Updates in Diagnosis and Treatment of Acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare disease, caused largely by a growth hormone (GH) pituitary adenoma. Incidence is higher than previously thought. Due to increased morbidity and mortality, if not appropriately treated, early diagnosis efforts are essential. Screening is recommended for all patients with clinical features of GH excess. There is increased knowledge that classical diagnostic criteria no longer apply to all, and some patients can have GH excess with normal GH response to glucose. Treatment is multifactorial and personalised therapy is advised.

Cost-Effectiveness and Efficacy of a Novel Combination Regimen in Acromegaly: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

CONTEXT

Combination therapy with somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) plus pegvisomant for patients with acromegaly is recommended after a maximizing dose on monotherapy. Lower-dose combination regimens are not well studied.

OBJECTIVE

To compare cost-effectiveness and efficacy of 3 lower-dose combination regimens in controlled and uncontrolled acromegaly.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel arm study at a tertiary referral pituitary center.

PATIENTS

Adults with acromegaly regardless of response to prior SRL and biochemical control status at baseline, stratified by an SRL dose required for insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I normalization during any 3-month period within 12 months preceding enrollment.

INTERVENTION

Combination therapy for 24 to 32 weeks on arm A, high-dose SRL (lanreotide 120 mg/octreotide long-acting release [LAR] 30 mg) plus weekly pegvisomant (40-160 mg/week); arm B, low-dose SRL (lanreotide 60 mg/octreotide LAR 10 mg) plus weekly pegvisomant; or arm C, low-dose SRL plus daily pegvisomant (15-60 mg/day).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Monthly treatment cost in each arm in participants completing ≥ 24 weeks of therapy.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled and 52 were evaluable. Fifty of 52 (96%) demonstrated IGF-I control regardless of prior SRL responsiveness (arm A, 14/15 [93.3%]; arm B, 22/23 [95.7%]; arm C, 14/14 [100%]). Arm B was least costly (mean, $9837 ± 1375 per month), arm C was most expensive (mean, $22543 ± 11158 per month), and arm A had an intermediate cost (mean, $14261 ± 1645 per month). Approximately 30% of patients required pegvisomant dose uptitration. Rates of adverse events were all < 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose SRL plus weekly pegvisomant represents a novel dosing option for achieving cost-effective, optimal biochemical control in patients with uncontrolled acromegaly requiring combination therapy.

Pasireotide: a novel treatment for patients with acromegaly

Morbidity and mortality rates in patients with active acromegaly are higher than the general population. Adequate biochemical control restores mortality to normal rates. Now, medical therapy has an increasingly important role in the treatment of patients with acromegaly. Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) are considered the standard medical therapy, either after surgery or as a first-line therapy when surgery is deemed ineffective or is contraindicated. Overall, octreotide and lanreotide are first-generation SRLs and are effective in ~20%-70% of patients. Pegvisomant, a growth hormone receptor antagonist, controls insulin-like growth factor 1 in 65%-90% of cases. Consequently, a subset of patients (nonresponders) requires other treatment options. Drug combination therapy offers the potential for more efficacious disease control. However, the development of new medical therapies remains essential. Here, emphasis is placed on new medical therapies to control acromegaly. There is a focus on pasireotide long-acting release (LAR) (Signifor LAR®), which was approved in 2014 by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency for the treatment of acromegaly. Pasireotide LAR is a long-acting somatostatin multireceptor ligand. In a Phase III clinical trial in patients with acromegaly (naïve to medical therapy or uncontrolled on a maximum dose of first-generation SRLs), 40 and 60 mg of intramuscular pasireotide LAR achieved better biochemical disease control than octreotide LAR, and tumor shrinkage was noted in both pasireotide groups. Pasireotide LAR tolerability was similar to other SRLs, except for a greater frequency and degree of hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus. Baseline glucose may predict hyperglycemia occurrence after treatment, and careful monitoring of glycemic status and appropriate treatment is required. A precise definition of patients with acromegaly who will derive the greatest therapeutic benefit from pasireotide LAR remains to be established. Lastly, novel therapies and new potential delivery modalities (oral octreotide) are summarized.

