ER predicts poor prognosis in male lung squamous cell cancer of stage IIIA-N2 disease after sequential adjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Introduction

The efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is still unclear in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with pIIIA-N2 disease. Estrogen receptor (ER) was proven significantly associated with poor clinical outcome of male lung squamous cell cancer (LUSC) after R0 resection in our previous study.

Methods

A total of 124 male pIIIA-N2 LUSC patients who completed four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy and PORT after complete resection were eligible for enrollment in this study from October 2016 to December 2021. ER expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry assay.

Results

The median follow-up was 29.7 months. Among 124 patients, 46 (37.1%) were ER positive (stained tumor cells≥1%), and the rest 78 (62.9%) were ER negative. Eleven clinical factors considered in this study were well balanced between ER+ and ER- groups. ER expression significantly predicted a poor prognosis in disease-free survival (DFS, HR=2.507; 95% CI: 1.629-3.857; log-rank p=1.60×10^-5). The 3-year DFS rates were 37.8% with ER- vs. 5.7% with ER+, with median DFS 25.9 vs. 12.6 months, respectively. The significant prognostic advantage in ER- patients was also observed in overall survival (OS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). The 3-year OS rates were 59.7% with ER- vs. 48.2% with ER+ (HR, 1.859; 95% CI: 1.132-3.053; log-rank p=0.013), the 3-year LRFS rates were 44.1% vs. 15.3% (HR=2.616; 95% CI: 1.685-4.061; log-rank p=8.80×10^-6), and the 3-year DMFS rates were 45.3% vs. 31.8% (HR=1.628; 95% CI: 1.019-2.601; log-rank p=0.039). Cox regression analyses indicated that ER status was the only significant factor for DFS (p=2.940×10^-5), OS (p=0.014), LRFS (p=1.825×10^-5) and DMFS (p=0.041) among other 11 clinical factors.

Conclusions

PORT might be more beneficial for ER negative LUSCs in male, and the examination of ER status might be helpful in identifying patients suitable for PORT.

Postoperative radiotherapy with modern techniques does not improve survival for operable stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate whether postoperative radiotherapy using newer techniques (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT]) is associated with improved survival for patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent complete resection.

METHODS

The overall survival of patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC who received postoperative IMRT versus no postoperative IMRT following induction chemotherapy and lobectomy in the National Cancer Database from 2010-2018 was assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards analysis and propensity score-matched analysis. Additional survival analyses were also conducted in patients with completely resected stage IIIA-pN2 NSCLC who had upfront lobectomy (without induction therapy) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy alone or adjuvant chemotherapy with postoperative IMRT. Only patients receiving IMRT, which is a newer, more conformal radiotherapy technique, were included. Patients with positive surgical margins were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 3203 patients with stage IIA-N2 NSCLC who underwent lobectomy were included. Five hundred eighty-eight (18.4%) patients underwent induction chemotherapy followed by lobectomy, and 2615 (82%) underwent lobectomy followed by chemotherapy. In unadjusted, multivariable-adjusted, and propensity score--matched analyses, there were no significant differences in overall survival between the patients who also received postoperative IMRT versus those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national analysis, the use of postoperative IMRT was not associated with improved survival in patients with completely resected stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC with or without induction chemotherapy.

Risk of cardiac-related mortality in stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database

Background

In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and cardiac‐related mortality in patients with stage IIIA‐N2 non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods

The United States (US) population based on the SEER database was searched for cardiac‐related mortality among patients with stage IIIA‐N2 NSCLC. Cardiac‐related mortality was compared between the PORT and Non‐PORT groups. Accounting for mortality from other causes, Fine and Gray's test compared cumulative incidences of cardiac‐related mortality between both groups. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using the competing risk model.

Results

From 1988 to 2016, 7290 patients met the inclusion criteria: 3386 patients were treated with PORT and 3904 patients with Non‐PORT. The five‐year overall incidence of cardiac‐related mortality was 3.01% in the PORT group and 3.26% in the Non‐PORT group. Older age, male sex, squamous cell lung cancer, earlier year of diagnosis and earlier T stage were independent adverse factors for cardiac‐related mortality. However, PORT use was not associated with an increase in the hazard for cardiac‐related mortality (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78–1.24, p = 0.91). When evaluating cardiac‐related mortality in each time period, the overall incidence of cardiac‐related mortality was decreased over time. There were no statistically significant differences based on PORT use in all time periods.

Conclusions

With a median follow‐up of 25 months, no significant differences were found in cardiac‐related mortality between the PORT and Non‐PORT groups in stage IIIA‐N2 NSCLC patients.

Evaluation of Postoperative Radiotherapy Effect on Survival of Resected Stage III-N2 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Objective: The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in resected stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the effect of PORT on survival of resected stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients.

Methods: Resected stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients aged 18 years or older were identified from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database from 2010 to 2015. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors including PORT associated with survival time. A subgroup analysis of patients stratified by number of lymph node metastases was also performed. Overall survival (OS) and overall mortality were compared among the different groups.

