Electron microscopic findings can support multiple etiologies of nephrotoxicity in renal tubules

Electron microscopy (EM) has been mainly used for identifying ultrastructural abnormalities such as fusion of foot processes and immune complex deposits in glomeruli. However, electron microscopic findings in renal tubules can provide either diagnostic evidence (unique finding) or supportive evidence (additional finding) for final diagnosis. Here we present multiple situations that EM can be used for drawing conclusions of various drug-associated nephrotoxicity. Multiple cases with drug-induced nephrotoxicity are reviewed, including clinical history, EM findings, and serum creatinine (sCr) levels, prior to renal biopsy and during follow-up. Two cases with nephrotoxicity by aminoglycoside antibiotics showed acute tubular injury with EM findings of myeloid bodies, characterized by laminated dense materials in lysosomes in both proximal and distal tubular epithelium (diagnostic evidence). Five cases of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity presented with acute tubular injury and vancomycin casts in distal tubules, characterized by central laminated casts in the lumina of distal tubules (supportive evidence). Vedolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody used in treating Crohn's disease, can cause T-cell dominant acute interstitial nephritis, with EM revealing lymphocytic infiltration into tubules as tubulitis (supportive evidence). Four of Seven cases (5/8) cases had renal functional recovery upon follow-up check for sCr. EM findings of characteristic changes in renal tubules can be particularly useful as either diagnostic or supportive evidence, in correlation with clinical history and etiologies of nephrotoxicity. Therefore, EM should not only focus on glomerular changes, but renal tubular changes as well.

A Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD) Approach for a Low Dose of Empagliflozin in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes

In clinical trials, sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT) inhibitor use as adjunct to insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes (T1D) provides glucometabolic benefits while diabetic ketoacidosis risk is increased. The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin was evaluated in two phase III trials: EASE-2 and EASE-3. A low, 2.5-mg dose was included in EASE-3 only. As the efficacy of higher empagliflozin doses (i.e., 10 and 25 mg) in T1D has been established in EASE-2 and EASE-3, a modeling and simulation approach was used to generate additional supportive evidence on efficacy for the 2.5-mg dose. We present the methodology behind the development and validation of two modeling and simulation frameworks: M-EASE-1, a semi-mechanistic model integrating information on insulin, glucose, and glycated hemoglobin; and M-EASE-2, a descriptive model informed by prior information. Both models were developed independently of data from EASE-3. Simulations based on these models assessed efficacy in untested clinical trial scenarios. In this manner, the models provide supportive evidence for efficacy of low-dose empagliflozin 2.5 mg in patients with T1D, illustrating how pharmacometric analyses can support efficacy assessments in the context of limited data.

You don't know: knowledge as supportive alibi evidence

Until now, supportive evidence for alibis has been conceptualised into two distinct types: witness and physical evidence. The present study examined whether knowledge, as a third type of supportive evidence, can contribute to the understanding of evidence for alibis. Three experiments were conducted in which police detectives, laypersons and undergraduate students were asked to evaluate four alibis with witness, physical or knowledge supportive evidence, or with no supportive evidence. The results from the three experiments show that knowledge evidence is equally believable as strong witness evidence. We also found that not all items of strong physical evidence are evaluated as equally strong and believable. We therefore suggest adjusting the criteria to determine the strength of physical evidence and conducting more research on knowledge evidence.