Impairment in insulin secretion without changes in insulin resistance explains hyperglycemia in patients with acromegaly treated with pasireotide LAR

Objective

Pasireotide is a second-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) used for treating acromegaly. Its clinical use is limited by adverse effects on glucose homeostasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate longitudinal changes in beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity associated with pasireotide in patients not controlled by first-generation SRLs.

Design

We performed a retrospective study.

Methods

The efficacy (growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) concentrations; tumor size) and effect on glucose homeostasis were analyzed in 33 patients. Longitudinal data on oral glucose tolerance tests were available before, shortly (mean ± s.d., 6.1 ± 3.8 months) and long term (24.4 ± 11.1 months) after initiation of pasireotide in 14 patients. Insulin secretion (insulinogenic index; disposition index) and insulin sensitivity were calculated by validated indices.

Results

Pasireotide-induced diabetes occurred in 12 patients (36%). It was mediated by impaired insulin secretion, which occurred shortly after initiation of treatment and then remained stable on long term (insulinogenic index, median (min; max), 80 (12; 542) vs 16 (6.4; 101) vs 25 (3.7; 396) pmol/mmol, respectively; P = 0.028; disposition index, 1.45 (0.42; 4.88) vs 0.53 (0.17; 2.63) vs 0.60 (0.22; 1.71), respectively; P = 0.024). No significant changes in insulin sensitivity were observed, despite a marked reduction of GH/IGF-1 concentrations. Older age and a worse glycemic control at baseline were the strongest predictors for hyperglycemia and the need for antidiabetic treatment.

Conclusion

Worsening of glycemic control during pasireotide therapy is caused by an impaired insulin secretion, whereas insulin sensitivity is not affected. These findings might be important for the choice of antidiabetic treatment for pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia.

Significance statement

Pasireotide, a second-generation SRL used for treating acromegaly, may be associated with glucose metabolism impairment. In a retrospective study of 33 patients, we observed that treatment with pasireotide was associated with normalization of serum IGF-1 in almost 60% of patients, but one-third of patients developed diabetes. In the patients who stopped pasireotide because of hyperglycemia, HbA1c promptly decreased. Longitudinal data in 14 patients show that diabetes is mediated by impaired insulin secretion, which occurred shortly and then remained stable on long term, while no significant changes in insulin sensitivity were observed, despite a marked reduction of GH/IGF-1 concentrations. Older age and a worse glycemic control at baseline were the strongest predictors for hyperglycemia.

The Effect of Metformin Treatment on Disease Control in Patients with Acromegaly

BACKGROUND

The increase in portal insulin levels has been shown to upregulate growth hormone receptor expression in the liver, leading to increased insulin-like growth hormone- 1 levels. Metformin inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis and reduces fasting insulin.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effect of metformin treatment in patients with acromegaly on growth hormone, insulin-like growth hormone-1, and pituitary adenoma size.

METHODS

Patients who were followed up with the diagnosis of acromegaly in Istanbul University- Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty were evaluated. The patients were divided into three groups after pituitary adenectomy as those who received somatostatin receptor ligand and metformin treatment (group A), somatostatin receptor ligand treatment only (group B), and those who received metformin treatment only (group C). Groups A and B were compared with each other, and patients in group C were compared among themselves.

RESULTS

While the median insulin-like growth factor-1 level decreased to 170 ng/ml in Group A after the treatment, the median insulin-like growth factor-1 level decreased to 229 ng/ml in Group B, and a statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (p =0.020). There was no significant difference in post-treatment growth hormone levels and residual adenoma sizes between groups A and B (p >0.005). In group C, there was no significant difference in growth hormone values pre-and post-metformin treatment (p =0.078); however, the median insulin-like growth factor-1 level decreased from 205 ng/ml to 168 ng/ml during metformin treatment and was found to be statistically significant (p =0.027).

CONCLUSION

Due to the effect of metformin treatment on insulin-like growth factor-1 values in patients with acromegaly, it can be used in disease control, as well as diabetes treatment.