Results: A total of 3,445 patients were included in the study. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that PORT had no significant impact on survival of patients with <6 positive lymph node [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.012, P = 0.858, 95% CI: 0.886–1.156]. Postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) (HR = 0.605, P < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.468–0.783) and PORT (HR = 0.724, P = 0.007, 95% CI: 0.574–0.914) are both favorable prognostic factors for stage IIIA-N2 patients with ≥6 positive lymph nodes. In 2,735 patients who featured <6 number of positive regional lymph nodes, patients who received PORT had better survival and lower 3-years and 5-years overall mortality rate than patients who underwent surgery only (41 vs. 28 months, P < 0.015). There was no significant difference in the survival of postoperative patients who underwent POCT in view of whether received PORT (44 vs. 53 months, P = 0.176). A total of 710 patients who featured ≥6 number of positive regional lymph node metastasis were divided into two groups by PORT. PORT did not prolong survival for postoperative patients who did not receive chemotherapy (12 vs. 15 months, P = 0.632). PORT showed a significant advantage in influencing OS in patients who received PORT combined with POCT as compared with those who received POCT only (32 vs. 25 months, P = 0.006).

Conclusions: For IIIA-N2 patients with <6 lymph node metastases, use of PORT can be encouraged to improve survival. For patients with ≥6 positive lymph nodes, PORT combined with POCT significantly improved OS and decreased overall mortality.

Prognostic Value of Tumor Size in Resected Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for lung cancer was introduced in 2017 and included major revisions, especially of stage III. For the subgroup stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgical resection remains controversial due to heterogeneous disease entity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of patients with completely resected stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. We retrospectively evaluated 77 consecutive patients with pathologic stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC (AJCC eighth edition) who underwent surgical resection with curative intent in China Medical University Hospital between 2006 and 2014. Survival analysis was conducted, using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed, using log-rank tests and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Of the 77 patients with pathologic stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC examined, 35 (45.5%) were diagnosed before surgery and 42 (54.5%) were diagnosed unexpectedly during surgery. The mean age of patients was 59 years, and the mean length of follow-up was 38.1 months. The overall one-, three-, and five-year OS rates were 91.9%, 61.3%, and 33.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size <3 cm (hazards ratio (HR): 0.373, p = 0.003) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach (HR: 0.383, p = 0.014) were significant predictors for improved OS. For patients with surgically treated, pathologic stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC, tumor size <3 cm and the VATS approach seemed to be associated with better prognosis.

Occult stage IIIA-N2 patients have excellent overall survival with initial surgery

Background

Patients may be found to have stage IIIA-N2 at the final pathology after the initial surgery. We want to determine the survival rate in this unique group of patients.

Methods

We reviewed all patients who underwent surgical resection for lung cancer from 2000 to 2011 who had pathologic stage N2 without induction therapy. We determined the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival rate in this unique group of patients.

Results

A total of 101 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age of the group was 65 years old with 53 (53%) females. The chest computed tomography (CT) scans showed 30 patients (30%) with mediastinal lymphadenopathy (>1 cm) and 13 (13%) with multistation disease. The positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) showed 24 patients (24%) with N2 positive uptake. Invasive mediastinal staging prior to surgery occurred in 43 patients (43%). Eighty-four patients underwent a lobectomy (83%), 7 with bilobectomy (7%), and 10 with pneumonectomy (10%). The most common pathology was adenocarcinoma with 73 patients (72%) and the second most common was squamous cell carcinoma with 22 patients (22%). Most of the patients completed the adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (86%). The 5-year survival rate was 48% and the 10-year survival rate was 24%.

Conclusions

Pathologic stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease process with a very small group of patients undergoing initial surgery. Patients with occult stage IIIA-N2 who undergo initial surgery have an excellent overall survival rate.

Advances in the use of surgery and multimodality treatment for N2 non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a heterogeneous group of bronchogenic carcinomas with locoregional involvement. Different categories of N2 disease exist, ranging from unexpectedly encountered N2 involvement after detailed preoperative staging or 'surprise' N2, to potentially resectable disease treated within a combined modality setting, and finally, bulky N2 involvement treated by chemoradiation. Areas covered: Large randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses on stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC have been published but their implications for treatment remain a matter of debate. No definite recommendations can be provided as diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms vary according to local, national or international guidelines. Expert commentary: From the literature, it is clear that patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC should be treated by combined modality therapy including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. The relative contribution of each modality has not been firmly established. For patients undergoing induction therapy, adequate restaging is important as only down-staged patients will clearly benefit from surgical resection. Each patient should be discussed within a multidisciplinary team to determine the best diagnostic and therapeutic approach according to the specific local expertise. In the near future, it might be expected that targeted therapies and immunotherapy will be incorporated as possible therapeutic options.

N2-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: a plea for surgery!

Management of stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer is still matter of ongoing controversy. The debate is flawed by the heterogeneity of this group of patients, lack of strong evidence from controlled trials, diverging treatment strategies, and hesitating estimation of prognosis. Surgery is credited a survival advantage in a trimodality setting. For many teams, N2 is by principle managed with induction chemotherapy, followed by surgery if the patient is down-staged. However, surgery remains a suitable option even in case of persistent N2. On the other hand, outcomes are comparable, regardless whether chemotherapy has been given as induction or adjuvant treatment. Hence, upfront surgery without invasive staging, followed by adjuvant therapies, appears reasonable in resectable single station N2 disease, simplifying patient care and reducing cost. We expect that molecular biomarkers will improve estimation of prognosis and patient selection in the future.

Role of surgery for stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Perhaps no topic other than stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer management is as controversial among surgeons, radiologists and medical oncologists. Much of the debate relates to the choice between surgical resection and radiation as the local control modality. Although limited, available evidence from randomized controlled trails raised concerns about the role of surgical resection. However, there is no perfect study, and the results should not be over-interpreted. This mini review will scrutinize these trials, focusing on the study design, results and, most importantly, limitations, and will explore the possible role of surgery for stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer.