CD147: an integral and potential molecule to abrogate hallmarks of cancer

CD147 also known as EMMPRIN, basigin, and HAb18G, is a single-chain type I transmembrane protein shown to be overexpressed in aggressive human cancers of CNS, head and neck, breasts, lungs, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, skin, hematological, and musculoskeletal. In these malignancies, the molecule is integral to the diverse but complimentary hallmarks of cancer: it is pivotal in cancerous proliferative signaling, growth propagation, cellular survival, replicative immortality, angiogenesis, metabolic reprogramming, immune evasion, invasion, and metastasis. CD147 also has regulatory functions in cancer-enabling characteristics such as DNA damage response (DDR) and immune evasion. These neoplastic functions of CD147 are executed through numerous and sometimes overlapping molecular pathways: it transduces signals from upstream molecules or ligands such as cyclophilin A (CyPA), CD98, and S100A9; activates a repertoire of downstream molecules and pathways including matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)-2,3,9, hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF)-1/2α, PI3K/Akt/mTOR/HIF-1α, and ATM/ATR/p53; and also functions as an indispensable chaperone or regulator to monocarboxylate, fatty acid, and amino acid transporters. Interestingly, induced loss of functions to CD147 prevents and reverses the acquired hallmarks of cancer in neoplastic diseases. Silencing of Cd147 also alleviates known resistance to chemoradiotherapy exhibited by malignant tumors like carcinomas of the breast, lung, pancreas, liver, gastric, colon, ovary, cervix, prostate, urinary bladder, glioblastoma, and melanoma. Targeting CD147 antigen in chimeric and induced-chimeric antigen T cell or antibody therapies is also shown to be safer and more effective. Moreover, incorporating anti-CD147 monoclonal antibodies in chemoradiotherapy, oncolytic viral therapy, and oncolytic virus-based-gene therapies increases effectiveness and reduces on and off-target toxicity. This study advocates the expedition and expansion by further exploiting the evidence acquired from the experimental studies that modulate CD147 functions in hallmarks of cancer and cancer-enabling features and strive to translate them into clinical practice to alleviate the emergency and propagation of cancer, as well as the associated clinical and social consequences.

Targeted Cancer Therapies Causing Elevations in Serum Creatinine Through Tubular Secretion Inhibition: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Rationale:

Targeted cancer therapies have revolutionized the field of oncology by selecting for specific molecular pathways, thus improving overall clinical prognosis. However, many of these targeted treatments have been reported to have adverse kidney effects, including acute kidney injury, interstitial nephritis, and glomerular disease. Furthermore, some of these targeted therapies have also been found to cause an asymptomatic rise in serum creatinine levels through inhibition of active tubular secretion.

Presenting concerns:

A 79-year-old woman was being followed for stage 4 A2 chronic kidney disease secondary to type 2 diabetes and longstanding hypertension. She was diagnosed with invasive mammary carcinoma and was initiated on letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, and palbociclib, a selective cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, was subsequently added. Prior to the initiation of her treatments, her baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) fluctuated between 25 and 28 mL/min/1.73 m² over the previous year. After initiating palbociclib, her serum creatinine progressively increased, despite having well-controlled blood pressure and diabetes. In addition, there was no history of pre-renal events nor any sonographic evidence of obstruction. Within 7 months, her eGFR based on serum creatinine had decreased down to 12 mL/min/1.73 m².

Interventions:

Given that there were no clinical or other biochemical changes suggestive of worsening renal function, a serum cystatin C was measured using an immunoturbidimetric assay, which was 1.71 mg/L and correlated with an eGFR of 33 mL/min/1.73 m² based on the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) cystatin C equation (2012). This value was consistent with her previous baseline. Based on these findings, the significant decrease in eGFR measured by serum creatinine was attributed to the inhibitory effects of palbociclib on tubular creatinine secretion, rather than representing true kidney damage. Thus, a kidney biopsy was not performed in this context.

Outcomes:

Seven months later, a repeat serum cystatin C was repeated to assess for any worsening of the patient’s kidney function and revealed an eGFR of 35 mL/min/1.73 m² based on the CKD-EPI cystatin C equation (2012), thus revealing stable kidney function and reinforcing the inhibitory effects of palbociclib on tubular creatinine secretion through its direct effects on kidney transporters.

Teaching points:

This case report and literature review acknowledges the importance of using alternative methods of assessing kidney function when patients are undergoing targeted cancer therapies known to affect tubular creatinine secretion, which include cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and mesenchymal-epithelial transition inhibitors. The use of non–creatinine-based markers of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), such as cystatin C and nuclear renal scans, will allow for more accurate estimation of kidney function in the appropriate setting, thus avoiding invasive diagnostic tests and unnecessary adjustments of treatment plans. However, certain targeted cancer therapies have also been proven to cause true kidney injury; therefore, physicians must still maintain a high degree of suspicion and consider invasive investigations and/or cessation or reduction of treatments when alternative measurements of kidney function do not suggest an underestimation of GFR via serum creatinine.