Biomarkers of response to treatment in acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

Medical treatment of acromegaly is based in a `trial and error` approach. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are prescribed as first-line medical therapy to the vast majority of patients, despite lack of disease control in approximately 60% of patients. However, other drugs used in acromegaly treatment are available (cabergoline, pasireotide and pegvisomant).

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we review and discuss the biomarkers of response to medical treatment in acromegaly.

EXPERT OPINION

Biomarkers for fg-SRL that can already be applied in clinical practice are: gender, age, pretreatment GH and IGF-I levels, cytokeratin granulation pattern, and the expression of somatostatin receptor type 2. Using biomarkers of response could guide treatment towards precision medicine with greater efficacy and lower costs.

Real-Life Data on the Safety of Pasireotide in Acromegaly: Insights from EudraVigilance

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Pasireotide (PAS) is a somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) used to treat acromegaly, a chronic condition caused by excess growth hormone. While it offers significant benefits as a second-line treatment for uncontrolled acromegaly, its use raises major concerns due to hyperglycemic side effects and gastrointestinal issues, the latter being similar to those seen with first-generation SRLs. The aim of this study is to evaluate the real-world evidence on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported for PAS in the EudraVigilance database, in comparison to other established drug-based therapies for acromegaly.

METHODS

A descriptive analysis and a disproportionality analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

The fewest individual case safety reports (ICSRs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported for PAS, with 698 (4%) ICSRs and 1,647 (4%) ADRs, which is even lower than for pegvisomant (PEG), which had 1765 (11%) ICSRs and 4842 (10%) ADRs. Both PAS and lanreotide (LAN) exhibited the lowest proportion of cases classified as serious. Among the total reported ADRs, those categorized as "Metabolic and nutrition disorders" were most frequent and severe for PAS (PAS-17.5% vs. OCT-4.6%, LAN-4.5%, and PEG-2.7%). Additionally, PAS demonstrated a higher likelihood of reporting endocrine disorders, which were frequently classified as serious, as well as stones affecting the hepatobiliary system compared to other drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although PAS had the fewest ICSRs and ADRs, and less frequent serious ADRs, it had more reports frequently classified as serious in the "Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders" category (including events such as elevated blood glucose levels or diabetes) and "Endocrine Disorders" category compared to other SRLs and PEG. Furthermore, there was a higher likelihood of reporting hepatobiliary stones with PAS compared to OCT and PEG. This highlights the importance of adequately monitoring glycemic control and the biliary tract through ultrasound at the initiation and during follow-up of PAS therapy. Improved monitoring and reporting of these ADRs could enhance care for patients with acromegaly.

Oral octreotide capsules for acromegaly treatment: application of clinical trial insights to real-world use

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a rare endocrine disorder usually caused by a benign growth hormone‒secreting pituitary adenoma. Surgical adenoma resection is typically the first line of treatment, and medical therapy is used for patients with persistent disease following surgery, for adenoma recurrence, or for patients ineligible for, or declining, surgery. Approved somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) have been limited to injectable options, until recently. Oral octreotide capsules (OOC) are the first approved oral SRL for patients with acromegaly.

AREAS COVERED

We review published reports and provide case study examples demonstrating practical considerations on the use of OOC. Using two hypothetical case scenarios, we discuss current treatment patterns, breakthrough symptoms and quality of life (QoL), efficacy of SRLs, OOC dose titration, evaluation of OOC treatment response, and incidence and management of adverse events.

EXPERT OPINION

OOC are an option for patients with acromegaly including those who experience breakthrough symptoms, who have preference for oral therapies, or other reasons for declining injectable SRLs. OOC have been associated with improved patient-reported QoL measures compared with those reported for lanreotide and octreotide. Continued real-world experience will determine whether OOC, alone or in combination with other therapies, provides further advantages over current injectable acromegaly treatments.

