Practical and systematic approach using the steerable catheter and stylet-driven lead to deliver safe and effective left bundle branch area pacing

INTRODUCTION

Current delivery tools were not designed for left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). Challenges using these tools include lack of reach into the right ventricle and poor support for the lead to penetrate the interventricular septum. Concerns using stylet-driven leads (SDL) for LBBAP have been previously highlighted. Knowledge and the technical know-how of using SDL for LBBAP need to be evaluated in a fair and consistent manner. A stepwise approach is devised for use of Agilis HisProTM steerable catheter with Tendril STS Model 2088TC lead for LBBAP and evaluated for safety and reproducibility.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing LBBAP using the stepwise approach with Agilis HisProTM steerable catheter were analyzed. The safety, efficacy and reproducibility of the technique were evaluated. The lead parameters were analyzed in the immediate (1 day) and short-term period (3-6 months) post implantation.

RESULTS

LBBAP was attempted in 41 patients using the stepwise approach of which 37 (90.7%) were successful. The lead parameters were stable in the immediate and short-term post implantation in all our patients. There was no significant difference between the group of patients with multiple repositioning of the lead compared to those successful at the 1st attempt. There were no acute or short-term lead and procedural complications.

CONCLUSION

A stepwise and systematic approach using the Agilis HisProTM steerable catheter and proper handling of the Tendril STS Model 2088TC stylet-driven lead is an important part of the armamentarium to deliver LBBAP in a practical, effective and reproducible manner.

Permanent His bundle pacing in patients with right atriomegaly: The value of different dedicated delivery sheaths

BACKGROUND

An enlarged right atrium (RA) is a challenging anatomy that can limit the successful use of His bundle pacing (HBP). It is unknown whether new implantation tools could help overcome these challenges.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with RA volume index >25 mL/m² in men and >21 mL/m² in women underwent permanent HBP. We used a stylet-driven lead (SDL) with an extendable helix delivered via a dedicated delivery sheath (Selectra 3D, Biotronik) as a first attempt. In case of failure, a second attempt was performed with the same lead but with a different delivery curve. Finally, a lumen-less lead (LLL) was also available as a third attempt.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 24 patients (median age 75.7 years [interquartile range, 70.9-79.0], 88% men) with a RA volume of 49 mL/m² (45-54). Using SDL, HBP was achieved with a single sheath curve in 17 patients (71%). The second attempt with the same lead but a different sheath was successful in four more patients (SDL success 87%). The fluoroscopy time increased significantly when the second attempt was necessary (8 min [6-11] vs. 15 min [13-17], p < .001). In the remaining three patients, HBP was further attempted with a LLL leading to a final procedural success of 96%. No lead dislodgment nor significant increase in pacing threshold was observed at 1-month (1.2 [0.7-1.7] V@1.0 ms vs. 1.1 [0.8-1.7] V@1.0 ms, p = .939).

CONCLUSION

The availability of different dedicated delivery systems for HBP can improve procedural outcomes even in challenging circumstances, such as in patients with right atriomegaly.