Controlling Healthcare Costs: Just Cost Effectiveness or "Just" Cost Effectiveness?

Meeting healthcare needs is a matter of social justice. Healthcare needs are virtually limitless; however, resources, such as money, for meeting those needs, are limited. How then should we (just and caring citizens and policymakers in such a society) decide which needs must be met as a matter of justice with those limited resources? One reasonable response would be that we should use cost effectiveness as our primary criterion for making those choices. This article argues instead that cost-effectiveness considerations must be constrained by considerations of healthcare justice. The goal of this article will be to provide a preliminary account of how we might distinguish just from unjust or insufficiently just applications of cost-effectiveness analysis to some healthcare rationing problems; specifically, problems related to extraordinarily expensive targeted cancer therapies. Unconstrained compassionate appeals for resources for the medically least well-off cancer patients will be neither just nor cost effective.

Precision QALYs, Precisely Unjust

Warwick Heale has recently defended the notion of individualized and personalized Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in connection with health care resource allocation decisions. Ordinarily, QALYs are used to make allocation decisions at the population level. If a health care intervention costs £100,000 and generally yields only two years of survival, the cost per QALY gained will be £50,000, far in excess of the £30,000 limit per QALY judged an acceptable use of resources within the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. However, if we know with medical certainty that a patient will gain four extra years of life from that intervention, the cost per QALY will be £25,000. Heale argues fairness and social utility require such a patient to receive that treatment, even though all others in the cohort of that patient might be denied that treatment (and lose two years of potential life). Likewise, Heale argues that personal commitments of an individual (religious or otherwise), that determine how they value a life-year with some medical intervention, ought to be used to determine the value of a QALY for them. I argue that if Heale's proposals were put into practice, the result would often be greater injustice. In brief, requirements for the just allocation of health care resources are more complex than pure cost-effectiveness analysis would allow.

Translational modeling and simulation approaches for molecularly targeted small molecule anticancer agents from bench to bedside

INTRODUCTION

Recent advances in molecular biology have enabled personalized cancer therapies with molecularly targeted agents (MTAs), which offer a promising future for cancer therapy. Dynamic modeling and simulation (M&S) is a powerful mathematical approach linking drug exposures to pharmacological responses, providing a quantitative assessment of in vivo drug potency. Accordingly, a growing emphasis is being placed upon M&S to quantitatively understand therapeutic exposure-response relationships of MTAs in nonclinical models.

AREAS COVERED

An overview of M&S approaches for MTAs in nonclinical models is presented with discussion about mechanistic extrapolation of antitumor efficacy from bench to bedside. Emphasis is placed upon recent advances in M&S approaches linking drug exposures, biomarker responses (e.g. target modulation) and pharmacological outcomes (e.g. antitumor efficacy).

EXPERT OPINION

For successful personalized cancer therapies with MTAs, it is critical to mechanistically and quantitatively understand their exposure-response relationships in nonclinical models, and to logically and properly apply such knowledge to the clinic. Particularly, M&S approaches to predict pharmacologically active concentrations of MTAs in patients based upon nonclinical data would be highly valuable in guiding the design and execution of clinical trials. Proactive approaches to understand their exposure-response relationships could substantially increase probability of achieving a positive proof-of-concept in the clinic.

Detection of cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy associated with new biologicals and targeted cancer therapies from the FDA's adverse event reporting system

OBJECTIVE

To identify and summarize FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) associated with biological and targeted cancer therapies (BTCT) that were approved between 2009 and 2015.

METHODS

FAERS was searched using each BTCT name as primary or secondary suspect drug and the adverse reaction of PML. Among BTCTs with >2 case reports of PML, proportional reporting ratios (PRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Among 49 new BTCTs, 82 cases of PML were found for 16 drugs. Significant PRR signals were found among 7 (14.6%) BTCTs including: brentuximab (24.5, CI:14.8-40.6), ofatumumab (16.3, CI:9.6-27.4), alemtuzumab (9.9, CI:6.0-16.4), obinutuzumab (7.4, CI:2.4-22.8), ibrutinib (5.6 CI:3.0-10.5), belimumab (4.5 CI:2.3-9.0), and idelalisib (4.1, CI:1.3-12.6). Among the 82 cases with significant signals, confirmation of the diagnosis of PML using objective criteria was found in 56% of the cases. A limitation of FAERS data is that missing data are common.

CONCLUSIONS

When using BTCTs, clinicians and patients consider the risk of PML versus the therapeutic benefit, particularly when used in combination with other drugs which may cause PML, such as rituximab. It is important to recognize that PML may occur in some conditions, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, regardless of drug therapy.

Oral targeted therapy for cancer

Oral targeted therapies are increasingly being used to treat cancer. They work by interfering with specific molecules or pathways involved in tumour growth. It is essential that health professionals managing patients taking these drugs have appropriate training and skills. They should be aware of potential adverse effects and drug interactions, and be able to manage toxicities when they occur. Despite the selectivity of these targeted therapies, they still have serious adverse effects including skin reactions, diarrhoea and altered organ function.