.39-0.74)], canagliflozin [HR, 0.64 (95%CI, 0.54-0.75)], sotagliflozin [HR, 0.71 (95%CI, 0.46-1.09)], and ertugliflozin [HR, 0.81 (95%CI, 0.63-1.04)] were associated with a reduction in the renal composite outcome. All SGLT2 inhibitors showed a reduction in cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, renal composite outcomes and all-cause mortality. Canagliflozin and empagliflozin seemed to have the same efficacy in reducing hospitalization for heart failure, but empagliflozin had advantage in reducing cardiovascular mortality, whereas dapagliflozin most likely showed the best renal composite outcomes.

Pharmacological treatment options for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A 2022 update

INTRODUCTION

Despite considerable advances in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) over the last 60 years, mortality and morbidity remains high. Fortunately, in the last years, further developments expanded the toolbox for HF treatment.

AREAS COVERED

The authors provide an overview of recent developments in HF treatment and bring the recommendations in the HF guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology into perspective.

EXPERT OPINION

Nowadays, basic pharmacological treatment of patients with HFrEF consists of a combination of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and the SGLT2 inhibitors dapagliflozin or empagliflozin. Treatment initiation of all four drug classes should be fast and simultaneous. In some cases, the ARNI sacubitril/valsartan may be initiated even in ACE inhibitor-naïve patients. Further HF treatment has to be individualized. Another important point is that both SGLT2 inhibitors and vericiguat can be used in patients with severely reduced kidney function. Finally, an important piece in the HF management puzzle is the treatment of its comorbidities. For instance, patients hospitalized for acute HF decompensation should be systematically screened for iron deficiency, since HF patients with proven iron deficiency benefit from intravenous ferric carboxymaltose.