Effectiveness of combined first-line medical treatment in acromegaly with prolactin cosecretion

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the response to first-line medical treatment in treatment-naive acromegaly patients with pure growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma (GH-PA) and those with GH and prolactin cosecreting PA (GH&PRL-PA).

DESIGN

This is a retrospective multicentric study of acromegaly patients followed from 2003 to 2023 in 33 tertiary Spanish hospitals with at least 6 months of first-line medical treatment.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics, first-line medical treatment strategies, and outcomes were analyzed. We employed a multiple logistic regression full model to estimate the impact of some baseline characteristics on disease control after each treatment modality.

RESULTS

Of the 144 patients included, 72.9% had a GH-PA, and 27.1% had a GH&PRL-PA. Patients with GH&PRL-PA were younger (43.9 ± 15.0 vs 51.9 ± 12.7 years, P < .01) and harboring more frequently macroadenomas (89.7% vs 72.1%, P = .03). First-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (fgSRL) as monotherapy was given to 106 (73.6%) and a combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline in the remaining 38 (26.4%). Patients with GH&PRL-PA received more frequently a combination therapy (56.4% vs 15.2%, P < .01). After 6 months of treatment, in the group of patients under fgSRL as monotherapy, those patients with GH&PRL-PA had worse control compared to GH-PAs (29.4% vs 55.1%, P = .04). However, these differences in the rate of disease control between both groups disappeared when both received combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline.

CONCLUSION

In GH&PRL-PA, the biochemical control achieved with fgSRL as monotherapy is substantially worse than in patients harboring GH-PA, supporting the inclusion of cabergoline as first-line medical treatment in combination with fgSRLs in these subgroups of patients.

Somatostatin receptor ligands suppressed proliferation and lipogenesis in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes

Somatostatin and its analogues, known as somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), have been reported to attenuate weight gain in some clinical settings. However, their direct effects on preadipocytes are barely investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the influence of SRLs on preadipocytes and to further explore the potential mechanisms. Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, Oil Red O staining, triglyceride contents measurements, qPCR, and western blot were used to investigate the effects of SRLs on preadipocytes. We found that three SRLs (octreotide, TT232, and pasireotide) inhibited cell viability after 8-48 h but not 4 h. Further western blot results showed that they significantly suppressed activation of PI3K/Akt pathway. Besides, lipid accumulation was also significantly inhibited by these SRLs. Moreover, mRNA levels of some critical adipogenic markers, including Pparg, Cebpa, Fasn, Fabp4, Acaca, and Lpl, were downregulated by the treatments of all these SRLs. Consistently, the protein expression of PPARγ, C/EBPα, and FAS were also suppressed by SRLs. SRLs inhibit the proliferation and lipogenesis in preadipocytes. Their inhibitory effects on cell proliferation may be mediated by the downregulated PI3K/Akt pathway, and the suppressive actions on lipogenesis may be related to the decreased PPARγ and C/EBPα expression.

Advances in pharmacological treatment of Cushings disease

Cushing's disease is a rare endocrine disorder characterized by hypercortisolism. Chronic elevated cortisol levels can lead to dysfunction or complications in multiple organs of systems, including cardiovascular, glucose, and bone metabolism, severely impacting patients' quality of life and posing life-threatening risks. Surgery is the first-line treatment for Cushing's disease. However, in cases of delayed diagnosis, surgical contraindications, or suboptimal surgical outcomes, pharmacological therapy is often required. Currently, three categories of medications are commonly used: 1) Drugs targeting somatostatin and/or dopamine receptors to inhibit pituitary adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) synthesis (e.g., pasireotide, cabergoline); 2) drugs targeting adrenal cortex-related receptors to suppress steroid synthesis (e.g., ketoconazole, metyrapone, mitotane, and osilodrostat); 3) drugs acting on glucocorticoid receptors (e.g., mifepristone). Research on pharmacological treatments for Cushing's disease is ongoing, with new drugs such as seliciclib, CRN04894, fimepinostat, vorinostat, and SPI-62 currently in phase II clinical trial. The development of novel drugs holds promise for more precise and effective treatment for Cushing's disease patients.